Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/04/02 18:38:16
Subject: Will the New Tau Codex bring wanted changes, or will the Tau no longer be worth playing?
|
 |
Towering Hierophant Bio-Titan
|
Last time we wanted something better quality and quicker, we got finecast!
I see no problem with the way its going
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/04/02 18:39:32
Subject: Will the New Tau Codex bring wanted changes, or will the Tau no longer be worth playing?
|
 |
Bounding Assault Marine
|
Wait, it's not out yet?
I haven't tried to buy it from GW's website but it looks like it is already out..
either way, those new tau models are sexy.
I want to get a broadside just cause it's so groovy lookin'.
Also, they have awesome HQ models now, like a FireWarrior looking guy and a pathfinder!
How cool is that!? Automatically Appended Next Post: Last time we wanted something better quality and quicker, we got finecast!
I see no problem with the way its going
lol Automatically Appended Next Post: http://www.games-workshop.com/gws/catalog/productDetail.jsp?catId=cat440287a&prodId=prod1990142a
Darkstrider, dude.
I can't wait til summer so I can work full time.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2013/04/02 18:42:51
2000+
"Can we stop saying CCSM and CSM to just say CSM and SM? I mean really, don't we already know they have a codex? Plus my colon key is broken." |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/04/02 18:43:09
Subject: Will the New Tau Codex bring wanted changes, or will the Tau no longer be worth playing?
|
 |
Towering Hierophant Bio-Titan
|
All comes out on the 6th yukondal.
So still 4 days away.
However, pre-orders before a certain date will get to stores on the day of release, and to home the day before (this friday)
So all seems good.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/04/02 18:45:09
Subject: Will the New Tau Codex bring wanted changes, or will the Tau no longer be worth playing?
|
 |
Bounding Assault Marine
|
oh ok. cool, thanks Jackal
|
2000+
"Can we stop saying CCSM and CSM to just say CSM and SM? I mean really, don't we already know they have a codex? Plus my colon key is broken." |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/04/02 18:46:55
Subject: Will the New Tau Codex bring wanted changes, or will the Tau no longer be worth playing?
|
 |
Shas'la with Pulse Carbine
|
frogy is just upset that Tau are getting an update and wants us to use the old codex so he wont lose all the time......
I dont think its a downgrade in quality...just GW getting their butts in gear. The codexes that are coming out now(tau,eldar, maybe orks{hopefully BT....poor bastards} and some fantasy stuff) have probably been in the works for quite some time and are now finally getting released in piecemeal for maximum profit and final tweaks lol
|
Tyranids will consume the universe!!! There is no chance for survival!!
.........eventually anyways......... |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/04/02 18:48:49
Subject: Will the New Tau Codex bring wanted changes, or will the Tau no longer be worth playing?
|
 |
Ladies Love the Vibro-Cannon Operator
|
Well, as said this edition is more shooty than the former ones. This could be beneficial for Tau unless the designers have screwed them. But this seems unlikely.
|
Former moderator 40kOnline
Lanchester's square law - please obey in list building!
Illumini: "And thank you for not finishing your post with a " " I'm sorry, but after 7200 's that has to be the most annoying sign-off ever."
Armies: Eldar, Necrons, Blood Angels, Grey Knights; World Eaters (30k); Bloodbound; Cryx, Circle, Cyriss |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/04/02 19:01:36
Subject: Will the New Tau Codex bring wanted changes, or will the Tau no longer be worth playing?
|
 |
Stone Bonkers Fabricator General
|
frogy27 wrote:And rail guns being nerfd to s8 makeing them no better then ms and useless fron what i have read they have been overall nerfed so my tau will still stay on the shelf
railguns on broadsides have been nerfed. Hammerheads still have your str10 fun, and it got better as it can kill muttiple things
|
Dark Mechanicus and Renegade Iron Hand Dakka Blog
My Dark Mechanicus P&M Blog. Mostly Modeling as I paint very slowly. Lots of kitbashed conversions of marines and a few guard to make up a renegade Iron Hand chapter and Dark Mechanicus Allies. Bionics++ |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/04/02 19:11:15
Subject: Will the New Tau Codex bring wanted changes, or will the Tau no longer be worth playing?
|
 |
[DCM]
Procrastinator extraordinaire
|
Melissia wrote:Fifth edition Tyranids was a good, relatively balanced codex that caused a lot of people to whine because they were expecting something that was ridiculously overpowered and unbalanced. No GW invalidated a lot of units that everyone used to use in order to make profit for shiny new trygons. Carnifexes would be a prime example. In fact, there are plenty underpowered units in the codex, which is why you only see a few builds for 'Nids at tournaments.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/04/02 19:13:02
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/04/02 19:11:27
Subject: Will the New Tau Codex bring wanted changes, or will the Tau no longer be worth playing?
|
 |
Foolproof Falcon Pilot
|
Melissia wrote:Fifth edition Tyranids was a good, relatively balanced codex that caused a lot of people to whine because they were expecting something that was ridiculously overpowered and unbalanced.
Sounds like someone who hasnt even looked at the codex. You have 9 units to build a competitive list from: Tyrant, Terv, gaunt, Zoan, HG, Ymargl, Biovore, Doom, Trygon. After that you are venturing into the poor-horrible realm. Nids is still the worst internally balanced codex in current use and is only limping along because tervigons exist. When one unit is the only thing keeping a codex from being entirely invalid, the book is crap. I would agree, i wouldnt wish a 5th nid codex on anyone.
Tau will see an overall improvement in play. Pretty significantly, they will also be one of the most popular ally choices due to the number of armies they ally with. They also have access to Eldar for psychic powers and defense, something that they lack, and will see a lot of the other gaps in the old codex filled in. They will have more mid-strength shooting, more ways to deal with assault, and generally a stronger codex. How internally balanced the codex is remains to be seen, but at this point the old codex is nearly invalid for competitive settings. They can really only go up.
|
"Ask not the Eldar a question, for they will give you three answers, all of which are true and terrifying to know."
-Inquisitor Czevak
~14k
~10k
~5k corsairs
~3k DKOK |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/04/02 19:23:01
Subject: Will the New Tau Codex bring wanted changes, or will the Tau no longer be worth playing?
|
 |
Fireknife Shas'el
|
I guess there are only a few issues that seem to bother me so far. I'm still optimistic, since it looks like we will be able to field troops that can do something instead of relying on heavily loaded Elite and Heavy choices.
I'm disappointed that the Devilfish will probably still be expensive and terrible. With a unit that has unit wide strong weapons they need an open topped transport like the Necron's ghost ark.
Suits are still BS3. Just going to save myself a lot of typing. With multi-trackers built in, it could mean that it will be easier to get the upgrade for BS4 and still bring two weapons.
I don't see why people are so positive about the Hammerhead being the only S10 weapon in the army. It's only getting the single shot, not line of death most people hoped for. It gives even less reason to bring the Ionhead.
I'm still hopeful though.
|
I'm expecting an Imperial Knights supplement dedicated to GW's loyalist apologetics. Codex: White Knights "In the grim dark future, everything is fine."
"The argument is that we have to do this or we will, bit by bit,
lose everything that we hold dear, everything that keeps the business going. Our crops will wither, our children will die piteous
deaths and the sun will be swept from the sky."
-Tom Kirby |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/04/02 19:32:53
Subject: Will the New Tau Codex bring wanted changes, or will the Tau no longer be worth playing?
|
 |
Stubborn Hammerer
|
I have think the changes will be welcome ones and needed ones. All the books that have out this year so far have been really quite good.
