Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
2016/11/20 19:17:56
Subject: Daemon Primarch Magnus/Wrath of Magnus/Traitor Legions Codex Supplement/Thousand Sons
Well since you cannot polish a turd(Gw have been trying since 4th) and it is explicitly stated that Legions is a c:sm supplement I guess csm is kinda getting squatted yay finally.
All they need to do is allow and restrict c:sm units based on legion and allow the use of the real chaos marine units like raptors and oblits etc again allowed/restricted by legion.
Sprinkle new legion exclusive units and rules and you have the codex most people have wanted for years.
Your last point is especially laughable and comical, because not only the 7th ed Valkyrie shown dumber things (like being able to throw the troopers without parachutes out of its hatches, no harm done) - Irbis
2016/11/20 19:47:18
Subject: Daemon Primarch Magnus/Wrath of Magnus/Traitor Legions Codex Supplement/Thousand Sons
SeanDrake wrote: Well since you cannot polish a turd(Gw have been trying since 4th) and it is explicitly stated that Legions is a c:sm supplement I guess csm is kinda getting squatted yay finally.
All they need to do is allow and restrict c:sm units based on legion and allow the use of the real chaos marine units like raptors and oblits etc again allowed/restricted by legion.
Sprinkle new legion exclusive units and rules and you have the codex most people have wanted for years.
I think that's extremely unlikely. Firstly they just released Traitors Hate for the CSM codex which wouldn't have happened if they were about to squat that codex. Secondly, and already posted, so many kits and existing units become invalidated. Chaos terminators, any chaos vehicle with a havoc launcher, chaos marine squads with double special weapons, chosen squads, chaos lords with certain weapon configurations etc. To accommodate all of that stuff you'd have to practically write the entire codex over again but as a supplement for space marines. The supplement would be gigantic!
It would just be really complicated.
Hydra Dominatus
2016/11/20 19:51:28
Subject: Daemon Primarch Magnus/Wrath of Magnus/Traitor Legions Codex Supplement/Thousand Sons
SeanDrake wrote: Well since you cannot polish a turd(Gw have been trying since 4th) and it is explicitly stated that Legions is a c:sm supplement I guess csm is kinda getting squatted yay finally.
All they need to do is allow and restrict c:sm units based on legion and allow the use of the real chaos marine units like raptors and oblits etc again allowed/restricted by legion.
Sprinkle new legion exclusive units and rules and you have the codex most people have wanted for years.
Explicitly stated by a guy on Redit, or a small typo by a guy on Redit. I know which one I find more likely.
2016/11/20 19:58:31
Subject: Daemon Primarch Magnus/Wrath of Magnus/Traitor Legions Codex Supplement/Thousand Sons
What about the C:SM says codex astartes organization. It uses the same as every other army in the game. 2 HQ, 3 Elites, 6 Troops, 3 FA and 3 HS at the most basic organization not including all of thr various other organization styles. If you can play a chapter that doesn't use codex astartes in C:SM then how does that arguement make sense?
Easiest place to point to are the formations, which are strict "Demi-Company" Setups. The Demi Companies are formed from the rigid Battle Company lineup of 6 Tactical, 2 Assault and 2 Devastator squads.
Then there are the unit differences: Sternguard, Vanguard, Centurions vs. Chosen, Berzerkers, Daemon Engines etc. Also the ATSKNF rule, which the Chaos Marines lack and 30K marines don't have AFAIK. The fact that Loyalists can't have CC weapons on their basic guys, or can't get their squads in numbers beyond 10. Combat Squad rules, etc. Not to mention Marks, Spells, Daemon Princes. . .
It would very much surprise me if the Legions supplement was supplemented to C:SM as was rumored.
BrotherGecko wrote: I think I would prefer Traitor Legions being a Space Marine supplement over a Choas Marine supplement. Mostly because I already use the C:SM book when I port over my 30k IW. Unless CSM got a major overhaul, it does not allow for porting 30k.
Does anyone really think it's going to be C: SM?
It does make more sense if you consider that only C:SM has rules for cataphractii terminators and contemptor dreadnoughts. If you look at the new Tzeentch minis, we see stylized 30k armor and not 40k chaos armor. Basically if Traitor Legions isn't attached to C:SM, it makes it much harder for people to buy up those HH plastic kits for 40k. Attaching to C:SM maximizes potential profits whilst also needing to cover the least amount of rules.
C:SM doesn't have rules for Cataphractii Terminators and Contemptor Dreadnoughts.
Angels of Death; a Codex: Space Marines supplement has them.
I wouldn't be surprised to see Traitor Legions containing the rules for those items, and possibly even the Tartaros Terminator Armour.
2016/11/20 20:14:13
Subject: Daemon Primarch Magnus/Wrath of Magnus/Traitor Legions Codex Supplement/Thousand Sons
What about the C:SM says codex astartes organization. It uses the same as every other army in the game. 2 HQ, 3 Elites, 6 Troops, 3 FA and 3 HS at the most basic organization not including all of thr various other organization styles. If you can play a chapter that doesn't use codex astartes in C:SM then how does that arguement make sense?
I can play my HH era army with C:SM but I can't with CSM. Post-HH is still easier with C:SM.
You're digging your heels in on this stupid idea waaay too hard.
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2016/11/20 20:15:25
The old meta is dead and the new meta struggles to be born. Now is the time of munchkins.
2016/11/20 20:21:19
Subject: Daemon Primarch Magnus/Wrath of Magnus/Traitor Legions Codex Supplement/Thousand Sons
Chad Warden wrote: How can Legions be getting their own rules I thought they didnt exist anymore
A warband that was once part of the Emperor's Children, World Eaters etc. may only be 30 or 40 strong but on the tabletop that can easily be a 2000 point army with their vehicles, and they'll still fight like their legion fought. Plus other legions didn't fracture in the same way
Hydra Dominatus
2016/11/20 20:27:11
Subject: Daemon Primarch Magnus/Wrath of Magnus/Traitor Legions Codex Supplement/Thousand Sons
Chad Warden wrote: How can Legions be getting their own rules I thought they didn't exist anymore
That's just what the imperium want you to think
Its hard to be awesome, when your playing with little plastic men. Welcome to Fantasy 40k
If you think your important, in the great scheme of things. Do the water test.
Put your hands in a bucket of warm water,
then pull them out fast. The size of the hole shows how important you are.
I think we should roll some dice, to see if we should roll some dice, To decide if all this dice rolling is good for the game.
2016/11/20 21:45:57
Subject: Re:Daemon Primarch Magnus/Wrath of Magnus/Traitor Legions Codex Supplement/Thousand Sons
How can Legions be getting their own rules I thought they didnt exist anymore
They do exist though...
The game 40k takes place over the 10,000 after the Heresey.
They didn't immediately split up right after retreating from Terra. It took hundreds, if not thousands of years to fracture into different cults and warbands.
I could argue that my Emperor's children army is from m32 and are still fully functioning, or that my World Eaters have been lost in the warp since the onset of the Heresey and now have come back 9000 years later (which to them only felt like a few days) and are still very much a legion centred army. Therefore Legions do exist.
Or I can just give you the real answer and tell you that most Chaos players don't want Codex: Warbands or Codex: Renegades. We want Codex: Traitor Legions! We had it, and they took it away because reasons, and now over a decade later they've realized that we don't give a gak about the Red Corsairs (sorry red corsair players, I had to pick on somebody). We want full on traitor legions.
The Horus Heresy series has proven just how much people want this product, and GW would be the biggest idiots in the world not to cater to this very large demographic of players that buy their game. We've been asking for this for years only to be ignored. And the last two dismal failures of Chaos Marine Codex's were poorly recieved and show that we don't want to be spoon fed the gak that they are trying to serve us.
Give me Traitor Legions or give me Death
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/11/20 21:46:23
Square Bases for Life!
AoS is pure garbage
Kill Primaris, Kill the Primarchs. They don't belong in 40K
40K is fantasy in space, not sci-fi
2016/11/20 22:04:50
Subject: Re:Daemon Primarch Magnus/Wrath of Magnus/Traitor Legions Codex Supplement/Thousand Sons
angelofvengeance wrote:Legion supplement YouTube vid for those who don't like Facebook
That is not the original video. I see they have fixed it. In the first one, Alpha Legion were hiding. Now the logo is present in this video.
Agies Grimm:The "Learn to play, bro" mentality is mostly just a way for someone to try to shame you by implying that their metaphorical nerd-wiener is bigger than yours. Which, ironically, I think nerds do even more vehemently than jocks.
Everything is made up and the points don't matter. 40K or Who's Line is it Anyway?
Auticus wrote: Or in summation: its ok to exploit shoddy points because those are rules and gamers exist to find rules loopholes (they are still "legal"), but if the same force can be composed without structure, it emotionally feels "wrong".
2016/11/20 22:33:02
Subject: Re:Daemon Primarch Magnus/Wrath of Magnus/Traitor Legions Codex Supplement/Thousand Sons
Brutus_Apex wrote: Or I can just give you the real answer and tell you that most Chaos players don't want Codex: Warbands or Codex: Renegades. We want Codex: Traitor Legions! We had it, and they took it away because it was a broken NPE-generating pile of crap, and now over a decade later they've realized that we don't give a gak about the Red Corsairs (sorry red corsair players, I had to pick on somebody). We want full on traitor legions.
