Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/26 23:18:42
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 26 May 2017: More Primaris Stats(all info in OP)
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
*Current meatspace coordinates redacted*
|
docdoom77 wrote:changemod wrote:No seriously, did I miss bonus attack for charging or is it just not there anymore?
I think it's been replaced by going first. Which is fine, but I sure hope Orks still have a Furious Charge equivalent, or they're gonna have some lackluster charges.
Two base attacks (unless that changes, but I don't see it dropping) plus one from a choppa, (plus a pistol shot) isn't bad. Going first makes a huge difference (especially the Klaws).
|
He knows that I know and you know that he actually doesn't know the rules at all. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/26 23:19:07
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 26 May 2017: More Primaris Stats(all info in OP)
|
 |
[DCM]
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Hmm. Transport rules don't mention anything about Access Points (you just put embarked units within 3" of the transport vehicle, not anything specific as to where) or what happens if a vehicle is surrounded by the enemy and destroyed (just mentions that if the vehicle is destroyed, on a 1 the occupant dies after being set up).
Could be that if the enemy models cannot be set up around the perimeter of the destroyed vehicle because then they would be within 1" of enemy models (and then not eligible for being set up) then that would effectively destroy them...
Also, I have yet to see anything about vehicles exploding and affecting nearby units. I wonder if explosion damage still even happens.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/05/26 23:20:17
-GrimTeef- Proud mod of The-Waaagh forum and Vice-President of the Brian Nelson is a Sculpting God Club |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/26 23:19:23
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 26 May 2017: More Primaris Stats(all info in OP)
|
 |
Brutal Black Orc
|
Yeah, let's be honest: this was mediocre but not as bad as you guys want to paint it. In so far I saw no mentions of multilasers nor any side invoking their spiritual liege. Nothing great, let's not kid ourselves but that looks like it's an introductory blurb of something that would actually develop more properly rather than proper "fluff" (it just says it happened doesn't expand on it).
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/26 23:19:55
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 26 May 2017: More Primaris Stats(all info in OP)
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
I'm currently working my way through the Black Library Horus Heresy series of novels.
Then I read this BA material.
The experience was... jarring.
Obviously you expect a quality difference between novels and game book fluff, but even so...
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2017/05/26 23:23:31
"The Omnissiah is my Moderati" |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/26 23:20:04
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 25 May 2017: Missions/Ork focus/FB #17(all info in OP)
|
 |
Mighty Vampire Count
|
Kirasu wrote: Galas wrote:Poor Tyranids... feeded to Khorne:
What a coincidence how great losses all chapters receive now that you can have Super better Primaris Marines, eh?
This is quite possibly the worst fluff gw has ever written.
Its not good but its better than much of the stuff in the Grey Kinghts Codex or Murder Mc Murder from planet murder............hell its better than the constant "blood" this and Blood that in previous BA codex.
Sadly it is another Marines, Marines, Marines, Marines - oh and its about Marines. Yeah its about Baal but then Cadia had plenty of other factions.....
Automatically Appended Next Post:
GrimTeef wrote:Hmm. Transport rules don't mention anything about Access Points (you just put embarked units within 3" of the transport vehicle, not anything specific as to where) or what happens if a vehicle is surrounded by the enemy and destroyed (just mentions that if the vehicle is destroyed, on a 1 the occupant dies after being set up).
Could be that if the enemy models cannot be set up around the perimeter of the destroyed vehicle because then they would be within 1" of enemy models (and then not eligible for being set up) then that would effectively destroy them...
Also, I have yet to see anything about vehicles exploding and affecting nearby units. I wonder if explosion damage still even happens.
Yep that works - you can't deploy them - they die.
I doubt normal vehicles explode.
|
This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2017/05/26 23:22:13
I AM A MARINE PLAYER
"Unimaginably ancient xenos artefact somewhere on the planet, hive fleet poised above our heads, hidden 'stealer broods making an early start....and now a bloody Chaos cult crawling out of the woodwork just in case we were bored. Welcome to my world, Ciaphas."
