466
Post by: skkipper
I forget what their previous name was but the got hit by the GW ip gods before and changed to http://www.coolcastornot.com/
it seems they have been hit again as all of their forgeworld and GW stuff has dissappeared again.
722
Post by: Kanluwen
*point and laugh*
Couldn't happen to a more deserving bunch.
518
Post by: Kid_Kyoto
Wow, I never would expected that.
Uh... go China? Automatically Appended Next Post: Opps they missed one!
http://www.coolcastornot.com/at02-28mm-scale-resin-kit-railings-p-203.html
Love how they forgot to take off the plastic tabs from their photo
34906
Post by: Pacific
Wait a couple of weeks and a new website will spring up, this one will close down. Repeat ad nauseum.
The problem for GW is that they always seem to have a grace period of 3-4 months (at least) when they are selling stuff.
60791
Post by: Sean_OBrien
Pacific wrote:Wait a couple of weeks and a new website will spring up, this one will close down. Repeat ad nauseum.
The problem for GW is that they always seem to have a grace period of 3-4 months (at least) when they are selling stuff.
Was going to mention as much...though it deserves repeating.
There are so many recasters in China that trying to stop them in this manner is like attempting to deal with a termite infestation with a tweezers. They might get one or two - but I could probably find another 50 sources within an hour or less if I was so motivated. More than that, even if they do convince a host (or host country) to go through and remove the recasts...they will not be removed from the market, just shuffled around a bit.
Just searching eBay for Forgeworld with the "Buy it Now" option checked brings up over a dozen (stopped counting) different sources which are in all likelihood recasters.
4727
Post by: Makaleth
I agree with Sean here.
There are dozens of these around China and they will just pop up again.
7075
Post by: chaos0xomega
He was pretty lousy as far as recasters go, very limited selection, even more limited inventory... my group and I just placed a 1100 dollar order with all sorts of goodies from another source or two... >.>
115
Post by: Azazelx
Why not just buy from Forgeworld?
7075
Post by: chaos0xomega
Because my 1100 dollar chinese recast order would buy me less than half of what I got from FW?
19148
Post by: Aerethan
A shame I ordered a ton of stuff there and the casts were great quality(shipping took a while though, but that is mostly China's fault). And 1 reason for it is because I don't want to buy 10 sets of FW just for the head to a kit. They broke down many sets into bits. And contemptors cost $21. So there's that. This site was the reformed miniatureshobby site. Give them a few weeks and they'll have a new site with all the old product back up. And if you look at ebay, there is all of squat that GW or FW can do as these companies exist in areas that could care less about IP laws. The items were likely removed at the behest of paypal reacting to pressure from GW. The company will get a new site, a new paypal and go right back to doing it. This url lasted about a year, so doing this once a year isn't really that much hassle.
4727
Post by: Makaleth
To be entirely honest, I have bought A LOT from Forgeworld... and our group even more. I could handle the cost if the quality matched. This site actually had MUCH better quality than what I have experienced with FW.
Once quality was an issue as well, couldn't justify buying something from FW when they had it. If it wasn't I still went to FW though
19148
Post by: Aerethan
Sites like that need to be wake up calls to FW and GW. The ONLY reason those sites exist is because people very much want the models and they feel that FW in particular is charging far too much for what amounts to toy soldiers.
Perhaps those costs could be justified with plastic injection, but I know personally how much effort it takes to crank out resin models once the molds are made and the prices are quite off. I understand they need to pay for design, overhead, production etc, but those could all be covered with increased sales volume at a lower margin.
If you don't want people to counterfeit your product, price them out of the market. GW and FW could quite easily make resin kits so cheap that China and Russia would be losing money trying to rip them off. As it stands, a Contemptor dread costs $21 in China which is somehow enough to pay the bills there.
And you know how long it takes to make that thing once the mold is done? About 5 minutes of actual handling. The rest of the time is resin curing. You mix, you pour, you wait, you demold. 5 minutes tops.
12313
Post by: Ouze
Copied and pasted from this week's " Why is Forge World's shipping so slow" thread:
Nerm86 wrote:I ended up giving them a call and apparently it was 'stuck' in the system. The guy had to manually move it or something, anyway all sorted now.
Now I just have to wait a month for it :(
In my opinion, THIS is why the Chinese recasters are so popular. The resin is better, the quality is better, and it shows up in half the time for free shipping.
I don't think FW can, or should try to, compete with counterfeiters on price for reasons that Aerethan already said. On the other hand, they could fix a lot of their stupid shenanigans and stop running a subsidiary of a multi-million dollar business like 2 guys in a garage. They charge a premium price but the quality of their product is often shoddy and the handling is atrocious. The flat 15% shipping is a slap in the face and they should have dropped that years ago.
I think FW should try to compete by offering luxury, premium quality control and handling to go with their luxury, premium prices. I love their designs, but FFS, get it together.
19148
Post by: Aerethan
Ouze wrote:Copied and pasted from this week's " Why is Forge World's shipping so slow" thread:
Nerm86 wrote:I ended up giving them a call and apparently it was 'stuck' in the system. The guy had to manually move it or something, anyway all sorted now.
Now I just have to wait a month for it :(
In my opinion, THIS is why the Chinese recasters are so popular. The resin is better, the quality is better, and it shows up in half the time for free shipping.
I don't think FW can, or should try to, compete with counterfeiters on price for reasons that Aerethan already said. On the other hand, they could fix a lot of their stupid shenanigans and stop running a subsidiary of a multi-million dollar business like 2 guys in a garage. They charge a premium price but the quality of their product is often shoddy and the handling is atrocious. The flat 15% shipping is a slap in the face and they should have dropped that years ago.
I think FW should try to compete by offering luxury, premium quality control and handling to go with their luxury, premium prices. I love their designs, but FFS, get it together.
Don't forget that international buyers still have to pay FW's local sales tax for online purchases, which defies like 100% of internet commerce practice and is not required by UK law. I'm inclined to think that it's illegal to charge sales tax on out of state purchases here in the US.
So we pay 15% for the worlds slowest shipping, and then we pay VAT on top of that. All this for fairly light and often quite small resin pieces that can be shipped in medium envelopes with a little bubble wrap.
You know how much shipping I pay for bits from the UK? About $4 regardless of size. Why should FW be making profit on shipping when their markup is already insanely high?
And I totally forgot that coolcast offered free shipping on orders over $25-30, which was insanely easy to break due to how much you could get for that money.
For those who don't know what the prices were like(not that it matters now as the site no longer has GW items) here are a few examples in USD:
5x GK marine torsoes $2.5
12x GK Marine shoulders $2
1x GK Term Legs $.65
1x GK Term Torso $.50
5x GK shield icon $.30
1x GK Term Head $.15
1x GK Term shoulder $.20
1x GK Flamer $.40
1x SM Dev. Lascannon $2.50
1x SM Dev. Multi-Melta $4.00
1x Vamp Lord w/ Terrorgheist $24
1x Gamesday 2006 Daemon Slayer $16
1x Gamesday 2007 Ork Boss $20
1x Archaon on foot $18
1x Harry the Hammer $28
1x Kaptin Badrukk $12
1x Changeling $11
1x Kaldor Draigo $15
1x Firebelly $20
1x Captain Sicarius $12
1x Any etched brass $6.50
1x Contemptor Dreadnought $21
1x GK Dreadnought $18
63000
Post by: Peregrine
Aerethan wrote:If you don't want people to counterfeit your product, price them out of the market. GW and FW could quite easily make resin kits so cheap that China and Russia would be losing money trying to rip them off. As it stands, a Contemptor dread costs $21 in China which is somehow enough to pay the bills there.
Nonsense. You can only make a profit selling at those prices if you remove the entire cost of designing the model (good artists don't work for free) by just stealing someone else's work, and then cast them in a country with no minimum wage laws or other pesky things getting in the way of minimizing your labor costs.
Aerethan wrote:he resin is better, the quality is better, and it shows up in half the time for free shipping.
You mean the resin is worse, the casting quality is far worse than FW's, and it takes 2-3 times as long to get it. I ordered a Malcador from them out of curiosity and I would've had a better product if I'd just lit my $50 on fire.
So we pay 15% for the worlds slowest shipping, and then we pay VAT on top of that. All this for fairly light and often quite small resin pieces that can be shipped in medium envelopes with a little bubble wrap.
Actually what you're doing is paying for the free express shipping I get on my boxes of superheavy tanks (and you probably don't want to know what those cost to ship). So, thank you for ordering expensive things that don't cost much to ship so that FW can continue to give me a good deal.
55568
Post by: CainTheHunter
Because of all those guys that buy quality stuff cheaply from third party recasters, GW and FW are loosing their deserved profit from their hard work. Which in its turn leads to desperate actions to stay in business and avoid eventual insolvency, such as notorious price increases. And because of that small fat boys cannot afford buying the much needed Tactical Space Marine box, which is essential for the Humanity's Domination in the 40th Millenium and stomping over their mates at local GW shop.
16689
Post by: notprop
Cheap hobbiests are cheap.
These fellers will always exist for any product that is popular,
As will hobbiest that want or believe they deserve their toys at a fraction of the cost.
Sooner or later this blip will come to someone's attention in China (ie if/when Gw becomes relatively wide spread there) and they will address these individuals with the usual subtle Chinese law interpretation. Recasting/IP copying represents a significant stain on Chinas reputation and one that they will expunge as move rapidly toward the modern developed state they want to be/are.
Then it will probably pop up somewhere else as those cheap hobbiests will still want cheap copies.
This would happen whether a SM costs 60p or £60, demand drives this as with all other scams.
52163
Post by: Shandara
You can't compete with free (in this case no design costs or marketing).
15717
Post by: Backfire
In a way, knock-offs are sorta positive sign for the state of the hobby. It means that there's a wide audience which buys stuff, otherwise these recasters couldn't make profit themselves. But obviously, it's a loss for GW (and in general, hobbyists).
60791
Post by: Sean_OBrien
notprop wrote:Sooner or later this blip will come to someone's attention in China (ie if/when Gw becomes relatively wide spread there) and they will address these individuals with the usual subtle Chinese law interpretation. Recasting/IP copying represents a significant stain on Chinas reputation and one that they will expunge as move rapidly toward the modern developed state they want to be/are.
Simply put...No.
Bigger companies have tried and failed to address China's counterfeit and knock off markets. In the best case scenario, they are ignored. In the worst case scenario, China actually rules that the original creators are in violation of the counterfeiter's right of production and sale within China and they are fined or locked out of the Chinese market for a period of time. China has no interest in addressing the issue - it isn't something which is in their interest to address, and their lack of action has nothing to do with not knowing about it.
In the modern economy, companies factor in Chinese knock offs into their business plan as assumed losses (not much different than assumed losses from shoplifters for retail stores).
44272
Post by: Azreal13
Sean_OBrien wrote: notprop wrote:Sooner or later this blip will come to someone's attention in China (ie if/when Gw becomes relatively wide spread there) and they will address these individuals with the usual subtle Chinese law interpretation. Recasting/IP copying represents a significant stain on Chinas reputation and one that they will expunge as move rapidly toward the modern developed state they want to be/are.
Simply put...No.
Bigger companies have tried and failed to address China's counterfeit and knock off markets. In the best case scenario, they are ignored. In the worst case scenario, China actually rules that the original creators are in violation of the counterfeiter's right of production and sale within China and they are fined or locked out of the Chinese market for a period of time. China has no interest in addressing the issue - it isn't something which is in their interest to address, and their lack of action has nothing to do with not knowing about it.
In the modern economy, companies factor in Chinese knock offs into their business plan as assumed losses (not much different than assumed losses from shoplifters for retail stores).
QFT
If some of the biggest auto manufacturers in the world have got nowhere, GW have no chance.
34906
Post by: Pacific
TBH, it's a 'problem' throughout asia; they have a completely different concept of things like copyright and ownership of ideas. My personal record for how many times a single item can break copyright is 3, seen in S. Korea: A t-shirt depicting a lego Super Mario jumping out of a transforming Octopus Prime.
Regarding the topic at hand, I think it will only remain a 'fringe' issue. 99.8% of consumers will continue to buy legitimate products, and be completely unaware of counterfeits even existing. In fact, without any data at all to support my hypothesis, I would say that GW have probably spent far, far more money on solicitors than they would ever have lost from either instances such as this or 3rd party bits makers working in their garages.
19148
Post by: Aerethan
Indeed. The main reason I've ever bothered buying fakes is to prevent GW from making those few dollars off of me, since they insist on treating veterans so terribly. Their core demographic I'd imagine has no clue about recasts in any broad sense. EDIT: and for the record, I don't feel that GW "owes" me anything. I never said my reasons for buying recasts were valid, but I will own up to them.
28365
Post by: OverwatchCNC
I wasn't even aware these existed...
I must live under a rock.
36184
Post by: Alfndrate
Sean_OBrien wrote: notprop wrote:Sooner or later this blip will come to someone's attention in China (ie if/when Gw becomes relatively wide spread there) and they will address these individuals with the usual subtle Chinese law interpretation. Recasting/IP copying represents a significant stain on Chinas reputation and one that they will expunge as move rapidly toward the modern developed state they want to be/are.
Simply put...No.
Bigger companies have tried and failed to address China's counterfeit and knock off markets. In the best case scenario, they are ignored. In the worst case scenario, China actually rules that the original creators are in violation of the counterfeiter's right of production and sale within China and they are fined or locked out of the Chinese market for a period of time. China has no interest in addressing the issue - it isn't something which is in their interest to address, and their lack of action has nothing to do with not knowing about it.
In the modern economy, companies factor in Chinese knock offs into their business plan as assumed losses (not much different than assumed losses from shoplifters for retail stores).
Best example to back up your point ( imo)... Apple... There are stores that sell Apple knock-offs that look like Apple stores...
664
Post by: Grimtuff
Alfndrate wrote: Sean_OBrien wrote: notprop wrote:Sooner or later this blip will come to someone's attention in China (ie if/when Gw becomes relatively wide spread there) and they will address these individuals with the usual subtle Chinese law interpretation. Recasting/IP copying represents a significant stain on Chinas reputation and one that they will expunge as move rapidly toward the modern developed state they want to be/are.
Simply put...No.
Bigger companies have tried and failed to address China's counterfeit and knock off markets. In the best case scenario, they are ignored. In the worst case scenario, China actually rules that the original creators are in violation of the counterfeiter's right of production and sale within China and they are fined or locked out of the Chinese market for a period of time. China has no interest in addressing the issue - it isn't something which is in their interest to address, and their lack of action has nothing to do with not knowing about it.
In the modern economy, companies factor in Chinese knock offs into their business plan as assumed losses (not much different than assumed losses from shoplifters for retail stores).
Best example to back up your point ( imo)... Apple... There are stores that sell Apple knock-offs that look like Apple stores...
To go even further, I seem to recall a documentary where there are entire shopping malls of counterfeit stores. China's like the IP blackspot of the world.
60791
Post by: Sean_OBrien
Alfndrate wrote:Best example to back up your point ( imo)... Apple... There are stores that sell Apple knock-offs that look like Apple stores...
To be fair, in that case many of the Apple Knock offs aren't even really Apple knock offs...just Apple equipment which never makes it onto the boat. For the companies who have items produced in China, that is a similar (though different) problem that they face.
Although the exact numbers are hard to lock down, a friend has a company who sells vacuum equipment. About 10 years ago they relocated their factory from Mexico to China. Everything was identical...same machines in the factory using the same materials and the same tooling. The Mexican factory had a 2% reject rate off the QC checks (bad castings or other problems with the components). The Chinese factory has about an 8% failure rate, though based on his best guesses by watching the counterfeit market (and purchasing a few of them to compare the counterfeits with his product) the 6% change in reject rates largely has been items walking out the back door to be packaged up on the Chinese grey market and sold. The only difference between the two products are the serial numbers which are placed on the equipment stateside after they pass QC checks here. When he broached the subject with the Chinese factory managers, they assured him that he was mistaken and the reject rate dropped to 4%. The counterfeits also had the manufacturers number plate removed and replaced with a generic blank one (with no rating information, model number or other information).
Follow ups with the Chinese government were ignored and follow ups with the US government were effectively dropped by the US government (they said they contacted the Chinese authorities who assured them that that was not happening). Almost everyone I have talked to who has products manufactured in China have similar stories as well. It is just as much a part of business there as bribes are in other countries (and political contributions are in the civilized world).
10349
Post by: Bat Manuel
It sucks they got shut down.
54838
Post by: Monasou
I had 61 items in my cart the day that site died. Sadface...
38157
Post by: RoninXiC
Their probably are similar and maybe even cheaper stores with more miniatures... right?
7375
Post by: BrookM
I wonder if their quality was better than that of Forge World itself.
14698
Post by: Lansirill
BrookM wrote:I wonder if their quality was better than that of Forge World itself.
From the couple of people I was chatting with at a GW shop (heh, it was an all nighter Iron Painter thing; things were pretty loose) it sounded like they tend to be just as good. One guy was saying he bought some and the darn things came with cleaned up mold lines. Now that's just a second-hand anecdote so I wouldn't make a major purchased based on that, but if I ever stumble across a recaster with a decent rep I may experiment with my luck.
31456
Post by: Bolognesus
Having an original contemptor here, and having seen a few of 'theirs' some time ago, I couldn't advise you to buy original, TBH.
and that's on one of the newer sculpts, on which FW casts are generally quite acceptable - but even then the FW original had more defects to fix.
guy with the bootleg contemptor basically told me that's constistently the quality they deliver - seems only their packing material is abysmal, and sometimes that will make components break during shipping. aside from that, seems they deliver superior casts.
it's a bit like buying an original DVD and being forced to watch the stupid unskippable anti-piracy messages, only here you get shafted with inferior quality casts, all for 'doing the "right" thing' and buying original.
18698
Post by: kronk
They'll be back next month with a new website.
27987
Post by: Surtur
Why couldn't they shut down Forge World while they're at it for their criminal prices?
1464
Post by: Breotan
Surtur wrote:Why couldn't they shut down Forge World while they're at it for their criminal prices?
If you just don't go to their site or buy their product, it's effectively the same thing.
19148
Post by: Aerethan
BrookM wrote:I wonder if their quality was better than that of Forge World itself.
The quality of casts are all on par with GW injected plastics. I've not come across a single bubble or defect.
The ONLY qualm I had was with the shipping time, but that has more to do with Chinese shipping than it does with the company. The parts where sent out in a timely fashion. After it was all said and done it took about 2-3 weeks to arrive.
8617
Post by: Hulksmash
The few possible recasts I've gotten (normally rhino doors from ebay) have been better quality than the ones I purchased directly from Forgeworld.
10349
Post by: Bat Manuel
I bought one of those big FW Ork Dreadnoughts from them and it was pretty detailed. I also bought a bunch of resin space marines because I just can't pay GW's $4 for a tac marine when all I want to do is make a special weapon guy for squad swaps. The quality on looks good.
54838
Post by: Monasou
Can someone post the new site here? I want. o_o
18698
Post by: kronk
That's not really something DakkaDakka endorses...
21358
Post by: Dysartes
Shandara wrote:You can't compete with free (in this case no design costs or marketing).
Well, I'm not seeing any difference in marketing budget between the two entities...
664
Post by: Grimtuff
Sorry I don't have access to a time machine...
The website in question is in the OP, the new one which will inevitably spring up does not exist (yet).
19148
Post by: Aerethan
I also don't generally share my sources for recasts, lest "the man" catch on to them too quickly.
The best prices are from China, but Russia generally has a larger selection, although I've not found a Russian seller outside of ebay.
And sharing such sources publicly is not allowed here, nor should it be.
23979
Post by: frozenwastes
From what of them I've seen, quality is about the same as forgeworld.
Wouldn't the easiest way to find out where they are setting up shop again be to contact them through their current website that has no GW products and ask them about it?
19148
Post by: Aerethan
In email they have not announced a new site or any plans to make a new site.
They mention doing business by email, but not sure how well that would work without having a visual catalog to go throught.
23979
Post by: frozenwastes
This thread title is a bit misleading then, isn't it? Cool Cast is not shut down and is still operating, they just removed all their FW product from their website, ostensibly sell it via email, and still have a wide variety of other hobby kits.
20908
Post by: angryboy2k
Pacific wrote:
The problem for GW is that they always seem to have a grace period of 3-4 months (at least) when they are selling stuff.
No, I think the biggest problem for GW is that the quality of this guy was WAY better than the quality of product being pushed out by Forge World itself (as a number of others in this thread have said).
The fact of the matter is that Forge World charge an ever more ridiculous price for something they tout as premium, luxury, high-quality product. It's not. Forge World's products frequently arrive with:
- parts bent so badly they don't want to go straight (ork flakk gun),
- slip moulds leaving mould lines that are near impossible to fix (almost every model I've ever bought from them, though the worst offenders may have been gretchin crew)
- shrunken parts for one side of a model that don't fit with the matching part on the other side (storm eagle right side, looks like someone sat on the mould before the piece inside had hardened)
- "sweaty" resin that doesn't appear to have been mixed properly (storm eagle, ork stompa)
- pieces that look like the mould was only partially filled and later filled in with more resin (grot tanks).
- bubbles, shrunken parts and bendy elements that are completely unfit for purpose ( SM character conversion kit - especially the sword which was also slipcast, chainaxes - even with a replacement I got six usable weapons out of twenty)
I've lost track of the number of products I've had to ask for replacement parts on. The latest was Angron, who amusingly enough was missing his arms - and of course came with the usual plethora of slipped mould lines. I hate dealing with the problem. I had sworn off FW until foolishly giving them another chance with Angron, but now I find myself regretting giving in to temptation.
Compare this to Coolcast, whose recast parts are:
- mouldline free
- solid, not sweaty
- excellent castings that fit together like FW's product is supposed to
- and it's actually possible to wash the mould release off them in one attempt instead of about three.
Hell, even the recasts of plastic bits are better than GW's plastic mouldings, not a few of which I've had with unacceptable mould lines.
To be honest, the only reason I don't buy from the recasters is that their resin smells something terrible. It's probably going to give you cancer if you fill your house with the stuff. I'd happily keep throwing money at FW to avoid that worry if their products weren't frequently such a load of crap.
TL;DR Forge World needs to get their act together because the recasters' products are not just cheaper but they're MUCH better quality too.
19148
Post by: Aerethan
frozenwastes wrote:This thread title is a bit misleading then, isn't it? Cool Cast is not shut down and is still operating, they just removed all their FW product from their website, ostensibly sell it via email, and still have a wide variety of other hobby kits.
Well the recasting of GW products has been shut down, and their email says the site will be down at the end of the month, presumably when the registration is up.
722
Post by: Kanluwen
Yeah, well you can get a lot more labor for a lot less when you own a sweatshop in China.
19148
Post by: Aerethan
Kanluwen wrote:Yeah, well you can get a lot more labor for a lot less when you own a sweatshop in China.
I really doubt that they were doing the volume to facilitate a sweat shop. They could produce their entire GW line in 2 days with only a few people running molds.
Now if they had the entire FW catalog available, that argument could be reasonable.
21196
Post by: agnosto
Yeah, give them a few weeks and they'll be back up. I bought a whole GK army from them for about 1/4 to 1/2 what it would have cost from GW.
I'll be getting an email from them sometime next month with the new site I imagine.
19148
Post by: Aerethan
Hooray for seedy underworlds and black markets!!! brought to you by the convenience of the internet! No more sewers and moldy taverns!
23979
Post by: frozenwastes
LOL. The Taco-34 in their Ma.K line is a really great model as well. It's a recast of a Junk Tank Rock model that is only sold within Japan. Here's a great series of blog posts about building, converting and painting it: http://fichtenfoo.net/blog/tag/junk-tank-rock/
32887
Post by: leroy233
I didnt even know that these sites were available, i thought gw would trample on all who defy them.
I know what they do is wrong but some of the fw stuff is just plain expensive.
If they drop the price people would buy more stuff, well i would anyway.
Are there anymore site like this?
10345
Post by: LunaHound
The site is not shut down, nor are the FW products gone.
Boys and Girls, expect to see Revenant and Phantom Titan dropping in 3 weeks from now.
*Edit, actually the next wave are already out, just not on a private owned website .
leroy233 wrote:I didnt even know that these sites were available, i thought gw would trample on all who defy them.
I know what they do is wrong but some of the fw stuff is just plain expensive.
If they drop the price people would buy more stuff, well i would anyway.
Are there anymore site like this?
Thats what GW fans want you to believe, they tell you the quality is bad, which is actually superior.
They tell you the shipping is slow, but its 3 weeks and free shipping.
They tell you its cheap because sweat shop. Well if you call 3 people in a kitchen sized room a sweat shop.
They tell you why GW is expensive, yet I can tell you the recasters are making high % of profit still, even at a fraction of FW price.
However....... I don't like pirates and recasters, and that link still links to recasts, which is still not ok.
Reporting link.
Kanluwen wrote:*point and laugh*
Couldn't happen to a more deserving bunch.
Don't know what to tell you.... there are at least 10 other re casters I can find.
15094
Post by: pixelpusher
But does any of those on Tabao etc. cater to non chinese customers?
494
Post by: H.B.M.C.
They'll be back.
8742
Post by: MeanGreenStompa
I wonder if they'll move into the recasting of finecast and if so, whether they will have a better quality control than GW?
3806
Post by: Grot 6
LunaHound wrote:The site is not shut down, nor are the FW products gone.
Boys and Girls, expect to see Revenant and Phantom Titan dropping in 3 weeks from now.
*Edit, actually the next wave are already out, just not on a private owned website .
leroy233 wrote:I didnt even know that these sites were available, i thought gw would trample on all who defy them.
I know what they do is wrong but some of the fw stuff is just plain expensive.
If they drop the price people would buy more stuff, well i would anyway.
Are there anymore site like this?
Thats what GW fans want you to believe, they tell you the quality is bad, which is actually superior.
They tell you the shipping is slow, but its 3 weeks and free shipping.
They tell you its cheap because sweat shop. Well if you call 3 people in a kitchen sized room a sweat shop.
They tell you why GW is expensive, yet I can tell you the recasters are making high % of profit still, even at a fraction of FW price.
However....... I don't like pirates and recasters, and that link still links to recasts, which is still not ok.
Reporting link.
Kanluwen wrote:*point and laugh*
Couldn't happen to a more deserving bunch.
Don't know what to tell you.... there are at least 10 other re casters I can find.
MMMM..... Luna makes me want to go on a shadowrun down in Jumphouse Barrens.
Just make sure you got the clink, Mr Johnson.
7075
Post by: chaos0xomega
People asking for links: No. Get over it, I'm not posting it or pm'ing you. It's against forum rules, and unfortunately for y'all, I enjoy having my own more or less private shopping network. The reason miniatureshobby/coolcast went down the drain is because certain people (bell of lost souls especially) made the dumb mistake of posting links all over the place. Once everyone knows about it, GW knows about it, and legal action is initiated. Besides that, ordering from my 'contacts' requires going through middlemen, etc. So no joy if you want the amazon.com experience.
3806
Post by: Grot 6
chaos0xomega wrote:People asking for links: No. Get over it, I'm not posting it or pm'ing you. It's against forum rules, and unfortunately for y'all, I enjoy having my own more or less private shopping network. The reason miniatureshobby/coolcast went down the drain is because certain people (bell of lost souls especially) made the dumb mistake of posting links all over the place. Once everyone knows about it, GW knows about it, and legal action is initiated. Besides that, ordering from my 'contacts' requires going through middlemen, etc. So no joy if you want the amazon.com experience.
You got a Doc Wagon Contract for that, too?
7075
Post by: chaos0xomega
Errr... what?
3806
Post by: Grot 6
Sorry, got caught up in the Shadowrun moment, looking at the seedy underbelly of rebel casters, and dark deals with Dragons, Demons, and whatnot.
back on track though-
The basic info on this subject is to go look for what your looking for, but don't run your hole when you find it to paraphrase you.
and yes, Virginia, they are out there.
Remember the first rule of fight club?
Yeah, thats the one.
855
Post by: grotblaster
So if you place a large order and they shut down to reopen elsewhere, do they still send you your order? Or refund your money? Typically businesses that close shop aren't terribly good about fulfilling outstanding orders. Especially ones on the other side of the globe.
This is what keeps me from seriously considering an order.
51394
Post by: judgedoug
How does everyone feel about the Rackham recasts? I'm tempted to order some. I know many of the molds are currently _in_ China, and last I heard from Paulo Parente, one of the guys who Rackham owed a ton of money to when they went bust is about to destroy them.
8742
Post by: MeanGreenStompa
judgedoug wrote:How does everyone feel about the Rackham recasts? I'm tempted to order some. I know many of the molds are currently _in_ China, and last I heard from Paulo Parente, one of the guys who Rackham owed a ton of money to when they went bust is about to destroy them.
Given the price that CMON are asking for the same minis?
My morality to the subject is entirely governed by my perception of the greed of the manufacturer...
42808
Post by: Marthike
If you really want cheap models go buy it from chinese websites and look for warhammer however, they will not send overseas so thats 1 problem.
51394
Post by: judgedoug
MeanGreenStompa wrote: judgedoug wrote:How does everyone feel about the Rackham recasts? I'm tempted to order some. I know many of the molds are currently _in_ China, and last I heard from Paulo Parente, one of the guys who Rackham owed a ton of money to when they went bust is about to destroy them.
Given the price that CMON are asking for the same minis?
My morality to the subject is entirely governed by my perception of the greed of the manufacturer...
I'm talking about the ones that CMON will never be able to re-release because the molds are gone.
60791
Post by: Sean_OBrien
grotblaster wrote:So if you place a large order and they shut down to reopen elsewhere, do they still send you your order? Or refund your money? Typically businesses that close shop aren't terribly good about fulfilling outstanding orders. Especially ones on the other side of the globe.
This is what keeps me from seriously considering an order.
They never actually go out of business - it just becomes difficult for them to do business under a specific name in the Western world. Paypal refuses to process payments to them until the offending items are removed from the website (though they will still process a payment for an unspecified invoice). eBay removes listings which are the easiest form of advertising for them. Domain registries remove the site from their servers...
The actual casters just keep on casting, more or less oblivious to the efforts to stop them. When a site goes down, they create a new one (Happy Hobby Network or something equally silly). When eBay bans their account - they create a new one. When Paypal stops processing their payments - they create a new Paypal account. While they are indifferent to IP laws, they tend to actually provide pretty good customer support for the products which they sell directly.
18249
Post by: Charax
I'll miss coolcastornot (until they come back) - I got a few items from them, some back when they were miniatureshobby and they've been consistently great
Shame I don't know about the more obscure sites, but as long as miniatureshobby comes back it'll be alright. Unlike most people I don't actually use them for Forgeworld stuff (although I might if FW take much longer to send out my last order, it's been two weeks already) - I use them for plastic parts recast in resin, because I prefer working in resin. That, and they have a nice range of resin skulls for which I have no idea who the original manufacturer was.
60791
Post by: Sean_OBrien
Charax wrote:I'll miss coolcastornot (until they come back) - I got a few items from them, some back when they were miniatureshobby and they've been consistently great
Shame I don't know about the more obscure sites, but as long as miniatureshobby comes back it'll be alright. Unlike most people I don't actually use them for Forgeworld stuff (although I might if FW take much longer to send out my last order, it's been two weeks already) - I use them for plastic parts recast in resin, because I prefer working in resin. That, and they have a nice range of resin skulls for which I have no idea who the original manufacturer was.
Learn Chinese - there are a lot of them out there. Heck - online translators have gotten good enough you can stumble around without too much of a problem using Google or Bing translators.
19148
Post by: Aerethan
Marthike wrote:If you really want cheap models go buy it from chinese websites and look for warhammer however, they will not send overseas so thats 1 problem.
except all those chinese sites that send overseas, by which I mean pretty much all of them.
10345
Post by: LunaHound
I feel threads like this are actually catering to recasters... so much info and hints and everything >.>
Its really not helping us fight recasters....
18249
Post by: Charax
Fighting recasters is GW's job, I don't recall being deputised to help GW protect its business model at any point.
32887
Post by: leroy233
I haven't ordered from these site and would be a bit dubious about it, Im not a fan of ordering from China after a bad seller on the net done me over.
However if the quality is as good as people are saying what are GW playing at with all their money they should be streets ahead in quality?
10345
Post by: LunaHound
Charax wrote:
Fighting recasters is GW's job, I don't recall being deputised to help GW protect its business model at any point.
Just saying, a few wants to "celebrate" some FW items being taken down, while openly link the recaster site.
Which no doubt is bringing in more new customers.....
A bit detrimental I guess to their aim?
36184
Post by: Alfndrate
Charax wrote:
Fighting recasters is GW's job, I don't recall being deputised to help GW protect its business model at any point.
The problem is, and GW is shooting themselves in the foot with this, that if you wish for GW to be the game company you want to know and love, you'll protect their game. It's like showing loyalty to your flgs by buying there instead of buying online at places like Wayland or Maelstrom, etc... You love GW, you want to support GW, then you should strive to shut down recasters because they're undercutting GW.
Yes, this is a bit of ridiculous example because GW is very hard to like/love, but at the same time it is something that needs to be done by those that wish to see 40k keep expanding.
The recasters are just making it tough by offering good prices and good, if not better, product.
19148
Post by: Aerethan
I'll posit a little point here.
Say Ford made the Pinto. It was expensive, and had all manner of production flaws that required you to fix it up right after you bought it brand new.
Now say that Xao Bing Corp sells that exact Pinto, for less money and you don't have to fix it at all.
Which would you buy?
GW should be forced to fix their quality and pricing, otherwise I,ll keep buying what I can from the company that is doing it right, regardless of who designed the models.
Oddly enough You don't really see recasts of smaller companies like CHS or Maxmini, at least not on the scale that GW has. CHS is a garage company and their products are shipped just fine, and if not they are replaced with proper versions.
How many times did Akaranseth have to swap out Finecast models until he got a proper cast?
722
Post by: Kanluwen
And that's an asinine stance to take, especially as it ignores a major factor.
Xao Bing Corp is running their manufacturing in such a way that they are using the exact same machines and the exact same employees that they are paid by Ford for the production of the Pinto.
So why is there such a difference?
30289
Post by: Omegus
They'll be back.
In fact, in the last few weeks, at least two Russian-based recasters have set up shop online. I've already taken advantage of the savings.
36184
Post by: Alfndrate
Aerethan wrote:I'll posit a little point here. Say Ford made the Pinto. It was expensive, and had all manner of production flaws that required you to fix it up right after you bought it brand new. Now say that Xao Bing Corp sells that exact Pinto, for less money and you don't have to fix it at all. Which would you buy? GW should be forced to fix their quality and pricing, otherwise I,ll keep buying what I can from the company that is doing it right, regardless of who designed the models. Oddly enough You don't really see recasts of smaller companies like CHS or Maxmini, at least not on the scale that GW has. CHS is a garage company and their products are shipped just fine, and if not they are replaced with proper versions. How many times did Akaranseth have to swap out Finecast models until he got a proper cast? I agree with the sentiments of your statement, but you're missing out on the massive levels of regulation that come with the production of cars. I would like to note that you did have to fix the Pinto right after you bought it, but at the same time there are different regulations between models and cars. A finecast model won't ignite and explode if you drop its ass on the table. Though if you were GW, it would be a nice marketing strategy, and a way to make people buy more models as they would have to replace their new and improve "fineshrapnel". Also I'm not saying recasters are a good thing or a bad thing, I don't buy from them because I don't buy enough GW to warrant me looking at their recasting competitiors, but the guy I was responding to was asking why it is our job as gamers to police the market when it's GW's job... Also in the continuance of your example... if Ford's Pinto had issues and overpriced the value of the car that exploded upon being rear-ended, and Xao Bing Corp sold that exact same car cheaper and without the threat of death, I would go to Chevy instead of buying the Ford, no one is forcing me to only buy the Ford, just like no one is forcing me to buy GW models (or sculpts) for GW games.
54348
Post by: angel of ecstasy
Alfndrate wrote:Charax wrote:
Fighting recasters is GW's job, I don't recall being deputised to help GW protect its business model at any point.
The problem is, and GW is shooting themselves in the foot with this, that if you wish for GW to be the game company you want to know and love, you'll protect their game. It's like showing loyalty to your flgs by buying there instead of buying online at places like Wayland or Maelstrom, etc... You love GW, you want to support GW, then you should strive to shut down recasters because they're undercutting GW.
Yes, this is a bit of ridiculous example because GW is very hard to like/love, but at the same time it is something that needs to be done by those that wish to see 40k keep expanding.
The recasters are just making it tough by offering good prices and good, if not better, product.
Maybe they'll start offering good, if not better, rules and fluff as well.
18249
Post by: Charax
leroy233 wrote:I haven't ordered from these site and would be a bit dubious about it, Im not a fan of ordering from China after a bad seller on the net done me over.
However if the quality is as good as people are saying what are GW playing at with all their money they should be streets ahead in quality?
I feel dubious about every new retailer I try, the first order is always a gamble - I chucked in a $30 order with the expectation that either I'd lose $30, or I'd gain models & a new source of models. It paid off massively. It did take a month to get here though, so those are just factors you have to weigh up.
LunaHound wrote:
Just saying, a few wants to "celebrate" some FW items being taken down, while openly link the recaster site.
Which no doubt is bringing in more new customers.....
A bit detrimental I guess to their aim?
It does seem quite inconsistent, except that the links are going to a place that explicitly doesn't sell GW recasts anymore, so I dont see how it's helping - they don't use redirects on the site so whenever the replacement goes up knowing the URL for the old shop won't help
Alfndrate wrote:
The problem is, and GW is shooting themselves in the foot with this, that if you wish for GW to be the game company you want to know and love, you'll protect their game. It's like showing loyalty to your flgs by buying there instead of buying online at places like Wayland or Maelstrom, etc... You love GW, you want to support GW, then you should strive to shut down recasters because they're undercutting GW.
By the same token shouldn't I always buy direct from GW so they get the whole price of whatever I buy rather than a FLGS or online retailer taking a cut?
Brand loyalty is a funny thing, because it usually comes into play because a certain brand is better in some way than another - like the android Vs iphone thing, people are loyal to a brand because of that brand's attributes, but here they're the exact same products, the only difference is the source. I don't think many companies would survive (indeed, many haven't) because someone else could manufacture the exact same thing cheaper. If someone started selling NotCoke which had the same exact properties as regular coke, but was cheaper, people will choose it.
Here, the differences are quite minor (the casting medium, the fact it's being sold from China, the fact it's not GW selling it, the relative obscurity of the recasters) that the only reasons to show loyalty are if one of those very specific differences resonates with you in some way?
Personally? I've given GW (Forgeworld, really) about £40 this year, the rest I buy second-hand, the people I game with have full armies, the local GW shut down almost a decade ago - I don't really see how my gaming would change one iota if GW crumbled tomorrow, so without the "Do it to keep GW alive because you wub them" argument what is there as an incentive?
722
Post by: Kanluwen
angel of ecstasy wrote: Alfndrate wrote:Charax wrote:
Fighting recasters is GW's job, I don't recall being deputised to help GW protect its business model at any point.
The problem is, and GW is shooting themselves in the foot with this, that if you wish for GW to be the game company you want to know and love, you'll protect their game. It's like showing loyalty to your flgs by buying there instead of buying online at places like Wayland or Maelstrom, etc... You love GW, you want to support GW, then you should strive to shut down recasters because they're undercutting GW.
Yes, this is a bit of ridiculous example because GW is very hard to like/love, but at the same time it is something that needs to be done by those that wish to see 40k keep expanding.
The recasters are just making it tough by offering good prices and good, if not better, product.
Maybe they'll start offering good, if not better, rules and fluff as well.
How is this hard to understand?
