Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

i don't know anymore if they update wh / dh i'd want to destroy them all the same...im new to battling but my goal is to beat any army under the emperors sun i'm sure they'll kick my ass at first but then ill get them, anyways if they update or renew i hope they keep them seperate i'm not a big fan if dh and grey knights

^Oh God that hurt!

Sarigar wrote:Then, a big question would be: will there still be allies allowable in the new Inquisition codex? The trend GW seems to have went to is having everything you need in a single codex, so would allies fall into this category?

I suspect GW will incorporate generic Marines and generic Guard as Troops options in the same way that they currently incorporate generic Stormies today.

ChaosxVoid wrote:i dunno anymore if they update wh/dh id want to destroy them all the same...im not to batteling but my goal is to beat any army under the emerors sun im sure they will kick my ass at first but them muahaha ill get them anyways if they do fix them i hope they keep them seperate im not a big fan if dh and grey knights

Please use proper grammar and sentence structure on Dakka.

Reading the above is extremely painful.

hm okay guess i cant be a lazy typer on dakka, didn't know it was so strict

Noobtodagame wrote:^Oh God that hurt!

LOL!

ChaosxVoid wrote:i don't know anymore if they update wh / dh i'd want to destroy them all the same...im not to battling but my goal is to beat any army under the emperors sun i'm sure they'll kick my ass at first but then ill get them, anyways if they update or renew i hope they keep them seperate i'm not a big fan if dh and grey knights

I don't know where the sentence ended and the joke began o.0

ChaosxVoid wrote:hm okay guess i cant be a lazy typer on dakka, didn't know it was so strict

Dakka require strict typing only if you compare it to WoW's /trade. Just use a few capsed letters and a few dots here and there and you will be all fine.

And welcome to the fray. Glad to have you here.

I fear the emergence of a new wing of the =I=... the Ordo Grammaticus...


Suffer not the illiterate to live...




[Edited for typo, how ironic]

The Watcher in the Dark wrote:I fear the mergence of a new wing of the =I=... the Ordo Grammaticus...


Suffer not the illiterate to live...

Matched only in skill by the Adeptus Orthodontus (Ordo Toothbrusheus)

ChaosxVoid wrote:i don't know anymore if they update wh / dh i'd want to destroy them all the same...im new to battling but my goal is to beat any army under the emperors sun i'm sure they'll kick my ass at first but then ill get them, anyways if they update or renew i hope they keep them seperate i'm not a big fan if dh and grey knights

DH and GK are currently together. WH are a separate book but can be allied in. I'm not sure what this is really stating at all. If they keep them separate and take out allies you still have GK and DH together.

My head is going to explode ...

Well if they do go with "allies" in one dex GW could always put in the info for the allowable units right in the dex.

Kervin wrote:Well if they do go with "allies" in one dex GW could always put in the info for the allowable units right in the dex.

I wouldn't be surprised if they do that. It discourages stuff like online copies of codices. And, if they do go that way, I hope they also stop allowing you to have single units of DH in other armies. I hate how people can just say "hey, I play Blood Angels, but I can just put in a random assassin for no reason, even though I don't even own his codex!" It's kind of a kick in the balls to those of us that can't see the fluff behind 1500 points of Space marines or what have you with one odd unit of grey knights or something there.

ChaosxVoid wrote:I don't know anymore.

If they update Witch-hunters and Daemon-hunters, I would want to destroy them all the same. I'm new to this whole business of waging table-top war with my mini War-hams, but my goal is to eradicate any army under the Emperor's [Imperial] sun.

At first, I'm sure they will defeat me in honorable combat, but my urges for revenge/retribution are severe.

If GWS does update or renew their respective books, I hope they keep them seperated because deep-striking jerks with storm bolters are not my cup of tea.

Savvy?

How's that?

Much improved I must admit.

A combined INQ would be cool. Hopefully sisters recieve some plastic to go with it.

Mellon wrote:

ChaosxVoid wrote:hm okay guess i cant be a lazy typer on dakka, didn't know it was so strict

Dakka require strict typing only if you compare it to WoW's /trade. Just use a few capsed letters and a few dots here and there and you will be all fine.

And welcome to the fray. Glad to have you here.

as per your. request i Have utilized a few capsed letters and added a few dots. here and there in my typing normally i Try. to use full and proper grammar but Since this. is what is needed to Be fine i figured i would. follow your advice

/troll

Kervin wrote:Well if they do go with "allies" in one dex GW could always put in the info for the allowable units right in the dex.

I can definitely see this happening. Having one unit allied from DH or WH into another army I see being wiped out of the codex(codices). It seems that having multiple books that interact with each other is something of the past. Also when updating codices it breaks the game (aka mystics with IG) and makes for insane combinations.

Also, on another note - deepstriking SB are nothing. Deepstriking crisis suits are much worse. The difference ends up being the fact that crisis suits can get assaulted to death whereas GK will be able to defend their ground for a while.

The only thing the loss of allies will bother me over is leaving the poor IG bereft of any defense against psykers (really should have had a hood type option for the Primaris).

Other then that minor gripe tossing allies is both expected and appreciated.

Jack

Jackmojo wrote:The only thing the loss of allies will bother me over is leaving the poor IG bereft of any defense against psykers (really should have had a hood type option for the Primaris).

Other then that minor gripe tossing allies is both expected and appreciated.

Jack

There's nothing wrong with an army having weaknesses.

True enough, but I like being able to do something about certain psychic mummery other then hide in my transports or take it on the chin.

Jack

P.S. IG have plenty of weaknesses so it not like I'm asking for the moon here , and to whit, I think all armies should have some form of psychic defense even Tau and Necrons

Yorick_of_Tau wrote:

Kervin wrote:Well if they do go with "allies" in one dex GW could always put in the info for the allowable units right in the dex.

I wouldn't be surprised if they do that. It discourages stuff like online copies of codices. And, if they do go that way, I hope they also stop allowing you to have single units of DH in other armies. I hate how people can just say "hey, I play Blood Angels, but I can just put in a random assassin for no reason, even though I don't even own his codex!" It's kind of a kick in the balls to those of us that can't see the fluff behind 1500 points of Space marines or what have you with one odd unit of grey knights or something there.

If any one pulls that on you don't let them you are only allowed assassins it you have an inquisitor in your army

sonofruss wrote:

Yorick_of_Tau wrote:

Kervin wrote:Well if they do go with "allies" in one dex GW could always put in the info for the allowable units right in the dex.

I wouldn't be surprised if they do that. It discourages stuff like online copies of codices. And, if they do go that way, I hope they also stop allowing you to have single units of DH in other armies. I hate how people can just say "hey, I play Blood Angels, but I can just put in a random assassin for no reason, even though I don't even own his codex!" It's kind of a kick in the balls to those of us that can't see the fluff behind 1500 points of Space marines or what have you with one odd unit of grey knights or something there.

If any one pulls that on you, don't let them, you are only allowed assassins if you have an inquisitor in your army

Fixed it.

``If anyone pulls that on you, do not let them. You are only allowed to field Assassins if you have an Inquisitor in your army.''

Could we all stop pretending to be Grammar Nazis and stay on topic? There will always be someone else who comes along and finds something wrong in your correction. Modquisition, please?

Elric of Grans wrote:Modquisition, please?

Sentence fragment.

Actually, the main thing I was "fixing", was changing the "it" to an "if". Added in the commas as an afterthought.

Interesting how a rumour thread turns into a nazi fest.

Meanwhile, all of the threads on Stormfront end up being about Blood Angels.

This thread is long enough.

Start another one if you want to discuss Blood Angels some more.

Locking thread.