Inquisitor Amberley Vail, Ordo Xenos
"I will admit that some Primachs like Russ or Horus could have a chance against an unarmed 12 year old novice but, a full Battle Sister??!! One to one? In close combat? Perhaps three Primarchs fighting together... but just one Primarch?" da001
www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/528517.page
A Bloody Road - my Warhammer Fantasy Fiction |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/26 23:21:47
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 25 May 2017: Missions/Ork focus/FB #17(all info in OP)
|
 |
Lethal Lhamean
Birmingham
|
Kirasu wrote: Galas wrote:Poor Tyranids... feeded to Khorne:
What a coincidence how great losses all chapters receive now that you can have Super better Primaris Marines, eh?
This is quite possibly the worst fluff gw has ever written.
Not worst but, is that it? I mean we had an excellent 2 book campaign in Shield of Baal leading up to this and 4 paragraphs is all we get?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/26 23:22:47
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 26 May 2017: More Primaris Stats(all info in OP)
|
 |
Chaplain with Hate to Spare
|
JohnnyHell wrote:I like that the points aren't all round 5s, 10s etc. I trust non-round numbers more than conveniently rounded ones!
When most Squads are still in groups of five, you still end up with the same result. The characters deviate from that though.
I gotta say, I have the odd numbers, but I will survive.
|
5250 pts
3850 pts
Deathwatch: 1500 pts
Imperial Knights: 375 pts
30K 2500 pts |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/26 23:23:22
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 26 May 2017: More Primaris Stats(all info in OP)
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
changemod wrote:jcd386 wrote:changemod wrote:No seriously, did I miss bonus attack for charging or is it just not there anymore?
I think you just get to attack first instead.
BlaxicanX wrote:changemod wrote:No seriously, did I miss bonus attack for charging or is it just not there anymore?
The general assumption is that there is no universal charge bonus other then hitting first. The only units that will get an attack bonus for charging are those who have it as a special rule.
Then I really hope they frequently raised the base attacks of assault units or bonus charge attacks are -really- common, because otherwise that along with the no bonus for two weapons thing is a major game-wide nerf to assault.
It is a nerf compared the old rules if you only look at those two things, but there are also a lot of new things (vehicles can assault, units can fall back out of assault, a lot of the weapons do different things, etc).
It will definitely be different, but if anything i think assault will be more tactical and interesting.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/26 23:23:31
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 25 May 2017: Missions/Ork focus/FB #17(all info in OP)
|
 |
Chaplain with Hate to Spare
|
Imateria wrote: Kirasu wrote: Galas wrote:Poor Tyranids... feeded to Khorne:
What a coincidence how great losses all chapters receive now that you can have Super better Primaris Marines, eh?
This is quite possibly the worst fluff gw has ever written.
Not worst but, is that it? I mean we had an excellent 2 book campaign in Shield of Baal leading up to this and 4 paragraphs is all we get?
Perhaps a campaign book that lets you play it out in your way will come out.
|
5250 pts
3850 pts
Deathwatch: 1500 pts
Imperial Knights: 375 pts
30K 2500 pts |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/26 23:24:05
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 25 May 2017: Missions/Ork focus/FB #17(all info in OP)
|
 |
Commander of the Mysterious 2nd Legion
|
yes we do, 13 points, per GW
|
Opinions are not facts please don't confuse the two |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/26 23:26:25
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 26 May 2017: More Primaris Stats(all info in OP)
|
 |
Lit By the Flames of Prospero
|
The imperial guard can take so much in a single troop choice I can't see any reason for them not to build their armies in vanguard, spearhead or out rider. They have great unit choices in all three of these slots.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/26 23:26:57
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 26 May 2017: More Primaris Stats(all info in OP)
|
 |
Pious Palatine
|
changemod wrote:jcd386 wrote:changemod wrote:No seriously, did I miss bonus attack for charging or is it just not there anymore?
I think you just get to attack first instead.
BlaxicanX wrote:changemod wrote:No seriously, did I miss bonus attack for charging or is it just not there anymore?
The general assumption is that there is no universal charge bonus other then hitting first. The only units that will get an attack bonus for charging are those who have it as a special rule.
Then I really hope they frequently raised the base attacks of assault units or bonus charge attacks are -really- common, because otherwise that along with the no bonus for two weapons thing is a major game-wide nerf to assault.