Fixed that for you.
Before anyone jumps down my throat about it, I have no issues with Chaos getting a Legions book - so long as someone writes it who gives a damn about both balance and background. And, preferably, doesn't play the Legions themselves, so we don't end up with that Iron Warriors list all over again...
Gamgee on Tau Players wrote:we all kill cats and sell our own families to the devil and eat live puppies.
Kanluwen wrote: This is, emphatically, why I will continue suggesting nuking Guard and starting over again. It's a legacy army that needs to be rebooted with a new focal point.
Confirmation of why no-one should listen to Kanluwen when it comes to the IG - he doesn't want the IG, he want's Kan's New Model Army...
tneva82 wrote: You aren't even trying ty pretend for honest arqument. Open bad faith trolling.
- No reason to keep this here, unless people want to use it for something...
2016/11/20 22:54:53
Subject: Re:Daemon Primarch Magnus/Wrath of Magnus/Traitor Legions Codex Supplement/Thousand Sons
Brutus_Apex wrote: Or I can just give you the real answer and tell you that most Chaos players don't want Codex: Warbands or Codex: Renegades. We want Codex: Traitor Legions! We had it, and they took it away because it was a broken NPE-generating pile of crap, and now over a decade later they've realized that we don't give a gak about the Red Corsairs (sorry red corsair players, I had to pick on somebody). We want full on traitor legions.
Fixed that for you.
Before anyone jumps down my throat about it, I have no issues with Chaos getting a Legions book - so long as someone writes it who gives a damn about both balance and background. And, preferably, doesn't play the Legions themselves, so we don't end up with that Iron Warriors list all over again...
Yet we still get Phil Kelly writing Craftworld Eldar.
2016/11/20 23:30:11
Subject: Re:Daemon Primarch Magnus/Wrath of Magnus/Traitor Legions Codex Supplement/Thousand Sons
How can Legions be getting their own rules I thought they didnt exist anymore
They do exist though...
The game 40k takes place over the 10,000 after the Heresey.
They didn't immediately split up right after retreating from Terra. It took hundreds, if not thousands of years to fracture into different cults and warbands.
I could argue that my Emperor's children army is from m32 and are still fully functioning, or that my World Eaters have been lost in the warp since the onset of the Heresey and now have come back 9000 years later (which to them only felt like a few days) and are still very much a legion centred army. Therefore Legions do exist.
Sorry I was being facetious
Whenever people asked for Legion rules in the past you'd always have someone saying "they cant get rules because they don't exist anymore"
2016/11/20 23:35:22
Subject: Daemon Primarch Magnus/Wrath of Magnus/Traitor Legions Codex Supplement/Thousand Sons
Yeah, when 50,000 warriors from a Legion 'broke up into Warbands' somehow they managed to never do so in large enough numbers to warrant rules, yet a 1000 strong Chapter certain does.
It makes a lot more sense to make some legion specific books than it does to add yet another flavour of space marines. Chaos has so much untapped potential. Hopefully we start seeing some new codexes rather than yet another supplement.
Necrons
Imperial Knights
Orcs and Goblins
Tomb Kings
Wood Elves
High Elves
2016/11/21 02:29:57
Subject: Daemon Primarch Magnus/Wrath of Magnus/Traitor Legions Codex Supplement/Thousand Sons
Does anyone have a page count on the supplement? Could we be seeing a bunch of new kits to flesh out all Traitor Legions? Even an update of the much beloved Khorne Berzerkers kit?
GamesWorkshop wrote: And I would have gotten away with it too, if it weren't for you meddling kids!
2016/11/21 02:35:07
Subject: Daemon Primarch Magnus/Wrath of Magnus/Traitor Legions Codex Supplement/Thousand Sons
Mathieu Raymond wrote: Does anyone have a page count on the supplement? Could we be seeing a bunch of new kits to flesh out all Traitor Legions? Even an update of the much beloved Khorne Berzerkers kit?
I think they'll slowly start releasing kits to match units in the supplement, at least I hope
2016/11/21 02:57:00
Subject: Daemon Primarch Magnus/Wrath of Magnus/Traitor Legions Codex Supplement/Thousand Sons
Supposedly it's 136 pages. I don't think it will have units.
I'm somewhat suspecting Wrath of magnus is how they are going to introduce new units though. This way they can release new units and models without having to wait for a whole new codex and release several campaign books over time too. I could be way off tough.
2016/11/21 03:03:55
Subject: Daemon Primarch Magnus/Wrath of Magnus/Traitor Legions Codex Supplement/Thousand Sons
That would be a huge slap in the face for the other legions though. Why do only the TSons get new units. Seems pretty unfair for a supplement that is supposed to be for all nine legions. The rumour didn't say anything about new units mind you.