| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/16 23:56:01
Subject: Eldar Nightspinner Confirmation
|
 |
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
JohnHwangDD wrote:
Automatically Appended Next Post:
Kanluwen wrote:New models doesn't mean something need new rules, so it's still a silly assumption. When the Guard Stormtroopers are finally released, I sincerely doubt we'll see new rules for them.
Guard has Kasrkin models for their Stormtroopers, so no update was needed.
The new Stormtrooper models are likely to be model-specific to, and released as part of Codex: Inquisition / Grey Knights (not C: Sisters of Battle), with new rules. That would make sense.
Then you'd be wrong, because the Stormtrooper green we saw way back when we saw the other Guard codex greens points them towards looking like the Kasrkin, just in plastic and with shotgun options for Grenadier Veterans.
Releasing them as part of Codex "Grey Knights/Inquisition" would be a stupid move.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/17 00:06:38
Subject: Eldar Nightspinner Confirmation
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Kanluwen wrote:Releasing them as part of Codex "Grey Knights/Inquisition" would be a stupid move.
How would it be stupid? It's a base Troops unit for Inqs vs an Elites for IG.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/17 00:14:16
Subject: Eldar Nightspinner Confirmation
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Thanks, Plat - quicker on the draw than I!
C: Inquisition would include Storms for Troops, which means new plastic Storms.
Keeping the Troops metal wouldn't follow the current rule of Troops get plastic kits.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/17 00:33:14
Subject: Re:Eldar Nightspinner Confirmation
|
 |
Bonkers Buggy Driver with Rockets
|
CadianXV wrote:I'd like to take this opportunity to point out that whilst a plastic Manticore will undercut FW sales, a plastic Nightspinner will do exactly the same...
I'm guessing the GW suits may have considered this.
This may be so, but I have a feeling that the Manticores and Nightspinners havn't been selling to well down at FW.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/17 00:34:00
Subject: Eldar Nightspinner Confirmation
|
 |
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
Platuan4th wrote:Kanluwen wrote:Releasing them as part of Codex "Grey Knights/Inquisition" would be a stupid move.
How would it be stupid? It's a base Troops unit for Inqs vs an Elites for IG.
It's a basic Troops unit for Inquisition now. We don't know that they'd remain Troops in a redone GK/Inquisition codex.
For all we know, they'd be a Fast Attack slot with jetpacks firing out of their arses.
JohnHwangDD wrote:C: Inquisition would include Storms for Troops, which means new plastic Storms.
Keeping the Troops metal wouldn't follow the current rule of Troops get plastic kits.
Again: assumption. We've been told that we'll see the Chambers Militant taking a bigger role. What does that mean?
Hell if I know, but it puts Stormtroopers out of the running.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/17 00:50:02
Subject: Eldar Nightspinner Confirmation
|
 |
Yellin' Yoof on a Scooter
|
yes i can finally expand my eldar force plus da warboss has hadd da dremz of takin down da floatie pointy eared humies big flyer thingys
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/17 00:53:14
Subject: Eldar Nightspinner Confirmation
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Kanluwen wrote:JohnHwangDD wrote:C: Inquisition would include Storms for Troops, which means new plastic Storms.
Keeping the Troops metal wouldn't follow the current rule of Troops get plastic kits.
Again: assumption. We've been told that we'll see the Chambers Militant taking a bigger role. What does that mean?
Hell if I know, but it puts Stormtroopers out of the running.
If we're complaining about bad assumptions, your assumption that Storms are going to disappear entirely from the Inq / DH / GK book or else move from Troops to some other position is *far* less believable.
You're saying that a focus on Grey Knights is somehow going to result in 40+pt GKTs and/or 20+ pt GKPA/GKAA as Troops with 10+ pt Storms as Elites?
In an edition that is Troops-centric, Inq / DH / GK are going to *lose* a perfectly-viable Troops choice?
And I'm the one who's making the wild assumption for staying with the status quo?
Really?
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/17 01:19:12
Subject: Eldar Nightspinner Confirmation
|
 |
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
JohnHwangDD wrote:Kanluwen wrote:JohnHwangDD wrote:C: Inquisition would include Storms for Troops, which means new plastic Storms.
Keeping the Troops metal wouldn't follow the current rule of Troops get plastic kits.
Again: assumption. We've been told that we'll see the Chambers Militant taking a bigger role. What does that mean?
Hell if I know, but it puts Stormtroopers out of the running.
If we're complaining about bad assumptions, your assumption that Storms are going to disappear entirely from the Inq / DH / GK book or else move from Troops to some other position is *far* less believable.
You're saying that a focus on Grey Knights is somehow going to result in 40+pt GKTs and/or 20+ pt GKPA/GKAA as Troops with 10+ pt Storms as Elites?
In an edition that is Troops-centric, Inq / DH / GK are going to *lose* a perfectly-viable Troops choice?
And I'm the one who's making the wild assumption for staying with the status quo?
Really?
I point you at the Imperial Guard Veteran Squads v. Imperial Guard Infantry Platoons.
We've been told this is going to be a "combined" Inquisition codex. Which implies Deathwatch, Sisters of Battle, and Grey Knights as available choices. For all we know, Deathwatch as FA, Grey Knights as Heavy Support/Elites and Sisters as Troops.
It's possible, but it's so far we can't say.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/04/17 01:19:25
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/17 02:48:54
Subject: Eldar Nightspinner Confirmation
|
 |
Malicious Mandrake
|
Kanluwen wrote:JohnHwangDD wrote:Kanluwen wrote:JohnHwangDD wrote:C: Inquisition would include Storms for Troops, which means new plastic Storms.
Keeping the Troops metal wouldn't follow the current rule of Troops get plastic kits.
Again: assumption. We've been told that we'll see the Chambers Militant taking a bigger role. What does that mean?
Hell if I know, but it puts Stormtroopers out of the running.
If we're complaining about bad assumptions, your assumption that Storms are going to disappear entirely from the Inq / DH / GK book or else move from Troops to some other position is *far* less believable.
You're saying that a focus on Grey Knights is somehow going to result in 40+pt GKTs and/or 20+ pt GKPA/GKAA as Troops with 10+ pt Storms as Elites?
In an edition that is Troops-centric, Inq / DH / GK are going to *lose* a perfectly-viable Troops choice?
And I'm the one who's making the wild assumption for staying with the status quo?
Really?
I point you at the Imperial Guard Veteran Squads v. Imperial Guard Infantry Platoons.
We've been told this is going to be a "combined" Inquisition codex. Which implies Deathwatch, Sisters of Battle, and Grey Knights as available choices. For all we know, Deathwatch as FA, Grey Knights as Heavy Support/Elites and Sisters as Troops.
It's possible, but it's so far we can't say.
But then you couldn't ake an all grey knights/Sob army, which they wouldn't do. Stop being the old man going "And another thing..."
|
Nids - 1500 Points - 1000 Points In progress
TheLinguist wrote:bella lin wrote:hello friends,
I'm a new comer here.I'm bella. nice to meet you and join you.
But are you a heretic? |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/17 02:54:49
Subject: Eldar Nightspinner Confirmation
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
So given that there's going to be a Nightspinner, presumably as part of an all-plastic Fire Prism kit, do you think we'll see a Firestorm sprue to round it off? The Demolisher got three variants, and some anti-aircraft (although Fire Prisms are AA in Epic) to go with anti-tank and anti-infantry would be peachy-keen.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/17 03:09:24
Subject: Eldar Nightspinner Confirmation
|
 |
[DCM]
.
|
Have we been told that we're getting a 'combined' IQ codex?
I though we were told we're getting Codex: Grey Knights and Codex: Sister of Battle?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/17 03:11:52
Subject: Eldar Nightspinner Confirmation
|
 |
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
Alpharius wrote:Have we been told that we're getting a 'combined' IQ codex?
I though we were told we're getting Codex: Grey Knights and Codex: Sister of Battle?
The louder elements of the rumor community point towards a combined Inquisition codex, with options to make 'pure' Chamber Militant armies via characters.
But nobody is saying much either way.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/17 03:35:03
Subject: Eldar Nightspinner Confirmation
|
 |
Tunneling Trygon
|
I gotta say that picture earlier makes it look quite cartoony.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/17 04:45:34
Subject: Eldar Nightspinner Confirmation
|
 |
Owns Whole Set of Skullz Techpriests
Versteckt in den Schatten deines Geistes.
|
JohnHwangDD wrote:The only point of FW continuing to exist at all is to have the early adopters pay for the basic model design via sales of limited edition resin variants.
Not really.
FW does their own thing and does things that GW will never do. FW has been a huge success. Why would they treat it only as a 'test bed' for products they want to do in plastic. Automatically Appended Next Post: Tim the Biovore wrote:I gotta say that picture earlier makes it look quite cartoony.
That's just the paint job. Friend of mine has a Nightspinner. They look really cool in person.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/04/17 04:48:27
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/17 06:31:15
Subject: Eldar Nightspinner Confirmation
|
 |
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
Alaitoc's color scheme has always been cartoony on vehicles. The blue and yellow makes it look like a movie tie-in toy, if it's not done properly or broken up with patches of white or handpainted runes.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/17 10:52:36
Subject: Re:Eldar Nightspinner Confirmation
|
 |
Lone Wolf Sentinel Pilot
|
Boss 'eadbreaka wrote: This may be so, but I have a feeling that the Manticores and Nightspinners havn't been selling to well down at FW. Based on what information? If the models haven't been selling, it would make more financial sense to simply discontinue them, rather than risk the expense of turning them into plastic, surely?
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/04/17 10:56:48
DR:90S+G+M++B++I+Pw40k00#-D+A++/mWD292R+T(M)DM+
FW Epic Bunker: £97,871.35. Overpriced at all?
Black Legion 8th Grand Company
Cadian XV Airborne "Flying Fifteens"
Order of the Ebon Chalice
Relictors 3rd Company |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/17 12:21:12
Subject: Eldar Nightspinner Confirmation
|
 |
Owns Whole Set of Skullz Techpriests
Versteckt in den Schatten deines Geistes.
|
Or the moulds are about to die and rather than put money into renewing them, they can port them over to plastic 40K kits. In the case of the Manticore, it's in the Codex, so it makes sense, and then in the case of the Nightspinner, they can write a 'tank expansion' and include the rules with that (which is exactly what they're doing - using the rules to drive model sales, as always).
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/17 17:47:30
Subject: Eldar Nightspinner Confirmation
|
 |
Servoarm Flailing Magos
|
Kanluwen wrote:We've been told this is going to be a "combined" Inquisition codex. Which implies Deathwatch, Sisters of Battle, and Grey Knights as available choices. For all we know, Deathwatch as FA, Grey Knights as Heavy Support/Elites and Sisters as Troops.
Actually, I think we've been told that it isn't going to be a combined Codex.
But plans can change, sure.
|
Working on someting you'll either love or hate. Hopefully to be revealed by November.
Play the games that make you happy. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/17 17:59:44
Subject: Eldar Nightspinner Confirmation
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
According to the 5th edition rulebook it'll be a single army book.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/17 19:28:33
Subject: Re:Eldar Nightspinner Confirmation
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
According to the thread title , this thread is about Eldar Night Spinners, not an Inquisition Codex. There are half a dozen other threads on that topic.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/17 19:33:18
Subject: Re:Eldar Nightspinner Confirmation
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Kroothawk wrote:According to the thread title , this thread is about Eldar Night Spinners, not an Inquisition Codex. There are half a dozen other threads on that topic.
Nobody expects the Inquistion! (sorry, but you did tee it up)
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/18 06:14:22
Subject: Eldar Nightspinner Confirmation
|
 |
Imperial Recruit in Training
Calgary, Alberta Canada
|
Well here what i figured out from watching GW/FW marketing moves and heres how it is
Games workshop and Forgeworld are redeveloping there market stratagy and sharehold. GW seems to be making the models found in the codex's while Forgeworld seems to be more concentrating on units found in there Imperial armor books. Every new codex released so far has a ton of new models available for use in your core game. As expected GW releases a few new models when they release the codex. They also hold back model releases for certain events to keep people who play/collect the models to keep coming back to the store. This has a 2 fold effect, first this enables longevity of an army to more than the first month of its release for sales as well as it keeps sales at a constant level by having consumers make repeat visits to the store every couple of months vs a intial rush then the army does poorly after the intial release.
Manticore/Deathstrike Lets be honest its gonna be based of the chimera chasis. This is the standard platform for all support vechiles in the Imperial Guard. Although something different for looks would be nice, it doesn't fit properly with architecture of the imperial gaurd.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/04/18 06:16:58
first rank fire second rank fire! |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/19 20:28:02
Subject: Re:Eldar Nightspinner Confirmation
|
 |
[MOD]
Decrepit Dakkanaut
Cozy cockpit of an Archer ARC-5S
|
All models will go on pre-order the 10th of May.
|
Fatum Iustum Stultorum
Fiat justitia ruat caelum
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/19 20:42:44
Subject: Re:Eldar Nightspinner Confirmation
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
BrookM wrote:All models will go on pre-order the 10th of May.
That will be awesome if true. Cannot wait!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/19 20:49:57
Subject: Re:Eldar Nightspinner Confirmation
|
 |
[MOD]
Decrepit Dakkanaut
Cozy cockpit of an Archer ARC-5S
|
GW Amsterdam put that in their newsletter today.
|
Fatum Iustum Stultorum
Fiat justitia ruat caelum
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/19 21:12:31
Subject: Eldar Nightspinner Confirmation
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
They didn't give a fully disclosed list of what would be preorder-able, though, did they?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/19 21:25:19
Subject: Eldar Nightspinner Confirmation
|
 |
Owns Whole Set of Skullz Techpriests
Versteckt in den Schatten deines Geistes.
|
I've heard from another source that the releases definitely are a new Russ, the Manticore/Deathstrike, Fire Prism/Night Spinner, and Eldar Support Weapon Platform. No Buggies, nothing else. And no idea if the Russ is a proper new Russ (ala the new Demolisher kit) or a half-assed repackage w/price increase (ala the 'new' Basilisk).
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/04/19 21:26:18
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/19 21:32:16
Subject: Eldar Nightspinner Confirmation
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
If that's it, I'm kind of sad. But the LRBT at least better have all the remaining variants.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/19 21:38:47
Subject: Eldar Nightspinner Confirmation
|
 |
[MOD]
Decrepit Dakkanaut
Cozy cockpit of an Archer ARC-5S
|
Scottywan82 wrote:They didn't give a fully disclosed list of what would be preorder-able, though, did they?
Nope, otherwise I would've shared it. They probably already know, but like good peons they adhere to the rules.
|
Fatum Iustum Stultorum
Fiat justitia ruat caelum
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/04/20 14:31:47
Subject: Eldar Nightspinner Confirmation
|
 |
[DCM]
.
|
H.B.M.C. wrote:
And no idea if the Russ is a proper new Russ (ala the new Demolisher kit) or a half-assed repackage w/price increase (ala the 'new' Basilisk).
They wouldn't dare pull that Basilisk stunt again, would they???
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|