Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

I've never understood GW's addiction to putting armchairs on dragons - even way back with the original dragons which had a mile-high-chariback I've never understood it.


But I DO WANT that dragon!

New terrain:



by battle bunnies

What is that Dragon thingy? And how did the other rider look like? I must have missed that and it´s awesome!

Btw what happened to Sayl the Faithless? He´s not in the app or in the FW pdf´s.

Can we get spoiler tags on the pics for those on mobile devices?

I assume the dragon must be something Foregeworld?

 tommse wrote:
What is that Dragon thingy? And how did the other rider look like? I must have missed that and it´s awesome!

Btw what happened to Sayl the Faithless? He´s not in the app or in the FW pdf´s.

Sayl and his demon friend are in the monstrous arcanum compendium.

 Mad Doc Grotsnik wrote:
Can we get spoiler tags on the pics for those on mobile devices?

Can you just report the offending post in question so that a Mod can take care of it, rather than adding boring non-content to the thread?

Edited with spoiler. sorry.

 tommse wrote:
What is that Dragon thingy? And how did the other rider look like? I must have missed that and it´s awesome!

Oh yeah, that old rider was much better.

We'll maybe have options for both helmeted and un helmeted heads

They udated the app but didn't update warscrolls from what I can tell. :,(

 HorticulusDK wrote:
We'll maybe have options for both helmeted and un helmeted heads

And another body? :p

 HorticulusDK wrote:
We'll maybe have options for both helmeted and un helmeted heads

The whole model is different, not just the head.

Just left my FLGS empty handed, no Hexwraith Flame, no banshees :( Both are listed as in stock on their site. Had I known that I might've gone to the GW store in another city.

Seeing all those upcoming 'haunts units makes me seriously ponder starting a small force and ordering the starter set. I wanted to finish* my Nurgle army first, though. Stupid plastic crack. The banshees would've been for 40k conversions and I'm only interested in Lady Olynder to turn her into the Lady of Cankerwell, I swear!

*building, we all know the pile of shame will never be painted

zamerion wrote:

 HorticulusDK wrote:
We'll maybe have options for both helmeted and un helmeted heads

And another body? :p

Yeah what I meant is that they maybe have kept at least ONE PIECE (the head) of the original, IMO better rider

I'm also somewhat pleased with the more female depictions the Stormcast are getting.

This plus some units representing other races (like the undead Skaven) makes me hope we can get more variation for all games branches in order to get a more lively troops (as it always open more interesting ideas for conversions)

P.S: i really love those sword wielding nighthaunts and the reaper banshees.

Picture of the Dracolines with Evocator riders.


Automatically Appended Next Post:

 Mysterio wrote:

 Mad Doc Grotsnik wrote:
Can we get spoiler tags on the pics for those on mobile devices?

Can you just report the offending post in question so that a Mod can take care of it, rather than adding boring non-content to the thread?

He could also PM the individual who originally posted them, Zamerion seems to be fairly accommodating.

Yeah really liking the addition of unhelmeted heads and female Stormcasts. Aos 1st edition held no interest for me but 2nd edition has enough I like that I went and bought Soul Wars.

They mentioned in the live cast today that the Glaivewraith Stalkers are former huntsmen who have been twisted and merged with their horse in death so they aren't Skaven,

 Lord Perversor wrote:
I'm also somewhat pleased with the more female depictions the Stormcast are getting.

This plus some units representing other races (like the undead Skaven) makes me hope we can get more variation for all games branches in order to get a more lively troops (as it always open more interesting ideas for conversions)

P.S: i really love those sword wielding nighthaunts and the reaper banshees.

The Glaivewrath Stalkers have horse skulls, not Skaven skulls. I do like the female Stormcast though.

I really don't care if the Stormcast is a female or male, but the model and pose is nice, looks a pleasure to paint.

I'm very curious about that unit that looks like Evocators with staffs amped up to 11...

(Part of one appears to the far left of the mounted evocators picture above, but was seen in full at the big reveal event a whilst back)

The number of female Stormcast and Nighthaunt sculpts is really interesting I think. From zero to this is a pretty good jump. I wonder if we’ll see that diversity in more armies.

Pic from the Open Day via Warhammer Community with Lady Olynder, Kurdoss Valentian and the Black Coach.

Aren73 wrote:
I really don't care if the Stormcast is a female or male, but the model and pose is nice, looks a pleasure to paint.

The female Stormcasts have much nicer proportions, smaller shoulder pads, and generally look better than the male versions IMO.

So the Azyr app is bug filled, incomplete and just plain wrong and I’m forced to write my lists with a pen, paper and using maths to add it all up like some sort of caveman. What is this? 2005?

If I get a paper cut, I’m suing.

 Mymearan wrote:

Aren73 wrote:
I really don't care if the Stormcast is a female or male, but the model and pose is nice, looks a pleasure to paint.

The female Stormcasts have much nicer proportions, smaller shoulder pads, and generally look better than the male versions IMO.

My exact opinion. I dont like the males that much, but the females just look more natural, their poses more dinamic. Look the evocators, for example, the tabards of the males are shorther and look worse.

I presume the answer is negative, but does anyone know if Crawlocke the Jailer - the named Spirit Torment that went on preorder today - has a unique warscroll/abilities from the regular version in the box set? The online store only has a download for the accompanying Chainghasts...

Clockpunk wrote:
I presume the answer is negative, but does anyone know if Crawlocke the Jailer - the named Spirit Torment that went on preorder today - has a unique warscroll/abilities from the regular version in the box set? The online store only has a download for the accompanying Chainghasts...

I don't think so. GW just have this weird habit of giving names to rulewise generic models.

So is the Black Coach a Nighthaunt thing now? Shouldn't it, of all things, be a Vampire thing?

Definitely Nighthaunt. May well have a dual keyword though.