Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/23 01:55:26
Subject: Re:Fuzzy rumour about changes of GW paint range
|
 |
Ruthless Interrogator
|
Sidstyler wrote:Dropper bottles are the reason I switched to Vallejo. More precise mixing and less risk of losing a hundred bucks or more worth of paint from having it dry out too quickly.
While I do like Vallejo for the dropper bottle, I still also use lots of GW paints. You do realize that dry up paint is far from useless, right? They are water-based acrylics, you can just add water and stir it around until it gets back to a usable consistency. I've taken 10 year old bottles that were completely hardened and turned them back into usable paint with a little work and a bit of water.
Knowledge is power, folks. Being unfamiliar with a product does not make the product bad.
|
You can never beat your first time. The second generation is shinier, stronger, faster and superior in every regard save one, and it's an unfair criticism to level, but it simply can't be as original. - Andy Chambers, on the evolution of Games Workshop games |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/23 02:52:40
Subject: Fuzzy rumour about changes of GW paint range
|
 |
Hollerin' Herda with Squighound Pack
|
ell ill be buying my gamestores supply of scabread and scorched brown!
|
How many Space Marines does it take to screw in a lightbulb.
6, 1 techpriest and 5 tacticals that stand around trying to pose like badasses.
An Ork, Space Marine and Eldar are walking down the road. They see a Chaos portal that has a sign on it. It says: 'say what is true or be sucked in'. The Space Marine says: "I think I'm the bravest" and walks past safely, the Eldar says: "I think I'm the most agile" and walks past safely. The Ork says: "Me thinks..." and gets sucked into the portal.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/23 02:57:00
Subject: Fuzzy rumour about changes of GW paint range
|
 |
Most Glorious Grey Seer
|
Friends don't let friends dropper bottles.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/23 17:56:49
Subject: Re:Fuzzy rumour about changes of GW paint range
|
 |
Scarred Ultramarine Tyrannic War Veteran
|
Cadaver wrote:Sidstyler wrote:Dropper bottles are the reason I switched to Vallejo. More precise mixing and less risk of losing a hundred bucks or more worth of paint from having it dry out too quickly.
While I do like Vallejo for the dropper bottle, I still also use lots of GW paints. You do realize that dry up paint is far from useless, right? They are water-based acrylics, you can just add water and stir it around until it gets back to a usable consistency. I've taken 10 year old bottles that were completely hardened and turned them back into usable paint with a little work and a bit of water.
Knowledge is power, folks. Being unfamiliar with a product does not make the product bad.
There metailcs are really good too! Onlyif they did the range in dropper bottles!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/23 20:25:07
Subject: Fuzzy rumour about changes of GW paint range
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
United Kingdom
|
Andrew1975 wrote:
I always wondered if that would work. A friend of mine bought a bunch of cheap acrylic paint at Pat Catans and it didn't work so well for him, but maybe it was just him. It seamed like the pigment was not as fine and dried kind of powdery.
Some acrylic paint is rubbish, same as anything else. GW oranges, yellow, etc are rubbish, watery and don't go on without dozens of coats. I guess your mate got bad quality acrylics.
I use artist quality ones like Windsor and Newton, Galleria, Reeves, etc. I get these from all over including supermarkets. As I said they are usually thicker than GW paints as they are designed to squeeze out of tubes and mix on artists's pallets. I simply damp my brushes and get the desired consistency that way. All mainstream British artist suppliers and major chains like WHSmith and Hobbycraft keep extensive ranges of good acrylics. The thicker ones are incredibly useful as well because you can use them undiluted and then the yellows, etc go on properly. The metallics I have are infinitely better than GW ones, for a start off they don't need frantic shaking for ages to try and get an even mix, they come mixed and stay mixed. Be sure that the paints you buy are good quality ones, it's easy to tell. I also like the Americana craft acrylics as they are thinner and come in all sorts of colours, 59ml pots are £1.99.
