| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/24 17:45:41
Subject: Re:Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
RE: Ravenwing bikers.... Would it be overpowered if you allowed them to deploy from the opponent's table edge as reserves? That could reflect both their flanking ability and the DA's improved strategic knowledge. Give them that ability and teleport homers and I don't think anyone would complain about them lacking a Jink rule, although a 6+ invulnerable save wouldn't be awful as a Jink rule.
RE: Deathwing vs. other terminator crews... IIRC, the Deathwing started when a group of DA Terminators returned to their homeworld to find it infested with Genestealers. Knowing that the consequence of reporting the infestation would have been the death by virus bomb of their homeworld and tribe, they took it upon themselves to try to purge the infestation. As their homeworld culture was based on Native Americans, they painted their armor with warpaint, which gave it the characteristic white color. They steeled themselves to what was certainly a suicide mission, not expecting to return. Because they expected to die, they entered the Genestealer warrens unafraid -- and that is the root of the Deathwing's Fearless fluff.
So while I wouldn't necessarily classify them as "better" warriors than other Terminator marines, it would be worthwhile to represent their implacable fearlessness as a special rule. I don't think that needs to be a bonus to their stats. Perhaps a special rule bonus if they are outnumbered?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/24 18:40:31
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain
|
as much as i dislike the current fearless rules, DW need to keep em :(
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/24 18:57:00
Subject: Re:Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Ultramarine Master with Gauntlets of Macragge
|
milo wrote:RE: Ravenwing bikers.... Would it be overpowered if you allowed them to deploy from the opponent's table edge as reserves? That could reflect both their flanking ability and the DA's improved strategic knowledge. Give them that ability and teleport homers and I don't think anyone would complain about them lacking a Jink rule, although a 6+ invulnerable save wouldn't be awful as a Jink rule.
I think first off Ravenwing need Skilled Rider. A jink save would be nice though; 6++ isn't reliable enough to depend on but it's nice. I think a bunch of bikers coming in behind enemy lines is pretty bad though. Wolf Scouts and Kommandos (with Snikrot) can do this, but they can't move 12" a turn. Maybe you could have one squad do this, but I don't recall DA being particularly well known above other Marine armies for their tactics.
|
Check out my Youtube channel!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/24 18:57:59
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Fireknife Shas'el
|
to Clarify this si about news and rumours.
But it look like if we don't see a codex release in June (which would be foolish of GW) What will we see (Fantasy Wave?).
We'll see but the lack of DA characters in the Wave is a promising sign.
Automatically Appended Next Post: Brother SRM wrote:milo wrote:RE: Ravenwing bikers.... Would it be overpowered if you allowed them to deploy from the opponent's table edge as reserves? That could reflect both their flanking ability and the DA's improved strategic knowledge. Give them that ability and teleport homers and I don't think anyone would complain about them lacking a Jink rule, although a 6+ invulnerable save wouldn't be awful as a Jink rule.
I think first off Ravenwing need Skilled Rider. A jink save would be nice though; 6++ isn't reliable enough to depend on but it's nice. I think a bunch of bikers coming in behind enemy lines is pretty bad though. Wolf Scouts and Kommandos (with Snikrot) can do this, but they can't move 12" a turn. Maybe you could have one squad do this, but I don't recall DA being particularly well known above other Marine armies for their tactics.
This is stated in the codex as the legacy of the Lion in how we go about fighting. Then again it may just be my chapter is better than yours.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/04/24 18:59:31
8000 Dark Angels (No primaris)
10000 Lizardmen (Fantasy I miss you)
3000 High Elves
4000 Kel'shan Ta'u
"He attacked everything in life with a mix of extraordinary genius and naive incompetence, and it was often difficult to tell which was which." -Douglas Adams |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/24 21:21:59
Subject: Re:Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Beautiful and Deadly Keeper of Secrets
|
Wolf Scouts and Kommandos (with Snikrot) can do this, but they can't move 12" a turn.
Wolf scouts can take melta bombs for the entire squad, along with a wolfguard terminator with cyclone.
And kommando's actually can, take ghazkull, or just declare a Waagh! You get fleet, ghazgull automatically lets you fleet 6" + 6" than assault, or the waagh gives you at worst a +1 movement.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/24 23:33:21
Subject: Re:Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Veteran Inquisitor with Xenos Alliances
|
milo wrote:RE: Ravenwing bikers.... Would it be overpowered if you allowed them to deploy from the opponent's table edge as reserves? That could reflect both their flanking ability and the DA's improved strategic knowledge.
I tend to think GW represent "strategic knowledge" as the ability to re-roll reserve rolls or re-roll which edge they'd come in on.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/24 23:39:52
Subject: Re:Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Been Around the Block
|
ZebioLizard2 wrote:Wolf Scouts and Kommandos (with Snikrot) can do this, but they can't move 12" a turn.
Wolf scouts can take melta bombs for the entire squad, along with a wolfguard terminator with cyclone.