Can't be a nerf because nerf is a relative value and we don't have a baseline yet. This is not 7th+ it's an entirely new game (pretty much) and things like this are apples to oranges.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/26 23:27:18
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 25 May 2017: Missions/Ork focus/FB #17(all info in OP)
|
 |
Nasty Nob
|
Rippy wrote:Please take the "Primaris weapons use Tau tech" to a new thread
you need to goto the hospital
|
ERJAK wrote:
The fluff is like ketchup and mustard on a burger. Yes it's desirable, yes it makes things better, but no it doesn't fundamentally change what you're eating and no you shouldn't just drown the whole meal in it.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/26 23:29:42
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 26 May 2017: More Primaris Stats(all info in OP)
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
Denmark
|
Lockark wrote:The imperial guard can take so much in a single troop choice I can't see any reason for them not to build their armies in vanguard, spearhead or out rider. They have great unit choices in all three of these slots.
I think guard will be among a few of the only factions that can fill out the batallion FOC, which gives a wopping 9 CPs, so I can see guard commanders aiming for that.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/26 23:31:20
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 26 May 2017: More Primaris Stats(all info in OP)
|
 |
Oozing Plague Marine Terminator
|
My all Lootaz army is now legally possible.
*salivates*
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/26 23:32:54
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 26 May 2017: More Primaris Stats(all info in OP)
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
ERJAK wrote:changemod wrote:jcd386 wrote:changemod wrote:No seriously, did I miss bonus attack for charging or is it just not there anymore?
I think you just get to attack first instead.
BlaxicanX wrote:changemod wrote:No seriously, did I miss bonus attack for charging or is it just not there anymore?
The general assumption is that there is no universal charge bonus other then hitting first. The only units that will get an attack bonus for charging are those who have it as a special rule.
Then I really hope they frequently raised the base attacks of assault units or bonus charge attacks are -really- common, because otherwise that along with the no bonus for two weapons thing is a major game-wide nerf to assault.
Can't be a nerf because nerf is a relative value and we don't have a baseline yet. This is not 7th+ it's an entirely new game (pretty much) and things like this are apples to oranges.
It has an absurdly long list of legacy stats and rules, so a particularly sweeping change can have pretty predictable effects.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/26 23:36:36
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 26 May 2017: More Primaris Stats(all info in OP)
|
 |
Chaplain with Hate to Spare
|
I hope Plasmaguns are basically shorter ranged, lower AP versions of the Plasma Incinerator. 24", Str 7, AP -3, with the same Overcharge ability. If they keep the same AP, I will be okay with it though.
|
5250 pts
3850 pts
Deathwatch: 1500 pts
Imperial Knights: 375 pts
30K 2500 pts |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/26 23:43:49
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 26 May 2017: More Primaris Stats(all info in OP)
|
 |
Warplord Titan Princeps of Tzeentch
|
Don't think plasma guns will have an overcharge ability.
I wager 24" rapid fire 1 Str 7 Ap -4 with always-on "gets-hot"
The fact the new incinerators don't blow up ALL the time is the upgrade.
|
can neither confirm nor deny I lost track of what I've got right now. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/26 23:44:00
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 26 May 2017: More Primaris Stats(all info in OP)
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Binabik15 wrote:Re: awesome Nurgle art
Are those things in the lower left the full gribblies to the rumour engine pic of many chubby feet? Yum.
Wonder if those are new Beasts of Nurgle?
|
"The Omnissiah is my Moderati" |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/26 23:56:24
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 25 May 2017: Missions/Ork focus/FB #17(all info in OP)
|
 |
Hissing Hybrid Metamorph
|
I am at the hospital. In the waiting room. 2 hours later. Automatically Appended Next Post: Loving that new Nurgle/Ultramarine art, great indication of what DG might be getting shortly after launch.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/05/26 23:57:10
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/27 00:00:16
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 25 May 2017: Missions/Ork focus/FB #17(all info in OP)
|
 |
Trustworthy Shas'vre
|
Rippy wrote:
I am at the hospital. In the waiting room. 2 hours later.
Automatically Appended Next Post:
Loving that new Nurgle/Ultramarine art, great indication of what DG might be getting shortly after launch.
As a fellow dad, hope the best for you and the family - never fun with kids at the hospital.
|
DavePak
"Remember, in life, the only thing you absolutely control is your own attitude - do not squander that power."
Fully Painted armies:
TAU: 10k Nids: 9600 Marines: 4000 Crons: 7600
Actor, Gamer, Comic, Corporate Nerd
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/27 00:06:44
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 26 May 2017: More Primaris Stats(all info in OP)
|
 |
Stealthy Kroot Stalker
|
casvalremdeikun wrote:I hope Plasmaguns are basically shorter ranged, lower AP versions of the Plasma Incinerator. 24", Str 7, AP -3, with the same Overcharge ability. If they keep the same AP, I will be okay with it though.
I think you have the right of it, and it tracks the recent boost from Bolter to Bolt Rifle after getting the Cawl Treatment: +6" range, -1 AP
I'm hoping that the Tau Plasma Rifle remains distinguished for its reliability (albeit at lower raw output) - something like Rapid Fire 1, 24" S6 AP-3 D2.
I'd rather have AP-4 too, but I think that unlikely (Primaris Marines gotta primaris).
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/05/27 00:08:51
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/27 00:07:17
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 26 May 2017: More Primaris Stats(all info in OP)
|
 |
Enigmatic Chaos Sorcerer
|
Thanks for collecting all this. Really busy right now but looks like some solid info about the workings are coming clear.
What goes up for pre-order tomorrow?
|
BlaxicanX wrote:A young business man named Tom Kirby, who was a pupil of mine until he turned greedy, helped the capitalists hunt down and destroy the wargamers. He betrayed and murdered Games Workshop.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/27 00:11:43
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 26 May 2017: More Primaris Stats(all info in OP)
|
 |
Towering Hierophant Bio-Titan
|
Nothing for 40k... all of that is the following Saturday
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/27 00:16:03
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 26 May 2017: More Primaris Stats(all info in OP)
|
 |
Lit By the Flames of Prospero
|
So if your playing a open imperial faction army does that mean you can buy any imperial transport for any imperial unit? Land raiders for ogryn, chimerias for space marines, etc?
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/05/27 00:16:28
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/27 00:16:18
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 26 May 2017: More Primaris Stats(all info in OP)
|
 |
Khorne Chosen Marine Riding a Juggernaut
|
Nostromodamus wrote:I'm currently working my way through the Black Library Horus Heresy series of novels.
Then I read this BA material.
The experience was... jarring.
Obviously you expect a quality difference between novels and game book fluff, but even so...
And you see why the Black Legion codex supplement fluff was so good compared to any other codexes or supplement, its was written by ADB.
They should hire their best BL novelist to make Fluff in codexes honestly...
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/27 00:17:16
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 26 May 2017: More Primaris Stats(all info in OP)
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
Eldarain wrote:Thanks for collecting all this. Really busy right now but looks like some solid info about the workings are coming clear.
What goes up for pre-order tomorrow?
Lord of the Rings and Blood Bowl.
|
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/27 00:21:38
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 26 May 2017: More Primaris Stats(all info in OP)
|
 |
Towering Hierophant Bio-Titan
Mexico
|
Lockark wrote:So if your playing a open imperial faction army does that mean you can buy any imperial transport for any imperial unit? Land raiders for ogryn, chimerias for space marines, etc?
You can buy, but you probably can't use as I expect that transports work using keywords.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/27 00:26:37
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 26 May 2017: More Primaris Stats(all info in OP)
|
 |
Veteran Inquisitorial Tyranid Xenokiller
|
Tyran wrote: Lockark wrote:So if your playing a open imperial faction army does that mean you can buy any imperial transport for any imperial unit? Land raiders for ogryn, chimerias for space marines, etc?
You can buy, but you probably can't use as I expect that transports work using keywords.
You could play an Imperial Faction, and take Ogryn elites and space marine drop pods I suppose.
|
Inquisitor Jex wrote:Yeah, telling people how this and that is 'garbage' and they should just throw their minis into the trash as they're not as efficient as XYZ.
Peregrine wrote:So the solution is to lie and pretend that certain options are effective so people will feel better? |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/05/27 00:27:47
Subject: Warhammer 40k 8th Edition Summary - 26 May 2017: More Primaris Stats(all info in OP)
|
 |
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain
Vigo. Spain.
|
Are you serious? Only this?! This has to be the worst pre-order week in... GW history
|
Crimson Devil wrote:
Dakka does have White Knights and is also rather infamous for it's Black Knights. A new edition brings out the passionate and not all of them are good at expressing themselves in written form. There have been plenty of hysterical responses from both sides so far. So we descend into pointless bickering with neither side listening to each other. So posting here becomes more masturbation than conversation.
ERJAK wrote:Forcing a 40k player to keep playing 7th is basically a hate crime.
|
|
 |
 |
|