Switch Theme:

If you ran GW, would you allow Codices/Army Books to ship without models for all the units?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Poll
If you ran Games Workshop, would you allow Codices/Army Books to ship without models for all the units in them being available at the time of printing?
Yes, I would do what they're doing now: ship the book with units in them with no current models that therefore allow for growth of the range without re-releasing the book.
No, I would hold off on releasing the book until all the units had models for them, even if that means a massive delay in the release of the book.
No, I would ONLY allow units in the book that we have the time & money to make by the release date of the book, even if that means a drastic reduction in the number of units in the book.
I don't care / I don't play 40K or WHFB.

View results
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
[ADMIN]
Decrepit Dakkanaut






Los Angeles, CA

For the purpose of this poll, please assume:

A) That Games Workshop does not have some diabolical plan where they create miniatures and then choose not to release them as part of some elaborate marketing scheme. Instead, assume that making miniatures takes time and money and they put out their miniatures essentially as quickly as they can within their budget and marketing release schedules.

B) That Games Workshop's method of releasing new rules for their armies only in the form of a Codex/Army Book is the way you're going to stick with rules updates for Warhammer 40K & WHFB.


With that in mind, if you ran Games Workshop, would you allow Codices/Army Books to ship without models for all the units in them being available at the time of printing?


This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/01/29 06:24:25


I play (click on icons to see pics): DQ:70+S++G(FAQ)M++B-I++Pw40k92/f-D+++A+++/areWD104R+T(D)DM+++
yakface's 40K rule #1: Although the rules allow you to use modeling to your advantage, how badly do you need to win your toy soldier games?
yakface's 40K rule #2: Friends don't let friends start a MEQ army.
yakface's 40K rule #3: Codex does not ALWAYS trump the rulebook, so please don't say that!
Waaagh Dakka: click the banner to learn more! 
   
Made in au
Tunneling Trygon






I would, because it gives most people a chance to convert.
   
Made in ca
Avatar of the Bloody-Handed God





Inactive

Yep , and converting with extra GW kits = more profit.
Win win!

Paused
◙▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
           ◂◂  ►  ▐ ▌  ◼  ▸▸
          ʳʷ   ᵖˡᵃʸ  ᵖᵃᵘˢᵉ  ˢᵗᵒᵖ   ᶠᶠ 
   
Made in au
Spawn of Chaos




Melbourne, Australia

I would hold off until all the models were ready.

Iron Within! Iron Without!  
   
Made in ca
Boosting Space Marine Biker







Just release the codices for God's sake.

Riddle me this: what has four sides, moves twelve inches, and moved fourteen?

RAW-RAW-RAWsputin, Lover of the Russian Queen/ there was a cat who really was gone... 
   
Made in us
Serious Squig Herder






I would - but not to the degree they do with the Tyranid codex for instance.

But leaving a few for a second/third wave is a good idea, and gives people something to look forward to (in theory).

Plus it gives converters something to do.
   
Made in us
Flashy Flashgitz





Kintnersville/Philadelphia, PA

I would, to a certain extent - not quite as much as the Imperial Guard codex, with the amount of variant tanks that are represented. I'd make sure that there were at the very least conversion kits available, or a bigger set with more options for at least a few of the options given depending on the army or unit in question. But not for all of them, because converting's very fun to do.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/01/29 07:48:02


Ouze on GW: "I'd like to be like, hey baby, you're a freak but you just got too much crazy going on, and I don't hook up with bunny boilers. But then Necrons are going to come out, and I'm going to be like damn girl, and then next thing you know, it's angry sex time again.

It's complicated."


Da Goldtoof Marauders - 2000 pts, The Sacred Host of Kai'Xili (Lizardmen) - 500 pts


 
   
Made in us
Ruthless Rafkin






Glen Burnie, MD

Why wait for GW? I'll make my own stuff.




-Loki- wrote:
40k is about slamming two slegdehammers together and hoping the other breaks first. Malifaux is about fighting with scalpels trying to hit select areas and hoping you connect more. 
   
Made in us
Psychic Novitiate selected by a Gatherer





Bay Area

Well, it gets people excited and causes some to start saving up or putting some cash aside for the future models. From a business man's standpoint, its an excellent idea.

Armies:
3000 points
2000 points
1500-2500 points (WIP) 
   
Made in gb
Long-Range Land Speeder Pilot





Birmingham UK

Having seen a fantastic Tervigon conversion just last night I can see that it doesn't matter so much if the models aren't available, but personally I'd prefer to see all the models come out to time with the Codex release.