The additon of the Riptide is interesting and I am sure it will be a real flyer killer. And well, anything killer. Also from what I understand, there are a great deal more HQ options which is really needed. One thing I found that Tau lacked was solid HQ also making a Fire Warriors based army more viable will be nice to see as well as making specific lore based tactics more relavant.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/04/02 19:39:01
Subject: Will the New Tau Codex bring wanted changes, or will the Tau no longer be worth playing?
|
 |
Consigned to the Grim Darkness
|
Ignoring the other crap ( lol, "haven't looked at the codex", sure thing kiddo)... As a Sisters of Battle player, that's quite a fething lot to me. I have nine non- SC, non-transport units, period for a pure Sisters army. But then again, I disagree that you only ever have nine competitive units to build from to begin with. That's a discussion for another thread though, and a discussion that's been had to death already anyway.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2013/04/02 19:39:41
The people in the past who convinced themselves to do unspeakable things were no less human than you or I. They made their decisions; the only thing that prevents history from repeating itself is making different ones.
-- Adam Serwer
My blog |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/04/02 20:03:16
Subject: Re:Will the New Tau Codex bring wanted changes, or will the Tau no longer be worth playing?
|
 |
Rogue
|
Does anybody know if the Riptide takes normal support systems like XV8s? It'd probably be pretty worth it to slap a Targeting Array on that baby, otherwise the statline looks pretty good to be honest. Yay for taking spanish classes. I know I'm using the Riptide, got the launch bundle. What do you guys think about the weapons systems? Like whether the mega burst cannon thingy will be better than the ion cannons, or vice versa.
|
Sacean 28th Hunter Cadre: 2000
Armageddon 53rd Heavy Armored Division: 3000
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/04/02 20:17:32
Subject: Will the New Tau Codex bring wanted changes, or will the Tau no longer be worth playing?
|
 |
Fireknife Shas'el
|
It looks like we aren't getting Targeting arrays. So basically the entire army may be gimped so that it can rely on a very fragile Pathfinder team.
|
I'm expecting an Imperial Knights supplement dedicated to GW's loyalist apologetics. Codex: White Knights "In the grim dark future, everything is fine."
"The argument is that we have to do this or we will, bit by bit,
lose everything that we hold dear, everything that keeps the business going. Our crops will wither, our children will die piteous
deaths and the sun will be swept from the sky."
-Tom Kirby |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/04/02 20:22:35
Subject: Will the New Tau Codex bring wanted changes, or will the Tau no longer be worth playing?
|
 |
Stone Bonkers Fabricator General
|
zephoid wrote: Melissia wrote:Fifth edition Tyranids was a good, relatively balanced codex that caused a lot of people to whine because they were expecting something that was ridiculously overpowered and unbalanced.
Sounds like someone who hasnt even looked at the codex. You have 9 units to build a competitive list from: Tyrant, Terv, gaunt, Zoan, HG, Ymargl, Biovore, Doom, Trygon. After that you are venturing into the poor-horrible realm. Nids is still the worst internally balanced codex in current use and is only limping along because tervigons exist. When one unit is the only thing keeping a codex from being entirely invalid, the book is crap. I would agree, i wouldnt wish a 5th nid codex on anyone.
Tau will see an overall improvement in play. Pretty significantly, they will also be one of the most popular ally choices due to the number of armies they ally with. They also have access to Eldar for psychic powers and defense, something that they lack, and will see a lot of the other gaps in the old codex filled in. They will have more mid-strength shooting, more ways to deal with assault, and generally a stronger codex. How internally balanced the codex is remains to be seen, but at this point the old codex is nearly invalid for competitive settings. They can really only go up.
and DE have, what 7 viable choices?
most non IoM codexes quickly become invalidated when a new edition comes out
|
Dark Mechanicus and Renegade Iron Hand Dakka Blog
My Dark Mechanicus P&M Blog. Mostly Modeling as I paint very slowly. Lots of kitbashed conversions of marines and a few guard to make up a renegade Iron Hand chapter and Dark Mechanicus Allies. Bionics++ |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/04/02 22:30:00
Subject: Will the New Tau Codex bring wanted changes, or will the Tau no longer be worth playing?
|
 |
Dour Wolf Priest with Iron Wolf Amulet
|
Exergy wrote:frogy27 wrote:And rail guns being nerfd to s8 makeing them no better then ms and useless fron what i have read they have been overall nerfed so my tau will still stay on the shelf
railguns on broadsides have been nerfed. Hammerheads still have your str10 fun, and it got better as it can kill muttiple things
Yeah they're only S8, but at least they're twin-linked and AP1 - short of a Land Raider, you should be blowing the hell out of any vehicle out there still... just not with the laughable ease that they could before. And to be honest, Land Raiders have had it rough for too long now.
Also, froggy... no one agrees with you. I'm sorely tempted to click that little "ignore" button.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/04/03 00:03:04
Subject: Will the New Tau Codex bring wanted changes, or will the Tau no longer be worth playing?
|
 |
Stubborn Hammerer
|
The S8 is a little disapointing but still damn good, and twin linked like it was said. They can take on whatever whilst the Hammerheads take on big stuff. Thats probably a better spread though, I mean S10 is of course the best, but I always had trouble deciding what to shoot at with the Hammerhead or what to save for the Broadsides. I mean, shoot ar armour, thats pretty straight forward. But I still like the S8 and S10 spread.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/04/03 00:48:47
Subject: Will the New Tau Codex bring wanted changes, or will the Tau no longer be worth playing?
|
 |
Land Raider Pilot on Cruise Control
|
Mountain-Breaker wrote:The S8 is a little disapointing but still damn good, and twin linked like it was said. They can take on whatever whilst the Hammerheads take on big stuff. Thats probably a better spread though, I mean S10 is of course the best, but I always had trouble deciding what to shoot at with the Hammerhead or what to save for the Broadsides. I mean, shoot ar armour, thats pretty straight forward. But I still like the S8 and S10 spread.
+1 to this. Just because the "rail rifles" were nerfed to S8 doesn't mean that they are worthless (though one could give it lance, because heck, rail guns eat armor for breakfast) They still mash anything AV13 and under, with the skyfire option tau now have really good AA. Watch out vendettas, you now are threatened!
|
Blood Ravens 2nd Company (C:SM)
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/04/03 01:22:48
Subject: Will the New Tau Codex bring wanted changes, or will the Tau no longer be worth playing?
|
 |
Fireknife Shas'el
|
S8 Vs A13 means you only pen on a 6 and it is useless against A14 because for that price and a Heavy Support slot it shouldn't be forced to "glance it to death" unless it gets a crazy amount of shots. Look at the Forgefiend for example, which will 8 shots total for about 4 hits compared to BS3 Broadsides with twinlinked railguns for at most 3 hits. The Forgefiend would be the more reliable choice to me since it also gets to reroll to pen rolls and is comparable in price. It's also in an army with a versatile Obliterator and Triple Twin-Linked Lascannon Predator.
Also the increase in AA effectiveness is marginal thanks to the reduction in S, going from ~20% to ~25% chance to penetrate an A12 flyer. I don't understand why they couldn't make the MissileSide have Skyfire and leave the regular Broadside alone.
However suits can now take 18" Melta guns, so armor might not be an issue anyways.
|
I'm expecting an Imperial Knights supplement dedicated to GW's loyalist apologetics. Codex: White Knights "In the grim dark future, everything is fine."
"The argument is that we have to do this or we will, bit by bit,
lose everything that we hold dear, everything that keeps the business going. Our crops will wither, our children will die piteous
deaths and the sun will be swept from the sky."
-Tom Kirby |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/04/03 01:31:27
Subject: Will the New Tau Codex bring wanted changes, or will the Tau no longer be worth playing?
|
 |
Shas'la with Pulse Carbine
|
So, im a little disappointed in the broadrail nerf. Should either have glance or be S9 at least i think. Should be able to compete with a damn guardsmen on taking out Armor of any kind. I was also hoping for Stealths as troops! even if they stayed the same price. Oh well!
Im still looking forward to the release because Tau have needed it for quite some time now
Our conquest is inevitable......
|
Tyranids will consume the universe!!! There is no chance for survival!!
.........eventually anyways......... |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/04/03 07:08:08
Subject: Will the New Tau Codex bring wanted changes, or will the Tau no longer be worth playing?
|
 |
Boosting Black Templar Biker
|
"Boohoo, every single unit doesn't have S10!" Really guys? S10 should be rare, not spammable. Vehicles are screwed enough as it is.
|
Armies:
Primary: Black Templars Crimson Fists Orks
Allied: Sisters of Battle Imperial Guard |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/04/03 09:59:47
Subject: Will the New Tau Codex bring wanted changes, or will the Tau no longer be worth playing?
|
 |
Pyromaniac Hellhound Pilot
|
tvih wrote:"Boohoo, every single unit doesn't have S10!" Really guys? S10 should be rare, not spammable. Vehicles are screwed enough as it is.
Heh... The Imperial Guard can bring 9 R48" S10 AP1, Blast(!), Armourbane(!!) guns to the table for mere 1395 points  .
|
My armies:
14000 points |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/04/03 10:23:48
Subject: Will the New Tau Codex bring wanted changes, or will the Tau no longer be worth playing?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
Dundee, Scotland/Dharahn, Saudi Arabia
|
It's too early to say at this point. Regardless of what others bring to the table, what this edition will do is bring change. Remember the whining when Necrons were rumoured to be losing WBB and dropping to a 4+ save? It was the end of the world (apparently) Necrons are now a top tier codex. Broadsides went from tank killing to air defence, Something that is in short supply in the current meta. With the changes to overwatch, and the advantages that the Tau seem to be getting, they are a scary prospect for any assault based army. From the rumours I'm hearing, Tau are going to be a scary prospect for any army to face. Necron air force are in serious trouble now. Vendetta Spam is in trouble too. Who knows what else the codex will bring. There is one certainty though, on Saturday, we'll find out, and it won't be the end of the world.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/04/03 10:41:51
If the thought of something makes me giggle for longer than 15 seconds, I am to assume that I am not allowed to do it. item 87, skippys list
DC:70S+++G+++M+++B+++I++Pw40k86/f#-D+++++A++++/cWD86R+++++T(D)DM++ |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/04/03 10:36:43
Subject: Will the New Tau Codex bring wanted changes, or will the Tau no longer be worth playing?
|
 |
Pyromaniac Hellhound Pilot
|
marv335 wrote:
Necron air force are in serious trouble now. Vendetta Spam is in trouble too.
Pfffff... These two are in a "serious trouble" since the CSM codex. As I can see, the only Flyer what has something to fear from the new AA Broadsides is the Heldrake, as it has no weapons to instagib the 'sides. And FMCs will have a bad time too for the same reason.
|
My armies:
14000 points |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/04/03 10:43:46
Subject: Will the New Tau Codex bring wanted changes, or will the Tau no longer be worth playing?
|
 |
Stalwart Veteran Guard Sergeant
|
My interpretation of the White Dwarf battle report is that there are going to be lots of chances to upgrade units to have skyfire. This is just how I read it though.
|
2000+ pts Dark Angels
1500pts Death Korps of Krieg
1000 pts Night Lords
You can't spell Imperium of Man without X-treme |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/04/03 16:07:40
Subject: Will the New Tau Codex bring wanted changes, or will the Tau no longer be worth playing?
|
 |
Fireknife Shas'el
|
tvih wrote:"Boohoo, every single unit doesn't have S10!" Really guys? S10 should be rare, not spammable. Vehicles are screwed enough as it is.
I would agree to that if our Heavy Support slot wasn't limited to being the only decent slot for taking out armor at range. When other armies can field triple t/l lascannon predators at a cheaper price than our single shot Hammerhead, the various Leman Russ and Land Raider variants, drop pod melta units on the cheap side, or just bringing heavy weapons in troop slots. Also the "re-purposing" to an AA unit was already discussed as being almost negligible due to the drop in S.
Or just be a dismissive jerk and think that all people are saying about the issue is crying. The day that infantry with lascannons are S7 Ap2, since S9 should be rare, I would understand the decision. Quite frankly I'm not too worried about it now that I know that Fusion blasters are up to 18" range and will probably spam melta suits in the off chance I see Land Raiders, since a single S10 shot is almost completely worthless against it.
|
I'm expecting an Imperial Knights supplement dedicated to GW's loyalist apologetics. Codex: White Knights "In the grim dark future, everything is fine."
"The argument is that we have to do this or we will, bit by bit,
lose everything that we hold dear, everything that keeps the business going. Our crops will wither, our children will die piteous
deaths and the sun will be swept from the sky."
-Tom Kirby |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/04/03 17:41:30
Subject: Will the New Tau Codex bring wanted changes, or will the Tau no longer be worth playing?
|
 |
Stubborn Hammerer
|
Yeah I agree, with both. S10 should be more rare. But also that the Hammerhead is really the only big time armour killer. Not to say there arent others. But the only S10. Maybe the Broadside will still have an option for S10? It was a pretty damn good deal last time around, and I cant say id mind too much paying some extra points for it.
Im also certain that other tactics and such will be made mkre viable, which means that im sure within a weeks time kf tge books release, there will be an ultimate tank bane list where you can get to the rear armour with ease.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/04/03 21:38:08
Subject: Re:Will the New Tau Codex bring wanted changes, or will the Tau no longer be worth playing?
|
 |
Smokin' Skorcha Driver
Canada
|
I'm thinking a bit more about the strike fighter, and i think it's going to be really good against ground targets. That turret is going to make it really easy to hit rear armor on stuff.
|
tgjensen wrote:labmouse42 wrote:Another problem is the abject masculinity of the game. Nearly every character I've read about has the emotional range of a turnip. Hate, Anger, Fear, Loyalty, and Worship. That's about it.
Christ, where do you buy your turnips? |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/04/03 21:48:10
Subject: Will the New Tau Codex bring wanted changes, or will the Tau no longer be worth playing?
|
 |
Shas'o Commanding the Hunter Kadre
Olympia, WA
|
There's a lot of changes and not all of them good but it's early to tell yet. A lot of the changes are found here:
http://40kunorthodoxy.blogspot.com/2013/04/tau-in-translation.html
The thing that I like about the new models is that they DEFINITELY fill a valuable role and seem to be good at their jobs.
Fire Warriors seem to have done nothing but benefit, Broadsides became a lot less necessary, but they are still worth taking. I dunno. As in all new codex's, you'll see a lot different builds than before. Not sure that's totally a bad thing.
|
Hold out bait to entice the enemy. Feign disorder, and then crush him.
-Sun Tzu, the Art of War
http://www.40kunorthodoxy.blogspot.com
7th Ambassadorial Grand Tournament Registration: http://40kambassadors.com/register.php |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/04/03 22:00:20
Subject: Will the New Tau Codex bring wanted changes, or will the Tau no longer be worth playing?
|
 |
Trustworthy Shas'vre
Cruising in my CRASSUS ARMORED ASSAULT TRANSPORT
|
Well, it looks like there will be much change in this edition for the Tau, judging by this wave of responses. I'm actually not discouraged by this at all. Hearing as to how much more useful infantry are in 6th edition, I'm really glad about my immense gunline of FWs. Thanks for all of this info, guys!
|
I guarantee you that I'm not really as smart as the test says:
 Test Your IQ |
|
 |
 |
|