I despair when people say things like "you can only paint miniatures with GW paints" and look horrified when you use others. They are either ignorant or have been suckered by GW propaganda. I'll bet a GW staffer can give you a long explanation of why you should only ever use GW paints but it is not true. Some of my friends are like this and I honestly think they just like wasting their money.
Another point to bear in mind is that you can mix colours to make the ones you want. If you want some defunct GW colour but something close in an artists's paint range and mix til you get it. Probably not practical for a whole army but for single figures it is painless enough.
Next stop GW brushes, another load of **** which some people 'have' to use. never had brushes that get loose bristles so quickly and for miniature brushes they simply don't come to a sharp enough tip. Kolinsky sable is the way to go but at £4+ a brush they are not cheap. Apparently the makers of Kolinsky make Army Painter brushes, which are much better than GW.
|
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/23 20:29:56
Subject: Re:Fuzzy rumour about changes of GW paint range
|
 |
Hungry Ghoul
Indiana
|
vinsal wrote:I just hope they copy a lot of other good paint products and go dropper bottle style.
This is what I have heard will be happening. Personally, I wish they'd just switch back to a lid that would stay open/upright like the old pots or foundation paints.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/01/23 20:31:37
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/23 20:32:45
Subject: Fuzzy rumour about changes of GW paint range
|
 |
Scarred Ultramarine Tyrannic War Veteran
|
I argree with you with the brushes but some of the paint GW make is some of the best in the market. The metalics are suprub. Btw I no a GW fanaticI I honesly perfer supporting local culbs which offer a 20% discount than my local GW.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/23 20:39:50
Subject: Fuzzy rumour about changes of GW paint range
|
 |
Angry Blood Angel Assault marine
|
Isengard wrote:Andrew1975 wrote:
I always wondered if that would work. A friend of mine bought a bunch of cheap acrylic paint at Pat Catans and it didn't work so well for him, but maybe it was just him. It seamed like the pigment was not as fine and dried kind of powdery.
Some acrylic paint is rubbish, same as anything else. GW oranges, yellow, etc are rubbish, watery and don't go on without dozens of coats. I guess your mate got bad quality acrylics.
I use artist quality ones like Windsor and Newton, Galleria, Reeves, etc. I get these from all over including supermarkets. As I said they are usually thicker than GW paints as they are designed to squeeze out of tubes and mix on artists's pallets. I simply damp my brushes and get the desired consistency that way. All mainstream British artist suppliers and major chains like WHSmith and Hobbycraft keep extensive ranges of good acrylics. The thicker ones are incredibly useful as well because you can use them undiluted and then the yellows, etc go on properly. The metallics I have are infinitely better than GW ones, for a start off they don't need frantic shaking for ages to try and get an even mix, they come mixed and stay mixed. Be sure that the paints you buy are good quality ones, it's easy to tell. I also like the Americana craft acrylics as they are thinner and come in all sorts of colours, 59ml pots are £1.99.
I despair when people say things like "you can only paint miniatures with GW paints" and look horrified when you use others. They are either ignorant or have been suckered by GW propaganda. I'll bet a GW staffer can give you a long explanation of why you should only ever use GW paints but it is not true. Some of my friends are like this and I honestly think they just like wasting their money.
Another point to bear in mind is that you can mix colours to make the ones you want. If you want some defunct GW colour but something close in an artists's paint range and mix til you get it. Probably not practical for a whole army but for single figures it is painless enough.
Next stop GW brushes, another load of **** which some people 'have' to use. never had brushes that get loose bristles so quickly and for miniature brushes they simply don't come to a sharp enough tip. Kolinsky sable is the way to go but at £4+ a brush they are not cheap. Apparently the makers of Kolinsky make Army Painter brushes, which are much better than GW.
people get what they get...
personally i don't have a problem with gw yellows. but i also wouldn't limit myself to one brand, i just use what works FOR ME, and for what i'm doing. but i don't really like winsor acrylics for minis, just not what i like to work with though. i don't like the paint pots currently, i dont' mind the dropper bottles, but it's also just not that big of a deal ether way.
brushes are another personal preference and sometimes availability... i've generaly prefered the rapheals, winsors and escodas, but i have some gw brushes as well, and have never had a problem...
