Switch Theme:

'Free Your Models - Contrast' paint range -- In stores June 15th, color charts and video pg. 34  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Powerful Phoenix Lord





 hotsauceman1 wrote:
IMO with these new paints, there is no excuse for unpainted armies


Honestly with coloured primers, washes, etc...there hasn't been an excuse for years.
   
Made in gb
Ridin' on a Snotling Pump Wagon






Yes and no.

I’m a reluctant painter, and the easier the products make it, the more enthused I am.

It also opens up a good number of armies to me, which I wouldn’t consider before due to the time it’d take to paint them. Guard, Orcs/Orks, Gobbos, Nids, Beastmen, Skaven. Loads.

   
Made in us
Humming Great Unclean One of Nurgle






 kodos wrote:
 NinthMusketeer wrote:
Having looked through more examples/experiences... I'm not sure. I'll have to try it for myself, because the potential seems there and despite claims otherwise do not see another product that actually behaves the same way.


Previous GW Washes did exactly the same, but they were never advertised as 1 Layer to get the job done but in addition to regular Citadel paints.
But lot of people used it that way and were therefore angry that GW removed them after while to promote their current Base/Layer/Shade system

I am really surprised that people forgot about those in such a short timeframe or just never believed those guys on the internet that White Primer + Citadel Wash allows very good results very fast, as GW told them they are not meant to be used that way.

GW 2019: this is the best Paint ever, there has never been something like this before and painting armies will be much fast now
People jumping the hypetrain as 1 Layer over white primer was impossible until that day

GW 2011:
Spoiler:




I could understand it if a different company would have made them in the past, but it was GW itself who did it. Therefore I won't understand the hate against people who say that this is nothing special. It is not, it was done by GW before but killed again for unknown reason (maybe they did not sold enough other paints any more) and now re-invented after people already have found alternatives


It is really good that GW brings those old Washes finally back, as my last bottle Asurmen Blue is getting empty and there is no similar dark blue Wash out there, with a wider range of colours.

But it is nothing new or special, more like correcting a bad mistake (killing their best painting product) and I do not jump on the hypetrain because I am not sure if they will stay longer or be removed again like the last time.
I used those washes quite a lot (I don't have any more because I used it all) and still have models that I speed-painted that way. So yeah, I 'remember' perfectly well how it looks. And it does not look like these new paints do. The passive-aggressive 'you are too blind to see it' tone certainly does you little favors; perhaps it is your eyesight simply lacking the clarity to make out the distinction?

Road to Renown! It's like classic Path to Glory, but repaired, remastered, expanded! https://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/778170.page

I chose an avatar I feel best represents the quality of my post history.

I try to view Warhammer as more of a toolbox with examples than fully complete games. 
   
Made in gb
RogueSangre



West Sussex, UK

Once i have tried them and they do a decent job then I'm probably going to pick up a set of the paints. Chances are I will still use my current time consuming (I am an especially slow painter) for my GW models but will instead use the Contrast paints to get through some of the miniature board game backlog I have.

Based on the videos I could see myself knocking out the entire wave 1 of the Hellboy board game in a weekend and the Journey in Middle-Earth models over a few evenings.

I will still stick to metallic paint and wash for the metals as I don't think Contrast pulls them off well enough I can see adding some Contrast techniques to my current painting method such as using them over metallic to get some nice coloured metal.
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIEtAlMSndQ

Here's a great video if people haven't seen it of how quick you can paint with this and how dark/rich the colors are. There's also some good info in here.

For those that don't want to watch, here's the takeaway.

GW will release two primers that are made to work best with Contrast paints. They are NOT NECESSARY, but are formulated to be super smooth (much smoother than Corax White). This means that as long as you have a very smooth base coat, the Contrast paints will work just fine.

They will work over metallics, they work with other paints, you can use washes over them to change the colors, etc.

DO NOT ADD WATER. They need no thinning and actually work worse with water.

Those are the key things that I heard from the salesperson in the video
   
Made in us
Lieutenant General





Florence, KY

drbored wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIEtAlMSndQ

Here's a great video if people haven't seen it of how quick you can paint with this and how dark/rich the colors are. There's also some good info in here.

For those that don't want to watch, here's the takeaway.

GW will release two primers that are made to work best with Contrast paints. They are NOT NECESSARY, but are formulated to be super smooth (much smoother than Corax White). This means that as long as you have a very smooth base coat, the Contrast paints will work just fine.

They will work over metallics, they work with other paints, you can use washes over them to change the colors, etc.

DO NOT ADD WATER. They need no thinning and actually work worse with water.

Those are the key things that I heard from the salesperson in the video

It's the same video that was posted by Chikout HERE if you've already seen The 2Ps Podcast video.

'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents
cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable
defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'

- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty
Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim
 
   
Made in gb
[DCM]
Stonecold Gimster






drbored wrote:

DO NOT ADD WATER. They need no thinning and actually work worse with water.


So... what do we thin them with?
After all, they're in GW pots, so some will be half dried out when you buy them. The rest will dry out rapidly like most GW paints seem to in those pots.

My Painting Blog: http://gimgamgoo.com/
Currently most played: Silent Death, Xenos Rampant, Mars Code Aurora and Battletech.
I tried dabbling with 40k9/10 again and tried AoS3 - disliked both, but I'm enjoying HH2 and trying Battletech Classic and AS out 
   
Made in us
Lieutenant General





Florence, KY

 Gimgamgoo wrote:
drbored wrote:

DO NOT ADD WATER. They need no thinning and actually work worse with water.


So... what do we thin them with?
After all, they're in GW pots, so some will be half dried out when you buy them. The rest will dry out rapidly like most GW paints seem to in those pots.

From Warhammer Community:

... to help you experiment with this new paint, we’ll also be launching a new Contrast Medium which gives pros even more opportunities to play with this new paint’s unique properties...

'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents
cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable
defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'

- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty
Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim
 
   
Made in us
Rampaging Chaos Russ Driver





Albany, NY

 Gimgamgoo wrote:
drbored wrote:

DO NOT ADD WATER. They need no thinning and actually work worse with water.


So... what do we thin them with?
After all, they're in GW pots, so some will be half dried out when you buy them. The rest will dry out rapidly like most GW paints seem to in those pots.


The Contrast Medium they announced. Similar to Lahmian Medium, but will maintain the Contrast properties.

   
Made in us
Stalwart Dark Angels Space Marine





Charlotte, NC

Contrast paint sounds great, but if GW really want to get me excited, just start selling paint in proper dropper bottles

2500 Points
2000 Points 
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut





 Freeflow44 wrote:
Contrast paint sounds great, but if GW really want to get me excited, just start selling paint in proper dropper bottles


Give them another 10 years. It takes GW a bit of time to catch up with basic logic and customer desires.
   
Made in us
Is 'Eavy Metal Calling?





Affton, MO. USA

 Freeflow44 wrote:
Contrast paint sounds great, but if GW really want to get me excited, just start selling paint in proper dropper bottles

I detest roller bottles, but I paint straight from the pot and I am not a great painter. I’ve only had three pots since they switched from the old bolted shell style bottles to these that have dried out, each of those were because I either added water or left the lid off .i have army painter and some Vallejo in dropper bottles and have them all set aside as I hate wasting it by pouring out more than I ever use.

LOL, Theo your mind is an amazing place, never change.-camkierhi 9/19/13
I cant believe theo is right.. damn. -comradepanda 9/26/13
None of the strange ideas we had about you involved your sexual orientation..........-Monkeytroll 12/10/13

I'd put you on ignore for that comment, if I could...Alpharius 2/11/14 
   
Made in us
Auspicious Aspiring Champion of Chaos






 Theophony wrote:
 Freeflow44 wrote:
Contrast paint sounds great, but if GW really want to get me excited, just start selling paint in proper dropper bottles

I detest roller bottles, but I paint straight from the pot and I am not a great painter. I’ve only had three pots since they switched from the old bolted shell style bottles to these that have dried out, each of those were because I either added water or left the lid off .i have army painter and some Vallejo in dropper bottles and have them all set aside as I hate wasting it by pouring out more than I ever use.


This is me. I've never had issues with Citadel paints drying out unless I left the bottle open. Dropper bottles would be great, but there's too much hyperbole about the Citadel paint pots.

2000 Khorne Bloodbound (Skullfiend Tribe- Aqshy)
1000 Tzeentch Arcanites (Pyrofane Cult - Hysh) in progress
2000 Slaves to Darkness (Ravagers)
 
   
Made in gb
Basecoated Black




East Midlands

Just found this video, look pretty good

(didn't see it posted here on a skim thru, sorry if it's already been posted)


   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka





West Michigan, deep in Whitebread, USA

I dunno, I think they suck, and this is after 20+ years with GW. The lid is especially bad, as paint always wicks into the lid at the back under the hinge, so I periodically have to scrape out the inner ring of dried paint.

Not as bad as the old style with a twist lid, but still behind all the competitions' offerings. Hell, I still have pre-bolter shell snap-top hexagonal pot GW paints that are still good (anyone remember colored metallics like Amethyst Purple?). Even those would be better than the current bottles. The tops just suck.



"By this point I'm convinced 100% that every single race in the 40k universe have somehow tapped into the ork ability to just have their tech work because they think it should."  
   
Made in fi
Locked in the Tower of Amareo





 Elbows wrote:
 hotsauceman1 wrote:
IMO with these new paints, there is no excuse for unpainted armies


Honestly with coloured primers, washes, etc...there hasn't been an excuse for years.


Coloured primer does one colour. Models generally have more than 1 colour in them. No good method to do in one step what has been shown with stock colours(mixing with water etc isn't quick and consistent enough). Ap's products might be similar but availability is issue. These will be available at your store without needing specific order with delay. Definite plus

2024 painted/bought: 109/109 
   
Made in gb
Longtime Dakkanaut





These are great for new painters, but they still demand accuracy and patience. Paint all at once and you will have colours running into each other and causing havoc, much better to take the time and let each colour dry. Neatness is also a necessity, so thinking you are going to get a 100+ model army painted up in a week may be taking it a bit far.

Painting Warhammer 40,000 Conquest a P and M blog : https://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/0/763491.page 
   
Made in us
Chaplain with Hate to Spare





Sioux Falls, SD

ListenToMeWarriors wrote:
These are great for new painters, but they still demand accuracy and patience. Paint all at once and you will have colours running into each other and causing havoc, much better to take the time and let each colour dry. Neatness is also a necessity, so thinking you are going to get a 100+ model army painted up in a week may be taking it a bit far.
They will probably be fine for batch painting. By the time you reach the end of the line, the initial color will probably be dry enough to move on to the next one. If you just work on just one dude at a time, it will be a disaster.

5250 pts
3850 pts
Deathwatch: 1500 pts
Imperial Knights: 375 pts
30K 2500 pts 
   
Made in gb
Longtime Dakkanaut





 casvalremdeikun wrote:
ListenToMeWarriors wrote:
These are great for new painters, but they still demand accuracy and patience. Paint all at once and you will have colours running into each other and causing havoc, much better to take the time and let each colour dry. Neatness is also a necessity, so thinking you are going to get a 100+ model army painted up in a week may be taking it a bit far.
They will probably be fine for batch painting. By the time you reach the end of the line, the initial color will probably be dry enough to move on to the next one. If you just work on just one dude at a time, it will be a disaster.


For sure, just concentrating on one colour at a time will be best and it will be amazing for troop types that are mainly one colour of skin or armour (well I am not fully sold on the technique for non-organic surfaces but time will tell). I am intrigued to see how Apothecary White works as well.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/05/13 04:52:29


Painting Warhammer 40,000 Conquest a P and M blog : https://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/0/763491.page 
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut





ListenToMeWarriors wrote:
These are great for new painters, but they still demand accuracy and patience. Paint all at once and you will have colours running into each other and causing havoc, much better to take the time and let each colour dry. Neatness is also a necessity, so thinking you are going to get a 100+ model army painted up in a week may be taking it a bit far.


According to some of the reviews, the paints actually dry relatively fast, like 10 minutes. That's a lot faster than most washes which take closer to 30 to completely dry on a model.

And a lot of the speed comes down to the kind of model/army you're painting.

Skeletons? Prime > Contrast bone > metal parts > Done
Orks? Prime > Contrast green > Contrast cloth > metal parts > Done
Tyranids? Prime > Contrast A > Contrast B > Done
Seraphon? Prime > Contrast scale color > Contrast shield color > metal parts > Done
Imperial Fists? Prime > Contrast yellow > Red trim > metal parts > Done

As soon as you throw in more detail or a more complicated scheme, it gets a lot more difficult and you have to be pickier about how you use these paints. Things like the checkerboard pattern on Orks will not be contrastable. Howling Griffons, just no. Ulthwe eldar? Better off painting the old fashioned way between that black and bone color. Black Legion? They're black and gold... Sure you could use the black Contrast, but that doesn't help you with the gold part. Same with Custodes. No gold Contrast. You're better off priming gold and then washing agrax or reikland.

But for a good 90% of armies, these paints will be a godsend. Anything organic (daemons, goblins, sylvaneth) are all going to be stupidly easy. I'm already regretting priming some of my models black. My next army I'll be priming white in prep for Contrast.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/05/13 04:56:36


 
   
Made in fi
Locked in the Tower of Amareo





ListenToMeWarriors wrote:
These are great for new painters, but they still demand accuracy and patience. Paint all at once and you will have colours running into each other and causing havoc, much better to take the time and let each colour dry. Neatness is also a necessity, so thinking you are going to get a 100+ model army painted up in a week may be taking it a bit far.


Batch painting is your friend. Unless they take significantly more to dry than shades shouldn't be issue. I have never really had to wait. If i feel like continuing just start with models i washed first

2024 painted/bought: 109/109 
   
Made in fi
Calculating Commissar







I can see what GW is trying to accomplish with these paints, but I don't really like the results that much. A lot of the photos of Contrast painted miniatures have a very particular look, a kind of watercolor-like effect for lack of a better word, and that's not compatible visually with anything I've ever painted (aside from maybe some of my wash painting experiments). This is a completely subjective viewpoint, but I'd go so far as to call a lot of the contrast-painted models actually unpleasant-looking in some undefinable sense.

I can see the use of some of the shades for particular effects, but for an established painter with a preset workflow and preexisting paint schemes, they have less to offer than for those looking to start new armies from scratch.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/05/13 06:03:36


The supply does not get to make the demands. 
   
Made in fi
Locked in the Tower of Amareo





 Agamemnon2 wrote:

I can see the use of some of the shades for particular effects, but for an established painter with a preset workflow and preexisting paint schemes, they have less to offer than for those looking to start new armies from scratch.


Those people aren"t really the target audience though. Guys with tons of unpainted are

2024 painted/bought: 109/109 
   
Made in at
Second Story Man





Austria

 NinthMusketeer wrote:
The passive-aggressive 'you are too blind to see it' tone certainly does you little favors; perhaps it is your eyesight simply lacking the clarity to make out the distinction?


the passiv-agressive was not intended, sorry if it read that way.

The difference is there, but there are also 4 times the colours and different primer available, allowing different combinations. There is a special medium to thin them down and a new varnish, also effecting the outcome.

Of course, I am not sure until I tested and compared them to others, but I don't expect them to be that different or being something completley new (most intresting one will be White anyway, as if this one works well over grey Primer it will speed up a lot my Napoleonic armies and I have a good reasons to finally get some Austrians)

But I can already see people being disappointed if their expectations are not met after the first trial, as it will still take time to learn how to handle them to get something like those models shown on the promo pictures (as those have seen some additional work and not just 1 Layer out of the bottle).

Harry, bring this ring to Narnia or the Sith will take the Enterprise 
   
Made in ca
Lit By the Flames of Prospero





Edmonton, Alberta

 kodos wrote:
 NinthMusketeer wrote:
The passive-aggressive 'you are too blind to see it' tone certainly does you little favors; perhaps it is your eyesight simply lacking the clarity to make out the distinction?


the passiv-agressive was not intended, sorry if it read that way.

The difference is there, but there are also 4 times the colours and different primer available, allowing different combinations. There is a special medium to thin them down and a new varnish, also effecting the outcome.

Of course, I am not sure until I tested and compared them to others, but I don't expect them to be that different or being something completley new (most intresting one will be White anyway, as if this one works well over grey Primer it will speed up a lot my Napoleonic armies and I have a good reasons to finally get some Austrians)

But I can already see people being disappointed if their expectations are not met after the first trial, as it will still take time to learn how to handle them to get something like those models shown on the promo pictures (as those have seen some additional work and not just 1 Layer out of the bottle).


I know you feel strongly they are the same. But this pic kinda proves they really aren't. No wash new or old GW has made would saturate the gold so much to create a effect like this. You would see alot more of the gold/silver showing thru instead
Spoiler:


Even GW's glazes don't give you a effect like that. I think their is a lot of interesting effects one will be able to achieve

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2019/05/13 07:00:43


 
   
Made in fi
Calculating Commissar







tneva82 wrote:
 Agamemnon2 wrote:

I can see the use of some of the shades for particular effects, but for an established painter with a preset workflow and preexisting paint schemes, they have less to offer than for those looking to start new armies from scratch.


Those people aren"t really the target audience though. Guys with tons of unpainted are

Well, yes and no. I mean, I am a guy with tons of unpainted. But the thing is, they're all unpainted models for armies I already own, and I would have to do considerable experimentation to match existing paint schemes for (insofar as that's even possible). I don't know how common the scenario of someone with an entirely unpainted army is.

I am curious about the potential for Contrast paints for painting white armor and other light tones, where traditional washing and highlighting is often either too aggressive and darkens the result too much, or requires you to custom-mix your own washes and paint tones to an infuriating degree.

The supply does not get to make the demands. 
   
Made in au
Owns Whole Set of Skullz Techpriests






Versteckt in den Schatten deines Geistes.

Yeah I've tried glazes over stormhost silver. Takes a lot of coats to build up a metallic colour effect.

Industrial Insanity - My Terrain Blog
"GW really needs to understand 'Less is more' when it comes to AoS." - Wha-Mu-077

 
   
Made in at
Second Story Man





Austria

 Lockark wrote:

I know you feel strongly they are the same. But this pic kinda proves they really aren't. No wash new or old GW has made would saturate the gold so much to create a effect like this. You would see alot more of the gold/silver showing thru instead
Spoiler:


Even GW's glazes don't give you a effect like that. I think their is a lot of interesting effects one will be able to achieve


That looks more like Tamiya Clear Red over Gold, but there are also additional Silver Highlights on the Red colour.

So it is difficult to say if it is one layer or more and what other additional steps were done.

But compare it to the steps in this old tutorial for Pre-Heresy 1kSons
http://www.mywargame.com/2010/02/14/painting-metallic-pre-heresy-thousand-sons/

I would say main difference between old and new would be the amount of pigments and you needed 2 or 3 layers from the old one.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/05/13 07:31:37


Harry, bring this ring to Narnia or the Sith will take the Enterprise 
   
Made in gb
Fixture of Dakka






 Freeflow44 wrote:
Contrast paint sounds great, but if GW really want to get me excited, just start selling paint in proper dropper bottles


GW's current lids are the best they've ever had; easy to clean and if kept clean they form a decent seal IME. By comparison, my Vallejo bottles have split lids, split nozzles, it's hard to get the paint out of the screw threads and when they separate, there always seems to be a build-up of pigment-free medium collected in the nozzle, no matter how hard I shake. And then there's the unexpected paint volcanos - I only want to paint a couple of gems and suddenly the red paint is fountaining out of the bottle like an arterial wound.

The latter is probably something I'm doing, perhaps by storing them horizontally like wine bottles, but then with flip-top pots I can store them whatever way I want and the paint stays where it should.

Dropper bottles are fine for those who want them, but "proper"? Nah, just "different".


Automatically Appended Next Post:
 H.B.M.C. wrote:
Yeah I've tried glazes over stormhost silver. Takes a lot of coats to build up a metallic colour effect.


I used Druchii Violet over Army Painter Plate Mail Metal for Fulgrim and some Phoenix Terminators. Two coats did the trick.

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2019/05/13 08:03:04


 
   
Made in us
Powerful Phoenix Lord





Have they mentioned cost yet?

GW seems to be learning their lesson. Instead of watering down (and thereby making more use of the scant 12 mL bottles they use...) they're creating a product you apply quite heavily to the mini - much in line with their "douse the entire model in wash" approach of years past. At $4.55 per bottle (12 mL @ $4.55 vs. something like Vallejo at 17 mL @ $2.75-3.00) they're going to make a load of money if they bump this by a buck or two.
   
 
Forum Index » News & Rumors
Go to: