Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

It's happened to me a couple times now, and I was wondering: if no one responds to your list, does that mean no one sees any flaws? If that isn't so, and I'm almost certain it isn't (if I was certain I wouldn't be posting the list), then they simply skipped over it. So what is it in the title that makes an army list attractive, before you even see it? I sometimes look at armies I don't know about, to watch how people compose other armies, and I've seen lists where even I recognise flaws (but can't offer solutions given my lack of knowledge with the codex) and yet none of the experienced players speak up. I've also seen well balanced lists that deserved some praise, or maybe some little tweaks, get skipped over.

I'm just kinda stumped. This isn't a rant, or me spilling out hurt feelings (heh, feelings...). I'm just passingly curious about the human thought process that goes into this.

So, why do you skip over army lists?

I generally just point out if people make very poor choices in their lists.

I don't visit that forum much because every list I see is either mech, cookie-cutter, or just plain sucks.