Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/12 15:13:42
Subject: Why didn't they put the Emperor in a Dreadnought?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Ascalam wrote:Would you consider the Transformers or Spiderman movies to be canon to the comic book fluff universe? Most would say no, some would say yes. Actually, the Transformers movies(designated the Tyrus Cluster) ARE considered Canon, because the TF Universe is a Multiverse, not a single continuity. Marvel comics and movies are the same way(just unlike the TF movies and the original 616 Universe Marvel comics, we don't know the Marvel Movieverse designation numbers). There is no maybe regarding the Canonical basis of them.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2011/05/12 15:17:37
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/12 15:13:46
Subject: Why didn't they put the Emperor in a Dreadnought?
|
 |
Winged Kroot Vulture
|
King Pariah wrote:If they stuck the emperor in a Dreadnought, and then made him an available apocalypse unit (seriously, he'd be too powerful for anything else), it'd still be like summoning chuck norris upon the field of battle. Yeah sure, everyone's dead, but where's the fun?
And then a Tau superheavy flyer squadron puts 9 twinlinked titan killer railgun rounds into him, each, and vaporizes him in one round of shooting...
and that's how 40k ended.
The IoM would never, ever, put the emperor on the field of battle. He's hidden away behind walls and walls of guardsmen upon guardsmen upon space marines... for a reason.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/05/12 15:15:04
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/12 15:17:04
Subject: Why didn't they put the Emperor in a Dreadnought?
|
 |
Sneaky Kommando
Atlanta
|
Ascalam wrote:  Which is why i said (in the quote that you clipped from my post no less ) that if you do it's cool.
I don't. If its not in a codex or the rulebook then FOR ME it isn't canon, especially given the tendency of the multiple writers in BL to contradict each other or just plain ignore established fluff to go on their own wierd tangents. If we went by the standard that some of these writers go a single marine tac-squad could clear whole worlds with no casualties.
I didn't say that it isn't canon for the community at large (although i think there was something about it being considered an aternate universe from GW at some point) but that i personally don't consider spinoff books to be canon to the game fluff.
A similar example
Would you consider the Transformers or Spiderman movies to be canon to the comic book fluff universe? Most would say no, some would say yes.
Regardless, there still isn't a non-human perspective on what the humans believe the Emperor is doing (holding back the daemons) that i know of. If you have one i'll happily read the quote
Nope, I have to disagree. Any GW sanctioned background material is just that. And thus it's as canon as you get with this universe. Black Library and Fantasy flight games have to go through a very rigid approval process from GW for all background material. I know this because my best friend's wife works for Fantasy flight games and is a writer for Deathwatch.
While it seems that Black Library has FAR more liberty than Fantasy Flight, i know for a fact that it is all approved by GW.
also...
Gridge wrote:
I do realize, though, that 40K is a system for tabletop battle and not a roleplaying game so background can be kept sparse and directed only at keeping the flavor of the setting.
You may not be aware that the 40k universe has expanded into the realm of Role Playing games, so allow me to illuminate you:
Dark Heresy
Rogue Trader
Death Watch
And the Forthcoming Black Crusade
|
I'm kind of a big deal... people know me... |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/12 16:23:19
Subject: Why didn't they put the Emperor in a Dreadnought?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
He requested he be put on the Golden Throne. You don't disobey the Emperor like that.
|
My Armies:
5,500pts
2,700pts
2,000pts
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/12 16:26:14
Subject: Why didn't they put the Emperor in a Dreadnought?
|
 |
Napoleonics Obsesser
|
This thread again
Didn't you know? The golden throne is just one big dreadnought, and in the imperium's darkest hour, he'll awaken.
|
If only ZUN!bar were here... |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/15 08:01:38
Subject: Re:Why didn't they put the Emperor in a Dreadnought?
|
 |
Spawn of Chaos
Unknown
|
How about they take him out and leave him to rot. Khorne wants his blood, Kharn wants his blood, why do you let them get thirsty
|
As a bearer of the word I bestow upon you the mighty power of the dictionary. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/15 09:58:40
Subject: Why didn't they put the Emperor in a Dreadnought?
|
 |
Helpful Sophotect
|
Valhallan42nd wrote:Hawkward wrote:It seems easy enough. The Space Marines do it all the time. And it's not like they didn't have time - he had enough time to repurpose the Golden Throne to serve as a life preservation chamber. Hell, they could have even stuck him in a stasis field if they didn't have the time; they had teleporters and stasis fields at their disposal.
Either the Emperor wanted to be stuck in his throne, or he's an idiot.
Because then the story isn't a tragedy. And if there is no tragedy, there is no sense of loss, and the background isn't compelling, and the game doesn't acquire a massive following.
If only cool gak happens in a story, it isn't a story, it's a 12 year-old's D&D campaign. Or Twlight.
I particularly agree.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/05/17 07:11:15
Subject: Why didn't they put the Emperor in a Dreadnought?
|
 |
Wight Lord with the Sword of Kings
|
purplefood wrote:thenoobbomb wrote:If you say that you want to loot the golden throne, then youre pretty stupid. Deamons everywhere. O, wait. Skulls for the Skull Throne and Mutations for Nurgle
Yeah but it'll be awesome.
Copy that. But hey, the throne is from gold and... that would mean rich orks! Oohh, that would be cool.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/06/05 07:03:31
Subject: Why didn't they put the Emperor in a Dreadnought?
|
 |
Sneaky Sniper Drone
|
tee hee
Automatically Appended Next Post: Sorry. that was my friend
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/06/05 07:03:50
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/06/05 07:49:06
Subject: Re:Why didn't they put the Emperor in a Dreadnought?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Dreadnoughts don't work so well when the pilot is unconscious.
|
"'players must agree how they are going to select their armies, and if any restrictions apply to the number and type of models they can use."
This is an actual rule in the actual rulebook. Quit whining about how you can imagine someone's army touching you in a bad place and play by the actual rules.
Freelance Ontologist
When people ask, "What's the point in understanding everything?" they've just disqualified themselves from using questions and should disappear in a puff of paradox. But they don't understand and just continue existing, which are also their only two strategies for life. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/06/05 15:30:31
Subject: Why didn't they put the Emperor in a Dreadnought?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Cottonjaw wrote:King Pariah wrote:If they stuck the emperor in a Dreadnought, and then made him an available apocalypse unit (seriously, he'd be too powerful for anything else), it'd still be like summoning chuck norris upon the field of battle. Yeah sure, everyone's dead, but where's the fun?
And then a Tau superheavy flyer squadron puts 9 twinlinked titan killer railgun rounds into him, each, and vaporizes him in one round of shooting...
and that's how 40k ended.
The IoM would never, ever, put the emperor on the field of battle. He's hidden away behind walls and walls of guardsmen upon guardsmen upon space marines... for a reason.
I know you're trolling but, I couldn't resist.
If the Emperor was in a Dreadnought, firstly, he wouldn't be leading a lot of armies.
Secondly, he'd never take to the open field against a threat so massively insignificant as the Tau.
Thirdly, he's the fething Emperor, I highly doubt that a pathetic flyer will do a lot against him when he managed to beat The Void Dragon into oblivion and imprisoned this God like being on Mars. The Tau, would likely never have existed either.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/06/22 10:28:50
Subject: Why didn't they put the Emperor in a Dreadnought?
|
 |
Sneaky Sniper Drone
|
TyraelVladinhurst wrote:Sothas wrote:Noisy_Marine wrote:At least they don't have psychic land raiders or storm ravens. That would be even more OP.
Oh I know, like a power that could ignore shaken and stunned. Man that'd be so OP! I'm glad GW doesn't have someone writing dexes with these rediculous ideas.
lol.... like the GK codex?
Mat Ward anyone?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/06/22 10:53:21
Subject: Why didn't they put the Emperor in a Dreadnought?
|
 |
Humorless Arbite
Outside the DarkTower, amongst the roses.
|
With the new allies system in 6th Ed. maybe the Eldar will put him in a wraithlord. WRAITHEMPEROR!!!
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/06/22 10:53:51
Every Dakkanaught gets a 4+ Pinch of Salt save.
When you suffer a Falling Sky hit, roll a D6 - on a 4+ the hit is ignored as per the Pinch of Salt save. On a 1-3 panic insues - you automatically fail common sense tests for the next 2 weeks and get +7 to your negativity stat. -Praxiss
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/06/22 14:24:53
Subject: Why didn't they put the Emperor in a Dreadnought?
|
 |
[MOD]
Otiose in a Niche
|
They did.
After the great battle they found several burned bodies. The one they thought was the Emperor was actually Horus, so he's on the Golden Throne.
The one they thought was Horus was actually Sangunius, so he's now in the Eye of Terror.
And the one they thought was a random Blood Angel was the Emperor. He's actually in a storage hanger on Baal somewhere.
It's all explained in an early WD issue, #97 I think.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/06/22 15:24:51
Subject: Re:Why didn't they put the Emperor in a Dreadnought?
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
Eye of Terra.
|
The Emperor is still alive and has no need for physical manifestation at this point. He has achieved 'god' status and can hear the thoughts of the countless millions. As such is able to manifest his will in countless ways in order to serve mankind.
What is that to the power of a dreadnought!?
*This messge brought to you by the Imperial Inquisition and the Lords of Terra*
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/06/22 15:42:00
Subject: Why didn't they put the Emperor in a Dreadnought?
|
 |
Ruthless Rafkin
|
Threadomancy say what?
|
-Loki- wrote:
40k is about slamming two slegdehammers together and hoping the other breaks first. Malifaux is about fighting with scalpels trying to hit select areas and hoping you connect more. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/06/22 17:04:27
Subject: Why didn't they put the Emperor in a Dreadnought?
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
iproxtaco wrote:Cottonjaw wrote:King Pariah wrote:
Thirdly, he's the fething Emperor, I highly doubt that a pathetic flyer will do a lot against him when he managed to beat The Void Dragon into oblivion and imprisoned this God like being on Mars. The Tau, would likely never have existed either.
An ork has almost killed him before, a silly little orc so yeah titan rail guns might blast him apart
|
20k+ Nids 10k Eldar (w/Phantom) 5k Necron 5k Lizardmen
3k Dwarfs
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/06/22 17:29:22
Subject: Why didn't they put the Emperor in a Dreadnought?
|
 |
Road-Raging Blood Angel Biker
Eye of Terror
|
The emperor is going to reborn in he 6th edition, have no fear.
*Brougt to you by the Imperial Inquisition*
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/06/22 21:44:24
Subject: Why didn't they put the Emperor in a Dreadnought?
|
 |
Humorless Arbite
Outside the DarkTower, amongst the roses.
|
Threadomancy say what?
Wow didn't even notice that. If I see a thread in the current list I post.
|
Every Dakkanaught gets a 4+ Pinch of Salt save.
When you suffer a Falling Sky hit, roll a D6 - on a 4+ the hit is ignored as per the Pinch of Salt save. On a 1-3 panic insues - you automatically fail common sense tests for the next 2 weeks and get +7 to your negativity stat. -Praxiss
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/06/22 22:01:04
Subject: Why didn't they put the Emperor in a Dreadnought?
|
 |
Legendary Dogfighter
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/06/22 22:08:52
Subject: Re:Why didn't they put the Emperor in a Dreadnought?
|
 |
Stormin' Stompa
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/06/22 22:51:15
Subject: Why didn't they put the Emperor in a Dreadnought?
|
 |
Water-Caste Negotiator
|
Automatically Appended Next Post:
Noisy_Marine wrote:A better question: How long before orks loot the Golden Throne and give it more dakka?
How about this?
http://img400.imageshack.us/img400/9222/1182498637112ex4.jpg
Found it on LO, not sure where it's from
|
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2012/06/22 22:52:25
|
|
 |
 |
|