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/24 01:39:17
Subject: Fuzzy rumour about changes of GW paint range
|
 |
Steady Space Marine Vet Sergeant
|
Isengard wrote:Andrew1975 wrote:
I always wondered if that would work. A friend of mine bought a bunch of cheap acrylic paint at Pat Catans and it didn't work so well for him, but maybe it was just him. It seamed like the pigment was not as fine and dried kind of powdery.
Some acrylic paint is rubbish, same as anything else. GW oranges, yellow, etc are rubbish, watery and don't go on without dozens of coats. I guess your mate got bad quality acrylics.
I use artist quality ones like Windsor and Newton, Galleria, Reeves, etc. I get these from all over including supermarkets. As I said they are usually thicker than GW paints as they are designed to squeeze out of tubes and mix on artists's pallets. I simply damp my brushes and get the desired consistency that way. All mainstream British artist suppliers and major chains like WHSmith and Hobbycraft keep extensive ranges of good acrylics. The thicker ones are incredibly useful as well because you can use them undiluted and then the yellows, etc go on properly. The metallics I have are infinitely better than GW ones, for a start off they don't need frantic shaking for ages to try and get an even mix, they come mixed and stay mixed. Be sure that the paints you buy are good quality ones, it's easy to tell. I also like the Americana craft acrylics as they are thinner and come in all sorts of colours, 59ml pots are £1.99.
I despair when people say things like "you can only paint miniatures with GW paints" and look horrified when you use others. They are either ignorant or have been suckered by GW propaganda. I'll bet a GW staffer can give you a long explanation of why you should only ever use GW paints but it is not true. Some of my friends are like this and I honestly think they just like wasting their money.
Another point to bear in mind is that you can mix colours to make the ones you want. If you want some defunct GW colour but something close in an artists's paint range and mix til you get it. Probably not practical for a whole army but for single figures it is painless enough.
Next stop GW brushes, another load of **** which some people 'have' to use. never had brushes that get loose bristles so quickly and for miniature brushes they simply don't come to a sharp enough tip. Kolinsky sable is the way to go but at £4+ a brush they are not cheap. Apparently the makers of Kolinsky make Army Painter brushes, which are much better than GW.
I used to use Ral Partha paints almost exclusively as they were pretty good and the bottle was about twice the size and cheaper. Don't get me started on GW modeling supplies, what you can't get from the dollar store (super glue, PVA glue) you can get at harbor freight for much much cheaper than the GW stuff. The fact that GW even offers superglue $6.60 and pva glue $8.25  let's me kow that they think we are rubes, the fact that some people buy it makes me know that in some cases they can feel completely justified charging what they do for everything. I mean if you will pay $8.50 for white glue why shouldn't they charge $10 for a miniature?
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/01/24 01:41:03
"I don't have principles, and I consider any comment otherwise to be both threatening and insulting" - Dogma
"No, sorry, synonymous does not mean same".-Dogma
"If I say "I will hug you" I am threatening you" -Dogma |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/24 02:24:14
Subject: Fuzzy rumour about changes of GW paint range
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
I thought most of GW's brushes were (supposedly) Kolinsky sable... Well, except the drybrushes really.
I was in a model train store recently looking for a new brush or two (as well as some undercoat spray). And well, if I thought I was getting ripped off from GW, that's a whole other league.
Ended up getting the sprays from army painter, still not found a brush I'm comfortable with though.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/24 02:36:44
Subject: Fuzzy rumour about changes of GW paint range
|
 |
Nihilistic Necron Lord
The best State-Texas
|
Compel wrote:I thought most of GW's brushes were (supposedly) Kolinsky sable... Well, except the drybrushes really.
I was in a model train store recently looking for a new brush or two (as well as some undercoat spray). And well, if I thought I was getting ripped off from GW, that's a whole other league.
Ended up getting the sprays from army painter, still not found a brush I'm comfortable with though.
Consider Winsor and Newton Series 7 brushes
http://www.dickblick.com/products/winsor-and-newton-series-7-kolinsky-sable-miniature-brushes/
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/24 02:38:24
Subject: Fuzzy rumour about changes of GW paint range
|
 |
Xenohunter Acolyte with Alacrity
prospero
|
Sasori wrote:Compel wrote:I thought most of GW's brushes were (supposedly) Kolinsky sable... Well, except the drybrushes really.
I was in a model train store recently looking for a new brush or two (as well as some undercoat spray). And well, if I thought I was getting ripped off from GW, that's a whole other league.
Ended up getting the sprays from army painter, still not found a brush I'm comfortable with though.
Consider Winsor and Newton Series 7 brushes
http://www.dickblick.com/products/winsor-and-newton-series-7-kolinsky-sable-miniature-brushes/
I also use these brushes, excellent quality and they last far longer than gws brushes.
|
1000pts 1500pts
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/24 06:04:43
Subject: Fuzzy rumour about changes of GW paint range
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
Isengard wrote:Apparently the makers of Kolinsky make Army Painter brushes...
Kolinsky isn't a brand name, but the type of hair used in the brush. In this case I believe its a type of weasel native to Russia.
|
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/24 07:13:43
Subject: Fuzzy rumour about changes of GW paint range
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Or, if you're in the UK, look at the Rosemary & Co series 33. I'd also recommend a series 323 3/0 for fine detail work, but that's just me. I've got a 1/8" series 78 that I've been using for some light drybrushing as well.
|
2021-4 Plog - Here we go again... - my fifth attempt at a Dakka PLOG
My Pile of Potential - updates ongoing...
Gamgee on Tau Players wrote:we all kill cats and sell our own families to the devil and eat live puppies.
Kanluwen wrote:This is, emphatically, why I will continue suggesting nuking Guard and starting over again. It's a legacy army that needs to be rebooted with a new focal point.
Confirmation of why no-one should listen to Kanluwen when it comes to the IG - he doesn't want the IG, he want's Kan's New Model Army...
tneva82 wrote:You aren't even trying ty pretend for honest arqument. Open bad faith trolling. - No reason to keep this here, unless people want to use it for something... |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/31 21:14:18
Subject: Re:Fuzzy rumour about changes of GW paint range
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
As a retailer, I can say with a good deal of confidence that the changes will NOT simply be the addition or removal of colors. As a comparison, when the Citadel Wash Set was discontinued, Games Workshop did not even bother to notify independent retailers, they simply dropped it off our orders. Advising retailers to sell down current inventory means that there will be significant differences between old product and new.
Most of Citadel's competing paint brands (Army Painter, Vallejo, and Reaper) use the 1/2 oz dropper bottles. Bear in mind, Citadel's current 1/4 oz bottle sells for $3.70, which is half the product for a higher price than their competitors. Also, Army Painter is releasing their 36 color Warpaints line in February, and they will be matching pigments to their colour primers. Retail on the Warpaints will be between $3.00 and $3.25 for 1/2 oz bottles. I am certain that Citadel's move will be a response to Army Painter's release.
I see a lot of brand loyalty to Citadel. 90% of the time, it is a simply a matter of conditioning. The box says "Red Gore" so they need a pot of Red Gore, regardless of how good a match Reaper Master Series Deep Red is. Having used multiple brands myself, I can tell you that Citadel has the worst flow characteristics out of the pot, and of all the paints I sell, I receive more complaints about Citadel products being DOA than all the other brands I sell combined. The customers I know that paint professionally (charge others for their painting services) never buy Citadel.
I don't like to make predictions without any real data, but if Citadel doesn't plan to move to 1/2 oz packaging, with an improved formula for less than $4.00 a bottle, There simply isn't any point to making any changes at all...
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/04 04:28:28
Subject: Fuzzy rumour about changes of GW paint range
|
 |
Pyro Pilot of a Triach Stalker
|
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Games-Workshop-CITADEL-PAINTS-x5-Brand-New-/260948310834
Looks like this is the change we are seeing. Foundation paints and secondary layers?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/04 04:34:03
Subject: Fuzzy rumour about changes of GW paint range
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
NecronLord3 wrote:http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Games-Workshop-CITADEL-PAINTS-x5-Brand-New-/260948310834
Looks like this is the change we are seeing. Foundation paints and secondary layers?
Slaanesh Grey? do want
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/04 04:41:30
Subject: Re:Fuzzy rumour about changes of GW paint range
|
 |
Infiltrating Oniwaban
|
Looks like the prediction from some time ago that GW would start incorporating copyrighted naming on their paints was correct. Cadian Fleshtone, Slaanesh Grey etc.
|
The Imperial Navy, A Galatic Force for Good. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/04 04:59:08
Subject: Re:Fuzzy rumour about changes of GW paint range
|
 |
Brainless Servitor
|
jmsincla wrote:
This is what I have heard will be happening. Personally, I wish they'd just switch back to a lid that would stay open/upright like the old pots or foundation paints.
I'm with you here - either have to stretch the doggone thing backwards and risk it snapping (but usually just closes back up) or try to fish under the mostly-closed lid. I loved the lids of the Foundation Paints, but then they took the little tab off those, too, so now they don't stay open well either. Sadness...
|
Addiction can be a hobby unto itself. Hobby addiction, though? Just plain nuts...but fun!
10K of Fenrisians and growing
4K of Ulthwe
4K Elysian Drop Troops
3K Iron Warriors
9K Armored Company
Titan Demi-maniple and growing
Chaos Titan Demi-maniple |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/04 05:04:29
Subject: Re:Fuzzy rumour about changes of GW paint range
|
 |
Lit By the Flames of Prospero
|
Dropers bottles leek realy bad if they get stored on thier sides. Their TERRIBLE for people who like to paint of the go and at FLGS's.
I got some recently, and this was a huge issue for me.
I like the current pots because they seal tightly, aren't a paint in the ass to try and open, and can be stores sideways....
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2012/02/04 05:06:18
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/04 05:12:34
Subject: Fuzzy rumour about changes of GW paint range
|
 |
Ultramarine Master with Gauntlets of Macragge
|
NecronLord3 wrote:http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Games-Workshop-CITADEL-PAINTS-x5-Brand-New-/260948310834
Looks like this is the change we are seeing. Foundation paints and secondary layers?
For the work blocked/if the auction gets taken down:
|
Check out my Youtube channel!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/04 05:52:17
Subject: Fuzzy rumour about changes of GW paint range
|
 |
Myrmidon Officer
|
I guess they're taking a page from Reaper and PP's book.
You prime with GW's Citadel non-primer spray.
You base-coat with Citadel Base.
You base-coat stubborn areas with Citadel Foundation.
You expose details with Citadel Wash.
You finish up with Citadel Layer.
What's next? Highlight with Citadel Highlight? Glaze with Citadel Glaze?
This jumble may confuse some people.
Reaper has had their "trinity" sets of colors for a while now to good effect. Base-coat with the middle color, shade with the darker color, and then highlight with the light color. That was simple.
Either way, more variety is always a good thing. I just hope they clearly explain the difference between Skull White and White Scar.
With all this unnecessary convolution, perhaps those 6thEd rules are true after all...
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/04 06:12:34
Subject: Fuzzy rumour about changes of GW paint range
|
 |
Serious Squig Herder
|
Absolutionis wrote:I guess they're taking a page from Reaper and PP's book.
You prime with GW's Citadel non-primer spray.
You base-coat with Citadel Base.
You base-coat stubborn areas with Citadel Foundation.
You expose details with Citadel Wash.
You finish up with Citadel Layer.
What's next? Highlight with Citadel Highlight? Glaze with Citadel Glaze?
This jumble may confuse some people.
Reaper has had their "trinity" sets of colors for a while now to good effect. Base-coat with the middle color, shade with the darker color, and then highlight with the light color. That was simple.
Either way, more variety is always a good thing. I just hope they clearly explain the difference between Skull White and White Scar.
With all this unnecessary convolution, perhaps those 6thEd rules are true after all...
I'd say it's more likely just intended as:
Foundation/Wash/Layer.
I'd be surprised if Skull White existed anymore.
Scar White = Skull White
Screaming Bell = looks like Vermin Brown to me.
Cadian Fleshton = looks like Elf Flesh
Slaanesh Grey = Actually looks like a light Shadow Grey.
I'm thinking a lot of the old colors will be gone. I'm tempted to run stock up on some - but I've mentally committed to switching to Vallejo for some time now anyway.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/04 06:37:20
Subject: Re:Fuzzy rumour about changes of GW paint range
|
 |
Steady Space Marine Vet Sergeant
|
My God the lengths GW will go to Copyright something.
|
"I don't have principles, and I consider any comment otherwise to be both threatening and insulting" - Dogma
"No, sorry, synonymous does not mean same".-Dogma
"If I say "I will hug you" I am threatening you" -Dogma |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/04 06:42:21
Subject: Re:Fuzzy rumour about changes of GW paint range
|
 |
Steadfast Grey Hunter
|
I just ran out of Chaos Black and need to stop by the local GW to pick some up. Hopefully they'll still have some left.
|
2000
#spacewolves |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/04 06:47:38
Subject: Re:Fuzzy rumour about changes of GW paint range
|
 |
Infiltrating Prowler
|
Well that answers the question about paint pots. Same old crap pots, but with a nice new shiny price tag most likely
Hopefully these pots will have the tab to keep the lids open.
So do I start with base or foundation? And then do I layer or base? I am seeing some real bad thought process for these.
Slaanesh and Grey are two words that I normally associate with each other
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/04 07:19:10
Subject: Re:Fuzzy rumour about changes of GW paint range
|
 |
Auspicious Aspiring Champion of Chaos
|
FabricatorGeneralMike wrote:Maelstrom808 wrote:DIDM wrote:silent25 wrote:Broke out some Vallejo the other day to use some colors that GW doesn't normally have and was reminded why I didn't switch to them. Can't get consistent colors and no matter how hard I shake, get a poorly mixed stream of color. Trying to get a couple drops and get a giant squirt. Friend brought up why he stopped using them. The dropper cap can come off. Squeeze too hard and cap shoots off spraying paint everywhere. Any container capable of catastrophic failure that sprays paint everywhere is a deal killer. Hope GW doesn't switch to the dropper pots.
Would like to use P3 more, but my LGS still hasn't been able to get a restock
Gentle hands
painting is a gentle hand activity
Also keeping a heavy sewing machine needle on hand to push through clots in the tips does wonders.
I found that the vallejo paints tend to congiel rather badly until I added 'agitators' inside the paint bottle and vola problem solved. I personally love the dapper bottle's but to each there own. I just used little steel ball bearings. I got a whole handful and Rona for like nothing. Plus they make good ammo for my friends sling shot. 
What type of "agitator? I have several paints that coul use a drop of whatever it is.
|
I collect:
Grand alliance death (whole alliance)
Stormcast eternals
Slaves to Darkness - currently Nurgle but may expand to undivided.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/04 07:31:03
Subject: Fuzzy rumour about changes of GW paint range
|
 |
Most Glorious Grey Seer
|
Absolutionis wrote:You prime with GW's Citadel non-primer spray.
Wait... wut?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/04 08:15:44
Subject: Re:Fuzzy rumour about changes of GW paint range
|
 |
Steady Space Marine Vet Sergeant
|
Slaanesh Grey? That makes as much sense as Ultramarines orange!
|
"I don't have principles, and I consider any comment otherwise to be both threatening and insulting" - Dogma
"No, sorry, synonymous does not mean same".-Dogma
"If I say "I will hug you" I am threatening you" -Dogma |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/04 08:18:34
Subject: Re:Fuzzy rumour about changes of GW paint range
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
Maryland
|
Andrew1975 wrote:Slaanesh Grey? That makes as much sense as Ultramarines orange!
It's the color you turn after Daemonette Red.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|