Switch Theme:

The Return of the Silent King - May 23rd  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Auspicious Aspiring Champion of Chaos






I've still yet to see a new edition rumor with any evidence more credible than "it feels like it's time," but if we do get one, I expect the changes to be minor. As far as this release goes, my only issue is I was hoping to take a break from painting when I finish my AoS Tzeentch force. At least Necrons are comparatively easy to paint.

2000 Khorne Bloodbound (Skullfiend Tribe- Aqshy)
1000 Tzeentch Arcanites (Pyrofane Cult - Hysh) in progress
2000 Slaves to Darkness (Ravagers)
 
   
Made in us
Powerful Ushbati





United States

 EnTyme wrote:
I've still yet to see a new edition rumor with any evidence more credible than "it feels like it's time," but if we do get one, I expect the changes to be minor. As far as this release goes, my only issue is I was hoping to take a break from painting when I finish my AoS Tzeentch force. At least Necrons are comparatively easy to paint.


Yeah, I'm not buying it. Everything I've seen and heard has been pure speculation.

Here is something I AM wondering about though. Is this Return of the SK a book of its own, not related to PA? Or is it just the name of a new group of models (or single mode) being released?
   
Made in au
Regular Dakkanaut




Well regardless of of how things shake out with 9th....I'm pumped for The Silent King Model and rules. I pretty much find every other Xenos race corny. Necrons are the only non-imperium army I'd ever consider collecting and I probably will start to on the back of this news.
   
Made in fr
Longtime Dakkanaut






Yeah, the the thing is is 9e is just a slightly improved version of 8e good ol' gw will demand you buy a whole new rulebook (probably 60$ minimum) plus a new series of codexes.

Not doing it.

"But the universe is a big place, and whatever happens, you will not be missed..." 
   
Made in us
Inspiring Icon Bearer





Colorado Springs, CO

 Ouze wrote:
I have modded every single necron vehicle I have done to remove the cockpit. A machine doesn't need another machine in it.

Spoiler:




I have posted the stl for my cockpit cover on Thingiverse if anyone would like to print their own. It's not a perfect fit and will need some greenstuff blending.

Spoiler:


I truly hope any new vehicles remove the inspid cockpits.

I also hope for better flayed ones - great concept with bad models - and for, finally, warriors that do not have the heads attached to the sprue by the cheeks.





Thanks for sharing! I’ve saved this in case I decide to take the plunge on Necrons. I’m waiting to see what the end of the month holds, but at least I know my planes will look super cool!!

One of them filthy casuals... 
   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka






Sisters new codex and models came out along faith and fury. Admech is getting a bunch of new models with engine war.
Could be that necrons are doing the same with Pariah?
   
Made in us
Terrifying Doombull




Maybe, but I honestly doubt it.

Both Sisters and Ad Mech had big previews and a string of previews going on for months. We just got the... third? fourth? preview just for the Ad Mech cavalry today.

If there was a significant Necron release beyond Szeras, I would have expected some of it alongside him in the mid-April preview (Preview 3, the Revenge of Previews) for...whenever that release is going to happen. Or at least hints of it.

I suspect Pariah will match the other PA books and just have an empty character face-off.

Efficiency is the highest virtue. 
   
Made in us
Regular Dakkanaut




Voss wrote:
If there was a significant Necron release beyond Szeras, I would have expected some of it alongside him in the mid-April preview (Preview 3, the Revenge of Previews) for...whenever that release is going to happen. Or at least hints of it.

I suspect Pariah will match the other PA books and just have an empty character face-off.


I think well find out on the 23rd.

 TwilightSparkles wrote:
Maybe there’s something in the “Tyranids being chased and fleeing something” theory and that’s the SK and whatever he has.


Spikeybits had this bat crazy post up about how the Silent King created the Tyranids. I'm sure the story involves them (they are an extra-galactic race after all) but no, hard no. Necron lore has had enough drama.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2020/05/15 04:36:35


 
   
Made in ca
Gargantuan Gargant






MiguelFelstone wrote:
Voss wrote:
If there was a significant Necron release beyond Szeras, I would have expected some of it alongside him in the mid-April preview (Preview 3, the Revenge of Previews) for...whenever that release is going to happen. Or at least hints of it.

I suspect Pariah will match the other PA books and just have an empty character face-off.


I think well find out on the 23rd.

 TwilightSparkles wrote:
Maybe there’s something in the “Tyranids being chased and fleeing something” theory and that’s the SK and whatever he has.


Spikeybits had this bat crazy post up about how the Silent King created the Tyranids. I'm sure the story involves them (they are an extra-galactic race after all) but no, hard no. Necron lore has had enough drama.


At the very least I hope the Silent King coming back means that they make Triarch stuff worth considering more rules-wise, even moreso if they include new models. Not having a dynasty-trait in return for ignoring morale is pretty lacklustre for the supposed elite/followers of the head honcho.

Also, yeah, ideally they don't involve the Tyranids too much regarding The Silent King and it focuses more on how his return impacts the current active dynasties.
   
Made in ie
Longtime Dakkanaut




Ireland

MiguelFelstone wrote:
Voss wrote:
If there was a significant Necron release beyond Szeras, I would have expected some of it alongside him in the mid-April preview (Preview 3, the Revenge of Previews) for...whenever that release is going to happen. Or at least hints of it.

I suspect Pariah will match the other PA books and just have an empty character face-off.


I think well find out on the 23rd.

 TwilightSparkles wrote:
Maybe there’s something in the “Tyranids being chased and fleeing something” theory and that’s the SK and whatever he has.


Spikeybits had this bat crazy post up about how the Silent King created the Tyranids. I'm sure the story involves them (they are an extra-galactic race after all) but no, hard no. Necron lore has had enough drama.


Way back in 3rd edition there was the crazy theory that The Outsider (the crazy C'tan), which fled from the all the goings on left the galaxy and made the Tyranids as the ultimate weapon to spite the other C'tan... however in it's madness it made the Tyranids a bit too powerful and lost control of them. There was also the theory that the Tyranids were made by the last of the Old Ones, as a way to wipe the galaxy clean and start again. Hence why they can blot out the Warp... the Old Ones learnt from that mistake.

Tyranids and Necron have for the fans always been seen as having a deeper connection.

The objective of the game is to win. The point of the game is to have fun. The two should never be confused. 
   
Made in gb
Decrepit Dakkanaut







 Aenar wrote:
Spoiler:
 Grimtuff wrote:
 Aenar wrote:
 Moscha wrote:
For a Non-40k-Player: How has 8th edition been around?

2 Years? And again a new edition of the rules???


June 2012: 6th ed
May 2014: 7th ed
June 2017: 8th ed

8th has been around for three years now, and previous editions lasted for a maximum of three years as well.
Even if there were no rumours about a new edition coming this summer (and we had them for some time now), I'd definitely have expected the 9th ed to be released.


Except they didn't...

Rogue Trader 1987-1993. 7 years.
2nd ed. 1993 to 1998. 6 years
3rd ed. 1998 to 2004. 6 years
4th ed. 2004 to 2008. 5 years.
5th ed. 2008 to 2012. 5 years.

6th is the outlier, being such a catastrophic failure GW decided they wanted to double down with the stupid instead of fixing the edition and released 7th barely 2 years later.

It makes little sense to compare older editions with newer ones, as the top management and most of the game designers changed over time.

Then maybe say recent editions rather than previous editions, otherwise you'll get fact-checked - I was going to do so myself, but Grim got here before me.

2021-4 Plog - Here we go again... - my fifth attempt at a Dakka PLOG

My Pile of Potential - updates ongoing...

Gamgee on Tau Players wrote:we all kill cats and sell our own families to the devil and eat live puppies.


 Kanluwen wrote:
This is, emphatically, why I will continue suggesting nuking Guard and starting over again. It's a legacy army that needs to be rebooted with a new focal point.

Confirmation of why no-one should listen to Kanluwen when it comes to the IG - he doesn't want the IG, he want's Kan's New Model Army...

tneva82 wrote:
You aren't even trying ty pretend for honest arqument. Open bad faith trolling.
- No reason to keep this here, unless people want to use it for something... 
   
Made in gb
Longtime Dakkanaut




 Dysartes wrote:
 Aenar wrote:
Spoiler:
 Grimtuff wrote:
 Aenar wrote:
 Moscha wrote:
For a Non-40k-Player: How has 8th edition been around?

2 Years? And again a new edition of the rules???


June 2012: 6th ed
May 2014: 7th ed
June 2017: 8th ed

8th has been around for three years now, and previous editions lasted for a maximum of three years as well.
Even if there were no rumours about a new edition coming this summer (and we had them for some time now), I'd definitely have expected the 9th ed to be released.


Except they didn't...

Rogue Trader 1987-1993. 7 years.
2nd ed. 1993 to 1998. 6 years
3rd ed. 1998 to 2004. 6 years
4th ed. 2004 to 2008. 5 years.
5th ed. 2008 to 2012. 5 years.

6th is the outlier, being such a catastrophic failure GW decided they wanted to double down with the stupid instead of fixing the edition and released 7th barely 2 years later.

It makes little sense to compare older editions with newer ones, as the top management and most of the game designers changed over time.

Then maybe say recent editions rather than previous editions, otherwise you'll get fact-checked - I was going to do so myself, but Grim got here before me.


That’s a perfectly valid use of “previous” with a full outlining of examples given. If you’re just going to nitpick without engaging with the actual point being made it’s better to stay clear of the conversation honestly.
   
Made in gb
Decrepit Dakkanaut







changemod wrote:
 Dysartes wrote:
 Aenar wrote:
Spoiler:
 Grimtuff wrote:
 Aenar wrote:
 Moscha wrote:
For a Non-40k-Player: How has 8th edition been around?

2 Years? And again a new edition of the rules???


June 2012: 6th ed
May 2014: 7th ed
June 2017: 8th ed

8th has been around for three years now, and previous editions lasted for a maximum of three years as well.
Even if there were no rumours about a new edition coming this summer (and we had them for some time now), I'd definitely have expected the 9th ed to be released.


Except they didn't...

Rogue Trader 1987-1993. 7 years.
2nd ed. 1993 to 1998. 6 years
3rd ed. 1998 to 2004. 6 years
4th ed. 2004 to 2008. 5 years.
5th ed. 2008 to 2012. 5 years.

6th is the outlier, being such a catastrophic failure GW decided they wanted to double down with the stupid instead of fixing the edition and released 7th barely 2 years later.

It makes little sense to compare older editions with newer ones, as the top management and most of the game designers changed over time.

Then maybe say recent editions rather than previous editions, otherwise you'll get fact-checked - I was going to do so myself, but Grim got here before me.


That’s a perfectly valid use of “previous” with a full outlining of examples given. If you’re just going to nitpick without engaging with the actual point being made it’s better to stay clear of the conversation honestly.

But is it really valid when you only include the examples which support your viewpoint? Looking at 6/7/8th edition to form a trend is missing over half the editions of the game - and as soon as you include 5th, the claim of "...and previous editions lasted for a maximum of three years..." breaks down as we run into an edition that ran for four years.

Either way, thinking about it, I'm not sure that talking about a new edition of the game is necessarily in keeping with a discussion of the announcement that there will be an announcement presumably to do with the Silent King on the 23rd...

2021-4 Plog - Here we go again... - my fifth attempt at a Dakka PLOG

My Pile of Potential - updates ongoing...

Gamgee on Tau Players wrote:we all kill cats and sell our own families to the devil and eat live puppies.


 Kanluwen wrote:
This is, emphatically, why I will continue suggesting nuking Guard and starting over again. It's a legacy army that needs to be rebooted with a new focal point.

Confirmation of why no-one should listen to Kanluwen when it comes to the IG - he doesn't want the IG, he want's Kan's New Model Army...

tneva82 wrote:
You aren't even trying ty pretend for honest arqument. Open bad faith trolling.
- No reason to keep this here, unless people want to use it for something... 
   
Made in us
Wicked Canoptek Wraith



United States

I don't know why everyone assumes there will be a model for the silent king. There hasn't been any evidence of a model yet. No preview, no glimpse. Could be that his return is just fluff based with no model or rules.

I think it's hilarious that the community whips themselves up into a frenzy about 9th edition, with no compelling evidence. Then everyone will piss and moan if their assumptions are wrong.

Do I hope we get a silent king model? Sure. Do I hope we have a new codex on the way very soon? Absolutely. Have I seen any evidence, beyond broad speculation, of either? No.

I don't mind speculation, but I hate when people assume it to be fact. Then they blame GW for their disappointment.

I'm curious about what a pariah unit might look like now. If I remember right, they used to have a negative, though negligible effect on psykers. Didn't they?

I thought it was interesting that the weapon on the new Szeras model resembles the old pariah weapons slightly. Maybe an indicator? Maybe nothing? I just hope if there are pariahs coming, they have more to offer than an area effect like Szeras has.



   
Made in us
Spawn of Chaos




New Jersey

Dammit, If 9th edition is coming soon, then it makes no sense for me to get the 8E rules and an 8E codex for Chaos.

Hydra Dominatus! 
   
Made in us
Wicked Canoptek Wraith



United States

 Conservative Heretic wrote:
Dammit, If 9th edition is coming soon, then it makes no sense for me to get the 8E rules and an 8E codex for Chaos.


