| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/27 14:31:38
Subject: Re:Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
DIDM wrote:didn't see this but I admit I did look fast
]
Based on that newest pic, we're a little less than halfway through the image. That would put as a probably November or December for the complete picture. Man that picture has built up slower than I expected. So at this stage, it's safe enough to assume that it was merely an image for the 25th anniversary. However, in the unlikely event that it is a teaser at all, it could be for a release to come in January (as the picture would be fully realized in December).
|
40k Project Log
tgtrammel.blogspot.com
Original Fantasy Setting Story Series Blog
kadenalshaddar.blogspot.com |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/27 14:44:26
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Why would the put a DA on the side of WD for the 25th anniversary though? Personaly I think it is because DA are going to be the focus of 6th ed. I would guess it will be the image that is used on the front of 6th ed. We will also get a codex at some point soon.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/27 15:32:42
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Ultramarine Master with Gauntlets of Macragge
|
Electro wrote:Why would the put a DA on the side of WD for the 25th anniversary though? Personaly I think it is because DA are going to be the focus of 6th ed. I would guess it will be the image that is used on the front of 6th ed. We will also get a codex at some point soon.
I don't think they'll put a fairly static looking Space Marine on the cover of 6th ed. It'll probably be the typical hammer, skull, and futurey bits they've put on the front since 4th.
|
Check out my Youtube channel!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/27 15:34:43
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Veteran Inquisitor with Xenos Alliances
|
If rumors that dark angels are the first codex in the new year then having the picture complete in December would be the same as the December issue advertising the release of dark angels in January
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/27 15:38:43
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
I dunno Mythos, that just seems a bit...subtle for GW.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/27 15:49:43
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Kanluwen wrote:I dunno Mythos, that just seems a bit...subtle for GW.
True.
GW don't do subtle advertising. Rather they get White Dwarf and go "OMFG! NEW CODEX!!!" whilst they tell the store managers to tell the customers that "This army is super powerful" and plaster it all over the website and such.
GW releasing a product with subtle advertising is like hoping that a brick will float in the pacific ocean. It'll end in disappointment and failure.
|
BlapBlapBlap: bringing idiocy and mischief where it should never set foot since 2011.
BlapBlapBlap wrote:What sort of idiot quotes themselves in their sigs? Who could possibly be that arrogant? |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/27 17:28:11
Subject: Re:Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Wrathful Warlord Titan Commander
|
At this stage of the WD pics, it is a Dark Angel without doubt, and I may throw in a name :
Azrael
|
Target locked,ready to fire
In dedicatio imperatum ultra articulo mortis.
H.B.M.C :
We were wrong. It's not the 40k End Times. It's the Trademarkening.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/27 17:28:34
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
Unless they're going to redo Azrael's model, I doubt it.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/27 17:33:45
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Veteran Inquisitor with Xenos Alliances
|
In GW's mind isn't the first month after the Christmas holiday a prized release month as kids spend money they received as gifts? That to me seems like exactly when they'd want a marine release, especially if in the months preceding the holiday are releases supporting the Hobbit.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/27 17:54:11
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Wrathful Warlord Titan Commander
|
Kanluwen wrote:Unless they're going to redo Azrael's model, I doubt it.
- non-standard backpack, design closer to the pic than anyone elses I remember. Both seem to have skulls as vents..
- Special weapon, maybe not exactly like the pic yet, but close enough.
- robes, has his helmet carried for him. So a robed marine without a helmet could be the one I am guessing he is.
- Shoulderpad sporting something I think is an Angel ( ? above a heap of skulls ? ), a typical DA image and one model which already has this, is the Grandmaster of the DA. Whats wrong in the assumtion an Angel is most likely a hint on a rank that is above squad leader?
Sure it isn't a perfect copy of the actual model and it may turn out as a different Character or generic Dark Angel marine.
For now I am going to stick with it, guessed identity of the marine = Azrael.
|
Target locked,ready to fire
In dedicatio imperatum ultra articulo mortis.
H.B.M.C :
We were wrong. It's not the 40k End Times. It's the Trademarkening.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/27 17:57:38
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
1hadhq wrote:Kanluwen wrote:Unless they're going to redo Azrael's model, I doubt it.
- non-standard backpack, design closer to the pic than anyone elses I remember. Both seem to have skulls as vents..
- Special weapon, maybe not exactly like the pic yet, but close enough.
- robes, has his helmet carried for him. So a robed marine without a helmet could be the one I am guessing he is.
- Shoulderpad sporting something I think is an Angel ( ? above a heap of skulls ? ), a typical DA image and one model which already has this, is the Grandmaster of the DA. Whats wrong in the assumtion an Angel is most likely a hint on a rank that is above squad leader?
Hey now. Who do you think argued that it's clearly a DA when we had that first spoiler image of the WD spines, and used Azrael to showcase that?
Sure it isn't a perfect copy of the actual model and it may turn out as a different Character or generic Dark Angel marine.
For now I am going to stick with it, guessed identity of the marine = Azrael.
I would say a different character is going to be the best option. Not because it's a case of "YOU'RE WRONG!" or anything, but Azrael is a character who has traditionally had that combi-plasma, and based upon the trends lately we haven't seen characters being redone in Finecast.
I would, for the record, absolutely love a new Azrael model.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/27 18:00:22
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Phanobi
|
Yeah, he's kinda tiny compared to his plastic battle-brothers.
|
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings. Look on My works, Ye Mighty, and despair.
Chris Gohlinghorst wrote:Holy Space Marine on a Stick.
This conversation has even begun to boggle my internet-hardened mind.
A More Wretched Hive of Scum and Villainy |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/27 18:00:39
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
Heresy, he's just tactically sized!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/27 18:06:41
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Phanobi
|
Not with his back-banner. "Ugh.. right in the heraldry!"
|
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings. Look on My works, Ye Mighty, and despair.
Chris Gohlinghorst wrote:Holy Space Marine on a Stick.
This conversation has even begun to boggle my internet-hardened mind.
A More Wretched Hive of Scum and Villainy |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/27 18:49:04
Subject: Re:Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Wrathful Warlord Titan Commander
|
Aren't the Dark Angel models up for a change, as back banners were dropped on squad leaders and the few characters who still got them are an exception? So yes, a few models may have them, but generally its not unthinkable to consider the banners available for GK per squad a possible trend that should suit the DA well. The first Legion, the ones who got some special banners to field.....
I am all for the back banner as a possible add-on for walkers. They are already a big target.
But infantry sized models should either have a real banner or none. Plus those back banners tend to fall off, snap etc.
|
Target locked,ready to fire
In dedicatio imperatum ultra articulo mortis.
H.B.M.C :
We were wrong. It's not the 40k End Times. It's the Trademarkening.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/27 18:56:30
Subject: Re:Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Ultramarine Master with Gauntlets of Macragge
|
1hadhq wrote:Aren't the Dark Angel models up for a change, as back banners were dropped on squad leaders and the few characters who still got them are an exception? So yes, a few models may have them, but generally its not unthinkable to consider the banners available for GK per squad a possible trend that should suit the DA well. The first Legion, the ones who got some special banners to field.....
I am all for the back banner as a possible add-on for walkers. They are already a big target.
But infantry sized models should either have a real banner or none. Plus those back banners tend to fall off, snap etc.
Back banners are still in every PA kit for Marines. They're not as prevalent in the art as they used to be, but they're still in every plastic kit and on most special characters.
|
Check out my Youtube channel!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/27 22:48:21
Subject: Re:Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Wrathful Warlord Titan Commander
|
Brother SRM wrote:1hadhq wrote:Aren't the Dark Angel models up for a change, as back banners were dropped on squad leaders and the few characters who still got them are an exception? So yes, a few models may have them, but generally its not unthinkable to consider the banners available for GK per squad a possible trend that should suit the DA well. The first Legion, the ones who got some special banners to field.....
I am all for the back banner as a possible add-on for walkers. They are already a big target.
But infantry sized models should either have a real banner or none. Plus those back banners tend to fall off, snap etc.
Back banners are still in every PA kit for Marines. They're not as prevalent in the art as they used to be, but they're still in every plastic kit and on most special characters.
......every?
- assault squad?
- devastators?
- bikes ?
- command squad?
- BT upgrade ?
- IH upgrade / squad ?
- WS upgrade?
- death company ?
- Sanguary guard?
- space wolf / PA ?
- GK / PA ?
These plastic kits either miss the back banners you seem to get and I and others don't, or they didn't have them from start.
- sternguard?
- vanguard?
- robed DA ?
- deathwatch hybrid kit?
- LotD except the SGT models?
- Masters of the chapter ?
- classic SM except SGT ?
- SM veterans?
These metal/ finecast or hybrid kits have no backbanner too.
- chronus?
- telion?
- shrike?
- he'stan?
- cortez?
- cassius?
- kor sarro?
- EC?
- corbulo?
- dante?
- sanguinor?
- astorath?
- lemartes?
- xavier?
- tycho?
- lucas?
- ulrik?
- ragnar?
- canis?
- helbrecht?
- grimaldus?
- seth?
- mephiston?
- sammael?
- every specialist and "officer" that hasn't got the old backpack plus banner pole
- every apothecary and techpriest
Most characters? You sure? Again, GW Phasing out the old backpack may reduce the amount of back-banners....
I am aware there are still some kits whith the back-banner, but they are less common now. The list above is just from memory, so please consider these "?" as a " i think they don't have this backbanner IIRC " .
BTW, the point was to get rid of the backbanners and use more of the big standarts, especially with DA.
|
Target locked,ready to fire
In dedicatio imperatum ultra articulo mortis.
H.B.M.C :
We were wrong. It's not the 40k End Times. It's the Trademarkening.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/28 02:52:45
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Stubborn Dark Angels Veteran Sergeant
Ontario
|
I like back banners, the only issue is how absolutely flimsy they are, but personally I think they look wicked.
|
DCDA:90-S++G+++MB++I+Pw40k98-D+++A+++/areWD007R++T(S)DM+ |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/28 04:16:17
Subject: Re:Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Stalwart Dark Angels Space Marine
|
I have actually magnetized the base of the banners with small 1/32 magnets and have a corresponding magnet in the top of the back pack. Makes for very hassle free storage and if I don't want them i just leave them off.
|
"And they shall know no fear"
Dark Angels- 6465pt.
Imperial Guard-3537pt.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/28 07:55:35
Subject: Re:Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Cultist of Nurgle with Open Sores
|
I hope they will make a new basic marines sprew with more robes and gothic bitz !
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/30 10:53:12
Subject: Re:Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Could be just a mix of wishlisting and common rumours by an unknown person, but here it is:
MarikLaw over at Warseer wrote:I don't post rumours very often as I can't trust half the stuff I hear, but I believe this was worth noting after I saw some of the recent BoLS rumours.
Please take these rumours with a grain of salt, never met the guy who told me this stuff before in my life but he seemed to be pretty confident about what he saw (or heard). I work in a gaming store so I tend to hear rumours all over the place, bought a 50/50 chance that any of them are ever true.
- Dark Angels will NOT be released prior to 6th Edition. Expect them after Chaos Legions, sometime this Fall (apparently Chaos Legions is being released shortly after or in tandem with 6th Edition). I believe the credibility of this (at least as far as the Dark Angels go) is pretty good, especially if we speculate on when the White Dwarf spine image of the Dark Angel is going to finish.
- Company Masters in Terminator armour will apparently be able to take a single Deathwing Terminator squad as Troops and a Company Master riding a bike will be able to take a single Ravenwing Attack squadron as Troops. Belial will let you take any number of Deathwing Terminator squads as Troops and Sammael will allow you to take any number of Ravenwing Attack squadrons as Troops. I'd rather see both units as Troops choices right off the bat, but if the recent Chaos Legions rumours are true than this seems all too likely to happen as well.
- Dark Angels will have Mortis Dreadnoughts as Heavy Support choices. Sounds like wishlisting to me, but would be nice if it was true.
- Person seemed to confirm some of the other rumours that have been floating around about Chaplains, nothing new or interesting to report from that though.
- Cypher will NOT be in the Dark Angels book, but will instead appear in the Chaos Legions book.
- Some sort of new Predator that has a plasma weapon as its main armament. Sounds like wishlisting again, but could still be cool if true.
- He also seemed to confirm that the Dark Angels would have an affinity for plasma weapons and that they would be slightly better than in other Marine books, but wouldn't say how. Sounds like rumour rehashing, but if not it could confirm some of the other rumours that have been floating around.
Again, please take with a helping of salt.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/30 10:57:04
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Smokin' Skorcha Driver
|
- Cypher will NOT be in the Dark Angels book, but will instead appear in the Chaos Legions book.
Didn't BoK have something about how CSM have no new special characters? Guess that guy was cowdung.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/30 11:05:46
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Rough Rider with Boomstick
|
terranarc wrote:- Cypher will NOT be in the Dark Angels book, but will instead appear in the Chaos Legions book.
Didn't BoK have something about how CSM have no new special characters? Guess that guy was cowdung.
Is Cypher a new SC?
|
With the galaxy as large as it is the odds of the average guardsmen seeing and fighting a marine or MEQ are relatively slim. Unfortunately the guardsmen in your (and anyone else who plays IG's) army are the REALLY, REALLY LUCKY ones that fight marines ALL the time... |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/28 07:06:13
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Krazed Killa Kan
|
nooooo... Cypher is an OOOOLLLLD SC...
http://wh40k.lexicanum.com/wiki/Cypher
Too much to type in...
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/04/30 11:07:33
2+2=5 for sufficiently large values of 2.
Order of St Ursula (Sisters of Battle): W-2, L-1, T-1
Get of Freki (Space Wolves): W-3, L-1, T-1
Hive Fleet Portentosa (Nids/Stealers): W-6, L-4, T-0
Omega Marines (vanilla Space Marine): W-1, L-6, T-2
Waagh Magshak (Orks): W-4, L-0, T-1
A.V.P.D.W.: W-0, L-2, T-0
www.40korigins.com
bringing 40k Events to Origins Game Fair in Columbus, Oh. Ask me for more info! |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/30 11:07:45
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Smokin' Skorcha Driver
|
Did you want to field a squad of Cyphers? Now that makes no sense.
A squad of plasma pistols though, I guess would be cool.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/30 11:17:31
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Veteran Inquisitor with Xenos Alliances
|
If that plasma turreted Predator is true, it doesn't matter if FW's is the same vehicle, but people will sure be using the model.
If the whole rumor of how Company Master in terminator armor and Belial making Deathwing troops is true... this to me heavily implies that Belial isn't going to be able to choose his weapons anymore. I guess we'll see a proper miniature of him, with a fixed weapon combo.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/30 12:15:22
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Stalwart Skittari
|
John D Law wrote:The dark Angels have always been my favorite chapter by far, the brooding, secretive mythos and their story line as always been very appealing. Like them so much when i was younger actually got old Deathwing symbol fromtheir oldest codex incarnation tattooed on my shoulder! ( The things we do when were young and foolish!!!)  As long as they flesh out there forcelist better than the last horrific version (never seen a army with so few unit options) I will be estatic.
SNAP  - mee too - i did mine about 2 1/2 yrs ago - on my right shoulder (original Dwing not Tactical!) - get a photo on here - someone should start a 40k tat post or something...... for true gamers.....
|
Live Hard
Fight Hard
Game Hard
Die Hard
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/30 12:55:02
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Smokin' Skorcha Driver
|
aka_mythos wrote:If that plasma turreted Predator is true, it doesn't matter if FW's is the same vehicle, but people will sure be using the model.
If the whole rumor of how Company Master in terminator armor and Belial making Deathwing troops is true... this to me heavily implies that Belial isn't going to be able to choose his weapons anymore. I guess we'll see a proper miniature of him, with a fixed weapon combo.
Not like he has much of a choice right now. I would much rather see him with a relic blade and iron halo than his 2 generic options. Something impressive, worthy of the master of deathwing instead of just mastercrafted weapons for everyone. Perhaps an assault cannon, mc relic blade, terminator armor and iron halo?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/30 13:17:03
Subject: Re:Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
My educated guess as to what will happen to Belial and Deathwing? Belial will get his iron halo finally along with a true heavenfall blade (relic blade) as well as gaining the typical space marine captain profile i.e. WS 6. He will likely also gain some new special rule(s) and will jump up a great deal in price as he's dirt cheap right now (easily the most cost efficient Terminator to troop swap in the game). Deathwing terminators will go to +5 points for a thunderhammer and storm shield and 30 points for a cyclone and we'll likely see the current pseudo-command squad replaced by a more traditional (read non-scoring) Deathwing command squad. All in all, I don't really see a new codex improving Deathwing terminator squads from where they stand right now as the most cost efficient troops terminators in the game
|
40k Project Log
tgtrammel.blogspot.com
Original Fantasy Setting Story Series Blog
kadenalshaddar.blogspot.com |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/30 13:51:06
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Veteran Inquisitor with Xenos Alliances
|
I have no doubt that GW will retain the generic weapon options for the Company Master in terminator armor just so players can continue using their creations... As far as what Belial has I think GW may go for something more dramatic than a relic blade. The rumor is Ravenwing are getting more... and the simple fact is there aren't as many way for Deathwing to keep up but obviously GW wants to sell to Deathwing players something... so I tend to believe GW will in usual fashion make Belial a "must have".
Hmmm... Dark Angels present the opportunity for GW to release plastic kits for generic Space Marine Terminator Commander as well as Chaplains... something thats been speculatively rumored.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|