And kommando's actually can, take ghazkull, or just declare a Waagh! You get fleet, ghazgull automatically lets you fleet 6" + 6" than assault, or the waagh gives you at worst a +1 movement.
Terminator armored wolf guard cannot join wolf scouts. Secondly, kommando's actually can't seeing as how you have to add a, what, 250+ model? So yeah, for all intents and purposes kommandos can't.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/25 12:08:46
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Just FYI its a perfectly valid and well known tactic to use Snkirot and some kommandos to bring Gazz in at the behind your enemy. It can be devistateing if done well, but like all things ork needs some finess and allot of luck to work.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/25 18:04:32
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Shame the first post in this thread hasnt been updated with further "tidbits" hard to sort through 32 pages
|
DT:80S+++G+++M+B++I+Pw40k00+D++A(WTF)/areWD100R+++++T(T)DM+ |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/25 20:57:39
Subject: Re:Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Storm Trooper with Maglight
|
ZebioLizard2 wrote:Wolf Scouts and Kommandos (with Snikrot) can do this, but they can't move 12" a turn.
Wolf scouts can take melta bombs for the entire squad, along with a wolfguard terminator with cyclone.
And kommando's actually can, take ghazkull, or just declare a Waagh! You get fleet, ghazgull automatically lets you fleet 6" + 6" than assault, or the waagh gives you at worst a +1 movement.
No they can't It says in the wolf guard pack leader rules they cant join scouts if they are in terminator armor.
|
3200 points > 5400 points
2500 points |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/26 14:33:43
Subject: Re:Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
I just heard, from a friend with a source that works@GW, that the DA codex just went to the printers. He also said there needs to be a test print, then proof edit, another print etc. the same source was predicting an August release, going against current only 1 codex this year rumors. Was wondering if anyone else had heard this.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/26 14:37:25
Subject: Re:Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Lord of the Fleet
|
Alex0077 wrote:I just heard, from a friend with a source that works@GW,
I always cringe when someone says this
I mean hey for all I know someone does have an inside source, but trying to find that source out of the million other claims....
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/04/26 14:38:15
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/26 14:46:44
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Stubborn Dark Angels Veteran Sergeant
|
I'm not convinced that they'd do two actual print runs, given the costs of setting up a print run. If GW actually proof edit their codexes at all (and given the number of typos and grammatical errors they contain, I'm not sure they do), they'll do it well before the layout stage, let alone the "went to the printers" stage.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/26 14:53:19
Subject: Re:Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
Hence the reason why I am asking to confirm what he says... Besides if you had an insider you wouldn't want him found out either... Automatically Appended Next Post: Some printers will print a proof before an actual run to confirm with the buyer.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/04/26 14:55:36
3000+ 5:4:1
3000+ 12:2:2
9:1
High Elves 9:3 |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/26 15:41:40
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Stubborn Dark Angels Veteran Sergeant
|
Yeah, true enough, though at that point, the changes you'd make are more along the lines of tweaking colour balance, or spotting layout peculiarities that meant the print copy looked different to your on-screen layout for some reason (like problems with the bleed).
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/26 16:01:55
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
That would take time, possibly a few months before seeing the end product, and getting said product to all the distribution centers.
|
3000+ 5:4:1
3000+ 12:2:2
9:1
High Elves 9:3 |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/26 17:06:13
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Focused Dark Angels Land Raider Pilot
|
I don't know if anybody noticed ... but on B&C they're doing this :http://www.bolterandchainsword.com/index.php?showtopic=251340&st=25 I really do not understand a thing but ... (hope it's not a duplicate but sincerely I cannot read 32 pages now) Automatically Appended Next Post: I'm not able to put a direct link but... well... copy and paste....
|
|
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2012/04/26 17:08:29
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/26 17:08:38
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
It's a fan thing. It has nothing to do with GW.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/26 20:45:51
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Stealthy Dark Angels Scout with Shotgun
|
To quote the B&C thread. "Harry and hastings76 don't have the privileged information the DA Inner Circle has." I know some people on that forum have had a link to JJ since the 4th ed codex.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/26 20:50:56
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Ultramarine Master with Gauntlets of Macragge
|
Droma wrote:To quote the B&C thread. "Harry and hastings76 don't have the privileged information the DA Inner Circle has." I know some people on that forum have had a link to JJ since the 4th ed codex.
That just sounds like typical B&C roleplay stuff.
|
Check out my Youtube channel!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/26 21:43:05
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Focused Dark Angels Land Raider Pilot
|
Oh well... in this chaos it's difficult to discern actual rumours
But actually thay told that someone heard of 5th of may release... sound very difficult to be true but I thought it was still worth a mention here... after all we listened to Ghost21 stuff for a long time....
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/26 22:58:00
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
5th of May is the Necrons 2nd Wave.
|
Enlist as a virtual Ultramarine! Click here for my Chaos Gate (PC) thread.
"It is the great irony of the Legiones Astartes: engineered to kill to achieve a victory of peace that they can then be no part of."
- Roboute Guilliman
"As I recall, your face was tortured. Imagine that - the Master of the Wolves, his ferocity twisted into grief. And yet you still carried out your duty. You always did what was asked of you. So loyal. So tenacious. Truly you were the attack dog of the Emperor. You took no pleasure in what you did. I knew that then, and I know it now. But all things change, my brother. I'm not the same as I was, and you're... well, let us not mention where you are now."
- Magnus the Red, to a statue of Leman Russ
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/26 23:14:57
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Mutated Chosen Chaos Marine
|
This may be very, very, very stupid, but I feel the need to say it.
Is it possible that the Dark Angels are the new Space Marine poster boys as opposed to the Ultramarines, and in fact the supposed Dark Angel Codex will just be a generic Space Marine Codex with lots of pictures of green angsty Marines as opposed to blue, perfect awesome totally radical superman completely flawless Marines.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/26 23:16:01
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Beautiful and Deadly Keeper of Secrets
|
LoneLictor wrote:This may be very, very, very stupid, but I feel the need to say it.
Is it possible that the Dark Angels are the new Space Marine poster boys as opposed to the Ultramarines, and in fact the supposed Dark Angel Codex will just be a generic Space Marine Codex with lots of pictures of green angsty Marines as opposed to blue, perfect awesome totally radical superman completely flawless Marines.
Seeing as even the sisters of battle and dark eldar weren't squatted, this is a pretty stupid thing to say.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/26 23:35:24
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Mutated Chosen Chaos Marine
|
ZebioLizard2 wrote:LoneLictor wrote:This may be very, very, very stupid, but I feel the need to say it.
Is it possible that the Dark Angels are the new Space Marine poster boys as opposed to the Ultramarines, and in fact the supposed Dark Angel Codex will just be a generic Space Marine Codex with lots of pictures of green angsty Marines as opposed to blue, perfect awesome totally radical superman completely flawless Marines.
Seeing as even the sisters of battle and dark eldar weren't squatted, this is a pretty stupid thing to say.
But this would be different than being squatted. It'd be kind of like how the Harlequins, who once had their own codex, became part of the Eldar Codex.
But yes, it is stupid.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/26 23:41:08
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Ultramarine Master with Gauntlets of Macragge
|
I wouldn't count on it. Blood Angels were the posterboys in 2nd ed (or at least on the starter box) and Codex: Ultramarines was a separate book from Angels of Death.
|
Check out my Youtube channel!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/27 03:20:55
Subject: Re:Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Fully-charged Electropriest
Portland, OR by way of WI
|
didn't see this but I admit I did look fast
|
3000+
Death Company, Converted Space Hulk Termies
RIP Diz, We will never forget ya brother |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/27 05:49:24
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
LoneLictor wrote:But this would be different than being squatted. It'd be kind of like how the Harlequins, who once had their own codex, became part of the Eldar Codex.
Last I checked, the Harlequin list was in the Citadel Journal, and therefore doesn't count as an example of a code not being squatted.
|
2021-4 Plog - Here we go again... - my fifth attempt at a Dakka PLOG
My Pile of Potential - updates ongoing...
Gamgee on Tau Players wrote:we all kill cats and sell our own families to the devil and eat live puppies.
Kanluwen wrote:This is, emphatically, why I will continue suggesting nuking Guard and starting over again. It's a legacy army that needs to be rebooted with a new focal point.
Confirmation of why no-one should listen to Kanluwen when it comes to the IG - he doesn't want the IG, he want's Kan's New Model Army...
tneva82 wrote:You aren't even trying ty pretend for honest arqument. Open bad faith trolling. - No reason to keep this here, unless people want to use it for something... |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/27 06:33:23
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Trustworthy Shas'vre
In a hole in New Zealand with internet access
|
I just want to see all the new models! Fwwwwwwwaaaaa!
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/04/27 06:45:50
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
[DCM]
Coastal Bliss in the Shadow of Sizewell
Suffolk, where the Aliens roam.
|
Dysartes wrote:LoneLictor wrote:But this would be different than being squatted. It'd be kind of like how the Harlequins, who once had their own codex, became part of the Eldar Codex. Last I checked, the Harlequin list was in the Citadel Journal, and therefore doesn't count as an example of a code not being squatted. They had their own rules in the Compedium, although that is Rogue trader level, so hard to judge if it was or wasn't a codex, more of a list. Kinda like how Warhammer armies in 3rd edition warhammer had the Nippon and Cathay rules, but we've not seen hide nor hair of them since. At least Eldar players still have harlies.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/04/27 06:46:16
"That's not an Ork, its a girl.." - Last words of High General Daran Ul'tharem, battle of Ursha VII.
Two White Horses (Ipswich Town and Denver Broncos Supporter)
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|