No corporation not based in a third world country is able to compete with recasters.
Recasters have no real overhead to speak of, nor do they worry about things like paying their employees a livable wage.
The phenomenon from China is that these recasters are actually using the same molds that the corporation which is paying the factory to produce their product gave them.
42808
Post by: Marthike
LunaHound wrote:The site is not shut down, nor are the FW products gone.
Boys and Girls, expect to see Revenant and Phantom Titan dropping in 3 weeks from now.
*Edit, actually the next wave are already out, just not on a private owned website .
leroy233 wrote:I didnt even know that these sites were available, i thought gw would trample on all who defy them.
I know what they do is wrong but some of the fw stuff is just plain expensive.
If they drop the price people would buy more stuff, well i would anyway.
Are there anymore site like this?
Thats what GW fans want you to believe, they tell you the quality is bad, which is actually superior.
They tell you the shipping is slow, but its 3 weeks and free shipping.
They tell you its cheap because sweat shop. Well if you call 3 people in a kitchen sized room a sweat shop.
They tell you why GW is expensive, yet I can tell you the recasters are making high % of profit still, even at a fraction of FW price.
However....... I don't like pirates and recasters, and that link still links to recasts, which is still not ok.
Reporting link.
Kanluwen wrote:*point and laugh*
Couldn't happen to a more deserving bunch.
Don't know what to tell you.... there are at least 10 other re casters I can find.
That is expensive for a recast. £16.8
36184
Post by: Alfndrate
Charax wrote: Alfndrate wrote:
The problem is, and GW is shooting themselves in the foot with this, that if you wish for GW to be the game company you want to know and love, you'll protect their game. It's like showing loyalty to your flgs by buying there instead of buying online at places like Wayland or Maelstrom, etc... You love GW, you want to support GW, then you should strive to shut down recasters because they're undercutting GW.
By the same token shouldn't I always buy direct from GW so they get the whole price of whatever I buy rather than a FLGS or online retailer taking a cut?
No
Brand loyalty is a funny thing, because it usually comes into play because a certain brand is better in some way than another - like the android Vs iphone thing, people are loyal to a brand because of that brand's attributes, but here they're the exact same products, the only difference is the source. I don't think many companies would survive (indeed, many haven't) because someone else could manufacture the exact same thing cheaper. If someone started selling NotCoke which had the same exact properties as regular coke, but was cheaper, people will choose it.
Not to step on your parade, but there already is NotCoke, and it exists all around the word. My own personal experience with "NotCoke" was with a drink called Mecca-Cola. The can I had tasted exactly like coke, and according to my professor who bought it for the class after watching the Coke Wars documentary in our Intercultural Communications class, it was cheaper than a 12 pack of Coke. The reason why the majority of people still buy Coke is because it's got mass market, global appeal. Mecca-Cola is literally marketed to the muslim community world-wide. And there are already examples of people in other countries buying "NotCoke" that's cheaper... is LA Ice Cola still a thing in Australia?
19148
Post by: Aerethan
Kanluwen wrote: angel of ecstasy wrote: Alfndrate wrote:Charax wrote:
Fighting recasters is GW's job, I don't recall being deputised to help GW protect its business model at any point.
The problem is, and GW is shooting themselves in the foot with this, that if you wish for GW to be the game company you want to know and love, you'll protect their game. It's like showing loyalty to your flgs by buying there instead of buying online at places like Wayland or Maelstrom, etc... You love GW, you want to support GW, then you should strive to shut down recasters because they're undercutting GW.
Yes, this is a bit of ridiculous example because GW is very hard to like/love, but at the same time it is something that needs to be done by those that wish to see 40k keep expanding.
The recasters are just making it tough by offering good prices and good, if not better, product.
Maybe they'll start offering good, if not better, rules and fluff as well.
How is this hard to understand?
No corporation not based in a third world country is able to compete with recasters.
Recasters have no real overhead to speak of, nor do they worry about things like paying their employees a livable wage.
The phenomenon from China is that these recasters are actually using the same molds that the corporation which is paying the factory to produce their product gave them.
Forgeworld is being cast in China? Or are they casting resin copies from the plastic injection molds?
None of the parts that were sold on coolcast are manufactured in China by those same methods from GW.
Does china do any manufacturing for GW models? If so, I'd say it's only a matter of time before we start seeing plastics on the black market, and I'll crap myself from all the savings.
Perhaps companies will think twice about having China do all their production if it means that exact copies will outsell the originals.
44272
Post by: Azreal13
News Flash!
From 2013 all GW miniatures will have an rfid tag embedded somewhere in the model.
All models will be scanned at our HHHobby Centres before any gaming commences. Any models failing the scan will be confiscated as fakes and destroyed.
Obviously older, official, miniatures will not have the tag, and so will need to be replaced with newer finescan originals. We appreciate the impact this may have on our loyal and valued customers, so for the initial week from launch we will only increase prices by 317% to cover the cost of the new finescan technology.
After the initial promotion prices will stabilise at a very reasonable 500% of today's prices, which I'm sure our loyal fans will appreciate is still very reasonable pricing for the peace of mind that their models are the genuine articles.
19148
Post by: Aerethan
Holy crap FineScan. I love it.
722
Post by: Kanluwen
Forge World was being cast in China at one point, yes. A large quantity of the range was.
China was approached for manufacturing GW models. By all accounts, GW pulled out.
7375
Post by: BrookM
Yes, a batch of my Elysians are from China and sold by FW, the kicker is, best batch of casting to date. Space Hulk was also done in China.
63000
Post by: Peregrine
Charax wrote:By the same token shouldn't I always buy direct from GW so they get the whole price of whatever I buy rather than a FLGS or online retailer taking a cut?
No. GW's sales through FLGS or online retailers are legal. GW has willingly accepted a lower cut of the sales in exchange for allowing the third-party seller to pay the costs of shelf space, marketing, etc. While there's something to be said for "buy where you play", there's certainly nothing unethical about buying through any legal seller of GW's products.
This is NOT the same as buying from a recaster that steals GW's work and sells illegal copies of it.
Here, the differences are quite minor (the casting medium, the fact it's being sold from China, the fact it's not GW selling it, the relative obscurity of the recasters) that the only reasons to show loyalty are if one of those very specific differences resonates with you in some way?
And the tiny little difference that the recasters are stealing someone else's work. It's no different than walking into a GW store and stealing a box of space marines off the shelf. Now, this might be ok with you (the popularity of illegal pdfs of GW books demonstrates that it's a common attitude), but don't pretend that we're talking about just another retailer to buy from.
19148
Post by: Aerethan
Pirating =/= theft. GW didn't lose something they made. They were pirated.
GW didn't have something stolen off the shelf. You can't compare the two at all. A lost sale? sure, but lost sales are not the same as shrink/theft.
Here is a visual aid:
36184
Post by: Alfndrate
Just because I don't deal with piracy or sales, can you please explain why recasters that sell copies of GW products are not "stealing" simply because they're selling a copy of a GW product rather than walking into a GW and stealing the model? The MPAA and RIAA have been able to make a decent case that piracy is theft...
63000
Post by: Peregrine
Aerethan wrote:Pirating =/= theft. GW didn't lose something they made. They were pirated.
GW didn't have something stolen off the shelf. You can't compare the two at all. A lost sale? sure, but lost sales are not the same as shrink/theft.
While this might be true in the case of digital piracy where there's no profit involved, it isn't true here.
1) In at least some cases it IS a lost physical object, since the "recaster" is using the original molds provided by the company to make legitimate models, and just selling (hypothetically) 10% of the production on the side for their own profit.
2) This isn't a case of a lost "sale" where the person probably wouldn't have bought the item in question, it's a very clear loss of the money spent on the illegal copy.
3) IP theft is still theft. This isn't someone putting up scans of a book just because they can, it's a case of stealing someone else's work and selling it for your own gain.
722
Post by: Kanluwen
Aerethan has a very clear dog in this fight, as it's well-known that he recasts models for his own use.
47462
Post by: rigeld2
Peregrine wrote: Aerethan wrote:Pirating =/= theft. GW didn't lose something they made. They were pirated.
GW didn't have something stolen off the shelf. You can't compare the two at all. A lost sale? sure, but lost sales are not the same as shrink/theft.
While this might be true in the case of digital piracy where there's no profit involved, it isn't true here.
1) In at least some cases it IS a lost physical object, since the "recaster" is using the original molds provided by the company to make legitimate models, and just selling (hypothetically) 10% of the production on the side for their own profit.
I thought GW moved all the model production out of China a while ago...
2) This isn't a case of a lost "sale" where the person probably wouldn't have bought the item in question, it's a very clear loss of the money spent on the illegal copy.
I know for a fact that coolcast has made sales that GW never would have gotten.
Saying that everyone who buys a recast would've bought from GW if the recast wasn't available is naive.
722
Post by: Kanluwen
rigeld2 wrote: Peregrine wrote: Aerethan wrote:Pirating =/= theft. GW didn't lose something they made. They were pirated.
GW didn't have something stolen off the shelf. You can't compare the two at all. A lost sale? sure, but lost sales are not the same as shrink/theft.
While this might be true in the case of digital piracy where there's no profit involved, it isn't true here.
1) In at least some cases it IS a lost physical object, since the "recaster" is using the original molds provided by the company to make legitimate models, and just selling (hypothetically) 10% of the production on the side for their own profit.
I thought GW moved all the model production out of China a while ago...
And you think that the company returned the molds and all stock produced?
Companies like Hasbro basically figure on "lost" stock when it comes to producing in China, as mysteriously the machines keep running even when the workers aren't there. It's like they have little elves that churn out action figures that get sold as if they're the real thing...
2) This isn't a case of a lost "sale" where the person probably wouldn't have bought the item in question, it's a very clear loss of the money spent on the illegal copy.
I know for a fact that coolcast has made sales that GW never would have gotten.
Saying that everyone who buys a recast would've bought from GW if the recast wasn't available is naive.
Actually he is correct.
Did you buy the product that GW sells from Coolcast?
If yes: That is a sale that GW did not receive. The only way you could make this argument is if it's OOP models, but even then it's still a bit of a logical fallacy as the original product is still available on the market.
Not sure why this is so difficult for people to understand.
19148
Post by: Aerethan
Peregrine wrote: Aerethan wrote:Pirating =/= theft. GW didn't lose something they made. They were pirated.
GW didn't have something stolen off the shelf. You can't compare the two at all. A lost sale? sure, but lost sales are not the same as shrink/theft.
While this might be true in the case of digital piracy where there's no profit involved, it isn't true here.
1) In at least some cases it IS a lost physical object, since the "recaster" is using the original molds provided by the company to make legitimate models, and just selling (hypothetically) 10% of the production on the side for their own profit.
2) This isn't a case of a lost "sale" where the person probably wouldn't have bought the item in question, it's a very clear loss of the money spent on the illegal copy.
3) IP theft is still theft. This isn't someone putting up scans of a book just because they can, it's a case of stealing someone else's work and selling it for your own gain.
1. FW no longer produces in China, nor does GW. So there isn't some use of official molds for the black market. And honestly, it isn't hard to make molds, so the masters aren't even needed.
2. Loss of sales to competitors is still loss of sales, regardless of the legality of that competition. It is money that GW isn't making because someone else is. It isn't too different from people using PP models for Warhammer, which is also a lost sale.
3. IP is a very new concept. As the CHS case shows, GW's designs may not fall under sculptural art work, and instead as production design, which would make them not protected under UK law. I'm not saying that recasting is legal, or cool, or what have you.
4. I don't really have a dog in this as Kanluwen points out. My only qualm with this is that I was a customer. I don't sell my casts(not that that makes it any less illegal to make them). And honestly if GW wants to sue me they are welcome to. They can have my 93 Cavalier and already bad credit. I don't own any major assets, nor would they ever see a dime from me.
And as has been said, just because I bought a recast doesn't mean I didn't buy from GW. In many cases I bought the recasts because of the price. Do I need an OOP Archaon? No. If GW produced the model still and sold him at market value($50 on ebay) would I buy it from them? Hell no. But at $18 I can afford it, and it'll sit on my shelf until the day I get bored enough to paint it. GW didn't lose a sale there.
47462
Post by: rigeld2
Kanluwen wrote:
And you think that the company returned the molds and all stock produced?
Companies like Hasbro basically figure on "lost" stock when it comes to producing in China, as mysteriously the machines keep running even when the workers aren't there. It's like they have little elves that churn out action figures that get sold as if they're the real thing...
I'm not saying that. He said that it was models skimmed off the top of the production line. If they aren't producing in China, they weren't skimmed off the top of the production line. In other words, his statement was incorrect.
Did you buy the product that GW sells from Coolcast?
If yes: That is a sale that GW did not receive. The only way you could make this argument is if it's OOP models, but even then it's still a bit of a logical fallacy as the original product is still available on the market.
Not sure why this is so difficult for people to understand.
Because the purchased models would not have been purchased at GW prices. Guaranteed.
722
Post by: Kanluwen
Again:
Yes, they did lose a sale.
The product exists as produced by them. The fact that you weren't going to buy from them is irrelevant.
The fact is that you bought the exact same product, justifying it with "a smaller price".
19148
Post by: Aerethan
Kanluwen wrote:Again:
Yes, they did lose a sale.
The product exists as produced by them. The fact that you weren't going to buy from them is irrelevant.
The fact is that you bought the exact same product, justifying it with "a smaller price".
By those standards ebay is lost sales. So fine, if we want to nit pick.
722
Post by: Kanluwen
rigeld2 wrote: Kanluwen wrote:
And you think that the company returned the molds and all stock produced?
Companies like Hasbro basically figure on "lost" stock when it comes to producing in China, as mysteriously the machines keep running even when the workers aren't there. It's like they have little elves that churn out action figures that get sold as if they're the real thing...
I'm not saying that. He said that it was models skimmed off the top of the production line. If they aren't producing in China, they weren't skimmed off the top of the production line. In other words, his statement was incorrect.
Except it's not.
There were, as of March, still things being produced in China. Just because production ceased since then does not mean that the machines and molds are not still present, especially since the things being produced in China were plastic kits for the most part.
Did you buy the product that GW sells from Coolcast?
If yes: That is a sale that GW did not receive. The only way you could make this argument is if it's OOP models, but even then it's still a bit of a logical fallacy as the original product is still available on the market.
Not sure why this is so difficult for people to understand.
Because the purchased models would not have been purchased at GW prices. Guaranteed.
Irrelevant. You bought a model produced by them, opting for the illegally produced option rather than the legally produced option.
47462
Post by: rigeld2
Kanluwen wrote:Again:
Yes, they did lose a sale.
The product exists as produced by them. The fact that you weren't going to buy from them is irrelevant.
The fact is that you bought the exact same product, justifying it with "a smaller price".
No, they didn't lose a sale. No sale of those models from GW ever would have happened.
I might have bought them from eBay, but likely not.
722
Post by: Kanluwen
Aerethan wrote: Kanluwen wrote:Again:
Yes, they did lose a sale.
The product exists as produced by them. The fact that you weren't going to buy from them is irrelevant.
The fact is that you bought the exact same product, justifying it with "a smaller price".
By those standards ebay is lost sales. So fine, if we want to nit pick.
It is, but if we're going to nitpick...
The company has still been paid for that model.
63000
Post by: Peregrine
Aerethan wrote:2. Loss of sales to competitors is still loss of sales, regardless of the legality of that competition. It is money that GW isn't making because someone else is. It isn't too different from people using PP models for Warhammer, which is also a lost sale.
Except buying from PP is ALSO legal. Stop comparing legal purchases to illegal ones.
3. IP is a very new concept. As the CHS case shows, GW's designs may not fall under sculptural art work, and instead as production design, which would make them not protected under UK law. I'm not saying that recasting is legal, or cool, or what have you.
Err, no. The CHS case arguably shows that you can make your own designs based on GW's IP, not that you can make a literal copy of GW's work. There's a huge difference between the two.
Do I need an OOP Archaon? No. If GW produced the model still and sold him at market value($50 on ebay) would I buy it from them? Hell no. But at $18 I can afford it, and it'll sit on my shelf until the day I get bored enough to paint it. GW didn't lose a sale there.
Let's not pretend this is about maintaining access to OOP models (a cause I can sympathize with, if the model is genuinely OOP and never coming back). The majority of recast sales are of things GW currently produces.
19148
Post by: Aerethan
Boo wah about black markets and counterfeits. Every industry has them, and every company has fan boys who sound the alarm when they find them.
The difference here is that there isn't feth all that GW can realistically do about it beyond having paypal and site registrars slow them down.
47462
Post by: rigeld2
Kanluwen wrote:There were, as of March, still things being produced in China. Just because production ceased since then does not mean that the machines and molds are not still present, especially since the things being produced in China were plastic kits for the most part.
Right. I'm not disputing that.
Nothing is produced there currently. Therefore nothing sold from there is "skimmed" from GW's current production. Which is what Peregrine said.
19148
Post by: Aerethan
Let's not pretend this is about maintaining access to OOP models (a cause I can sympathize with, if the model is genuinely OOP and never coming back). The majority of recast sales are of things GW currently produces.
Did you see the metal models that coolcast offered? every one of them was OOP.
So now you have moral relativism. It's ok to recast something that GW stopped selling, but not current products?
It's not my fault GW released LE models that look insanely better than the production ones.
And with the destruction of the Bitz service, they opened themselves up to a crap ton of lost sales. GW could very well stem the tide of piracy on their products, but instead they probably ignore it like they do every other model company.
63000
Post by: Peregrine
Aerethan wrote:Did you see the metal models that coolcast offered? every one of them was OOP.
No, since I hadn't seen that particular site before it was posted here, and the context was FW recasts, not OOP recasts.
So now you have moral relativism. It's ok to recast something that GW stopped selling, but not current products?
It's not entirely ok, but it's less obviously wrong if you're talking about a product that will never be sold by the original producer, assuming you'd be willing to buy a legitimate one if it was sold again. And no, it isn't moral relativism because the situations are completely different.
And with the destruction of the Bitz service, they opened themselves up to a crap ton of lost sales. GW could very well stem the tide of piracy on their products, but instead they probably ignore it like they do every other model company.
How exactly can GW stop piracy? If people are willing to buy illegal copies of GW products there's no way GW can stop it, since it's very hard to sell at that kind of discount when you have to deal with minimum wage, workplace safety laws, artists who expect to be paid for their work, etc. Don't try to blame GW for your willingness to support IP theft. Automatically Appended Next Post: Aerethan wrote:Boo wah about black markets and counterfeits. Every industry has them, and every company has fan boys who sound the alarm when they find them.
So because theft is common we should just ignore it?
19148
Post by: Aerethan
GW could quit discontinuing items that apparently still have a demand.
And metal models are still viable for the older pieces. Have you seen what an Empire Grandmaster costs now? In metal it was $15 which was high for old sculpts that are single piece models. Now in Finecast they are $29, same sculpts cheaper medium, slightly more work.
No one asked for Finecast, no one wants it in the form it's at.
So for those, yes GW could stop it.
And let's not pretend like GW is strapped for profit once they've paid the bills. The business is run by what appear to be 5 year olds with no concept of long term viability. They squeeze every penny they can out of the market, and expect stupid fast turnaround on their customer base.
9594
Post by: RiTides
Peregrine wrote:Let's not pretend this is about maintaining access to OOP models (a cause I can sympathize with, if the model is genuinely OOP and never coming back). The majority of recast sales are of things GW currently produces.
Peregrine, I am shocked. We have found common ground
The only items I feel no qualms about purchasing are items that are out of production. That's my personal line, I understand everyone has different ones.
115
Post by: Azazelx
MeanGreenStompa wrote:I wonder if they'll move into the recasting of finecast and if so, whether they will have a better quality control than GW?
They'd have to get a perfect finecast cast to mould their recasts off of. So no, it ain't gonna happen. /snide
23979
Post by: frozenwastes
But they might get a finecast model, properly fix it with putty and then make moulds of that, producing a higher quality product in metal than the original finecast. A friend of mine bought some of the new necron finecast releases in metal off of ebay and they were way, way better than GW's crap.
As for legality, China is not a western democracy. I don't believe the sellers are actually violating any Chinese laws. Whether or not importing goods you know to be counterfeit for personal use is a crime will vary based on your jurisdiction.
1464
Post by: Breotan
Aerethan wrote:Pirating =/= theft. GW didn't lose something they made. They were pirated.
GW didn't have something stolen off the shelf. You can't compare the two at all. A lost sale? sure, but lost sales are not the same as shrink/theft.
Technically it is counterfitting, not piracy. Still, the end result is the same. Did GW/ FW get any money for the figure you purchased? If you had bought a legitimate figure, even on the secondary market, they would have. If you bought a counterfit figure then they did not. You could say that it is the guys doing the counterfitting who are guilty of stealing money from GW, but by buying those counterfit products you are complicit in the act. Also, the US and UK have laws in place regarding counterfit of physical goods so don't think your file-sharing analogy will help you if you wind up in court.
38934
Post by: aosol
Yeah, they're just dodging GW again. There is something wrong with your business model when a hobbit has acceptable knock offs. I look forward to finding them yet again.
57786
Post by: pitboy2710
Heh, i always miss these places
20908
Post by: angryboy2k
Kanluwen wrote:
Irrelevant. You bought a model produced by them, opting for the illegally produced option rather than the legally produced option.
Or maybe, they bought a model produced by them, opting for the illegally produced option rather than nothing.
I don't agree with counterfeiting, but I don't agree with equating it with a lost sale either. Your model implies that the person who buys from a recaster would have bought the item at any price from the original seller and that's clearly not true.
Somewhat more on-topic, Coolcast had the Tyranid Brood Nest on their site recently. Ironically, it was priced higher than the last price I saw it for on Forge World's website but when I checked FW the thing was out of production...
494
Post by: H.B.M.C.
Kanluwen wrote:Did you buy the product that GW sells from Coolcast?
If yes: That is a sale that GW did not receive. The only way you could make this argument is if it's OOP models, but even then it's still a bit of a logical fallacy as the original product is still available on the market.
Not sure why this is so difficult for people to understand.
And if I bought a (legit) FW model off of eBay for cheaper than what FW is selling it for, is that a sale 'lost', even though the model is 100% legit?
5946
Post by: Miguelsan
H.B.M.C. wrote: Kanluwen wrote:Did you buy the product that GW sells from Coolcast?
If yes: That is a sale that GW did not receive. The only way you could make this argument is if it's OOP models, but even then it's still a bit of a logical fallacy as the original product is still available on the market.
Not sure why this is so difficult for people to understand.
And if I bought a (legit) FW model off of eBay for cheaper than what FW is selling it for, is that a sale 'lost', even though the model is 100% legit?
OFC it is plus living in embargoland makes us elligible for a 60 pounds GW tax that we are supposed to pay praising our beloved overlords.
I never bought from a recaster but after GW's 2011 antics for the Asia-Oceania markets if I ever order from GW it will be a miracle.
M.
10345
Post by: LunaHound
Marthike wrote: LunaHound wrote:The site is not shut down, nor are the FW products gone.
Boys and Girls, expect to see Revenant and Phantom Titan dropping in 3 weeks from now.
*Edit, actually the next wave are already out, just not on a private owned website .
leroy233 wrote:I didnt even know that these sites were available, i thought gw would trample on all who defy them.
I know what they do is wrong but some of the fw stuff is just plain expensive.
If they drop the price people would buy more stuff, well i would anyway.
Are there anymore site like this?
Thats what GW fans want you to believe, they tell you the quality is bad, which is actually superior.
They tell you the shipping is slow, but its 3 weeks and free shipping.
They tell you its cheap because sweat shop. Well if you call 3 people in a kitchen sized room a sweat shop.
They tell you why GW is expensive, yet I can tell you the recasters are making high % of profit still, even at a fraction of FW price.
However....... I don't like pirates and recasters, and that link still links to recasts, which is still not ok.
Reporting link.
Kanluwen wrote:*point and laugh*
Couldn't happen to a more deserving bunch.
Don't know what to tell you.... there are at least 10 other re casters I can find.
http://i.imgur.com/XLM5A.jpg
That is expensive for a recast. £16.8
Its $26 for the whole model, the currency displayed was... Chinese dolla
And to those in tin foil cast claiming the counterfeit items are made by FW MOLD AND EX FW EMPLOYEES.
^This is 100% false. Chinese counterfeiters does NOT use FW molds, and the majority of them are NOT FW employees,
NOR do they need any "FW" training to handle resin. They have been pirating garage kits for decades, FW is baby walk in comparison.
I mean sure, I guess I can understand when the beloved company gets out done by pirates, yet
if you really love FW, you would ask them to step up their game, instead of making false information up to make FW ( AND FINECAST ) look better.
Automatically Appended Next Post:
Charax wrote:
It does seem quite inconsistent, except that the links are going to a place that explicitly doesn't sell GW recasts anymore, so I dont see how it's helping - they don't use redirects on the site so whenever the replacement goes up knowing the URL for the old shop won't help
Because, the link specifically links to a counterfeiter site, ATM they halt carrying FW, GW items,
which does not mean they dont carry pirated items.
Quoting myself, If one cares about something, its an issue, if they dont, then its drama.
We shouldn't be mad against counterfeiters only because they recast FW items... we should be against counterfeiter because counterfeiting is wrong....
Lastly, this thread lets people know counterfeiters exists ( which many didnt earlier )
now they'll be looking for them,
AND when that website decides to continue their shenanigan, then what? removing the link would be too late then.
722
Post by: Kanluwen
Yet, it's not restricted to FW. And it has nothing to do with them being "FW employees".
Forge World, for the span of a year or so in 2009, explored mass manufacturing by contracting out production to a Chinese firm.
As BrookM mentioned, there was a hefty run of Elysian Drop Troops done in China. There was also a run of Death Korps of Krieg, various Marine Dreadnoughts, and other "high volume" items which sell in droves.
In order to do so--they would have to provide molds to the Chinese firm for production purposes.
Supposedly production numbers and quality were not acceptable for the amount the firm was charging, with a large number of the master molds provided to the firm "walking off" the factory floor and being replaced with shoddy molds.
So yeah. Clearly they never ever ever would have had the molds to work from.
Ever.
10345
Post by: LunaHound
Simple question. What happens when you inject resin into plastic mold machine?
Also, what year was Decimator made.
722
Post by: Kanluwen
What do plastic mold machines have to do with anything?
10345
Post by: LunaHound
Oh I just want to know, what happens when you inject resin into a GW plastic mold machine. Since I have never tried yet, and you seem to know these things?
So... do you happen to know what happens?
22687
Post by: MajorTom11
Play nice guys....
722
Post by: Kanluwen
What does this have to do with anything?
Forge World outsourced to a Chinese firm for awhile. That has nothing to do with plastic production, nor does it have anything to do with GW.
There are firms in China which do resin production, and FW contracted out to one of them. That requires them to give over molds for production.
It is not an uncommon phenomenon. I suggest you do some research.
10345
Post by: LunaHound
It has to do with everything kan.
Just tell me, can you use GW plastic molds to yield resin products or not.
Im asking you because you are always at the forefront of claiming the nice casts are made by FW equipments.
494
Post by: H.B.M.C.
Everything actually.
Your assertion is that they were using the moulds given/sold/licensed to to them by FW to make their FW recasts. Thing is they were making resin recasts of GW's regular plastic kits and brand new FW resin kits as well. They're doing more than just using the moulds they had - they're making new ones.
722
Post by: Kanluwen
H.B.M.C. wrote:
Everything actually.
Your assertion is that they were using the moulds given/sold/licensed to to them by FW to make their FW recasts. Thing is they were making resin recasts of GW's regular plastic kits and brand new FW resin kits as well. They're doing more than just using the moulds they had - they're making new ones.
Which as Aerethan posted, isn't that hard. Garage operations can do that.
That still does not change the fact that the firm in question did have possession of FW's (and potentially GW's, depending on if they had been awarded the contract for the plastics as well) molds at one time when they were contracted and were making product using said molds.
14070
Post by: SagesStone
So they shared it out with the others then?
They never needed the FW or GW contract to produce it, they just needed some way to acquire a model.
722
Post by: Kanluwen
n0t_u wrote:So they shared it out with the others then?
They never needed the FW or GW contract to produce it, they just needed some way to acquire a model.
True, but having the original molds doesn't hurt any.
10345
Post by: LunaHound
Kanluwen wrote: n0t_u wrote:So they shared it out with the others then?
They never needed the FW or GW contract to produce it, they just needed some way to acquire a model.
True, but having the original molds doesn't hurt any.
And realizing counterfeiters doesn't need to use FW molds to produce BETTER products doesn't hurt either.
115
Post by: Azazelx
LunaHound wrote:
And to those in tin foil cast claiming the counterfeit items are made by FW MOLD AND EX FW EMPLOYEES.
^This is 100% false. Chinese counterfeiters does NOT use FW molds, and the majority of them are NOT FW employees,
NOR do they need any "FW" training to handle resin. They have been pirating garage kits for decades, FW is baby walk in comparison.
Any proof, or just pulling opinions out of ...whole air and calling it "100%" truth?
722
Post by: Kanluwen
Running a factory with hundreds of employees versus a shop floor of dozens plays a large part in that.
And I would be very interested to see exactly how many casts these counterfeiters go through before they get these "flawless" casts given the nature of resin casting.
10345
Post by: LunaHound
Kanluwen wrote:Running a factory with hundreds of employees versus a shop floor of dozens plays a large part in that.
And I would be very interested to see exactly how many casts these counterfeiters go through before they get these "flawless" casts given the nature of resin casting.
Oh now now, you are just back paddling.
What ever the chinese did, so can FW.
You are forgetting, producing additional only costs FW a few dollars to make sure you get a flawless product.
IF FW felt like it, they could, but nope.
Or we can settle with " pirates more competent than original "
or
"Pirates actually cares more about customers to throw away the flawed one, but hey! look! they are already surpassing FW in their QC and Customer Satisfaction support!"
Either way, all at the same time, still keeping the quality, and keeping the profit / business up.
Also, Not too sure whether resin can be re used or not hmmm
Automatically Appended Next Post:
scipio.au wrote: LunaHound wrote:
And to those in tin foil cast claiming the counterfeit items are made by FW MOLD AND EX FW EMPLOYEES.
^This is 100% false. Chinese counterfeiters does NOT use FW molds, and the majority of them are NOT FW employees,
NOR do they need any "FW" training to handle resin. They have been pirating garage kits for decades, FW is baby walk in comparison.
Any proof, or just pulling opinions out of ...whole air and calling it "100%" truth?
What do you think? Also, the more you know, more power to you sir :3
B.I.N.G.O found some more
3802
Post by: chromedog
@Luna: Resin can be reused - but only as filler (You can either grind it into dust and mix it in like any other filler, or you can just sandwich bits of the resin in between fresh stuff.
Unlike metals, that just go back into the crucible and remelted down.
3806
Post by: Grot 6
At the end of the day, it boils down to - How much am I going to pay for XXX model.
The way prices are these days? You are seriously nit picking these guys in china making bank?
FW should have though of that before sending the business out there, kept it local, and then at least they could have justified to exhorbant prices.
Then we could get into it over "Finecrap", itself. They charge MORE for the shoddy finecrap now then for Forgeworld.
No, it boils down to if you want to keep playing, you need to put it to Wart and company that they need to change the way they do business. OR face the loss.
On YOUR end, you can either pay 200+ for something, or 100. Thats not a real hard choice, at the end of the day.
The 100% disturbing thing for gamers should be- That the "Pirate" is doing the product BETTER then the standard issued stuff from FW. If I were FW, I'd be worried.
If you want to stop Pirated stuff, YOU would just not buy from them. ( Nevermind QUALITY! We WANT our bubbles and miscasts, Thats what makes them.... finecast!)
Thank you sir, may I have another!
(Google search- Chinese copyright infringement of Games Workshop) This is what comes up
http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=chinese+copyright+infringement+of+Games+Workshop&oq=chinese+copyright+infringement+of+Games+Workshop&gs_l=serp.3...32820.39650.0.40197.25.25.0.0.0.0.662.5062.5j7j2j7j1j1.23.0.les%3Beqn%2Ccconf%3D1-2%2Cmin_length%3D2%2Crate_low%3D0-035%2Crate_high%3D0-035%2Csecond_pass%3Dfalse%2Cnum_suggestions%3D2%2Cignore_bad_origquery%3Dtrue..0.0...1c.1.plif1tjnkF0&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=11b8100df2353230&bpcl=35466521&biw=1366&bih=615
http://www.chillingeffects.org/copyright/notice.cgi?NoticeID=30508
http://www.mi40k.com/2010/05/10/warhammeralliance-com-sued-by-games-workshop/
http://samods.org/articles/wiz/warletters
etc.etc.etc.
And.... lets not even start talking about 3D printers.
On my end? I know about them, but even though I have no love for GW- I'm not going to buy any copy from someone over in another country so they can make bank if they can, rip you off, and possibly not send you jack for your purchase, or even send you some sort of biohazardous material.
Feth both of them, Feth GW, and the Recasters.
As long as GW treats me like a shill, they can worry about thier own handwringing and "Protection"- seeing as they lost over $5,000+ USD in sales from me annually for the past three years.
Just so you know, though- these products are not honestly reputable, no matter how "Good" you think they are.
Maybe you get what you paid for, maybe they take your money and you get nothing, or maybe even they give you a pile of medical waste, who really knows.
Google search for Chinese recast toy hazards
http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=chinese+recast+toys+hazards&oq=chinese+recast+toys+hazards&gs_l=serp.12...4185.19214.0.20856.37.37.0.0.0.0.333.6431.12j9j3j12.36.0.les%3Beqn%2Ccconf%3D1-2%2Cmin_length%3D2%2Crate_low%3D0-035%2Crate_high%3D0-035%2Csecond_pass%3Dfalse%2Cnum_suggestions%3D2%2Cignore_bad_origquery%3Dtrue..0.0...1c.1.bWCA9jDSPic&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=11b8100df2353230&bpcl=35466521&biw=1366&bih=615
buyer beware.
19148
Post by: Aerethan
1. Coolcast will NOT be continuing under that URL. The company itself isn't called coolcast, or anything really. The site will be shut down at the end of the month(so they say) and they will likely open up a new one under a different name, but with the exact same pages and layout as before, which is what they did last time this happened.
2. Their access to FW molds is moot. They don't need them, and they don't gain much by already having them, other than perhaps a day or two of mold making up front.
3. Their casts are better because they bother to find out what works. As you can see they sell a lot more than GW/FW, and those items are also resin. They've been doing this a while and know what methods and resins will yield the best results. This is called R&D, something that FW should invest in.
Now at least Coolcast had the decency to use an off white resin, so you really can't argue that they are originals. Now the Russian casts are all in FW grey resin, making them pretty indistinguishable from the originals, thus allowing them to slide by on ebay so much.
And on that note, ebay casters don't have to prove that they AREN'T counterfeits if they don't look like it. To the average person they look legit, and ebay isn't going to start asking Russia for their FW receipts.
Honestly, Russia is the bigger threat here since they do almost the entire 40k GW line as well as a large chunk of the new Warhammer Forge stuff.
If GW was a company that earned some modicum of respect from me, I'd never buy another recast. As they are, I don't lose any sleep over it.
Stealing from thieves is still stealing, yes. But Robin Hood got away with it and won, so there's that.
Now quick, fanboys take everything I said out of context.
494
Post by: H.B.M.C.
Yes sir! *salutes* Aerethan wrote:... NOT ... really. The site [steals] FW molds [to] gain much... [ FW] casts are better [and] they sell a lot more than [Coolcast]... [ FW have] been doing this a while and know what methods and resins will yield the best results. [Coolcast do not]. This is called R&D, something that [Coolcast] should invest in. ... Coolcast [has no] decency... Honestly, [Coolcast] is the bigger threat here [and not FW]. If [Coolcast] was a company that earned some modicum of respect from me, I'd buy recast[s]. As they are, I don't lose any sleep over it. Stealing from [ FW] is still stealing, yes. But [I support Hiter] so there's that. Clearly this man supports Hitler.
19148
Post by: Aerethan
H.B.M.C. wrote:
Yes sir! *salutes*
Aerethan wrote:... NOT ... really. The site [steals] FW molds [to] gain much...
[ FW] casts are better [and] they sell a lot more than [Coolcast]... [ FW have] been doing this a while and know what methods and resins will yield the best results. [Coolcast do not]. This is called R&D, something that [Coolcast] should invest in.
... Coolcast [has no] decency...
Honestly, [Coolcast] is the bigger threat here [and not FW].
If [Coolcast] was a company that earned some modicum of respect from me, I'd buy recast[s]. As they are, I don't lose any sleep over it.
Stealing from [ FW] is still stealing, yes. But [I support Hiterl] so there's that.
Clearly this man supports Hitler.
You are my hero.
I just met you, and this is crazy, but I buy recasts, and like Hitler maybe?
65396
Post by: The Stranger
notprop wrote:Cheap hobbiests are cheap.
These fellers will always exist for any product that is popular,
As will hobbiest that want or believe they deserve their toys at a fraction of the cost.
Sooner or later this blip will come to someone's attention in China (ie if/when Gw becomes relatively wide spread there) and they will address these individuals with the usual subtle Chinese law interpretation. Recasting/IP copying represents a significant stain on Chinas reputation and one that they will expunge as move rapidly toward the modern developed state they want to be/are.
Then it will probably pop up somewhere else as those cheap hobbiests will still want cheap copies.
This would happen whether a SM costs 60p or £60, demand drives this as with all other scams.
China's business model is a monster created in the attic of capitalistic western world. What happens now (and probably more in the future) can only be described as poetic justice.
24567
Post by: Kroothawk
I bought a couple of Tyranid Spore chimneys from them, more than a year after FW decided to not sell them anymore. FW said they would have to double the price if they wanted to continue selling them, the Chinese sold them for less than original price. No lost sales, perfect quality, happy gamer.
686
Post by: aka_mythos
Kroothawk wrote:I bought a couple of Tyranid Spore chimneys from them, more than a year after FW decided to not sell them anymore. FW said they would have to double the price if they wanted to continue selling them, the Chinese sold them for less than original price. No lost sales, perfect quality, happy gamer.
This probably has more to do with limited space and warehousing for FW, where continuing to sell something means they can't sell something else that makes them more and sells better.
115
Post by: Azazelx
LunaHound wrote: Automatically Appended Next Post: scipio.au wrote: LunaHound wrote: And to those in tin foil cast claiming the counterfeit items are made by FW MOLD AND EX FW EMPLOYEES. ^This is 100% false. Chinese counterfeiters does NOT use FW molds, and the majority of them are NOT FW employees, NOR do they need any "FW" training to handle resin. They have been pirating garage kits for decades, FW is baby walk in comparison.[/size] Any proof, or just pulling opinions[/size] out of ...whole air and calling it "100%" truth? What do you think? Also, the more you know, more power to you sir :3 What do I think? I know that you have no way of knowing what goes on in China in any significant detail. You have an opinion of what you think you know goes on, but you actually have no real idea of what exactly goes on - with no more certainty than anyone else here. Claiming something like "100% false" discredits your posit, as you have no way of actually knowing what goes on in a factory on the other side of the world, despite your rather arrogant and misguided assertion. Though, I guess it's a bit of a habit. I'm probably going to put you on ignore now, as this isn't the first time you've come out of left field with this kind of rant filled with ...passionate opinion presented as hard fact (despite the language barrier). edit - tags and typo
59113
Post by: Mike712
I say feth games workshop, they totally deserve this.
Scratch building used to be a thing when I first started the hobby, that's all this is.
Games workshop management just need to get of their high horses, realize that they are a toy soldiers company and dramatically cut their prices, this Chinese competition is healthy in my opinion and GW needs to learn how to be competitive in a modern market.
