Continuing Rumors of WHFB 9th (Post-End Times) in Early Summer 2015

Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:

No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.

If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

**Sigvatr**

Do_I_Not_Like_That wrote:

Easily fixed with giving goblins and skaven a recycling rule that allows them to put dead models back on the table. I'm pretty sure Tyranids had this years ago.

Yeah, that's the problem. It still would not allow the army to represented on the board. Constantly respawning units doesn't spell out "horde".

**Do_I_Not_Like_That**

AkhilleusK42 wrote:
Do_I_Not_Like_That wrote:

All roads seem to be pointing to that.

Let's look at the facts:

1. Round bases in the latest WD would support GW's streamlining and cost-cutting policy as round bases would be standard for all its products

2. Rules for Dungeon fighting in the Skaven end times book. If that's not a heavy hint being dropped, I don't know what is.

3. Fantasy dying a slow death and GW's well known financial woes suggests change is imminent.

I predict that GW are moving towards a skirmish/RPG game of around 35-40 models, much in the vein of the herohammer/ monster hammer days. 6 well supported factions, with regular updates, limited edition books, and rules being exclusive to WD, and various dataslates, is GW taking a leaf out of Magic's book. We're witnessing a steady drip drip drip. Probably to keep people buying, and also to pull the rug from under 3rd party manufacturers.

GW love their big monster kits, people love buying them, so they'll stay. As it stands, having to collect 100+ models for a decent game is off putting for many people, hence the slow decline of fantasy. GW are applying the 40k template to fantasy.

In my view, the GW target audience will be 12-20 years olds, who will throw down £150 for all the models/paints/books they need, and the small model count will get them in the game quicker before they lose interest. Look at GW's paint guides in recent years. Shade, wash, highlight. Quick and easy to do.

I think GW will write off the veterans. They tend to have all the models they need anyway, are moving to other companies in droves, and tend not to buy a lot of GW stuff anyway. GW's model is new blood, and a high turnover at that.

Of course, I could be wrong, I usually am but for me, this is the direction GW are heading in.

Don't be putting forth your argument all logical and persuasive like. You're scaring me, stop it, I don't like it.

In all seriousness though, I'm kind of tentatively excited. Having been out of the loop for ages on WHF, I feel like my non-investment somewhat shields me (in a non-bubble fashion) from the coming storm

Automatically Appended Next Post:
Or like Chenkov's 'Send in the next wave' special rule in the Guard's last codex

As I said before, I feel sorry for the veterans, but I'm in the same boat as you - I bailed out of GW 2-3 years ago and sold all my fantasy stuff. I'd be starting with a clean slate, as well.

**NAVARRO**

Sigvatr wrote:
Do_I_Not_Like_That wrote:

Easily fixed with giving goblins and skaven a recycling rule that allows them to put dead models back on the table. I'm pretty sure Tyranids had this years ago.

Yeah, that's the problem. It still would not allow the army to represented on the board. Constantly respawning units doesn't spell out "horde".

THe appeal of horde armies is that they look like a horde in the first place. I would not like to see my gobbos reduced to a handful of minis per regiment.

**Do_I_Not_Like_That**

Sigvatr wrote:
Do_I_Not_Like_That wrote:

Easily fixed with giving goblins and skaven a recycling rule that allows them to put dead models back on the table. I'm pretty sure Tyranids had this years ago.

Yeah, that's the problem. It still would not allow the army to represented on the board. Constantly respawning units doesn't spell out "horde".

You're forgetting GW's forging a narrative. Let's speculate for a minute. These games are based on the premise of you are the hero, you are the commander.

Let's say it's a skirmish game in a dungeon. You can't see every skaven model, you can't see hordes of rats bearing down on your beleaguered band of Empire soldiers. It's dramatic tension for the game. It fits well into GW's forging a narrative, even if every model is not on the table.

Automatically Appended Next Post:

NAVARRO wrote:
Sigvatr wrote:
Do_I_Not_Like_That wrote:

Easily fixed with giving goblins and skaven a recycling rule that allows them to put dead models back on the table. I'm pretty sure Tyranids had this years ago.

Yeah, that's the problem. It still would not allow the army to represented on the board. Constantly respawning units doesn't spell out "horde".

THe appeal of horde armies is that they look like a horde in the first place. I would not like to see my gobbos reduced to a handful of minis per regiment.

If it's a skirmish game, then it's likely your goblin horde would outnumber the enemy 3:1 anyway, and would achieve the 'horde' effect as a result.

**Fayric**

Sigvatr wrote:
Yeah...well...skirmish has another problem, though: it doesn't work with some armies. Goblins and Skaven, for example, don't work in a skirmish game. Huge numbers of models is what makes those armies.

Skaven had a crew in Mordheim though. Im pretty sure some people made homebrew goblin gangs too.
The hard thing to add would more likely be heavy stuf like chaos warriors.

Edit: They would have to release som awesome ruins and open houses for scenery though. Huzza!

**Haight**

Piston Honda wrote:
Anyone think that these rumors are part of a new game?

Set in the warhammer universe, smaller scale but be a separate game from warhammer?

work as a gate way drug... I mean game.

I fall into this camp, but i think its more of an "i hope" rather than "i think".

All i know is i'm not rebasing 13k of elves onto round bases. Many things will happen.

That is not one of them.

**H.B.M.C.**

NAVARRO wrote:
Really confused about the bases. If infantry goes into circular bases and then movement trays are created why not just keep the square bases as they are in the first place? I do not see why skirmish cannot be played with square bases.

As Do_I_Not_Like_That wrote above your post, and it's not something that I had thought of up until he mentioned it, but going to round bases is a cost cutting measure. They no longer have to support two different styles of base, and can stop making movement trays.

So really this is about cost cutting, and never about the good of the game.

**Malika2**

Hmm, why not just bring back Mordheim?

**unmercifulconker**

Recalling the discussion ages ago about why the ET HC books were so low in supply was because GW didnt expect the sales to be THAT good.

So the End Times were to be a set up for the transformation of warhammer, yet didn't expect it to sell many?

**overtyrant**

Malika2 wrote:
Hmm, why not just bring back Mordheim?

The same reason why they got rid of there specialist games division, your not spending money on there 2 main games! (GW logic not mine) I'm rather excited about these changes as depending how it goes it might bring me back to the GW fold. Massed battle games, this includes 40k as well, should be restricted to epic and warmaster imo.

**NAVARRO**

H.B.M.C. wrote:
NAVARRO wrote:
Really confused about the bases. If infantry goes into circular bases and then movement trays are created why not just keep the square bases as they are in the first place? I do not see why skirmish cannot be played with square bases.

As Do_I_Not_Like_That wrote above your post, and it's not something that I had thought of up until he mentioned it, but going to round bases is a cost cutting measure. They no longer have to support two different styles of base, and can stop making movement trays.

So really this is about cost cutting, and never about the good of the game.

But for stacking the minis into regiments they would probably use LOTR style of movement trays? Also why did they create a new bigger size for 40k, that goes against cost cutting right? Looks better on some 40k minis but again it surely looks like they are going into extremes to make people rebase all their armies, I wonder why?
I see what you guys are saying and to an extent does make sense, maybe its just me not understanding how saving money on bases you risk destroying decades of WFB armies. Visually Lotr basing system looks pants too.

Replying to 3:1 ration, its different to have 3 blocks of 50 gobbos than 3 blocks of 10, even if other armies have less. I also collect other systems armies and skirmish so the main reason I do WFB is the overall look of the army, being gobbos an extreme example of that. WFB main difference of most other systems is the sheer size of the armies, you lose that and there is not much more that makes WFB visually unique... maybe the superhumans will change that.

**Wonderwolf**

unmercifulconker wrote:
Recalling the discussion ages ago about why the ET HC books were so low in supply was because GW didnt expect the sales to be THAT good.

So the End Times were to be a set up for the transformation of warhammer, yet didn't expect it to sell many?

Well, I suppose the End Times books might have only been there to send Oldhammer off on a nice little story, but not necessarily sell vastly more than previous Warhammer books (which apparently was where they were wrong). So something like this.

Kirby: WFB makes no revenue, gotta kill it and turn it into something with Space Marines

GW: It's a game with a declining, but loyal following, who enjoy the background of the past 30 years (pours Kirby a drink).

Kirby: Don't care. Kill it. Kill it good. Make Space Marines. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

GW: Ok, ok, you've got us convinced, but let's throw the old timers a bone. Let's close this 30-year tradition with a bang, not a whimper. (pours Kirby another drink).

Kirby: *barf* Fantasy .... Space Marines .... Money

GW: We promise, we'll only make small print runs and large models, which give a far better return per CAD than smaller ones, so they make money quicker and with less units sold (pours Kirby yet another drink)

Kirby: ... and ... Fantasy Marines ... after ... that ... nonsense .... ?

GW: Yes, oh Lord. We promise (another drink).

Kirby: ... alright .. but small print runs, no excess stock. *barf* And throw in a Space Hulk re-release to save our bottom-line.

GW: Thank you, oh Lord, thank you, oh Lord.

**unmercifulconker**

Wonderwolf wrote:
unmercifulconker wrote:
Recalling the discussion ages ago about why the ET HC books were so low in supply was because GW didnt expect the sales to be THAT good.

So the End Times were to be a set up for the transformation of warhammer, yet didn't expect it to sell many?

Well, I suppose the End Times books might have only been there to send Oldhammer off on a nice little story, but not necessarily sell vastly more than previous Warhammer books (which apparently was where they were wrong). So something like this.

Kirby: WFB makes no revenue, gotta kill it and turn it into something with Space Marines

GW: It's a game with a declining, but loyal following, who enjoy the background of the past 30 years (pours Kirby a drink).

Kirby: Don't care. Kill it. Kill it good. Make Space Marines. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

GW: Ok, ok, you've got us convinced, but let's throw the old timers a bone. Let's close this 30-year tradition with a bang, not a whimper. (pours Kirby another drink).

Kirby: *barf* Fantasy .... Space Marines .... Money

GW: We promise, we'll only make small print runs and large models, which give a far better return per CAD than smaller ones, so they make money quicker and with less units sold (pours Kirby yet another drink)

Kirby: ... and ... Fantasy Marines ... after ... that ... nonsense .... ?

GW: Yes, oh Lord. We promise (another drink).

Kirby: ... alright .. but small print runs, no excess stock. *barf* And throw in a Space Hulk re-release to save our bottom-line.

GW: Thank you, oh Lord, thank you, oh Lord.

Terrifyingly funny.

On a side note, ive just went to finish my Khorne stuff and my red gore has completely dried up! A true sign of the end times are upon us.

**Mr. Burning**

don't wish to be a pedant but its that other schmuck they promoted who should be dramatis personae in our little sketches about GW inner workings now.

**Yodhrin**

Mr. Burning wrote:
don't wish to be a pedant but its that other schmuck they promoted who should be dramatis personae in our little sketches about GW inner workings now.

Only if the sketch is of a marionette with a Kirby-shaped shadow looming over him.

**Wonderwolf**

Mr. Burning wrote:
don't wish to be a pedant but its that other schmuck they promoted who should be dramatis personae in our little sketches about GW inner workings now.

Not really.

He's on his job for only 10 days now.

**wuestenfux**

Wonderwolf wrote:
Mr. Burning wrote:
don't wish to be a pedant but its that other schmuck they promoted who should be dramatis personae in our little sketches about GW inner workings now.

Not really.

He's on his job for only 10 days now.

Just long enough to face the new annual report.

**migooo**

Malika2 wrote:
Hmm, why not just bring back Mordheim?

QFT

probably because that would mean once you buy a Warband you wouldnt be buying the latest "fantasy" space marines stuff?

**Warhams-77**

Harry posted another post compilation about what's going on with WFB

Worth to read

Re: Warhammer - And Now For Something Completely Different

Yay ... found it.
Here is everything that Autumn Leaves and I said about this on a thread over 12 months ago.

Originally Posted by Autumn leaves
It's downright sad.
I love Warhammer and I've loved it for years, probably since before some of the younger members here were born. Sadly WFB has not moved with the times and there are so many other options out there now many players have drifted away to them and stayed away.
I had high hopes for my teenage son to follow in my war hammer footsteps but he is not remotely interested in it. God knows I've tried but he is only interested in 40K and not very much either. I can see his his interest waning and all those 40K box sets I bought for him over the years in a vain effort to drag him into the hobby, and then showed him painstakingly how to put together and paint, they are going to be on eBay shortly. The only systems I have managed to get him interested in are the odd game of Space Hulk (yay) and Mantics 'Dwarf Kings Hold'. The idea being if I can keep him interested in DKH then i can turn him onto Mordheim…. but I digress.

A big part of what has taken so many thousands of war hammer players away from war hammer in the last 5 years is three fold and the reasons have been well explained by other members in this thread.
1) Warhammer fluff is generic with slip shod time lines compared to the much better fluff for 40K.
2)The price point has become too high. Big units cost a small fortune and armies look good and play well with big units. The fiscal outlay is prohibitive at bot the entrant level and for the veteran.
3) More modern games have come out with sleeker design features that interest older players looking for something 'different'. Competition has grown up.

Can GW win ground back for the ailing core game?
Of course they can but not by keeping it the same. Many many changes are required to improve its attractiveness to younger market and with the exceedingly precarious performance, that has seen a wide variety of WFB blisters and box sets being deleted by GW from the Indie retailers trade sales selection very scarily shows how little demand there is for the WFB product in the current climate.
When sales drop this low, and it has been happening for a long time, the axe is never far away.
Thats a reality.
Now I'm picking it will be the axe of change not the axe of final destruction that sees WFB take on a new look appealing to the youngsters as a Skirmishing game like 40K and LOtR. Smaller units,much smaller units. Many pundits see the same change approaching as it fits in with the GW sales format. WFB must start to increase it's profitability.
Change is coming.
To keep things the same means that WFB will go the way of the specialist games. Withering profitability = the end.

Can GW fix WFB under it's current format after years of decline in sales?
Possibly but the single biggest problem they have is to get profitability up they have to make it more appealing to the kids at the entrant level.
That would mean changing the format to bring it into line with the other two systems. Especially 40k.
Making it affordable.

1200 points is a skirmish game.
You need 2000 points to have a decent sized game.
If you really like war hammer skirmish then wait for 2015 and thats exactly what you will get as they repackage WFB for the entrant level market.

I have worked for the company.
I still know people that work for the company at Lenton and other parts of the world. I know some popular individuals who used to work for the company. From time to time all of those folks have been useful in offering insights as to what is coming up soon and to how the Kirby Hive mind thinks.
Common sense will tell us that 40K is not going to undergo any changes significant or otherwise, because it's happily making a great deal of money for the PLC.
WFB on the other hand has been suffering on a global level for a long time now and it needs re-booting to return to profitability.
Why would the PLC not take the easiest road to achieving that, by bringing WFB in to mimic the format that is working spectacularly well for 40K beginners?
Warhammer skirmish to get kids and adults in to play the game.
It makes sense and it lowers the entry cost making it instantly more attractive to a wide social strata of customers.
It won't hurt to finish releasing the army books to flesh out 8th edition and it's a fair call to the collectors of those armies without a book for a loooong time. A nod to the customer base. Nice touch.
I really hope the repackaging of war hammer skirmish works because the entire war gamer hobby benefits from the recruiting done by the GW bricks and mortar stores at a beginner entry level.
Perhaps a swan song…

I see Warhammer fantasy Skirmish starter set as a 'stepping stone' into the bigger war hammer game, perfect for entry level, and then options for growth of the beginners army into something more rewarding in time to come.
I can also see scenario aspects of the skirmish game that would lend itself in a slightly campaign way (each game affects the next) toward the Mordheim feel.
This is not a bad thing people, it could be a great new dawning for a system that drastically needs to be overhauled to catch up to the modern thinking that has moved on over the years.
I'm excited about it.
Perhaps introducing a skirmish style entrant level element in 2015 will give GW design a real chance to have the critical time to reinvent the wheel on WFB.
This last line I found interesting. He almost suggests 9th edition will be a temporary fix why they decide what to do with the Mass fantasy battle game???

Originally Posted by Autumn Leaves
Yeah they did fail with Warhammer skirmish in the past but to be fair that was pitched at an adult market more than an entrant level market.
I'm sure they have done their homework and they will make the new box set more attractive both price wise and game design wise than the previous war hammer skirmish.
Also, warhammer skirmish back in the day was quite an attractive game, but we had a fully supported Mordheim to fall back on. The cross over on other in-house systems was an issue for the older gamers.
No cross over now and an opportunity to get interest kindled in starting into fantasy with a skirmish box set.
I really don't think it's going to be a big problem for the older vets.
A new painting challenge.
A new gaming challenge.
Something that is guaranteed to be finished in a single club night. Maybe even two games O_o

WFB needs to be more accessible to the entrant level. Going to skirmish was the obvious choice, and the right choice.
But the round bases might be another issue..
Here is the first time anyone mentioned Round bases in fantasy.... as soon as he said this I knew he was not guessing ...as this was something I had already heard and you simply would never guess this for fantasy

Originally Posted by Malagor
Autumn Leaves, just because you keep repeating the same nonsense over and over again won't stop it from being nonsense.

Originally Posted by Harry
What if, eventually, he is shown to be the only one talking sense?

Originally Posted by Harry
As I have said repeatedly ... I do not know where the dust settled on all of this. Maybe the starter set is a skirmish game as Mr Leaves suggests ... maybe it's not?
Maybe Warhammer 9th is JUST a skirmish game ... as Mr. Leaves suggests ... Maybe it's not? Maybe they found a way of making it scale up successfully from a few figures in a skirmish encounter to an ambush on the vanguard to a full blown battle between two armies, to an apocalyptic 10,000 point battle of DOOOOOOOM!

That's what I have always done with every rules set (every edition) ... some have needed more bending than others.
It is how we did it in olden times.

I have huge armies of most fantasy armies but have always enjoyed playing small skirmish level games ... often as a prelude to and influencing future bigger games. I use smaller games as a way of focussing on individual units and writing their back story so they become more than just "a unit of 25 spearmen" and become something more ... "Bronzino and the Brown jackets, The veterans of skulldoom pass" etc ... you get the point.

Warhammer's origins were Role playing games ... I have always found it hard to shake that off ... thankfully.

I have been playing more 3rd edition than 8th edition recently ... but I still enjoy 8th edition ... however, the two games have very little to do with each other .... so it's not that big a deal to me if 9th edition is different again.
Just another way to enjoy Warhammer.
I am not saying Yes or No ... I am saying "I don't know".
All I know is they started into a 'ground up' re-write a couple of years ago.
Nothing was sacred. Not the timeline. Not the stat line. They started with a fresh page.
Anything could have changed ... Everything could have changed.
I have heard ... a few things since ... but not enough to say with any certainty what 9th edition will be.
Originally Posted by Autumn Leaves
I said Warhammer Fantasy won't be getting a new edition until 2015 and I also said it's going to be warhammer skirmish game in a similar format to the 40K starter sets and I also said that WFB is only contributing 8% of the overall revenue of GW's annual income in the last 12 months and thats a primary reason why the bean counters in the PLC are demanding some serious change to the former flagship core game.
Yes they are going to be 'rejuvenating' the Warhammer fantasy brand so it's more entrant level friendly for the kids.
I have made my predictions and I totally stand by them.
Watch and wait to see if they come true.
The company is undergoing some serious changes, the WD has been revamped already.

Originally Posted by Harry
Maybe they think they have cracked it with 8th edition (for the time being ... or once every army has a nice shiny new book) and the Skirmish thing for Fantasy (That Autumn leaves suggests) is more like Storm of Magic ... except designed to enable smaller games rather than bigger games ... just adding another dimension to the existing core game... Rather than replacing it. Just a thought.
Originally Posted by Autumn Leaves
Warhammer skirmish will be the gateway for the entrant level customers to be introduced to milieu.
Most of us won't buy it for anything other than the ruleset. I played LotR as a skirmish game but my miniatures were all on square bases and rectangular for the horses, so I could use them in war hammer and other systems.
You can easily buy movement trays for round bases to be ranked up in from the net.

The 8% is not a prediction or a rumour, it's a stone cold fact and the number may very sadly be a little high by the 'summer' of 2014 where GW numbers annually take a nosedive.
Gentlemen, wfb is sinking and not slowly, why… WHY do you think there is so much activity going on in the background around the White Dwarf revamp etc

Parents are not buying into a game for their kids where they are staring down the barrel of hundreds and hundreds of pounds just to build 'one army' on GW's current pricing strategy.
40K or LotR offer a cost ceiling in terms of box sets and whats required to crank out a little game for the entrant level customer.
LotR/The Hobbit is running hot at the box office and it's a self contained skirmish game.
40K does not make demands on the customer to purchase a wide variety of Big units. A couple of squads and a dreadnought or a tank and you're done, chances are most parents are thinking those toys will be in bits at the bottom of the toy box in a couple of months anyway. You know how kids are…
If the child shows a genuine interest then the incremental attachment for either LotR and in particular 40K are user friendly. Another squad and/or another tank/dreadnought/APC and you're all set.
They both play well for the entrant level customers and particularly 40K has enjoyed ongoing success and buoyancy.
Try playing war hammer with a unit of 25 models on each side and a general on a mount for each. With a war machine each.
It's beyond dull.
It's ridiculously expensive for what you get.
The actual customers worldwide who are buying these toys for their kids are not stupid. They can see the amount of money required to play war hammer effectively as it was meant to be played and as it is portrayed in the literature within the stores, i.e. with multiple units on each side and then they look at the boxes, how many figures do you get for how much?
Mums are thinking about the weekly food shop bill and that pair of Jimmy Choo's at the end of the month that hubby doesn't know is on the credit card yet… "Ummm, I think we'll take the space game thank you."
Of course GW are not foolish, the board members know Fantasy has been sick as a pig for a while now and it needs more than a revamp at 8%, it needs a full overhaul. Bar a few tweaks over the years it's essentially the same game designed in the very early 90's for 4th edition.
It's clearly not working and all the indicators are there to tell us it's not going to work until it is changed.
Warhammer skirmish?
Brilliant.
It gives the fantasy aspect of GW a chance to compete on a level playing field with 40K in a well priced self contained box set. Father and son can play it in a couple of hours at the dining room table and then son can teach it to his little buddies on the weekend. The budget can stretch to augmenting the model count to keep the boys interested. Job done.
In the meantime GW can flesh out all the army books for 8th edition and win the hearts and minds of elements of the disgruntled older members of the fraternity, and in the meantime, get to work feverishly on WFB 10th edition with an ALL NEW ruleset. Modernised and maximised for excellent quick gameplay. Reasonable levels of items and magic. Skirmishers that don't reinvent the wheel. Cannons that don't come with laser sighting, GPS and night vision et al the list goes on and on…

It will be the game that brings back the grumpy old grognards and joins them with the bubbly fan bois and we can all be happy little peas in a pod once again. 2015 is looking very positive.
Originally Posted by Harry
If Autumn Leaves is correct about the Skirmish thing ...This is the only thing that makes sense to me.
The only reason we are expecting a new edition of Warhammer fantasy Battle is because that is what we have had every few years.

BUT I remember having a conversation with Jervis and Gav .... so this is gong back a few years ... where they stated that they wanted to get Warhammer to the point that it did not need updating/re-writing and they wanted to get all the army books completed in such a way that they were robust enough to survive changes to the rules so they did not need to keep re-writing them. The reason for doing this was to allow them to look at more interesting things to develop aspects of Warhammer they did not have time to do. We discussed the obvious things like Skirmish, Siege, but also fighting on boats, in tunnels/underground, exploring new areas of the map, etc.

Alright this was a few editions and many years ago but what if? What if they feel they have reached that point with 8th. Where a new edition isn't going to change very much. Where every army has a book. What if they decide NOT to do a new edition but stick with Warhammer 8th as it is ... consider this the finished product for a while. .... What would they explore next?

We already have "Storm of Magic" for 'Big magic, Big Monster' games.

Maybe they would look next at Skirmish? (Autumn Leaves seems convinced).

So no new BRB ... as rumoured. But a new starter set ... as rumoured.
Not needing full army books but where all the armies could be combined in less books ... as rumoured. Would certainly be the way to present warband options.

Mmmm.

I was still left with some of the other stuff I had heard about the timeline advancing and multiple books. (Will it be two, three or four books?)
A recent conversation prompted a new line of thought ....
and started to make a different kind of sense to me.

What if this was nothing to to with the next edition .... but a "what would they explore next?"
What if they decided to explore different area of the world or different periods of history? Source books for playing warhammer in different times and places.
Same game ... same rules set just changing the setting a bit ... bit like the Lustria stuff.

An excuse to explore some new special rules, introduce some new characters, new monsters, exploring some undiscovered corner of the world or some undescribed period of history ... currently little more than a dot on the map or a story in an army book. A chance to undertake some new modelling projects, sculpt some new minis.
One book might be 500 years ahead, one 500 years the past (or exploring some key point in recent history). One might be based in an area of the world which has not been detailed yet. (Like the Lustrian stuff).

This started to make some sort of sense to me ... but it was late at night.

What if? What if you a games Developer for Warhammer fantasy? What if you were told you didn't need to write an new edition or rewrite an army book? Where would you go next? What aspect of Warhammer would you like to explore?
My guesswork here almost describing 'bubbles'

Originally Posted by Harry
I don't think they are trying to destroy it.
I suspect they will be trying their hardest to breath new life into it.
We are not seeing the end times for Warhammer just yet.

**Do_I_Not_Like_That**

NAVARRO wrote:
H.B.M.C. wrote:
NAVARRO wrote:
Really confused about the bases. If infantry goes into circular bases and then movement trays are created why not just keep the square bases as they are in the first place? I do not see why skirmish cannot be played with square bases.

As Do_I_Not_Like_That wrote above your post, and it's not something that I had thought of up until he mentioned it, but going to round bases is a cost cutting measure. They no longer have to support two different styles of base, and can stop making movement trays.

So really this is about cost cutting, and never about the good of the game.

But for stacking the minis into regiments they would probably use LOTR style of movement trays? Also why did they create a new bigger size for 40k, that goes against cost cutting right? Looks better on some 40k minis but again it surely looks like they are going into extremes to make people rebase all their armies, I wonder why?
I see what you guys are saying and to an extent does make sense, maybe its just me not understanding how saving money on bases you risk destroying decades of WFB armies. Visually Lotr basing system looks pants too.

Replying to 3:1 ration, its different to have 3 blocks of 50 gobbos than 3 blocks of 10, even if other armies have less. I also collect other systems armies and skirmish so the main reason I do WFB is the overall look of the army, being gobbos an extreme example of that. WFB main difference of most other systems is the sheer size of the armies, you lose that and there is not much more that makes WFB visually unique... maybe the superhumans will change that.

But you're not destroying decades of warhammer armies if you're GW. Look at this way. If you're GW, you don't care if somebody has been buying minis from the 1990s - you've got their money. What they do with the figures after that is not a factor. They could stick them up their noses for all GW care. Coca cola sell millions of tins every year, but would the coca cola bosses care if nobody drank the stuff, or poured it down the drain? Of Course not, as long as they get the money.

From a rational business sense, it's mad, because you want customers coming back. But that's not GW's model. GW don't care for veterans - all they do is moan

, switch to other systems, and as I've said, they've got more than enough figures anyway.

GW's model is reliant on kids persuading mums to throw down 200 dollars/pounds/Euros etc in one go and it's reliant on die hards spending money every month. People moan about every new edition, but most of them still buy it anyway.

Of course, I could be wrong.

Automatically Appended Next Post:

migooo wrote:
Malika2 wrote:
Hmm, why not just bring back Mordheim?

QFT

probably because that would mean once you buy a Warband you wouldnt be buying the latest "fantasy" space marines stuff?

It's coming back - as a video game

and that's a win win for GW as they profit from an intellectual licence, word spreads about their games, and somebody else had to put the money in to make it.

**RiTides**

chochky wrote:
I don't know if this has been mentioned on this thread already (haven't kept up with all 20+ pages), but do you guys remember the spanish rumors thread posted on Warseer early last fall?

http://www.warseer.com/forums/showthread.php?399509-Changes-to-Warhammer-in-2015-aka-quot-The-Spanish-Rumours-quot

Here's some of what those rumors claimed:

Originally Posted by Wonderwolf
A rumour from a spanish site (found here: http://www.cargad.com/index.php/2014...aba-warhammer/ )

They were the first to mention a release of Nagash / End Times campaign (May 29th), but did so in a context saying that this End Times campaign would be the lead to a closure of "Warhammer" (presumably WFB, not 40K), followed by a subsequent new skirmish game (presumably fantasy-ish-themed) in 2015

and

Originally Posted by cazzz669
So, just got off the horn with a contact at GW who apparently has just come out of a briefing regarding the future of WHF
in May 2015 after the End of Times WHF will become a skirmish game centered around surviving warbands after the "armegeddon" of the fantasy world as a result of the End of Times.
Chaos decimate the Empire
Nagash and co decimate Brettonia
Ulthuan sinks
there will be less army books than currently ( no idea if this means imalgimation armies )

appreciate I do not post very often so will doubtless recieve a whole load of flame for this post BUT given i literally just got told it, thought some people here would appreciate me sharing..
Personally I hope to god this is all incorrect

That second quote in particular mentions Ulthuan sinking, which happened in the Khaine book. Bear in mind these rumors were posted before the Khaine book was released. The May release date also roughly lines up with Darnok's rumored release date of April (i.e. late spring not summer). All of this, in combination, kind of make these rumors a bit more believable to me... and have made me a lot more concerned.
Thoughts?

Nice find, chochky!

And thanks for posting that, Warhams. I'd give Harry more credit if he was less cryptic, though

. It's great that he knew this was coming, but it would've been hard to get all this out of his dropped hints.

**Do_I_Not_Like_That**

Having just read warhams-77's post, it's all making sense.

Apply the successful 40k template to fantasy.

One man stores are no bad things if you're only playing skirmish games anyway.

Crank out the same round bases for both your main games.

Have forge world cater for the Vets and release an expansion for those who want bigger games of Fantasy.

Do you think Kirby's been planning this for months?

**agnosto**

Change everything to skirmidh, put rules in boxes, .... my but they've decided to copy the WM/H model pretty thoroughly.

**unmercifulconker**

Hmmm wow ok that is an excellent read. Thanks for posting it Warhams

I always thought this change was a business decision to simply get WFB to make GW enough money as they wanted; that our beloved universe was getting a new story solely for the sake of money rather than making money because of a new story. I know I know this is every business but it just annoyed me the most about this change, that it was greed driven. I didn't realise the sales compared to 40k were that low (if true).

The more I think about how I loved lotr games. The idea of a Skirmish is starting to ease with me. HOWEVER I will always love Warhammer for these mass clashes and this planet at war.

If the lore is as good as the end times developments then I wont worry at all actually and should known this from the start but perhaps my anger got the better of me.

The logic Harry has provided around the need for Skirmish is actually more customer focused which is nice to see and does make sense. Although simply lowering the cost of creating an army may also do the trick.

Regular expansions and such... Would I prefer regular updates to say create a dedicated Slaanesh warband with dedicated models and game with a lower cost? Maybe.

This situation is like the twin tailed comet. I am seeing it as an omen of doom. Perhaps however I should be seeing it as a sign of great change. Who knows.

I am now just going to enjoy the ride and wait and see. If it does turn out to be great change with small games leading up to mass armies with awesome new lore, then I owe GW a massive apology. If it doesnt... then well lets just wait and see.

**Warhams-77**

RiTides wrote:

I'd give Harry more credit if he was less cryptic, though

Absolutely

He is usually very reasonable and careful with what he hears to prevent hysteria and broken gamer hearts, protect the sources and because he is not part of the company and only gets info told by others. I like how he is acting responsible by the way he does it. Also he probably (just guessing he did not mention it) does this to protect him from the madness of the GW legal team

**eflix29**

Warhammer Skirmish sounds good to me !

I love miniatures and fluff, but last times a played a 750 pts games (of battle or 40k) i thought i would fell asleep ...
All units in CC. " Dude, just throw the dices for me and tell me who won ok" ?

A 10-20 miniatures would be welcome. Although i'm not a Magic/yugioh player , I was always jealous that they can play their game in 20 min with just a 10-50€ deck in the pocket...

**Wonderwolf**

Do_I_Not_Like_That wrote:

Do you think Kirby's been planning this for months?

Months?

First leak (I am aware of) of Warhammer going Skirmish and a rumoured Nagash release to send WFB on it's way are from May 2014. At this point in time, Nagash and the concept of End Times was already in place.

Put a lead time of 12 months (?) to develop a miniature like Nagash (Glottkin, etc..) from concept to box, and you're looking at May 2013. Add another 6 months (?) of brainstorming and design talk to come up with and plan the End Times / New Warhammer in its rough framework, and you're looking at late fall 2013.

Best guess, the final decision to kill WFB was made after the 2012/2013 financial year, which ended in june 2013, so summer 2013. The option or possibility has probably been discussed long before that.

Alternative theory, "Warhammer Skirmish" was planned even longer, release mid-2014, but things didn't pan out or got stuck, and thus they pulled 40K 7th forward to 2014 (without enough time to develop a Dark Vengeance-replacement) and pushed the new Warhammer back, In that case, the decision probably goes back to around summer 2012, which, funny enough, was the summer Mark Wells allegedly had a falling out with Kirby and decided to leave at the end of 2012.

**wuestenfux**

Warhammer Fantasy going skirmish would kill it.
Enjoyable games such as in 40k take place at a larger scale.

**RiTides**

eflix29 - I agree with the skirmish sentiment - I'm certainly open to the idea, if done well. That's the rub, really. I wish they'd take the LOTR rules to use, and not just force it on top of 8th edition rules.

**H.B.M.C.**

NAVARRO wrote:
Also why did they create a new bigger size for 40k, that goes against cost cutting right?

Preparing for the variety of Fantasy miniatures (and they're likely phasing out the old ones). Plus there's also the Chapterhouse of it all. Everyone and their dog makes regular bases, so of course GW would pick a new size that no one uses to replace the old one.