I guess that depends on how much you use it between now and then. Remember, 9th edition is just a rumor. Considering that PA hasn't even finished releasing, I think there will be AT LEAST 4 or 5 months before 9th could happen. How much would you play between now and then? Is it worth it to you?

Personally, I don't buy any of these 9th edition rumors so I would say buy it, enjoy it. You'll be supporting a company that does something you like.

I could be completely 100% wrong though. Worst case, you didn't get quite as much use out of the rule books. That wouldn't be a huge problem for me, but I don't know your circumstances/situation/perspective.

   
Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut





Biloxi, MS USA

 Conservative Heretic wrote:
Dammit, If 9th edition is coming soon, then it makes no sense for me to get the 8E rules and an 8E codex for Chaos.


If/when it happens, 9th will be closer to being an 8.5, all the books will be compatible.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2020/05/15 16:24:14


You know you're really doing something when you can make strangers hate you over the Internet. - Mauleed
Just remember folks. Panic. Panic all the time. It's the only way to survive, other than just being mindful, of course-but geez, that's so friggin' boring. - Aegis Grimm
Hallowed is the All Pie
The Before Times: A Place That Celebrates The World That Was 
   
Made in us
Regular Dakkanaut




punisher357 wrote:
I don't know why everyone assumes there will be a model for the silent king. There hasn't been any evidence of a model yet. No preview, no glimpse. Could be that his return is just fluff based with no model or rules.


Pretty sure they have already said they are giving us a sneak peak at the models rules on the 23rd.
   
Made in de
Nihilistic Necron Lord






Germany

MiguelFelstone wrote:
punisher357 wrote:
I don't know why everyone assumes there will be a model for the silent king. There hasn't been any evidence of a model yet. No preview, no glimpse. Could be that his return is just fluff based with no model or rules.


Pretty sure they have already said they are giving us a sneak peak at the models rules on the 23rd.


No, they dont. No mention of a new model, or new rules.
   
Made in us
Pragmatic Primus Commanding Cult Forces






Southeastern PA, USA

I thought it was *completely confirmed* that we're getting 9th edition on the 23rd with the Necrons being the new big bad led by the Silent King and getting a full range refresh.

If it's not that, I'm going to get really steamed on internet forums. Talkin' really cheesed off. GW *promised* us.


My AT Gallery
My World Eaters Showcase
View my Genestealer Cult! Article - Gallery - Blog
Best Appearance - GW Baltimore GT 2008, Colonial GT 2012

DQ:70+S++++G+M++++B++I+Pw40k90#+D++A+++/fWD66R++T(Ot)DM+++

 
   
Made in us
Tail-spinning Tomb Blade Pilot






Maybe the Silent King just returns...some video tapes.

The overdue fees might be a bit much though.

"Wir sehen hiermit wieder die Sprache als das Dasein des Geistes." - The Phenomenology of Spirit 
   
Made in gb
Regular Dakkanaut






punisher357 wrote:I don't know why everyone assumes there will be a model for the silent king. There hasn't been any evidence of a model yet. No preview, no glimpse. Could be that his return is just fluff based with no model or rules.

I think it's hilarious that the community whips themselves up into a frenzy about 9th edition, with no compelling evidence. Then everyone will piss and moan if their assumptions are wrong.



You could be right. However, the silent king has been back 'in the fluff' for a while. Also, when was the last time GW did a teaser like this for something like a fluff update? They don't even really do things like this for BL novels!
   
Made in gb
Decrepit Dakkanaut




UK

I can't see GW wanting to sell a 9th age until people can - you know - play games. Right now even GW stores can't play games the world over - even in regions that have relaxed some lockdown measures.

It's hard to push the sales of a rules system for a tabletop game if you can't actually meet up and play with that rules system.

A Blog in Miniature

3D Printing, hobbying and model fun! 
   
Made in gb
Dakka Veteran




punisher357 wrote:
I don't know why everyone assumes there will be a model for the silent king. There hasn't been any evidence of a model yet. No preview, no glimpse. Could be that his return is just fluff based with no model or rules.

I think it's hilarious that the community whips themselves up into a frenzy about 9th edition, with no compelling evidence. Then everyone will piss and moan if their assumptions are wrong.

Do I hope we get a silent king model? Sure. Do I hope we have a new codex on the way very soon? Absolutely. Have I seen any evidence, beyond broad speculation, of either? No.

I don't mind speculation, but I hate when people assume it to be fact. Then they blame GW for their disappointment.

I'm curious about what a pariah unit might look like now. If I remember right, they used to have a negative, though negligible effect on psykers. Didn't they?

I thought it was interesting that the weapon on the new Szeras model resembles the old pariah weapons slightly. Maybe an indicator? Maybe nothing? I just hope if there are pariahs coming, they have more to offer than an area effect like Szeras has.





Evidence isn't the same thing as proof. We do have evidence he's getting a model. It's the video dropped by the miniatures company telling us a figure already returned in the lore is coming back.
   
Made in se
Bonkers Buggy Driver with Rockets





Stockholm, Sweden

Necron Warriors look fine to me. Put them on 32mm bases and paint the rods, and they are perfectly good. Samey poses are fine because they are more or less mindless peons who just go where their Overlord wills them to go.



Now, rules-wise they are pretty useless, there is no real reason to take them as Tesla Immortals are better in every way.

Necrons need better rules, not better models, except possibly for Flayed Ones, who need both.

A nice alternate Lord sculpt would be nice though, even if they are fairly easy to kitbash out of Lychguard. So yeah, let's have another Space Marine Lieutenant instead.

Oguhmek paints Orks (and Necrons): 'Ere we go!
 
   
Made in ca
Commander of the Mysterious 2nd Legion





 Conservative Heretic wrote:
Dammit, If 9th edition is coming soon, then it makes no sense for me to get the 8E rules and an 8E codex for Chaos.


people have been predicting 9th edition since 8th edition launched.

Opinions are not facts please don't confuse the two 
   
Made in us
Powerful Ushbati





United States

 Oguhmek wrote:
Necron Warriors look fine to me. Put them on 32mm bases and paint the rods, and they are perfectly good. Samey poses are fine because they are more or less mindless peons who just go where their Overlord wills them to go.



Now, rules-wise they are pretty useless, there is no real reason to take them as Tesla Immortals are better in every way.

Necrons need better rules, not better models, except possibly for Flayed Ones, who need both.

A nice alternate Lord sculpt would be nice though, even if they are fairly easy to kitbash out of Lychguard. So yeah, let's have another Space Marine Lieutenant instead.


Something I always wonder is when people make statements and say "No reason to ever take these, X is better by all accounts." Why? Does every game have to be between min/max armies with the game being decided by the alpha strike or the end of turn two by tabling?

Most of the best games of 8th i have played have been using the so-called "trash units" people always complain about. When I stopped fighting other min/max players and found the people who just want to throw their models on the table, 8th Ed 40K is a completely different game. Me thinks it's the min/max mindset that hurts the game, not the rules as written. Try it out sometime, get a friend, build a "for fun" list with no stratagem in mind. It's light years better.

Also, nice looking Necrons. I really like the colors you have. Superb job.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2020/05/15 20:28:38


 
   
Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut




Except you don't need rules period if you're saying to just throw models on the table.

CaptainStabby wrote:
If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.

 jy2 wrote:
BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.

 vipoid wrote:
Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?

 MarsNZ wrote:
ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever.
 
   
Made in us
Regular Dakkanaut




 Togusa wrote:
Something I always wonder is when people make statements and say "No reason to ever take these, X is better by all accounts." Why? Does every game have to be between min/max armies with the game being decided by the alpha strike or the end of turn two by tabling?


No, but when you're playing the worst faction in the game from a table top point of view you need every advantage you can get, and running sub-par units in a faction that was already sub-par to begin with is handicapping yourself even further.
   
Made in gb
Twisted Trueborn with Blaster



Shropshire

 Oguhmek wrote:
Necron Warriors look fine to me. Put them on 32mm bases and paint the rods, and they are perfectly good. Samey poses are fine because they are more or less mindless peons who just go where their Overlord wills them to go.



Now, rules-wise they are pretty useless, there is no real reason to take them as Tesla Immortals are better in every way.

Necrons need better rules, not better models, except possibly for Flayed Ones, who need both.

A nice alternate Lord sculpt would be nice though, even if they are fairly easy to kitbash out of Lychguard. So yeah, let's have another Space Marine Lieutenant instead.




If Necrons are getting new models as part of a new edition launch, they're getting a new codex too.

"Marion! For Gods sake, you're going to die!"
"Ah, but then I'll wake up in a magical fantasy world, filled with virgins!"
"You mean Games Workshop?" Mongrels

"Realism? THESE ARE SPACE ELVES!!" - My friend Jordan during an argument about rule abstraction 
   
 
Forum Index » News & Rumors
Go to: