Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/07/06 21:58:56
Subject: MoN or MoT for Demon Prince?
|
 |
Confident Marauder Chieftain
Fort Benning
|
So I have a Daemon Prince all glued and ready to kill But I can't decide if I want MoN or MoT, what are your thoughts? I'm sort of leaning towards MoN since it would go with the theme of my army (Khorne/Nurgle) And just in case if they release a new codex with the old books of Chaos rules I won't have Tzeentch interfering with my Plague Marines/MoN Termies haha *Edit* And of course, Khorne hates psykers as well
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/07/06 22:00:27
Hypocrisy at its finest: Calling someone a nerd when you're posting on Dakka about wargaming
Death to all!
The Chainaxe is mightier than the pen! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/07/06 22:52:30
Subject: MoN or MoT for Demon Prince?
|
 |
Legendary Dogfighter
Garden Grove, CA
|
Uhm, what does the rest of your army look like?
If you have enough high toughness stuff and/or vehicles, I think the MoT would be the better choice because the DP's sole job is to get into assault. Typically it'd be with something like TH/SS termies or the like. The high toughness of MoN won't help you there.
|
"Do not practice until you get it right, practice until you can not get it wrong." In other words, stop effing up.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/07/06 22:55:46
Subject: Re:MoN or MoT for Demon Prince?
|
 |
Road-Raging Blood Angel Biker
|
for a themed army if you really want take the nurgle mark but i would take the mot just cuz you get a better invul save rather then more toughness cuz he already gets what 5 toughtness or is it 6 idk but its higher then 4 i know that.
|
Reconstruction WIP
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/07/06 23:02:45
Subject: MoN or MoT for Demon Prince?
|
 |
Confident Marauder Chieftain
Fort Benning
|
Well I've got a lot of Chosen, Termies, and Raptors so I can get right in their face and shoot away, drawing fire away from an advancing DS
And if I have the DS trail behind my Land Raider or Rhinos, I already get the 4+ save
|
Hypocrisy at its finest: Calling someone a nerd when you're posting on Dakka about wargaming
Death to all!
The Chainaxe is mightier than the pen! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/07/06 23:08:40
Subject: MoN or MoT for Demon Prince?
|
 |
Legendary Dogfighter
Garden Grove, CA
|
But you want the DP in CC and it'll typically face something really nasty like the typical TH/SS termies. The higher toughness is not going to help him win combat against things like that.
It also allows your DP to take warptime and some other power like Wind of Chaos or doombolt to soften up the enemy you'll attack.
|
"Do not practice until you get it right, practice until you can not get it wrong." In other words, stop effing up.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/07/06 23:14:57
Subject: Re:MoN or MoT for Demon Prince?
|
 |
Dark Angels Librarian with Book of Secrets
|
MoN is a huge boon IMHO. That one extra point of toughness will save you from many extra wounds, and makes the damn DPs much harder to take down.
* Bolter shots go from wounding on a 5+ to a 6. That's half as many wounds to save against.
* Heavy bolter shots go from wounding on a 4+ to a 5+. That's 1/3 less heavy bolter wounds to save against.
* STR 4 foes in assault with you will also do half as many wounds to you.
DPs with MoN, Wings, and Warptime are things that cause me much headache.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/07/06 23:24:12
Subject: MoN or MoT for Demon Prince?
|
 |
Confident Marauder Chieftain
Fort Benning
|
Yeah labmouse that was sort of my reasoning
I was looking in the To Wound chart and the difference in T5 and T6 is pretty ridiculous
|
Hypocrisy at its finest: Calling someone a nerd when you're posting on Dakka about wargaming
Death to all!
The Chainaxe is mightier than the pen! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/07/07 00:56:45
Subject: Re:MoN or MoT for Demon Prince?
|
 |
Road-Raging Blood Angel Biker
|
Toughness 6 on a dp is real bummer to sm players knowing that vindiactors cant id them but with wings and aproperate use of cover its unless.
againest anything but sm vindicators take the mot its definatly worth it knowing that a dp at already toughness 5 but gets a 4++ save or is it a 3++ i can't remember
imho the mot is more verstile and causes other armies to whine but sm take the nurgle mark
|
Reconstruction WIP
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/07/07 01:00:08
Subject: MoN or MoT for Demon Prince?
|
 |
Confident Marauder Chieftain
Fort Benning
|
Well DP's don't suffer instant death anyway, so that's of no concern
|
Hypocrisy at its finest: Calling someone a nerd when you're posting on Dakka about wargaming
Death to all!
The Chainaxe is mightier than the pen! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/07/07 01:15:55
Subject: Re:MoN or MoT for Demon Prince?
|
 |
Road-Raging Blood Angel Biker
|
they get ew? or some odd rule that im not aware of?
|
Reconstruction WIP
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/07/07 01:19:51
Subject: MoN or MoT for Demon Prince?
|
 |
Confident Marauder Chieftain
Fort Benning
|
Yes they have Eternal Warrior
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/07/07 01:20:27
Hypocrisy at its finest: Calling someone a nerd when you're posting on Dakka about wargaming
Death to all!
The Chainaxe is mightier than the pen! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/07/07 01:32:10
Subject: Re:MoN or MoT for Demon Prince?
|
 |
Road-Raging Blood Angel Biker
|
Ah ok not aware of that when i played them
anyway mon is probably better then in that case
against libs just stay away... far far away
...and take a mon if ever feel like switching just point it and problem solved
|
Reconstruction WIP
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/07/07 01:35:49
Subject: MoN or MoT for Demon Prince?
|
 |
Warplord Titan Princeps of Tzeentch
Pat that askala, O-H-I hate this stupid state
|
Doesnt matter anyways since it is fake toughness and doesnt apply towards ID. Hence why Vindicators will take out MoN bikers like nobodys business.
I agree since it goes with your army anyways i would go with MoN on yor DP and since DPs tend to be huge fire magnets that extra point of toughness will come in handy.
|
Then it comes to be that the soothing light at the end of your tunnel, its just a freight train coming your way!
Thousand Sons 10000
 Grey knights 3000
Sisters of battle 3000
I have 29 sucessful trades where others recommend me.
Be sure to use the Reputable traders list when successfully completing a trade found here:
Dakka's Reputable Traders List |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/07/07 01:36:43
Subject: MoN or MoT for Demon Prince?
|
 |
Confident Marauder Chieftain
Fort Benning
|
Yeah I already glued a nice little Mark of Nurgle onto his wings haha. Time to test him out against my brother's SPEHS MAREENZ tomorrow
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/07/07 01:36:50
Hypocrisy at its finest: Calling someone a nerd when you're posting on Dakka about wargaming
Death to all!
The Chainaxe is mightier than the pen! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/07/07 01:37:16
Subject: MoN or MoT for Demon Prince?
|
 |
Warplord Titan Princeps of Tzeentch
Pat that askala, O-H-I hate this stupid state
|
Sorry meant MoN lord or Sorcerer bikers.
|
Then it comes to be that the soothing light at the end of your tunnel, its just a freight train coming your way!
Thousand Sons 10000
 Grey knights 3000
Sisters of battle 3000
I have 29 sucessful trades where others recommend me.
Be sure to use the Reputable traders list when successfully completing a trade found here:
Dakka's Reputable Traders List |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/07/07 02:29:38
Subject: MoN or MoT for Demon Prince?
|
 |
Arch Magos w/ 4 Meg of RAM
|
I'm a little late to the party, but I'll weigh in anyway. Most opponents will realise not to throw anti-tank weapons at Tzeentch Daemon Prince. Instead of protecting it from anti-tank weapons, Mark of Tzeentch just makes your opponent kill it in other ways. Think about how durable 4 lone Bikers are; that's about how durable a T5 Daemon Prince is. It doesn't take much anti-infantry fire to kill a Daemon Prince. T6 makes anti-tank fire a requirement, and it also adds armored target saturation. That's an awesome thing to get out of an HQ choice in a Mech army like CSM.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/07/07 19:06:16
Subject: MoN or MoT for Demon Prince?
|
 |
Bounding Assault Marine
|
MoN seems the way to go. My buddy uses a demon prince without the mark, and he is pretty easy to kill at toughness five. As a space marine player, it lets me keep my anti tank fire focused on his tank, and usually just focus a tac squad or two on his dp, and kill him. With extra toughness...don't think I could pull that off.
|
Ipso facto auto-hit. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/07/07 19:30:20
Subject: MoN or MoT for Demon Prince?
|
 |
Confident Marauder Chieftain
Fort Benning
|
Yup MoN worked wonders. In a fight with my brother today (SM) he tried to kill the advancing DP with all his anti-tank fire, while my now safe Predator zapped him from afar
|
Hypocrisy at its finest: Calling someone a nerd when you're posting on Dakka about wargaming
Death to all!
The Chainaxe is mightier than the pen! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/07/07 20:20:50
Subject: Re:MoN or MoT for Demon Prince?
|
 |
Infiltrating Broodlord
|
Your Prince should be getting cover up the board anyways, and a 4+ instead of a 5+ really isnt that big of a difference in combat, not when you consider the benefits of T6 over T5.
|
Tyranids
Chaos Space Marines
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/07/07 21:09:14
Subject: Re:MoN or MoT for Demon Prince?
|
 |
Deranged Necron Destroyer
|
T6 makes str 3 & 4 powerweapons cry
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/07/07 21:31:03
Subject: Re:MoN or MoT for Demon Prince?
|
 |
Legendary Dogfighter
Garden Grove, CA
|
Irdiumstern wrote:T6 makes str 3 & 4 powerweapons cry
It makes str 4 PW cry.
Str 3 PW was bawling days ago
|
"Do not practice until you get it right, practice until you can not get it wrong." In other words, stop effing up.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/07/08 03:29:54
Subject: MoN or MoT for Demon Prince?
|
 |
Blood-Raging Khorne Berserker
|
I'm a fan of the MoN prince myself. It's not too awful getting Princes cover saves, especially given that you should have wings on them so it's easier to hop from terrain to terrain. The MoT also seems to make my princes much more expensive.
Lately I've been running Lash Princes not so much for their tactical cheesiness (although it is a nice side effect), but because they're so much darn cheaper and the I6 has been pretty dang useful for HQ hunting. I do miss Warptime though....
|
I'm not like them, but I can pretend.
Observations on complex unit wound allocation: If you're feeling screwed, your opponent is probably doing it right. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/07/08 13:10:24
Subject: MoN or MoT for Demon Prince?
|
 |
Rotting Sorcerer of Nurgle
|
Utility-wise, the Mark of Nurgle does nothing vs. Str3 attacks.
Anyway, if you can get Cover Saves easily, MoN will generally win out.
If you have the role of the DP to get into situations where the MoT will win out, it's the wielder's call.
I generally go without either though...cheap Daemon Princes make everyone cry.
-Sanct.
|
This is a little story about four people named Everybody, Somebody, Anybody, and Nobody.
There was an important job to be done and Everybody was sure that Somebody would do it.
Anybody could have done it, but Nobody did it.
Somebody got angry about that because it was Everybody's job.
Everybody thought that Anybody could do it, but Nobody realized that Everybody wouldn't do it.
It ended up that Everybody blamed Somebody when Nobody did what Anybody could have done.
|
|
 |
 |
|