DR:80SG+M+B+IPw40k95#+D++A++/fWD211R+++T(S)DM+

Current Projects:
Pre-Crusade Mantis Warriors force for Badab War campaign
Involved in the Great Marine Swap with the homebrew Defenders of Obscurus
Wedding fund sale: ebay and thread items! 
   
Made in au
Sinewy Scourge






Western Australia

Release it. I don't care if I have to do intricate conversions or proxy for a while, I just want my Dark Eldar codex!

Kabal of Venomed Dreams
Mourning Angel
UsdiThunder wrote:This is why I am a devout Xenos Scum. We at least do not worship Toasters.

 
   
Made in ie
Norn Queen






Dublin, Ireland

Voted for the 2nd option with the proviso "massive" dosent mean 5 years or something crazy.
Am useless at converting and was disappointed at the emphasis GW have put on the new Nid model conversions. Personally would not have minded waiting a few more months specifically for models such as the Tervi and Swarmlord.

Dman137 wrote:
goobs is all you guys will ever be

By 1-irt: Still as long as Hissy keeps showing up this is one of the most entertaining threads ever.

"Feelin' goods, good enough". 
   
Made in se
Fresh-Faced New User





Letting the sculptors work at their own pace and not under a bosun's whip works wonders.

They get more done, they get better stuff done, albeit not always in sync with a codex release.



I say let the creative staff do their magic, an inspired artist always produces better results than a pressured one.




p.s With that in mind, Dark eldar should be bloomin' amazing!

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/01/29 12:30:33


 
   
Made in ca
Cruel Corsair




MIll Creek, Nova Scotia

I would release the codex but ensure that there is a least enough models released for each army to make a legal list for 3 to 5 thousand points. (depending on 40k or fb)

Record as of 14/02/2011
Goblins 5W-3D-9L
Vanilla Marines 3W-1D-4L
Dark Elves-----4W-2D-7L
Space Wolves--1w-0d-0L 
   
Made in gb
Fixture of Dakka





Southampton

I went for option one. Last Tyranid Codex was dead boring. Now there's loads of options and though I imagine preferred army builds will soon start to emerge, you should never know what to expect. GW have supported a lot of the new Nids in the recent release anyway.

Have patience people

   
Made in gb
Dispassionate Imperial Judge






HATE Club, East London

Just release it ASAP.

I can convert models - I actually PREFER is there are a few units with no models for exactly that reason.

I'd much rather just get the rules update asap...

   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut





US

ArbitorIan wrote:Just release it ASAP.

I can convert models - I actually PREFER is there are a few units with no models for exactly that reason.

I'd much rather just get the rules update asap...


I feel the exact same way

Craftworld Uaire-Nem pics "Like shimmering daggers of light our fury shall rain down and cleanse this battlefield." Autarch of Uaire-Nem
BlueDagger's Nomad pics - "Morality, my friend, is merely a price tag." - BlueDagger, Contraband Dealer. Holo-recording played during the murder trial of an undercover PanOceania officer. Court Record 9002xaB, . Infinity Nomads - Come see what it's all about!
|Looking for War-gaming matches in the Colorado area? Colorado Infinity
 
   
Made in us
Jovial Plaguebearer of Nurgle




I do not see how they can support a wysiwyg tournement style play, but not create models for some of the best units in the codex, such as the IG Medusa and Manticore, the 'Nid Tervigon and T-Fex, just to name the newest ones. There is a lot of problems with how they produce their models.

When a new unit is introduced, every unit must have a model, or else they can not enforce a wysiwyg play style at all and they can not expect us to buy their models. They are only hurting themselves. Having a larger line of miniatures at a lesser price, they can increase sales and then increase profit by sacrificing to their dedicated audience.

The true followers of the God-Emperor will never forget their name! We are the Imperial Guard!
Now and forever serving the God-Emperor, and Him alone! 
   
Made in us
Brigadier General






Chicago

I would definitley ship the codex without all units being available. It makes sense to put codicies out faster, thereby keeping more armies viable and supporting those already collecting those armies. By releasing units later, you also keep the collectors of those armies interested, and keep the lines of figures expanding rather than sitting dormant for even longer than they already do.

GW has a long tradition of putting out codicies where not every unit and unit variant is currently produced. It sucks for tourney players who want their list complete and want it NOW, but for those of us without scads of $ to drop at once, it's nice to be able to build up our forces and periodically see new releases for our favorite armies.

It also gives converters stuff to do, and -especially in the case of IG- throws a nice bone to forgeworld.

Even if all the models were preped before the codex and still released slowly, I wouldn't see that as a bad thing, just good marketing.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/01/29 16:30:19


Chicago Skirmish Wargames club. Join us for some friendly, casual gaming in the Windy City.
http://chicagoskirmishwargames.com/blog/


My Project Log, mostly revolving around custom "Toybashed" terrain.
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/651712.page

Visit the Chicago Valley Railroad!
https://chicagovalleyrailroad.blogspot.com 
   
Made in gb
Sneaky Sniper Drone





Thames Valley, UK

It really annoys me when people complain that there are no models for a cirtain unit, put a bit of effort in and make something, even if it doesn't look amazing, you've tried.

Proud Member of the Dakka Dakka Casual Gamer Mafia - 'Our way is the only way!

Boris Johnson wrote:Voting Tory will cause your wife to have bigger breasts and
increase your chances of owning a BMW M3.


95% of teens would go into a panic attack if the jonas brothers were about to jump off the empire state building copy and paste this if you are the 5% who would pull up a lawn chair grab some popcorn and yell JUMP BITCHES!!!!!!!!!!!!! 
   
Made in us
Ruthless Rafkin






Glen Burnie, MD

Nenya97 wrote:I do not see how they can support a wysiwyg tournement style play, but not create models for some of the best units in the codex, such as the IG Medusa and Manticore, the 'Nid Tervigon and T-Fex, just to name the newest ones. There is a lot of problems with how they produce their models.

When a new unit is introduced, every unit must have a model, or else they can not enforce a wysiwyg play style at all and they can not expect us to buy their models. They are only hurting themselves. Having a larger line of miniatures at a lesser price, they can increase sales and then increase profit by sacrificing to their dedicated audience.


If I can do this:






Anyone can...

It is a hobby, after all. Before you complain about it being too hard, take a look at some of the flying rodent gak stuff regular modelers do with etched brass, resin interior kits, etc. See also: Gundam-Mecha's threads.




-Loki- wrote:
40k is about slamming two slegdehammers together and hoping the other breaks first. Malifaux is about fighting with scalpels trying to hit select areas and hoping you connect more. 
   
Made in gb
Sneaky Sniper Drone







I honestly don't care.

ARMY IN MASSIVE PROGRESS:


ARMIES IN MINI PROGRESS:

founding chapter named the Roaring Eagles.
 
   
Made in gb
Fixture of Dakka






Sheffield, UK

This poll is missing the following option:

I would release Codices without models but would have a clear and obvious window (say 6 months) in which all of the additional models would be released.

Actually what I would do is tie each release of a 'xenos' codex to one for a Space Marine chapter which would be released at the same time. This would give me a steady release of Space Marine (cash cow) models along side whichever army was being released at the time.

All fluff released during this period would in some way tie into a specified conflict between Marine chapter X and Xenos race Y.

Spain in Flames: Flames of War (Spanish Civil War 1936-39) Flames of War: Czechs and Slovaks (WWI & WWII) Sheffield & Rotherham Wargames Club

"I'm cancelling you, I'm cancelling you out of shame like my subscription to White Dwarf." - Mark Corrigan: Peep Show
 
   
Made in us
Shas'la with Pulse Carbine





The Realms of the Unreal, of the Glandeco-Angelinnian War Storm, Caused by the Child Slave Rebellion

George Spiggott wrote:This poll is missing the following option:

I would release Codices without models but would have a clear and obvious window (say 6 months) in which all of the additional models would be released.

Actually what I would do is tie each release of a 'xenos' codex to one for a Space Marine chapter which would be released at the same time. This would give me a steady release of Space Marine (cash cow) models along side whichever army was being released at the time.

All fluff released during this period would in some way tie into a specified conflict between Marine chapter X and Xenos race Y.


This.

2 - The hobbiest - The guy who likes the minis for what they are, loves playing with painted armies, using offical mini's in a friendly setting. Wants to play on boards with good terrain.
Devlin Mud is cheating.
More people have more rights now. Suck it.- Polonius
5500
1200 
   
Made in us
Renegade Kan Killin Orks





San Francisco, CA

I said yes. It makes for more opportunities to convert models, or sculpt your own. Also, I kinda like the metagame of doing without units, or being able to afford the fancy models. Adds a tier to the game.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
BloodofOrks wrote:
George Spiggott wrote:This poll is missing the following option:

I would release Codices without models but would have a clear and obvious window (say 6 months) in which all of the additional models would be released.

Actually what I would do is tie each release of a 'xenos' codex to one for a Space Marine chapter which would be released at the same time. This would give me a steady release of Space Marine (cash cow) models along side whichever army was being released at the time.

All fluff released during this period would in some way tie into a specified conflict between Marine chapter X and Xenos race Y.


This.

What they said...

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/01/30 01:19:18


   
Made in ca
Dakka Veteran






Nova Scotia, Canada

It seems like if we ever want to get stuff again than this is how it will have to be. On the other hand. I would NOT release an ork codex with a WAAAGH!!! banner...and then re-release the Nob box without one...

bastards

In a Society in which there is no law, and in theory no compulsion, the only arbiter of behaviour is public opinion. But public opinion, because of the tremendous urge to conformity in gregarious animals, is less tolerant than any system of law. When human beings are governed by "thou shalt not", the individual can practise a certain amount of eccentricity: when they are supposedly governed by "love" or "reason", he is under continuous pressure to make him behave and think in exactly the same way as everyone else.

George Orwell is my hero.

Social Experiment: if you're pissed like me, copy and paste this into your sig, and add a number after it.
PISSED 8374982374983749873948234
Check out my band Man In A Shed 
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut







I'd like to add one addendum to my answer:

I would ship codices/army books without models for all the units BUT appropriate bases sizes and a general model size would be specified.

Picking an examples at random, it would be nice to know how big a Deathstrike missile launcher, The Doom of Whatever, or a Thunderwolf rider is supposed to be.
   
Made in ca
Morally-Flexible Malleus Hearing Whispers






Well I kind of moved near Toronto, actually.

This is an interesting question. Thing is, given the current range of minis available GW can make cooler rules if they come out with rules for minis that do not have models yet. What's more if they come out with something new they can even see how popular it is before making minis for it, or else there is always Forge World.

Personally I think it is great that GW is coming out with new stuff, which was surprising and I really think it helps them, for lack of a better expression, compete with other companies; Privateer Press for example.

SO WHERE THE HELL IS RENEGADE/ MUTANT GUARD.

Dakka Articles: Eldar Tactica | In Defence of Starcannons (math) | Ork Takktika Quick Tips
taco online: WoW PvP
ur hax are nubz 
   
Made in us
[ADMIN]
Decrepit Dakkanaut






Los Angeles, CA

George Spiggott wrote:This poll is missing the following option:

I would release Codices without models but would have a clear and obvious window (say 6 months) in which all of the additional models would be released.

Actually what I would do is tie each release of a 'xenos' codex to one for a Space Marine chapter which would be released at the same time. This would give me a steady release of Space Marine (cash cow) models along side whichever army was being released at the time.

All fluff released during this period would in some way tie into a specified conflict between Marine chapter X and Xenos race Y.



Well, this poll assumes that Games Workshop generally releases miniatures when it is able to finish them (within the time frame of their ability to market the product, of course), so if you were demanding that your sculptors all work on getting every model out within 6 months of the release of the book those man hours are not being spent getting the next release ready which means you're essentially going with a variation of 'Option B' (wait until all the models are done until releasing the book), its just that you've set a different hard line 'out' point.


I play (click on icons to see pics): DQ:70+S++G(FAQ)M++B-I++Pw40k92/f-D+++A+++/areWD104R+T(D)DM+++
yakface's 40K rule #1: Although the rules allow you to use modeling to your advantage, how badly do you need to win your toy soldier games?
yakface's 40K rule #2: Friends don't let friends start a MEQ army.
yakface's 40K rule #3: Codex does not ALWAYS trump the rulebook, so please don't say that!
Waaagh Dakka: click the banner to learn more! 
   
Made in us
Humming Great Unclean One of Nurgle





Georgia,just outside Atlanta

I would release the codices,however,I would also make the FULL range of bitz available for easier conversions.


"I'll tell you one thing that every good soldier knows! The only thing that counts in the end is power! Naked merciless force!" .-Ursus.

I am Red/Black
Take The Magic Dual Colour Test - Beta today!
<small>Created with Rum and Monkey's Personality Test Generator.</small>

I am both selfish and chaotic. I value self-gratification and control; I want to have things my way, preferably now. At best, I'm entertaining and surprising; at worst, I'm hedonistic and violent.
 
   
 
Forum Index » Dakka Polls
Go to: