Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

IG_Urban wrote:and for the OP, there are a few different man hungs you can attempt.

Dude...


...what a thread to make that typo in.

Albatross wrote:I'm a modern gentleman.

Using this in my profile.

The category of "bi" makes no sense to me. If you are a male who finds masculine secondary sexual characteristics to be attractive then you are clearly gay. But if you are a male who finds feminine secondary sexual characteristics to be attractive and aren't too bothered by penises then I'd say your just straight and a bit adventurous.

I'll just remind you all of . . .

@Manchu - Well, I must be! I'm listening to Duffy and reading a thread about men hugging each other, for crying out loud!

You don't get much more 'modern' than that!

malfred wrote:First you punch him in the gut.

Then when he leans over to catch his breath, you extend your arms outward and
crush him with a bear squeeze.

Quite wrong.

Punch to the gut.

Knee the face, make sure to throw their head with your hands into your knee.

As they're falling, roundhouse punch to the jaw.

Well, that's how I hugged the guy who cheated on me with my ex.

Karon wrote:

malfred wrote:First you punch him in the gut.

Then when he leans over to catch his breath, you extend your arms outward and
crush him with a bear squeeze.

Quite wrong.

Punch to the gut.

Knee the face, make sure to throw their head with your hands into your knee.

As they're falling, roundhouse punch to the jaw.

Well, that's how I hugged the guy who cheated on me with my ex.

Um... Hate to call a technicality here, but shouldn't both of them gotten that? I mean... It takes two, or else he was just spanking it

I jest, of course. Though I would've gone for the hammer-ankle to the back of the skull myself.

Karon wrote:

malfred wrote:First you punch him in the gut.

Then when he leans over to catch his breath, you extend your arms outward and
crush him with a bear squeeze.

Quite wrong.

Punch to the gut.

Knee the face, make sure to throw their head with your hands into your knee.

As they're falling, roundhouse punch to the jaw.

Well, that's how I hugged the guy who cheated on me with my ex.

Make sure it doesnt go wrong and end up looking like 1:32

metallifan wrote:Um... Hate to call a technicality here, but shouldn't both of them gotten that? I mean... It takes two

There was a post edit here: from "that's how I hugged my ex" to "that's how I hugged the guy who cheated on me with my ex." Personally, I would suggest "that's how I hugged the guy with whom my ex was cheating."

But the story is so much more interesting this way!

It does have an implicit twist, discernible by the more careful readers.

Manchu wrote:
The category of "bi" makes no sense to me. If you are a male who finds masculine secondary sexual characteristics to be attractive then you are clearly gay. But if you are a male who finds feminine secondary sexual characteristics to be attractive and aren't too bothered by penises then I'd say your just straight and a bit adventurous.

I honestly don't think anyone is either/or. I think some people will go through life not running into someone of the opposite/same sex that they're attracted to, but I don't tihnk ti's impossible. I just say "bi" because all you stupid people need a label Some of the gayest guys I know have had girlfriends and I've known plenty of straight people who've tested the waters as well. I think it's stupid to have to name it to begin with. Hope that clears something up

On a side note, I enjoy the thought of both female parts and male parts. It's people I'm more attracted to than anything, though if we're talking purely bodies I enjoy a sexy lady more than a guy. A lot of that has to do with how they try and make guys look sexy and it has the opposite effect for me.

To clear up what I meant, seems to me that healthy, moral IRL attraction consists in persons being attracted to persons--that is, the whole human being--rather than one set of genitals or another. Yeah, I reckon we're on the same page.

Manchu wrote:To clear up what I meant, seems to me that healthy, moral IRL attraction consists in persons being attracted to persons--that is, the whole human being--rather than one set of genitals or another. Yeah, I reckon we're on the same page.

...and so the Modern Gentleman's Club gains a new member. Congratulations, have a pair of nice brogues. Call it a welcome gift.



EDIT:Edited for nicer brogues.

Fancy!

Oh, it's all fancy from now on Manchu - don't you worry about that, my old chum...

so . . .




?

I can live with that.

Manchu wrote:I'll just remind you all of . . .

...

Do I smell a trap?

@Manchu

No, I was thinking more along the lines of....





...you dig?

I'm down with the post above.


Automatically Appended Next Post:

Erasoketa wrote:Do I smell a trap?

You do indeed. Now is the scent any less sweet?

Albatross wrote:

Manchu wrote:To clear up what I meant, seems to me that healthy, moral IRL attraction consists in persons being attracted to persons--that is, the whole human being--rather than one set of genitals or another. Yeah, I reckon we're on the same page.

...and so the Modern Gentleman's Club gains a new member. Congratulations, have a pair of nice brogues. Call it a welcome gift.



EDIT:Edited for nicer brogues.

I fear that those shoes are just a bit too fancy for me.

Manchu wrote:

Erasoketa wrote:Do I smell a trap?

You do indeed. Now is the scent any less sweet?

It wasn't that sweet. You know, I was smelling it anyway

How did it come to this?

Not to be harsh... but this thread was bound for doom the instant you hit submit...

metallifan wrote:
I jest, of course. Though I would've gone for the hammer-ankle to the back of the skull myself.

I prefer a savate-style ankle sweep, myself. A shove in the midsection followed my a sweep to the back of the leg and, if the two of you are very dear friends, a direct to the face while he's going down.

Savate: One of the more manly things the French have invented.

Albatross wrote:

IG_Urban wrote:and for the OP, there are a few different man hungs you can attempt.

Dude...


...what a thread to make that typo in.

agreed, but I am keeping my post as is for hilarity.




Automatically Appended Next Post:
and give me those shoes in white and black, and I'm down.

Owain wrote:Savate: One of the more manly things the French have invented.

Only slightly less manly than straight kick-boxing.

slightly back on topic, i'm not a fan of hugging anyone but my husband and my son much. i always feel kind of awkward even hugging my long time friends.

Dr. Ew wrote:

Owain wrote:Savate: One of the more manly things the French have invented.

Only slightly less manly than straight kick-boxing.

I know we have some French people here.... would any of them care to back me up?

It doesn't feel wierd for me,but I don't know how to "initiate an assault",which means to hug someone before they do it
In my old school,I was always hugged before I initiated,cuz maybe Im just a slow reacter to this kind of communication

Under the shirt, over the bra.

Full tongue.

Go.

Tony the guardsman wrote:It doesn't feel wierd for me,but I don't know how to "initiate an assault",which means to hug someone before they do it
In my old school,I was always hugged before I initiated,cuz maybe Im just a slow reacter to this kind of communication

Ha-sah! You no speekah good Engleesh! You use moah-bettah desceeption!