Other consumer goods continue to get cheaper or improve in quality/features, flat screen TVs, smart phones, laptops, games consoles, but GW products continue to go up in price without improvements to the product being made, it's unsustainable.
44272
Post by: Azreal13
Frankly I'm surprised these sites get any business as they're so tricky to find for the uninformed.
I'm not sure how I feel about the morality of recasting, and I certainly don't have any hobby money spare, but I've tried to find some of these sites just to look and no luck at all.
If they are as cheap as is said and were easier to fall over in a Google search, GW and FW could have a real issue.
61137
Post by: mechanicalhorizon
LunaHound wrote:Simple question. What happens when you inject resin into plastic mold machine?
LunaHound wrote:Oh I just want to know, what happens when you inject resin into a GW plastic mold machine. Since I have never tried yet, and you seem to know these things?
So... do you happen to know what happens?
What happens when you try to use those molds for resin production is you get resin castings. You just have to use a special injection molding machine that works with two-component resins like these ones:
http://www.nisseiamerica.com/special.html
The molds for polystyrene can be refitted to be used with resins easily, it depends mostly on the type of resin being used. If the resin is too thin it will run out of the mold before it sets so you have to use a fairly viscous resin with a fast set time.
10345
Post by: LunaHound
scipio.au wrote: LunaHound wrote:
Automatically Appended Next Post:
scipio.au wrote: LunaHound wrote:
And to those in tin foil cast claiming the counterfeit items are made by FW MOLD AND EX FW EMPLOYEES.
^This is 100% false. Chinese counterfeiters does NOT use FW molds, and the majority of them are NOT FW employees,
NOR do they need any "FW" training to handle resin. They have been pirating garage kits for decades, FW is baby walk in comparison.[/size]
Any proof, or just pulling opinions[/size] out of ...whole air and calling it "100%" truth?
What do you think? Also, the more you know, more power to you sir :3
What do I think?
I know that you have no way of knowing what goes on in China in any significant detail. You have an opinion of what you think you know goes on, but you actually have no real idea of what exactly goes on - with no more certainty than anyone else here. Claiming something like "100% false" discredits your posit, as you have no way of actually knowing what goes on in a factory on the other side of the world, despite your rather arrogant and misguided assertion. Though, I guess it's a bit of a habit. I'm probably going to put you on ignore now, as this isn't the first time you've come out of left field with this kind of rant filled with ...passionate opinion presented as hard fact (despite the language barrier).
edit - tags and typo
Are you good at connecting the dots? If you are, I'll show you more info
Don't disappoint me sciipio, for someone that calls me out so strongly /gasp
I'll finish the rest of the "proof" you need when I get home, arrogance.... misguided assertion...?
Hmm its almost like you are describing another person in the thread xD
Don't worry, I'll back up everything I said later, just don't give me the same excuse of " **** your proof, I don't understand chinese"
Automatically Appended Next Post: mechanicalhorizon wrote:
What happens when you try to use those molds for resin production is you get resin castings. You just have to use a special injection molding machine that works with two-component resins like these ones:
http://www.nisseiamerica.com/special.html
The molds for polystyrene can be refitted to be used with resins easily, it depends mostly on the type of resin being used. If the resin is too thin it will run out of the mold before it sets so you have to use a fairly viscous resin with a fast set time.
Thank you very much mechanicalhorizon, I wonder if FW uses these type of machines in china?
I assume they cost more than the single plastic material type?
21196
Post by: agnosto
Luna,
So none of these sites you're pulling images from ship to the US? Bummer.
Soliciting, advocating, or directly pirating IP on this site is a violation of our rules. Please don't do so, or we'll have to suspend your account.
9594
Post by: RiTides
You do know, however, that if you Post the links here, they will be deleted and the thread likely locked.
For obvious reasons, pretty much any website that doesn't want to get in trouble with legitimate companies cannot allow the advertising of recasting sources.
44272
Post by: Azreal13
Soliciting, advocating, or directly pirating IP on this site is a violation of our rules. Please don't do so, or we'll have to suspend your account.
61137
Post by: mechanicalhorizon
Thank you very much mechanicalhorizon, I wonder if FW uses these type of machines in china?
I assume they cost more than the single plastic material type?
As far as I've been told GW no longer produces anything in China except for printed material, which they've always outsourced ( AFAIK). They did try to produce FW material in China when GW had their own manufacturing plant there but they had constant quality issues with more than just the models.
The first shipment of the (then new) Foundation paints had to be mostly thrown out since the paint lids were not being sealed properly in China so the paint leaked out of the pots during shipping. That's just one example of many problems I could list.
The cost of the resin injection machines is comparable to plastic injection machines. They are very similar except for how the material is fed into the mold, so about 1/3 of the machine is different than a plastic injection molding machine.
21196
Post by: agnosto
RiTides wrote:You do know, however, that if you Post the links here, they will be deleted and the thread likely locked.
For obvious reasons, pretty much any website that doesn't want to get in trouble with legitimate companies cannot allow the advertising of recasting sources.
Which is odd since it was said none of said sites shipped outside of China but ok, thanks for editing my post.
7075
Post by: chaos0xomega
Stop being dense, posting such sites is against forum rules and is also incredibly stupid (assuming youre smart enough to figure out how to get around the overseas shipping dilemma). Cool casts issues started when the internet at large figured out its existence, both because GW gave em a hassle and too many customers and too little inventory makes for an empty store
21196
Post by: agnosto
chaos0xomega wrote:Stop being dense, posting such sites is against forum rules and is also incredibly stupid (assuming youre smart enough to figure out how to get around the overseas shipping dilemma). Cool casts issues started when the internet at large figured out its existence, both because GW gave em a hassle and too many customers and too little inventory makes for an empty store
Instead of just assuming the worst of someone you don't know and being confrontational and rude; you could have just said that there are ways around the international shipping hurddle and I would have been fine with that. Not being "in the know" in such matters, I in fact was not aware that there are ways around the issue and it did not occur to me.
2711
Post by: boyd
azreal13 wrote: Sean_OBrien wrote: notprop wrote:Sooner or later this blip will come to someone's attention in China (ie if/when Gw becomes relatively wide spread there) and they will address these individuals with the usual subtle Chinese law interpretation. Recasting/IP copying represents a significant stain on Chinas reputation and one that they will expunge as move rapidly toward the modern developed state they want to be/are.
Simply put...No.
Bigger companies have tried and failed to address China's counterfeit and knock off markets. In the best case scenario, they are ignored. In the worst case scenario, China actually rules that the original creators are in violation of the counterfeiter's right of production and sale within China and they are fined or locked out of the Chinese market for a period of time. China has no interest in addressing the issue - it isn't something which is in their interest to address, and their lack of action has nothing to do with not knowing about it.
In the modern economy, companies factor in Chinese knock offs into their business plan as assumed losses (not much different than assumed losses from shoplifters for retail stores).
QFT
If some of the biggest auto manufacturers in the world have got nowhere, GW have no chance.
If their largest restaurant chain is KFC and they have no problem copying their logos and branding, this is just a little blip.
26158
Post by: Hulkster
I think this thread should be locked, its already giving counterfeit sites advertisement.
10345
Post by: LunaHound
chaos0xomega wrote:Stop being dense, posting such sites is against forum rules and is also incredibly stupid (assuming youre smart enough to figure out how to get around the overseas shipping dilemma). Cool casts issues started when the internet at large figured out its existence, both because GW gave em a hassle and too many customers and too little inventory makes for an empty store
Im going to play devil's advocate though. The first post in this thread is already advertising the counterfeiter's website.
If anything was supposed to be allowed or not allowed, we should have seen it should we not? Automatically Appended Next Post:
FBC = flame broiled chicken
KFG = kentucky fried Gai ( chicken in cantonese )
KLG = Kentucky lucky Gai
MFC = My favorite chicken
xD
26158
Post by: Hulkster
Yes, the first post did make the advertisement, but this thread is stoking curiosity to search for other sites. There are screen caps (albeit blacked out) of alternatives. These threads always end up turning into an argument about whats illegal or legal, as well as an advertisement for the many counterfeiters out there that do exist.
12313
Post by: Ouze
Hulkster wrote:Yes, the first post did make the advertisement, but this thread is stoking curiosity to search for other sites.
Doubleplusgood of you to point out these thoughtcrimes.
59113
Post by: Mike712
Hulkster wrote:Yes, the first post did make the advertisement, but this thread is stoking curiosity to search for other sites. There are screen caps (albeit blacked out) of alternatives. These threads always end up turning into an argument about whats illegal or legal, as well as an advertisement for the many counterfeiters out there that do exist.
Well thanks to this thread I'm making a dirt cheap barrel of monkys list, so yeh it's probably time to not only lock, but delete the thread too.
I will continue to buy from games workshop but anything that I consider to be vastly overpriced eg single miniatures and bitz, I'll now be getting from china, 40 pence per combi melta, booyah!
And no I'm not going to help anyone find my source so don't bother asking.
26158
Post by: Hulkster
Exactly,
This thread is already contributing to further counterfeiter sales. Similar sites, although harder to find/order from, are gaining new customers as we speak. Forums should be careful not to repeat the mistakes of Bell of Lost Souls. This thread should be deleted, unless of course you actually WANT more folks to head over to Ta.... well you get the idea.
7508
Post by: projectkmo
Hulkster wrote:I think this thread should be locked, its already giving counterfeit sites advertisement.
Says the guy with 13 gallery images, 7 of which are of models that are blatant ripoffs of GW IP.
Where does one draw the line of what is right and wrong? Is it ok to buy, paint and post pics of your models that are obvious ripoffs of GW IP? But wrong to buy a straight-up copy of a GW model?
I think if you researched it a bit, you'd see that GW has gone after those that originally made those GW IP ripoff models you have in your gallery.
They are cool models and I like them too but It really weakens your argument when you have such things in your gallery.
59113
Post by: Mike712
Hulkster wrote:Exactly,
This thread is already contributing to further counterfeiter sales. Similar sites, although harder to find/order from, are gaining new customers as we speak. Forums should be careful not to repeat the mistakes of Bell of Lost Souls. This thread should be deleted, unless of course you actually WANT more folks to head over to Ta.... well you get the idea.
Well as I said earlier, I think this competition is healthy for games workshop, companies that don't have direct competition stagnate, games workshop is stagnating.
Hopefully these copies become popular enough that games workshop management are forced to innovate, shake things up and cut prices to a more reasonable level, but they won't, because they are arrogant and ignorant to the real world, where competition exists.
115
Post by: Azazelx
Hulkster wrote:I think this thread should be locked, its already giving counterfeit sites advertisement.
True, dat. The post before your made me want to go get some delicious, oily, salty KFC chicken for lunch.
10345
Post by: LunaHound
scipio.au wrote: Hulkster wrote:I think this thread should be locked, its already giving counterfeit sites advertisement.
True, dat. The post before your made me want to go get some delicious, oily, salty KFC chicken for lunch.
Here are the stuff you wanted. Since I took the effort to satisfy your curiosity, return the favor.
Tell me whats wrong in this picture. And the significance of it.
In case you aren't familiar with Eldars, you are looking at a Wraith Seer, which is a plastic resin hybrid kit with GW WraithLord and FW add on.
Get my drift?
34252
Post by: Squigsquasher
Sigh...
Only DakkaDakka would try to defend Chinese knockoff companies.
These companies are scum and need shutting down.
59113
Post by: Mike712
Squigsquasher wrote:Sigh...
Only DakkaDakka would try to defend Chinese knockoff companies.
These companies are scum and need shutting down.
This opinion is pretty ignorant, they are not doing anything against the law in their country.
34252
Post by: Squigsquasher
That isn't saying much, Chinese law is...screwed up to say the least. They are making money off of someone else's hard work, and losing money from the people who actually made the original models. Chinese laws deliberately protect knockoff companies because they want to preserve Chinese business, no matter how morally objectionable.
10345
Post by: LunaHound
Im assuming scipio realized the significance of the wraith lord seer photo? Anyone else want to deduce for fun? ;p
kan?
59113
Post by: Mike712
Squigsquasher wrote:That isn't saying much, Chinese law is...screwed up to say the least. They are making money off of someone else's hard work, and losing money from the people who actually made the original models. Chinese laws deliberately protect knockoff companies because they want to preserve Chinese business, no matter how morally objectionable.
Why should we have to pay more for an inferior product, from what I've read, many of the recasts are of a better quality than games workshop/forgeworlds own products, if it is the case, GW needs to step up their game or cut prices.
Why should we have to pay more for a storm raven than fully functional digital camera? Games Workshop do not make a premium product, they like to believe they do, but they don't. Games Workshop products are not art until they are painted by us, they are mass produced injection moulded plastic toy soldier kits, if someone can do it better and cheaper than them, then more power to them.
Games workshop as a company have existed without any major competition for around 30 years, this is the number one reason for the annual price increases we see, other companies adapt to cheap competing products from china or die out, and now it's time for Games Workshop to learn to adapt along with the rest of the consumer goods industries.
LunaHound wrote:Im assuming scipio realized the significance of the wraith lord seer photo? Anyone else want to deduce for fun? ;p
kan?
It's a complete resin kit not made by GW/ FW......
10345
Post by: LunaHound
Mike712 wrote:
LunaHound wrote:Im assuming scipio realized the significance of the wraith lord seer photo? Anyone else want to deduce for fun? ;p
kan?
It's a complete resin kit not made by GW/ FW......
See, that was easy and fast, 100% spot on
62573
Post by: blingman
I am a big fan of cheap foreign recasters, I get lots from them .
It's not really sales lost by GW either, I would not buy anything if I had to pay GW or FW ridiculous prices.
I hope this recaster does not give up after this small hurdle.
26158
Post by: Hulkster
projectkmo wrote: Hulkster wrote:I think this thread should be locked, its already giving counterfeit sites advertisement.
Says the guy with 13 gallery images, 7 of which are of models that are blatant ripoffs of GW IP.
Where does one draw the line of what is right and wrong? Is it ok to buy, paint and post pics of your models that are obvious ripoffs of GW IP? But wrong to buy a straight-up copy of a GW model?
I think if you researched it a bit, you'd see that GW has gone after those that originally made those GW IP ripoff models you have in your gallery.
They are cool models and I like them too but It really weakens your argument when you have such things in your gallery.
Hey, I never said what my own opinion was on whether its right or wrong, or where I draw the line. As you can see in my gallery, I have been around the block when it comes to rare minis. I just think, that as a site and community, if you frown upon promoting counterfeit sites then lock this thread. The curious will stumble upon all the alternatives that are out there, just as I did when I saw "hey somebody makes primarch models that dont exist!"
These threads always seem to turn into a debate about the evils of GW or those dastardly Chinese and there counterfeiting ways.
All I'm saying is that is that these piracy debates always seem to promote piracy. If as a community that is not something you want to do, a la what happened when belloflostsouls revealed miniatureshobby, then you should lock the thread.
34252
Post by: Squigsquasher
Mike712 wrote: Squigsquasher wrote:That isn't saying much, Chinese law is...screwed up to say the least. They are making money off of someone else's hard work, and losing money from the people who actually made the original models. Chinese laws deliberately protect knockoff companies because they want to preserve Chinese business, no matter how morally objectionable.
Why should we have to pay more for an inferior product, from what I've read, many of the recasts are of a better quality than games workshop/forgeworlds own products, if it is the case, GW needs to step up their game or cut prices.
Why should we have to pay more for a storm raven than fully functional digital camera? Games Workshop do not make a premium product, they like to believe they do, but they don't. Games Workshop products are not art until they are painted by us, they are mass produced injection moulded plastic toy soldier kits, if someone can do it better and cheaper than them, then more power to them.
Games workshop as a company have existed without any major competition for around 30 years, this is the number one reason for the annual price increases we see, other companies adapt to cheap competing products from china or die out, and now it's time for Games Workshop to learn to adapt along with the rest of the consumer goods industries.
LunaHound wrote:Im assuming scipio realized the significance of the wraith lord seer photo? Anyone else want to deduce for fun? ;p
kan?
It's a complete resin kit not made by GW/ FW......
You are missing the point. The sculptors and model designers of GW and FW put a lot of effort into making those models. Recasters are making money off of someone else's hard work, and drawing money away from the people who put all that effort into making those models.
Suppose you were a painter. You spent weeks painting beautiful landscape pictures. And then some bastard comes along, copies the picture, and sells it, making money off of your effort. And then because his prices are cheaper, you don't get any money for the painting that you had made. You would be angry. After all, you would deserve the money for your hard work, not some thief.
And that is exactly the case here. Recasting is theft. Theft is illegal and detestable. By buying recasts you are stealing money from the sculptors who deserve said money, and giving it to filthy criminals. So before you click the buy button, think about the blood sweat and tears that went into making the original model, before you give your money to some sweaty Chinese copycat.
59113
Post by: Mike712
You are missing the point. The sculptors and model designers of GW and FW put a lot of effort into making those models. Recasters are making money off of someone else's hard work, and drawing money away from the people who put all that effort into making those models.
And if you were buying those sculpted models then fair enough, but you're not, you're buying copies of the sculpts that can be mass produced for mere pennies, mass production on the scale that Games Workshop does should mean cheap models, due to economies of scale, but this is not the case. For the price we pay, the models should be assembled and painted to a near Eavy Metal standard, not simply a cardboard box full with some 99 pence worth of mass produced plastic gakk.
Suppose you were a painter. You spent weeks painting beautiful landscape pictures. And then some bastard comes along, copies the picture, and sells it, making money off of your effort. And then because his prices are cheaper, you don't get any money for the painting that you had made. You would be angry. After all, you would deserve the money for your hard work, not some thief.
This happens, it's not even illegal as long as you're not claiming that the one you are selling is the original, back in my oil painting days I used to paint and sell copies of famous paintings, it was fine because the people I sold to were aware they were copies not the origional.
And that is exactly the case here. Recasting is theft. Theft is illegal and detestable. By buying recasts you are stealing money from the sculptors who deserve said money, and giving it to filthy criminals. So before you click the buy button, think about the blood sweat and tears that went into making the original model, before you give your money to some sweaty Chinese copycat.
You just don't get it, in China where this is happening they have different laws regarding IP they are not breaking the law by recasting Games Workshop/Forgworld or any other products, what you fail to understand is this is how the market in China works. You can buy a Luxury Mercedes in China, but it's not really a Mercedes, or a BMW, or an Iphone, they are Chinese companies simply using well know western companies IP to sell their products, there is no illusion that they are genuine, Games Workshop miniatures are small fry compared to the full scale of copping of IP that happens in China and happens all within the constraints of Chinese law. To call them criminals is simply incorrect.
Now please do some research before you try to argue a point of which you have little understanding.
34252
Post by: Squigsquasher
I understand perfectly that Chinese laws are different. However, those laws are wrong and need changing. Just because something is does not mean it should be so.
But then I imagine the only reason you support these recasters is because you are too much of a skinflint to buy the real thing.
15717
Post by: Backfire
Mike712 wrote:
You are missing the point. The sculptors and model designers of GW and FW put a lot of effort into making those models. Recasters are making money off of someone else's hard work, and drawing money away from the people who put all that effort into making those models.
And if you were buying those sculpted models then fair enough, but you're not, you're buying copies of the sculpts that can be mass produced for mere pennies, mass production on the scale that Games Workshop does should mean cheap models, due to economies of scale, but this is not the case. For the price we pay, the models should be assembled and painted to a near Eavy Metal standard, not simply a cardboard box full with some 99 pence worth of mass produced plastic gakk.
Nonsense.
As it is, biggest brands tend to be most expensive for consumer. It's a fact of life. Red Bull, Apple, Mercedes, Evian...
18249
Post by: Charax
Squigsquasher wrote:I understand perfectly that Chinese laws are different. However, those laws are wrong and need changing. Just because something is does not mean it should be so.
But then I imagine the only reason you support these recasters is because you are too much of a skinflint to buy the real thing.
That's a textbook example of ethnocentricism, you don't see them that blatantly much these days.
59113
Post by: Mike712
Squigsquasher wrote:I understand perfectly that Chinese laws are different. However, those laws are wrong and need changing. Just because something is does not mean it should be so.
But then I imagine the only reason you support these recasters is because you are too much of a skinflint to buy the real thing.
Or maybe their laws(apart from their human rights laws which are nothing other than deplorable) are in fact better.
Don't presume to know my financial tastes, this is nothing to do with being a skinfilnt, hell I collect Star Wars Statues that cost £100s a piece, but if I can buy the same thing or something better and cheaper elsewhere I will do, that's just smart, it's basic consumer economics, something that Games Workshop doesn't seem to have the most basic understanding of because until now they have not experienced any significant competition.
If I feel like I'm not getting value for money, which I don't because Games Worshop products are horrible value for money, the perceived value and real value falls far below what they are charging then I will go to someone else.
I've spent £1000s on genuine Games Workshop and Forgeworld products, most dating back to when their prices were more sensible, now their prices are a rip off and they wont see much more money from me until their prices drop somewhere in the region of 40% or their product is substantially improved somehow.
7942
Post by: nkelsch
Mike712 wrote:
You just don't get it, in China where this is happening they have different laws regarding IP they are not breaking the law by recasting Games Workshop/Forgworld or any other products, what you fail to understand is this is how the market in China works. You can buy a Luxury Mercedes in China, but it's not really a Mercedes, or a BMW, or an Iphone, they are Chinese companies simply using well know western companies IP to sell their products, there is no illusion that they are genuine, Games Workshop miniatures are small fry compared to the full scale of copping of IP that happens in China and happens all within the constraints of Chinese law. To call them criminals is simply incorrect.
Now please do some research before you try to argue a point of which you have little understanding.
Don't throw stones mr. glass house...
China is part of the World Intellectual Property Organization. What they are doing in china *IS* illegal and breaking Chinese laws. China just has poor enforcement of many of these laws as much of it is local government enforcement. Just because it is widespread and ignored doesn't mean it is legal there. There is just little recourse for someone to walk into China, find an actual person infringing and then take them to court over it. As far as the officials know, these are legal castings until someone complains within china.
They are breaking the laws in CHINA. The china market 'works' because they have lax enforcement, don't investigate and ask questions and most of the companies being infringed upon have ZERO access to the country in question to bring the parties to bear in a civil court.
There is actually a China-Britain business council exactly for this situation and helping businesses have remedy for counterfeiters.
Also:
http://www.mac.doc.gov/China/Docs/BusinessGuides/IntellectualPropertyRights.htm
So please... do not spout garbage about how it is LEGAL in China and that makes everything ok. It is 100% not legal in CHINA and CHINA does see piracy as a real issue even though they lack the ability to enforce it.
19148
Post by: Aerethan
Squigsquasher wrote:Mike712 wrote: Squigsquasher wrote:That isn't saying much, Chinese law is...screwed up to say the least. They are making money off of someone else's hard work, and losing money from the people who actually made the original models. Chinese laws deliberately protect knockoff companies because they want to preserve Chinese business, no matter how morally objectionable.
Why should we have to pay more for an inferior product, from what I've read, many of the recasts are of a better quality than games workshop/forgeworlds own products, if it is the case, GW needs to step up their game or cut prices.
Why should we have to pay more for a storm raven than fully functional digital camera? Games Workshop do not make a premium product, they like to believe they do, but they don't. Games Workshop products are not art until they are painted by us, they are mass produced injection moulded plastic toy soldier kits, if someone can do it better and cheaper than them, then more power to them.
Games workshop as a company have existed without any major competition for around 30 years, this is the number one reason for the annual price increases we see, other companies adapt to cheap competing products from china or die out, and now it's time for Games Workshop to learn to adapt along with the rest of the consumer goods industries.
LunaHound wrote:Im assuming scipio realized the significance of the wraith lord seer photo? Anyone else want to deduce for fun? ;p
kan?
It's a complete resin kit not made by GW/ FW......
You are missing the point. The sculptors and model designers of GW and FW put a lot of effort into making those models. Recasters are making money off of someone else's hard work, and drawing money away from the people who put all that effort into making those models.
Suppose you were a painter. You spent weeks painting beautiful landscape pictures. And then some bastard comes along, copies the picture, and sells it, making money off of your effort. And then because his prices are cheaper, you don't get any money for the painting that you had made. You would be angry. After all, you would deserve the money for your hard work, not some thief.
And that is exactly the case here. Recasting is theft. Theft is illegal and detestable. By buying recasts you are stealing money from the sculptors who deserve said money, and giving it to filthy criminals. So before you click the buy button, think about the blood sweat and tears that went into making the original model, before you give your money to some sweaty Chinese copycat.
Your analogy assumes that the sculptors are not getting paid because of the recasts, which isn't true.
If you hire a commission sculpt, you pay for it up front. The artist doesn't generally get paid for each copy sold, he is just paid X for the original. So really, you can't compare that to an artist who never had his product bought because of a copy, as that is simply not the case here.
FW is getting screwed out of money, not individual artists. Now most FW sculptors are on some sort of salary I'd assume, and are not freelance designers. As such, they are still paid for their work, and it is managements problem if the company loses money, not really the artists.
I highly doubt that anyone at FW will lose their job from cutbacks caused by some black market activity and a loss of sales. They charge an insane premium, much higher than any other games company. If the prices were more in line with industry standards, then the black market would drop off becuase of the low difference in price.
FW sells 5 marines for $37, double the already high price that GW charges for plastics. On Ebay you can get that same kit, in the same or better quality of cast, for $26. If the FW ones were $30, then there'd be no real reason to buy the recasts, because $4 isn't going to break the bank, unless you are buying like 100 of them. An $11 difference for 5 models is significant though.
Let's look at another popular item from FW, the Contemptor Dreadnought. On FW's site, with XE.com's current rate, a Contemptor runs $48, and weapons run about $13. A GW Dreadnought is $46 and comes with 4-5 weapons, as well as optional parts and decor. So the FW Equivalent would be $113, well over 2x the GW plastic cost. Now that same Contemptor was on Coolcast for $21, with $8 weapons. The body itself is 50% of the FW price, and the weapons are 65% of the FW price. On Ebay Contemptor bodies are about $35, and weapons are still $8.
If FW closed that gap a little, then there'd be no real financial reason to buy recasts. Again, as someone who knows how much labor it takes to actually cast something once molds are already made, FW's prices are not in line with their costs, or they are paying people way too much to pour resin all day. Automatically Appended Next Post: And for those thinking that Taobao has good prices, the recasts I see at first glance are way over priced. An example would be a Contemptor Conversion Beamer which goes for $12 USD is listed at 108 Yuan, which is $17 US.
So there's that.
59113
Post by: Mike712
China is part of the World Intellectual Property Organization. What they are doing in china *IS* illegal and breaking Chinese laws. China just has poor enforcement of many of these laws as much of it is local government enforcement. Just because it is widespread and ignored doesn't mean it is legal there. There is just little recourse for someone to walk into China, find an actual person infringing and then take them to court over it. As far as the officials know, these are legal castings until someone complains within china.
China's government don't care and wont act as long as their economy keeps growing, the fact that China is part of the World Intellectual Property Organization is simply a posterity measure to keep everyone in the west happy and quiet.
44272
Post by: Azreal13
Where in the landscape picture analogy does it allow for the fact that the finished copy is a better painting than the original?
7942
Post by: nkelsch
Mike712 wrote:
China is part of the World Intellectual Property Organization. What they are doing in china *IS* illegal and breaking Chinese laws. China just has poor enforcement of many of these laws as much of it is local government enforcement. Just because it is widespread and ignored doesn't mean it is legal there. There is just little recourse for someone to walk into China, find an actual person infringing and then take them to court over it. As far as the officials know, these are legal castings until someone complains within china.
China's government don't care and wont act as long as their economy keeps growing, the fact that China is part of the World Intellectual Property Organization is simply a posterity measure to keep everyone in the west happy and quiet.
But don't pretend that you are supporting law-abiding citizens in a perfectly legal market transaction then when we all know that is totally not true. Just admit "I waaaaant it and I should get things I want" is your primary motivation and don't claim that you are supporting legal business with a country with different laws.
Actually China's government does care, and it is actually one of the less talked about issues in this presidential election. The US government actually is suing china over a bunch of issues, this being one of them.
The biggest issues they have is lack of manpower to investigate and lack of access to confirm claims. If companies don't register thier patents, copyrights and trademarks in China, they have minimal tools to do anything about it. Hard to enforce copyright infringement for a copyright chinese officials have no ability to confirm.
It is getting better, it is still rampant, and China is making effort even though compared to the west it is a joke. None of it makes it legal so let's just remove that pathetic justification from this discussion and keep it to the 'other' justifications.
62573
Post by: blingman
I read that a few months back and found it hilarious that America think they can just "sue" China
Hahahahaha
18249
Post by: Charax
Here's how that's gonna go:
US: We're going to sue you
China: Fine, because we're going to pay any fines by levying a large export tax on all goods we produce, like those many, many electronic components that go into your shiny new iPads and phones and computers and EVERYTHING.
US: Um..call it a draw?
3330
Post by: Kirasu
I wish they'd levy a huge export tax.. We'd bring jobs back pretty quickly!
59113
Post by: Mike712
nkelsch wrote:
But don't pretend that you are supporting law-abiding citizens in a perfectly legal market transaction then when we all know that is totally not true. Just admit "I waaaaant it and I should get things I want" is your primary motivation and don't claim that you are supporting legal business with a country with different laws.
Actually China's government does care, and it is actually one of the less talked about issues in this presidential election. The US government actually is suing china over a bunch of issues, this being one of them.
The biggest issues they have is lack of manpower to investigate and lack of access to confirm claims. If companies don't register thier patents, copyrights and trademarks in China, they have minimal tools to do anything about it. Hard to enforce copyright infringement for a copyright chinese officials have no ability to confirm.
It is getting better, it is still rampant, and China is making effort even though compared to the west it is a joke. None of it makes it legal so let's just remove that pathetic justification from this discussion and keep it to the 'other' justifications.
I'm not claiming what I'm doing is legal once recasted products are imported to a country with stringent IP regulation like here in the UK it's breaking the law.
My primary motivation is that as a consumer I will chose the best value product, I wont pay over the odds if I can get a similar product elsewhere cheaper.
Like I said posterity measures, keep everyone happy, nothing really will be done.
Lack of man power, that's hilarious, there's over 1.3 billion of them, if they actually wanted to do something about it, it would be done and at a scale unimaginable to the rest of us.
19148
Post by: Aerethan
blingman wrote: I read that a few months back and found it hilarious that America think they can just "sue" China
Hahahahaha
Can you sue the people who are your primary creditors?
How much money do we owe China? What would we accomplish by suing them? Monetary damages?
And how does one sue an entire country? What court is that settled in? Whose jurisdiction?
7508
Post by: projectkmo
Hulkster wrote:projectkmo wrote: Hulkster wrote:I think this thread should be locked, its already giving counterfeit sites advertisement.
Says the guy with 13 gallery images, 7 of which are of models that are blatant ripoffs of GW IP.
Where does one draw the line of what is right and wrong? Is it ok to buy, paint and post pics of your models that are obvious ripoffs of GW IP? But wrong to buy a straight-up copy of a GW model?
I think if you researched it a bit, you'd see that GW has gone after those that originally made those GW IP ripoff models you have in your gallery.
They are cool models and I like them too but It really weakens your argument when you have such things in your gallery.
Hey, I never said what my own opinion was on whether its right or wrong, or where I draw the line. As you can see in my gallery, I have been around the block when it comes to rare minis. I just think, that as a site and community, if you frown upon promoting counterfeit sites then lock this thread. The curious will stumble upon all the alternatives that are out there, just as I did when I saw "hey somebody makes primarch models that dont exist!"
These threads always seem to turn into a debate about the evils of GW or those dastardly Chinese and there counterfeiting ways.
All I'm saying is that is that these piracy debates always seem to promote piracy. If as a community that is not something you want to do, a la what happened when belloflostsouls revealed miniatureshobby, then you should lock the thread.
If that is the case then I apologize. It was late and it seemed a little Pot/Kettle/Black-ish etc.
As I said though, I like those models in your gallery, especially the Horus one. I'm not excusing or condoning the IP infringement or the straight-up re-casting of models but I do understand that there are enough people out there (demand) over the years that would love to own model/s representing the various Primarchs etc such that if GW/ FW were smart, they would have created/issued them themselves ages ago. Like so many of the various model/weapon options that are found in the various codices that don't have an official GW model. Someone else takes the initiative to design/create an acceptable stand-in model (which may or may not be IP infringement - see Chapterh**** etc) for those missing from the GW/ FW line-ups.
As for straight-up re-casting - I know it's wrong and should not be encouraged/supported etc period.
That said, I have seen a number of re-casts and they were very high quality with little or no flash on any of the parts. It was if most of the items had been cleaned prior to being shipped. Packaging was well done on the few occasions we're I've witnessed an un-boxing. Bubbles? I don't recall seeing any actually. Bent and warped items? Again, nothing like I've witnessed over the years from FW. I recall one item I saw (re-cast) that had one blemish and had been filled (not sanded though) prior to shipping.
So I can understand peoples desire for better QC from FW. Even with FW's excellent CS (which I have needed a # of times and was/am thankful for) it would still be nice to see FW QC catch more prior to shipping, especially for those overseas.
Price? As many others have previously stated, there is a lot of money invested in the creation of new models which a re-caster does not need to worry about. I would imagine that most Asian re-casters have VERY VERY little overhead when it comes to employee wages/benefits etc. which would allow for them to sell at a much lower price. Even so, I'm fairly certain (though I can't back it up) that FW makes a very tidy profit on most of its kits such that they likely could lower prices and still do fine but again, I'm only speculating. So while re-casting is straight-up WRONG, I can understand the appeal to a lot of folks.
Who knows, maybe this will turn out like the music pirate issue... I believe there was some study recently that determined that people who have pirated music, also BUY A LOT more music than those who have not/do not pirate music.
7942
Post by: nkelsch
Mike712 wrote:nkelsch wrote:
But don't pretend that you are supporting law-abiding citizens in a perfectly legal market transaction then when we all know that is totally not true. Just admit "I waaaaant it and I should get things I want" is your primary motivation and don't claim that you are supporting legal business with a country with different laws.
Actually China's government does care, and it is actually one of the less talked about issues in this presidential election. The US government actually is suing china over a bunch of issues, this being one of them.
The biggest issues they have is lack of manpower to investigate and lack of access to confirm claims. If companies don't register thier patents, copyrights and trademarks in China, they have minimal tools to do anything about it. Hard to enforce copyright infringement for a copyright chinese officials have no ability to confirm.
It is getting better, it is still rampant, and China is making effort even though compared to the west it is a joke. None of it makes it legal so let's just remove that pathetic justification from this discussion and keep it to the 'other' justifications.
I'm not claiming what I'm doing is legal once recasted products are imported to a country with stringent IP regulation like here in the UK it's breaking the law.
My primary motivation is that as a consumer I will chose the best value product, I wont pay over the odds if I can get a similar product elsewhere cheaper.
Like I said posterity measures, keep everyone happy, nothing really will be done.
Lack of man power, that's hilarious, there's over 1.3 billion of them, if they actually wanted to do something about it, it would be done and at a scale unimaginable to the rest of us.
You should take your own advice
You just don't get it, in China where this is happening they have different laws regarding IP they are not breaking the law by recasting Games Workshop/Forgworld or any other products,
Now please do some research before you try to argue a point of which you have little understanding.
Your utter lack of understanding of the legalities probably extends the the lack of understanding of the free market. I am curious what your career is? Most people have jobs as a direct or indirect result of the 'western' marketplace working the way it does, copyrights included... Blatantly disregarding the marketplace and breaking the law harms the economy and loses people jobs. It is part of the reason the world economy is in the state it is because people 'cheated' in the marketplace by not following the rules. Just because you think you are sticking it to GW with a vindictive attitude of entitlement, doesn't mean it is limited to hurting them as it hurts the economy as a whole. Multiply thousands or millions of people 'cheating' in various industries and various ways and it all adds up.
I don't knowingly do harm to other industries because I don't want to lose my job due to others having the same entitled selfish attitudes towards work I do. I either pay or do without... never consume without paying or via illegal infringing ways. I highly recommend 'doing without' as no one has the right to own things.
19148
Post by: Aerethan
If no one has the right to own things, as you exactly said Nkelsch, then GW doesn't have the right to own it's designs, and more so all IP law is pointless.
If no one owns anything, then pretty much all matters of theft are void.
People have every right to own things, and that has been the case since the beginning of mankind, regardless of where mankind began.
Some cultures don't view certain things as ownable, such as native Americans and land. But those same cultures do accept ownership over personal property, such as clothing, tools, food etc.
If I don't have the right to own something, then neither does GW.
7942
Post by: nkelsch
Aerethan wrote:If no one has the right to own things, as you exactly said Nkelsch, then GW doesn't have the right to own it's designs, and more so all IP law is pointless.
.
This isn't IP, this is copyright. And they do have the right to own their copyright.
You don't have a right to own a copy of their copyright. You can have a copy under their legal guidelines or not at all... this is where you don't have the right to infringe just because you "waaaaaaaaaaaaant it and should get things you want."
19148
Post by: Aerethan
nkelsch wrote: Aerethan wrote:If no one has the right to own things, as you exactly said Nkelsch, then GW doesn't have the right to own it's designs, and more so all IP law is pointless.
.
This isn't IP, this is copyright. And they do have the right to own their copyright.
You don't have a right to own a copy of their copyright. You can have a copy under their legal guidelines or not at all... this is where you don't have the right to infringe just because you "waaaaaaaaaaaaant it and should get things you want."
But that isn't what you said. You said I highly recommend 'doing without' as no one has the right to own things.
So if no one has a right to own things, then neither does GW. Copyrights are ownership, and IP is copyrightable.
And what I can or can't do has little to do with legal guidelines. Just because something is illegal doesn't make it a) wrong, or b) impossible. Plenty of countries have laws that outlaw things that most of us consider morally acceptable, like women showing their faces, or heaven forbid their hair.
Secondly, just because something is illegal doesn't make it impossible to do. I speed on the freeway when traffic permits, as I don't particularly enjoy driving 90 miles to go visit family every other weekend. Do I feel a single bit of remorse or guilt about it? No. Is it illegal? Absolutely. Legality has very little bearing on my moral perception of an action, especially when it's a law that I had no input on.
We live in a country where other people made the rules, and we are expected to abide by them whether we agree or not. In fact, almost every lawmaker in this country is out of touch with the very people who have to obey those laws. Speed limit laws are predicated on the idea that I don't know how to safely drive at 100 MPH, which is in no way true, especially when it's on a 10 mile straight stretch of freeway at 2am on a Tuesday and there isn't another car within 200' of me in any direction.
So no, I don't feel bad about breaking laws that I'm opposed to, or that were made without my input.
59113
Post by: Mike712
nkelsch wrote:
Your utter lack of understanding of the legalities probably extends the the lack of understanding of the free market. I am curious what your career is? Most people have jobs as a direct or indirect result of the 'western' marketplace working the way it does, copyrights included... Blatantly disregarding the marketplace and breaking the law harms the economy and loses people jobs. It is part of the reason the world economy is in the state it is because people 'cheated' in the marketplace by not following the rules. Just because you think you are sticking it to GW with a vindictive attitude of entitlement, doesn't mean it is limited to hurting them as it hurts the economy as a whole. Multiply thousands or millions of people 'cheating' in various industries and various ways and it all adds up.
I don't knowingly do harm to other industries because I don't want to lose my job due to others having the same entitled selfish attitudes towards work I do. I either pay or do without... never consume without paying or via illegal infringing ways. I highly recommend 'doing without' as no one has the right to own things.
No the market is the way it is because the richest and most powerful are greedy and short sited..... The rules that are in place actually assist in allowing them to make the poor and irresponsible choices that have caused untold repercussions for the economy.... and you question my understanding.. I feel we have very polarised opinions on this matter and while I'm not opposed to capitalism in the slightest I am opposed to capitalistic greed, it will be the downfall of all of us.
My career? Drug dealer, Pimp, Attorney to the rich and famous! No really, I work in IT, with some background in business, self employed, I provide very reasonably priced advice and support for individuals and other small businesses.
19148
Post by: Aerethan
Mike712 wrote:
My career? Drug dealer, Pimp, Attorney to the rich and famous! No really, I work in IT, with some background in business, self employed, I provide very reasonably priced advice and support for individuals and other small businesses.
And he manages to survive even though India offers the same services at lower prices >.>
You'd think FW could.
59113
Post by: Mike712
Aerethan wrote:Mike712 wrote:
My career? Drug dealer, Pimp, Attorney to the rich and famous! No really, I work in IT, with some background in business, self employed, I provide very reasonably priced advice and support for individuals and other small businesses.
And he manages to survive even though India offers the same services at lower prices >.>
You'd think FW could.
I can assure you that my services go far beyond anything that an Indian call centre can offer, my business ethos revolves around cutting costs for my clients while retaining necessary systems functionality, and no that does not mean pirated software and hardware that fell of the back of a lorry, so don't even go there okay.
7942
Post by: nkelsch
Aerethan wrote:Mike712 wrote:
My career? Drug dealer, Pimp, Attorney to the rich and famous! No really, I work in IT, with some background in business, self employed, I provide very reasonably priced advice and support for individuals and other small businesses.
And he manages to survive even though India offers the same services at lower prices >.>
You'd think FW could.
You would be surprised how low some 'contractors' can undercut competition when they illegally use software. One of the biggest problems we face in IT contracting industry is when companies undercut bids and then later find to have only they were able to be the lowest bidder by either not understanding or blatantly ignoring that the technology solution they pitched had a 200k software licence attached to it which wasn't legally obtained.
I have had three projects this year where we lost a bid to a low-bid small business only to 6 months later be approached by the client with a sole-source bid to take over because the only way it was 'cheaper' was through rampant piracy. If those people could beat us with open source products, hard work and knowledge, more power to them. If they have to do it through ignorance and illegal practices, then they deserve to be found out.
Every industry is impacted by greed and it is not always the people at the top, the self-employed, small businesses cheat just as much as the big guy, it happens at all levels.
And I never speed, and I come to full and complete stop at red lights before turning right... I actually did so before we had red-light cameras on every corner which do not allow drivers to motor through intersections even if they 'think' it is clear because we have way too many pedestrian deaths due to the human brain ignoring unexpected input like pedestrians. I have about 150 speed/redlight cameras within a 5 mile radius of my house and it does save lives. I do not speed because it directly harms people in my community.
14765
Post by: paulson games
Man I hate chinese miniatures, no matter how many you order you're always hungry again in half an hour.
494
Post by: H.B.M.C.
Red light cameras huh?
I think we've veered off topic a bit.
59113
Post by: Mike712
nkelsch wrote: Aerethan wrote:Mike712 wrote:
My career? Drug dealer, Pimp, Attorney to the rich and famous! No really, I work in IT, with some background in business, self employed, I provide very reasonably priced advice and support for individuals and other small businesses.
And he manages to survive even though India offers the same services at lower prices >.>
You'd think FW could.
You would be surprised how low some 'contractors' can undercut competition when they illegally use software. One of the biggest problems we face in IT contracting industry is when companies undercut bids and then later find to have only they were able to be the lowest bidder by either not understanding or blatantly ignoring that the technology solution they pitched had a 200k software licence attached to it which wasn't legally obtained.
I have had three projects this year where we lost a bid to a low-bid small business only to 6 months later be approached by the client with a sole-source bid to take over because the only way it was 'cheaper' was through rampant piracy. If those people could beat us with open source products, hard work and knowledge, more power to them. If they have to do it through ignorance and illegal practices, then they deserve to be found out.
Every industry is impacted by greed and it is not always the people at the top, the self-employed, small businesses cheat just as much as the big guy, it happens at all levels.
And I never speed, and I come to full and complete stop at red lights before turning right... I actually did so before we had red-light cameras on every corner which do not allow drivers to motor through intersections even if they 'think' it is clear because we have way too many pedestrian deaths due to the human brain ignoring unexpected input like pedestrians. I have about 150 speed/redlight cameras within a 5 mile radius of my house and it does save lives. I do not speed because it directly harms people in my community.
And now you are insinuating that I pander pirated software to clients, buying copies of toys from china and distributing pirated software which would be commercial suicide for me are leagues apart, I have a stellar reputation and can easily back that with references from past clients.
I can charge less because by comparison other companies overcharge, £60-£80 labour costs to fit a new laptop screen is the norm, it's a 30 minute job at most and I charge accordingly.
17349
Post by: SilverMK2
H.B.M.C. wrote:Red light cameras huh?
I think we've veered off topic a bit.
If only this thread had cameras to make us all post more safely
7942
Post by: nkelsch
Mike712 wrote:
And now you are insinuating that I pander pirated software to clients, buying copies of toys from china and distributing pirated software which would be commercial suicide for me are leagues apart, I have a stellar reputation and can easily back that with references from past clients.
I can charge less because by comparison other companies overcharge, £60-£80 labour costs to fit a new laptop screen is the norm, it's a 30 minute job at most and I charge accordingly.
Actually I was pointing out your industry is directly impacted by copyright infringement and someone not playing by the rules can take food directly out of your families mouth... If you felt it was mirroring anything within your oganization or buisness practices, that is on you.
63000
Post by: Peregrine
Mike712 wrote:And if you were buying those sculpted models then fair enough, but you're not, you're buying copies of the sculpts that can be mass produced for mere pennies, mass production on the scale that Games Workshop does should mean cheap models, due to economies of scale, but this is not the case. For the price we pay, the models should be assembled and painted to a near Eavy Metal standard, not simply a cardboard box full with some 99 pence worth of mass produced plastic gakk.
You do realize that the cost of producing a model is not just the raw material cost, right? And that if GW sold their products for "mere pennies" they'd be bankrupt within a week?
Now please do some research before you try to argue a point of which you have little understanding.
Which is ironic given your lack of understanding of economics.
59113
Post by: Mike712
nkelsch wrote:
Actually I was pointing out your industry is directly impacted by copyright infringement and someone not playing by the rules can take food directly out of your families mouth... If you felt it was mirroring anything within your oganization or buisness practices, that is on you.
Then maybe you should not have quoted me when you wrote that, doing so makes it seem as the comment was directed at me.
Automatically Appended Next Post:
Peregrine wrote:
You do realize that the cost of producing a model is not just the raw material cost, right? And that if GW sold their products for "mere pennies" they'd be bankrupt within a week?
Yes I am fully aware of all the costs involved, the design of the original, the forging of the moulds which in the case of plastics can run into hundreds of thousands if not millions of pounds, the packaging, transportation, marketing, upkeep of the facilities and Games Workshops own stores, and so on, still with all that factored in with the volume that GW produce they are still massively over priced for what they are, mas produced injection moulded plastic, which as mediums goes is dirt cheap.
63000
Post by: Peregrine
Mike712 wrote:Yes I am fully aware of all the costs involved, the design of the original, the forging of the moulds which in the case of plastics can run into hundreds of thousands if not millions of pounds, the packaging, transportation, marketing, upkeep of the facilities and Games Workshops own stores, and so on, still with all that factored in with the volume that GW produce they are still massively over priced for what they are, mas produced injection moulded plastic, which as mediums go is dirt cheap.
Where exactly do you get your standards for what a "fair" price is and where the "overpriced" line is? And why does the medium matter when the raw material costs are only a small part of the final cost of the item?
59113
Post by: Mike712
Peregrine wrote:Mike712 wrote:Yes I am fully aware of all the costs involved, the design of the original, the forging of the moulds which in the case of plastics can run into hundreds of thousands if not millions of pounds, the packaging, transportation, marketing, upkeep of the facilities and Games Workshops own stores, and so on, still with all that factored in with the volume that GW produce they are still massively over priced for what they are, mas produced injection moulded plastic, which as mediums go is dirt cheap.
Where exactly do you get your standards for what a "fair" price is and where the "overpriced" line is? And why does the medium matter when the raw material costs are only a small part of the final cost of the item?
It's nothing to do with the raw materials, the process as a whole at the scale at which GW carries out their business is inexpensive.
To get an idea of what is a fair price you have to compare it to similar product. In comparison to other forms of model kit/toy GW kits are overpriced and have been increasing in price at a rate far exceeding inflation year on year, if you're going to argue that GW products are good value, well I don't know...seriously
61137
Post by: mechanicalhorizon
Yes I am fully aware of all the costs involved, the design of the original, the forging of the moulds which in the case of plastics can run into hundreds of thousands if not millions of pounds, the packaging, transportation, marketing, upkeep of the facilities and Games Workshops own stores, and so on, still with all that factored in with the volume that GW produce they are still massively over priced for what they are, mas produced injection moulded plastic, which as mediums goes is dirt cheap.
Remember though, the designers/sculptors/concept artists are hourly wage earners so the cost of making the sculpts and concepts is spread out over a large period of time (between 3-5 months) and they are also working on more than one project at a time.
The silicone molds used for metal casting cost between $30-$40 each and can last for over a decade. I don't have costs for Finecast molds, but I was told they use a similar process to molds made for metal casting so the cost would be comparable. Even less per figure since the weapons and arms are sprued together with the body so you have less molds to make than when they were sold in metal separately.
The steel/aluminium tools used for plastic injection molding are also made by hourly staff with CNC machines so the cost of those is far less than what you would think. I was told by several managerial level staff at GW Lenton that the steel/aluminium tools cost a few thousand to make for squad size sprues and the tools usually have 2 sprues cut into them. Larger sprues like the Mumakil etc do cost more, but nowhere near the hundreds of thousands of dollars you guys think they cost. GW used to have them made out-of-house by another company, back then they were expensive. But not anymore.
A while back there was a spreadsheet posted with some of the Direct Sales codes that had some of the costs listed. Those match up with what I have in my old spreadsheets so you can get an idea of how little it really costs GW to produce a single sprue or component. I'm sure the cost of Finecast is less, but the labor involve din producing Finecast is more than metal, but the individual cost of components should be about the same (give or take a few cents).
The other costs like marketing, package design etc are spread out over several departments so they have their own way of tracking and paying for their costs.
10345
Post by: LunaHound
This, I call it Exhibit B
For anyone still claiming pirates using GW, FW molds to yield flawless counterfeits? I shall put an end to that silly argument.
Anyone please feel free to deduce the significance of this new picture.
63000
Post by: Peregrine
Mike712 wrote:To get an idea of what is a fair price you have to compare it to similar product. In comparison to other forms of model kit/toy GW kits are overpriced and have been increasing in price at a rate far exceeding inflation year on year, if you're going to argue that GW products are good value, well I don't know...seriously
Except for one little problem here: GW's models aren't really much different in price per model than other 28mm games. The only people who are selling stuff significantly cheaper are either the dedicated "cheap model" companies that produce an inferior product, or small-scale companies with a handful of models and all of the work done by a single person as a hobby.
19148
Post by: Aerethan
Peregrine wrote:Mike712 wrote:To get an idea of what is a fair price you have to compare it to similar product. In comparison to other forms of model kit/toy GW kits are overpriced and have been increasing in price at a rate far exceeding inflation year on year, if you're going to argue that GW products are good value, well I don't know...seriously
Except for one little problem here: GW's models aren't really much different in price per model than other 28mm games. The only people who are selling stuff significantly cheaper are either the dedicated "cheap model" companies that produce an inferior product, or small-scale companies with a handful of models and all of the work done by a single person as a hobby.
http://www.perry-miniatures.com/product_info.php?cPath=22_62&products_id=1393
36 models for $29US, made by GW sculptors, in plastic. That is $.80 per model. GW's average 10 man box is $24.75, 3x the cost of Perry Minis. They are hardly inferior.
Also, you can't compare price per model against other games. Warmahordes requires far fewer models to play the game for example.
So really you have to look at the cost to play the game, in which case GW is the most expensive by a large margin.
There are plenty of other companies that make perfectly fine looking models for much less than GW. The difference is that those companies don't make brick and mortar stores with ludicrous rent in areas that don't need them. The price for all those GW stores is tacked on to the retail price I guarantee. GW survived just fine without having their own stores down the street from LGS's. And honestly, any place that doesn't already have an LGS in it probably can't support such a niche store, let alone one that ONLY sells GW product.
Let's not pretend that GW is doing everything in their power to promote healthy competition or heaven forbid promote wargaming as a hobby in general. They pretend that no one else makes models, and they price like there is no competition, which is a rather head in the sand approach to business that will eventually fail terribly.
EDIT: so Perry Miniatures has an army deal on those ACW models:
D1 Union Army Deal 20 x boxes of plastic Infantry, 4 x boxes of plastic Cavalry, 6 x metal artillery packs, 3 high command metal mounted figures ( 720 Infantry, 51 Cavalry 24 artillerymen and 6 guns)
£300 or $482 USD. Show me a GW army that will yield 800 models for under $500.
63000
Post by: Peregrine
Aerethan wrote:36 models for $29US, made by GW sculptors, in plastic. That is $.80 per model. GW's average 10 man box is $24.75, 3x the cost of Perry Minis. They are hardly inferior.
Do the historical models also come with the extra options that GW kits usually include?
Also, you can't compare price per model against other games. Warmahordes requires far fewer models to play the game for example.
Why not? The question here isn't overall price to play, it's whether particular models are overpriced, and whether that overpricing is severe enough to ethically justify IP theft. And the only thing that matters for that is price-per-model for roughly equivalent models.
Let's not pretend that GW is doing everything in their power to promote healthy competition or heaven forbid promote wargaming as a hobby in general. They pretend that no one else makes models, and they price like there is no competition, which is a rather head in the sand approach to business that will eventually fail terribly.
What does that have to do with anything? The wisdom of GW's business plan has nothing at all to do with whether or not their products are "overpriced" in some objective sense.
30289
Post by: Omegus
Squigsquasher wrote:
You are missing the point. The sculptors and model designers of GW and FW put a lot of effort into making those models. Recasters are making money off of someone else's hard work, and drawing money away from the people who put all that effort into making those models.
Suppose you were a painter. You spent weeks painting beautiful landscape pictures. And then some bastard comes along, copies the picture, and sells it, making money off of your effort. And then because his prices are cheaper, you don't get any money for the painting that you had made. You would be angry. After all, you would deserve the money for your hard work, not some thief.
And that is exactly the case here. Recasting is theft. Theft is illegal and detestable. By buying recasts you are stealing money from the sculptors who deserve said money, and giving it to filthy criminals. So before you click the buy button, think about the blood sweat and tears that went into making the original model, before you give your money to some sweaty Chinese copycat.
You are living in a dream-world. The sculptors aren't getting a cut of the proceeds of every model they designed in perpetuity for every copy of that model sold. They get their (no doubt miserly) salary, and the profits go to shareholders and executive bonuses.
19148
Post by: Aerethan
Peregrine wrote: Aerethan wrote:36 models for $29US, made by GW sculptors, in plastic. That is $.80 per model. GW's average 10 man box is $24.75, 3x the cost of Perry Minis. They are hardly inferior.
Do the historical models also come with the extra options that GW kits usually include?
Also, you can't compare price per model against other games. Warmahordes requires far fewer models to play the game for example.
Why not? The question here isn't overall price to play, it's whether particular models are overpriced, and whether that overpricing is severe enough to ethically justify IP theft. And the only thing that matters for that is price-per-model for roughly equivalent models.
Let's not pretend that GW is doing everything in their power to promote healthy competition or heaven forbid promote wargaming as a hobby in general. They pretend that no one else makes models, and they price like there is no competition, which is a rather head in the sand approach to business that will eventually fail terribly.
What does that have to do with anything? The wisdom of GW's business plan has nothing at all to do with whether or not their products are "overpriced" in some objective sense.
Ok, we'll go with objective arguments against the prices.
In 2000, a 19 man box of Empire soldiers was $25. It was a full multi piece kit that allowed tons of customization. In 2002~ that price rose to $30, with the statement that the increase was to offset profit losses on metals. The next year metal models increased anyway. In 2006~ that price then went to $35 for the exact same box, giving the same excuse as before. Then 2007 happened, and the Empire was redone. The old box was done away with, and a new boxed set structure was put into place. 10 models, at $22. Those models which are far less customizable and have all manner of God awful skulls and crap all over them as well as monkey faces and a lack of shoes. So subjectively an inferior product at an objectively higher price. So in 7 years the models went down in quality and went up 70% in price. And that was before the economy crapped out. So what happened when people could afford less in discretionary spending? GW instituted company wide price increases annually. Now that same box is $24.75 and since it wasn't raised this year, it will certainly be raised next year.
So since GW isn't exactly offering some staggeringly huge improvement in quality, but they are charging more, we can objectively say that they are over priced, especially when you look at Finecast quality versus the price increases those models saw for the EXACT same sculpt.
23979
Post by: frozenwastes
Forgeworld is a premium price specialty kit making division of GW. At the very least it's certainly worth noting that they can't seem to compete on casting quality with a Chinese knock off company.
Just think about that. Would any other company settle for quality worse than Chinese knock offs? Why does Forgeworld?
As for legalities, it's important to remember that China is still technically a communist country and any and all property rights are only extended so far as they are government exceptions to the official policy of abolition of property. China can sign all the international treaties about IP as needed to appease their customer nations, but that doesn't actually mean anything inside their own borders. They'll make a show of cooperating some times, but that's about it.
The US can sue China all they like, but China could simply sell, rather than buy, US treasuries to pay any damages and the damage to the purchasing power of the US dollar would be far, far greater than any cost to China in an international trade court case.
China will protect China. All the shows China puts on of closing counterfeit operations are only done on those brands that are produced in China by approved businesses with enough clout to get it done. That's not GW.
56721
Post by: Dawnbringer
Peregrine wrote:
Do the historical models also come with the extra options that GW kits usually include?
Not napoleonics, because it seems people don't want them as they'd rather they were easier to put together (though the Perry's often have multiple head options, sometimes as many as 4) However just go take a look at their WotR stuff for options. Also not every GW kit has a bunch of options, just look at the Bretonnian kits.
53523
Post by: Sining
frozenwastes wrote:.
Also, it's illegal in China for foreigners to own capital property, including business assets like IP. If you want to own a factory in China, you technically have to partner with a Chinese national and under local law the Chinese national has a 100% stake in the enterprise and is simply your supplier. So how do you handle the application of an international treaty about intellectual property inside a country that both forbids foreign ownership of the business asset itself, and only recognizes any sort of property rights at all as temporary exceptions to communist property abolition?
As someone who works for a company that owns a factory in shenyang, china, this isn't true -_- I think you're thinking of malaysia, where they used to require you to have a local citizen be the majority shareholder.
279
Post by: cerealkiller195
i always wonder about the people that keep saying that gw puts out a superior product and that's why they can charge as much...
maybe i'm just a jaded not so old gamer, i started in 98 where boxes were $15-20 for 16-20 multi pose miniatures. I can understand inflation and 'cost of materials' but every year even if its the same box sitting in the warehouse still gets a price increase you are telling me that's the way it's supposed to be?
it's the same people who blame knock offs and the second hand market for the price increase. it is not like you can say the customer service has increased, less RTT's, GT's and Gamesdays actually worth going to.
There is a market for this stuff sure, but at the same time there are a bunch of gamers in the dark that have no idea what;s going on. I remember walking into a gw store and saying that i got my oop minis from bartertown/ebay and received a bunch of dazzled looks that such a thing existed.
Like i said before maybe i'm just an jaded gamer but i just never really could understand what is up with people who play gw games having that whole 'beaten wife syndrome'.
10345
Post by: LunaHound
Sining wrote:As someone who works for a company that owns a factory in shenyang, china, this isn't true -_- I think you're thinking of malaysia, where they used to require you to have a local citizen be the majority shareholder.
Hi Sining, can you tell dakka abit about what you know about the chinese counterfeit garage kit makers, and other pvc figures?
like how common it is, whether its easy for them, and how long they have been doing these kind of things.
Thanks :']
63000
Post by: Peregrine
Dawnbringer wrote:Not napoleonics, because it seems people don't want them as they'd rather they were easier to put together (though the Perry's often have multiple head options, sometimes as many as 4) However just go take a look at their WotR stuff for options. Also not every GW kit has a bunch of options, just look at the Bretonnian kits.
And this is why historical miniatures are cheaper. It's a lot easier and cheaper to make simple single-pose models than the kind of complex kits GW produces. There's less time sculpting additional parts, ensuring that all of your infantry kits are compatible with each other, designing and producing the additional molds, etc. And then of course once you've designed the kit now each of your boxes includes more sprues to hold the extra option parts. So it's not entirely fair to just compare a box of historical miniatures to a tactical squad and add up the cost per X models.
19148
Post by: Aerethan
Peregrine wrote: Dawnbringer wrote:Not napoleonics, because it seems people don't want them as they'd rather they were easier to put together (though the Perry's often have multiple head options, sometimes as many as 4) However just go take a look at their WotR stuff for options. Also not every GW kit has a bunch of options, just look at the Bretonnian kits.
And this is why historical miniatures are cheaper. It's a lot easier and cheaper to make simple single-pose models than the kind of complex kits GW produces. There's less time sculpting additional parts, ensuring that all of your infantry kits are compatible with each other, designing and producing the additional molds, etc. And then of course once you've designed the kit now each of your boxes includes more sprues to hold the extra option parts. So it's not entirely fair to just compare a box of historical miniatures to a tactical squad and add up the cost per X models.
Again, Empire troops. Single pose, all parts fit on the standard pose so there isn't any complex design consideration. The only complex GW kit I've ever seen was maybe Minotaurs since the weapons have to be exact in order to rank up, and perhaps 5th edition Chaos Warriors.
There is literally no wrong way to assemble Empire troops, or almost any WFB infantry provided you understand where anatomy belongs. And GW has been steering away from unit integration when they started doing things like odd armatures and mono pose bodies. Bretonnian troops can't have Empire parts swapped out easily, and that was deliberate on GW's part. The heads have flat bases instead of round, the arms cut off at the elbow instead of the shoulder, scale is often quite variable across other armies.
And how many new boxes these days have an options sprue? That used to be standard, and since 2002ish it's been everything possible on a single sprue that is then folded in half and stuck in a box. 1 sprue per box. And they charge more for it.
Tell you what, GW should release an accessories sprue for every army, and charge separately for it. Box sets should come with only the basic bare ass unit and it's command. No fancy scrolls or skulls, no extra swords to put on their waists. And you know what? They'd sell a metric feth ton of them.
If you are going to white knight, at least do it with facts.
63000
Post by: Peregrine
Aerethan wrote:Again, Empire troops. Single pose, all parts fit on the standard pose so there isn't any complex design consideration. The only complex GW kit I've ever seen was maybe Minotaurs since the weapons have to be exact in order to rank up, and perhaps 5th edition Chaos Warriors.
Honestly, I don't care about fantasy so I'm not going to bother arguing that point. The models all look stupid and I wouldn't buy them even if they were free, so I'm not really gong to dispute that they're overpriced.
And how many new boxes these days have an options sprue? That used to be standard, and since 2002ish it's been everything possible on a single sprue that is then folded in half and stuck in a box. 1 sprue per box. And they charge more for it.
Except whatever the arrangement of the sprue/sprues those options still take up sprue space that could have gone to including more basic models and improving the cost per model. And of course those parts still take all the extra design work no matter where on the sprue they go, which still increases the cost.
Tell you what, GW should release an accessories sprue for every army, and charge separately for it. Box sets should come with only the basic bare ass unit and it's command. No fancy scrolls or skulls, no extra swords to put on their waists. And you know what? They'd sell a metric feth ton of them.
Now try that in 40k where every unit has lots of options and the general opinion that kits should come with MORE options included.
7361
Post by: Howard A Treesong
Also they may come with lots of 'options' but I regularly read complaints that they don't include the options people actually want. All the popular weapons are in short supply in boxes which is the very reason that people look to third party producers to get the bits that they wish GW had put in the box instead of the heap of unwanted alternative parts. It's not like this isn't GW's fault, they design the kits and write the rules so there's little excuse for the two not dovetailing.
This isn't really a comment on recasting but on 3rd party manufacturers. GW have created a market because they just don't pack their kits with the stuff they write the army lists for. They have a megre selection of 'bitz' on their site which are vastly overpriced and of dubious quality to make up for the absence of the most desired options in their plastic kits. Between that and just not bothering to release models for their own rule sets for years on end, it's no wonder gamers shop else where. It's just to play the games that GW sold them in the first place!
32887
Post by: leroy233
After a weekend of searching and entering countless related words into search engines, I have to believe that this is not a massive problem and must only be a very small operation that this company is running.
Some posters on here make out it is going to backrupt gw and fw, until reading this post I didnt know about these sites, but now I do, I still cant find all these apparent recasters.
I think gw do a pretty good job keeping people inline for copyrights, better than most anyway, but this is not going to hurt them finacially until these sites are easily and common place on the net.
494
Post by: H.B.M.C.
leroy233 wrote:I think gw do a pretty good job keeping people inline for copyrights, better than most anyway...
The Chapterhouse lawsuit would tend to indicate otherwise.
23979
Post by: frozenwastes
Sining wrote:As someone who works for a company that owns a factory in shenyang, china, this isn't true -_- I think you're thinking of malaysia, where they used to require you to have a local citizen be the majority shareholder.
Sorry, you're right. I was thinking of older laws in the wrong country.
3806
Post by: Grot 6
Peregrine wrote: Aerethan wrote:Again, Empire troops. Single pose, all parts fit on the standard pose so there isn't any complex design consideration. The only complex GW kit I've ever seen was maybe Minotaurs since the weapons have to be exact in order to rank up, and perhaps 5th edition Chaos Warriors.
Honestly, I don't care about fantasy so I'm not going to bother arguing that point. The models all look stupid and I wouldn't buy them even if they were free, so I'm not really gong to dispute that they're overpriced.
And how many new boxes these days have an options sprue? That used to be standard, and since 2002ish it's been everything possible on a single sprue that is then folded in half and stuck in a box. 1 sprue per box. And they charge more for it.
Except whatever the arrangement of the sprue/sprues those options still take up sprue space that could have gone to including more basic models and improving the cost per model. And of course those parts still take all the extra design work no matter where on the sprue they go, which still increases the cost.
Tell you what, GW should release an accessories sprue for every army, and charge separately for it. Box sets should come with only the basic bare ass unit and it's command. No fancy scrolls or skulls, no extra swords to put on their waists. And you know what? They'd sell a metric feth ton of them.
Now try that in 40k where every unit has lots of options and the general opinion that kits should come with MORE options included.
O.o
Where did you get your information?
Entirly wrong, but I'd really like to double check your "facts". Automatically Appended Next Post: leroy233 wrote:After a weekend of searching and entering countless related words into search engines, I have to believe that this is not a massive problem and must only be a very small operation that this company is running.
Some posters on here make out it is going to backrupt gw and fw, until reading this post I didnt know about these sites, but now I do, I still cant find all these apparent recasters.
I think gw do a pretty good job keeping people inline for copyrights, better than most anyway, but this is not going to hurt them finacially until these sites are easily and common place on the net.
It's not really as big a deal as people are making it and going all hyper over.
The only thing that they really don't like is that they have to work for something that they touted as "Thiers", yet gave up entirly when they stopped being a game company and started being a "Collectable miniatures" company.
Finecrap hasn't done them any favors, in that regard, either.
The only thing that GW has going for it is a good legal team that is good at threatening any run of the mill fan into submission, and when it comes down to it, they have more money to try to drag out anything of legal proceedings. They have after all put a copywrite on "The Hobby" and have put one in for C and D along with the G and W.
63000
Post by: Peregrine
Grot 6 wrote:Entirly wrong, but I'd really like to double check your "facts".
Feel free to explain how it's wrong.
3806
Post by: Grot 6
Where shall we begin...
"Except for one little problem here: GW's models aren't really much different in price per model than other 28mm games. The only people who are selling stuff significantly cheaper are either the dedicated "cheap model" companies that produce an inferior product, or small-scale companies with a handful of models and all of the work done by a single person as a hobby."
I could get all deep about it, but this is a pretty bold statement to start with. Finecast is pennies to make, yet they sell it at metals prices. Periods, and full stop.
Mom and pop companies are giving you metals, and to say that finecast is an improvement? Who exactly is the cheapskate here? That crap comes in barrels, two ply resin/ plastic? Who knows... but it is not all that hard to see that GW May have had a quality product at one point, yet they decided... for altruistic reasons of course that they were going to go out and give that product away, now. free of charge, I guess?
"And this is why historical miniatures are cheaper. It's a lot easier and cheaper to make simple single-pose models than the kind of complex kits GW produces. There's less time sculpting additional parts, ensuring that all of your infantry kits are compatible with each other, designing and producing the additional molds, etc. And then of course once you've designed the kit now each of your boxes includes more sprues to hold the extra option parts. So it's not entirely fair to just compare a box of historical miniatures to a tactical squad and add up the cost per X models."
These figures are made in the exact same way. "Complex" has nothing to do with it. It would be fine if you were comparing something from like, 20 or so years ago, but both sets of figures are sprue based, designed, and cast in a machine. There is not difference in the casting of either of the products.
As to the options? Seriously? Are you talking about GW's real kits, of when they gave you a full range of 16-26 figures, or the cheapskate "Hey, lets charge the same 30$ for a ten man squad" crap that they have reduced themselves to? They now charge you three times as much for a small sprue of "Options" as you loosly put them. A 2.00 sprue for 8.00-10.00.
"Do the historical models also come with the extra options that GW kits usually include?"
uh... Yes. Sometimes more, all depending on the game.
How about Dust? How about Warlords new gig? Westwinds, maybe? Oh, and remember, metals?
"Why not? The question here isn't overall price to play, it's whether particular models are overpriced, and whether that overpricing is severe enough to ethically justify IP theft. And the only thing that matters for that is price-per-model for roughly equivalent models."
Eye of the beholder, I guess. I just can't sdee your point that you use Ethics in this conversation, seeing as how far the apple has fallen from the tree.
How much was that finecrap "Insert name of character here" figure? as opposed to how much, and of the quality that they once were?
How many times should be acceptable to continue to resend a figure back for replacement, based on bubbled, miscast, mistakes, or flaws? How much is that exactly "acceptable"?
And lets just look at that "IP" that your protecting like someones sisters cherry.
Aliens. Judge Dredd. Generic Space Man Vs Alien parasite. Skulls. The name Space marine. Flying Space ship. various models from Forgeworld. One looks like a British infantryman from the Boer War. One looks like a WW1 Hiney, one looks like a russian.
We have "Fantasy" stuff from days of yor, each and every one a concept from midevil, high and low fantasy, and historical context. Dungeons and Dragons, etc.etc.etc.
Basicly, a compnay that bills itself as "The Hobby." yet is in the business of fantasy and scifi figures. Some of which have been around as long as there has been the subject.
What does that have to do with anything? The wisdom of GW's business plan has nothing at all to do with whether or not their products are "overpriced" in some objective sense.
The subject revolves all around the question of "How much are you reasonably wiling to pay to play a miniatures game.
Would you rather have flawed models from a compnay, or some that don't look half bad from "Brand X" as we could call... whoever wants to make some figures or parts of figures to enhance the game/ reproduce the products with.
And again, explain yourself with this tidbit.
"Except for one little problem here: GW's models aren't really much different in price per model than other 28mm games. The only people who are selling stuff significantly cheaper are either the dedicated "cheap model" companies that produce an inferior product, or small-scale companies with a handful of models and all of the work done by a single person as a hobby."
Do you play any other games then GW?
When you posted this-
"Where exactly do you get your standards for what a "fair" price is and where the "overpriced" line is? And why does the medium matter when the raw material costs are only a small part of the final cost of the item?"
What exactly are YOU talking about? Ask yourself THIS question, from another prospective, and you come to a pretty quick conclusion as to why these products are even given the effort.
$100 for X
$50 for X
As I said, where did you get your information?
56721
Post by: Dawnbringer
Peregrine wrote: Dawnbringer wrote:Not napoleonics, because it seems people don't want them as they'd rather they were easier to put together (though the Perry's often have multiple head options, sometimes as many as 4) However just go take a look at their WotR stuff for options. Also not every GW kit has a bunch of options, just look at the Bretonnian kits.
And this is why historical miniatures are cheaper. It's a lot easier and cheaper to make simple single-pose models than the kind of complex kits GW produces. There's less time sculpting additional parts, ensuring that all of your infantry kits are compatible with each other, designing and producing the additional molds, etc. And then of course once you've designed the kit now each of your boxes includes more sprues to hold the extra option parts. So it's not entirely fair to just compare a box of historical miniatures to a tactical squad and add up the cost per X models.
Did you go look at the Perry's War of the Roses sprues like I said? Even the Naps often have a complete second set of arms (esp the cavalry). Other sets to look at are Warlord's Bolt Action figures. The only reason GW's cost more is because people still buy them, either blissfully ignorant, or having deluded themselves into believing they are getting a superior product.
54348
Post by: angel of ecstasy
Dawnbringer wrote: Peregrine wrote: Dawnbringer wrote:Not napoleonics, because it seems people don't want them as they'd rather they were easier to put together (though the Perry's often have multiple head options, sometimes as many as 4) However just go take a look at their WotR stuff for options. Also not every GW kit has a bunch of options, just look at the Bretonnian kits.
And this is why historical miniatures are cheaper. It's a lot easier and cheaper to make simple single-pose models than the kind of complex kits GW produces. There's less time sculpting additional parts, ensuring that all of your infantry kits are compatible with each other, designing and producing the additional molds, etc. And then of course once you've designed the kit now each of your boxes includes more sprues to hold the extra option parts. So it's not entirely fair to just compare a box of historical miniatures to a tactical squad and add up the cost per X models.
Did you go look at the Perry's War of the Roses sprues like I said? Even the Naps often have a complete second set of arms (esp the cavalry). Other sets to look at are Warlord's Bolt Action figures. The only reason GW's cost more is because people still buy them, either blissfully ignorant, or having deluded themselves into believing they are getting a superior product.
Or they just like the models?
15717
Post by: Backfire
Grot 6 wrote:Where shall we begin...
"Except for one little problem here: GW's models aren't really much different in price per model than other 28mm games. The only people who are selling stuff significantly cheaper are either the dedicated "cheap model" companies that produce an inferior product, or small-scale companies with a handful of models and all of the work done by a single person as a hobby."
I could get all deep about it, but this is a pretty bold statement to start with. Finecast is pennies to make, yet they sell it at metals prices. Periods, and full stop.
Actually, their last financial report stated that Finecast actually costs more to manufacture than metal.
Repeat once again: leading brands cost more. Which bands have most expensive concert tickets and merchandise: it's the big bands, like Rolling Stones and Metallica. They COULD afford to sell their stuff at lower cost, but choose not to. Because they can.
Which has the most expensive phones? Apple. Which has most expensive cars? Mercedes. Which is most expensive energy drink? Red Bull. Which is most expensive bottled water? Evian.
Are any of those brands substantially better, in real-world terms, than their cheaper competitors? No.
34252
Post by: Squigsquasher
angel of ecstasy wrote: Dawnbringer wrote: Peregrine wrote: Dawnbringer wrote:Not napoleonics, because it seems people don't want them as they'd rather they were easier to put together (though the Perry's often have multiple head options, sometimes as many as 4) However just go take a look at their WotR stuff for options. Also not every GW kit has a bunch of options, just look at the Bretonnian kits.
And this is why historical miniatures are cheaper. It's a lot easier and cheaper to make simple single-pose models than the kind of complex kits GW produces. There's less time sculpting additional parts, ensuring that all of your infantry kits are compatible with each other, designing and producing the additional molds, etc. And then of course once you've designed the kit now each of your boxes includes more sprues to hold the extra option parts. So it's not entirely fair to just compare a box of historical miniatures to a tactical squad and add up the cost per X models.
Did you go look at the Perry's War of the Roses sprues like I said? Even the Naps often have a complete second set of arms (esp the cavalry). Other sets to look at are Warlord's Bolt Action figures. The only reason GW's cost more is because people still buy them, either blissfully ignorant, or having deluded themselves into believing they are getting a superior product.
Or they just like the models?
Basically this. I don't buy GW models because it's the cheapest option or the most uber high quality option (although the quality with most of their models is superb), I buy them because I like them. I like the 40K universe. If I wanted to play Haqqislam then I would buy Infinity products. But I don't. I want to play Tyranids. I support GW because I like their products, and I want them to continue to make products, which they cannot do if nobody buys said products.
This horsegak about "people being deluded and paying for GW's inferior products" is just that. Horsegak. If I want to buy an £18 box of Hormagaunts I will, in the same way that if I like Sainsbury's coronation chicken I will buy it. And nobody has the right to tell me otherwise.
Costly models are not illegal. Knockoff recast clones of said costly models are illegal. End of.
3289
Post by: 12thRonin
Squigsquasher wrote:
Costly models are not illegal. Knockoff recast clones of said costly models are illegal. End of.
Continuing to say this doesn't make it correct. Buying them is not illegal.
53523
Post by: Sining
LunaHound wrote:Sining wrote:As someone who works for a company that owns a factory in shenyang, china, this isn't true -_- I think you're thinking of malaysia, where they used to require you to have a local citizen be the majority shareholder.
Hi Sining, can you tell dakka abit about what you know about the chinese counterfeit garage kit makers, and other pvc figures?
like how common it is, whether its easy for them, and how long they have been doing these kind of things.
Thanks :']
Sorry, I'm in a totally different industry. -_- But if they're anything like the industry I work in, they're probably quite good at copying things once they get an actual sample of them without needing the original casts or anything.
36184
Post by: Alfndrate
The legal side of things says it's illegal to sell counterfeits or knockoffs, and I believe it's "legal" to buy them if you didn't know you were doing so... Anyone buying from these chinese recasters are well aware of what they're getting their hands on.
19148
Post by: Aerethan
12thRonin wrote: Squigsquasher wrote:
Costly models are not illegal. Knockoff recast clones of said costly models are illegal. End of.
Continuing to say this doesn't make it correct. Buying them is not illegal.
Purchase and ownership of known counterfeit goods is in fact illegal in the US. That said, I'd imagine the penalty for illegal toy soldiers to be rather minimal.
Now for me, since I recast anyway, that action is more severe than simply owning fake goods, so I've got bigger things to worry about if people start kicking down my door screaming "WHERE ARE THE FAKE TOY SOLDIERS!?".
115
Post by: Azazelx
Actually, if I could find metal casts of the newer finecast-only models, I'd definitely be tempted to purchase them. I've had a hideous experience with finecast product, which has resulted in some "free" models, but the "free" replacements were flawed as well, just not as much.
I didn't have the patience to be like that Golden Demon Winner guy who kept asking for (and getting) replacement figures, nor do I believe I have the "pull" or rep as he does to have them actually continue to supply me with reps, so I did what they want and expect us to do (just give up) except I've also done what they don't want people to do (give up on buying the Finecast product entirely, because it's gak).
So yeah, the newer sculpts as metal recasts, I'd probably buy them.
19148
Post by: Aerethan
Alfndrate wrote:The legal side of things says it's illegal to sell counterfeits or knockoffs, and I believe it's "legal" to buy them if you didn't know you were doing so... Anyone buying from these chinese recasters are well aware of what they're getting their hands on.
Which again, Coolcast did all their stuff in yellow/tan resin like the old Armorcast stuff. The Russians and a few people in Hong Kong do FW grey.
And even if you don't know that goods are counterfeit, they can be confiscated without compensation.
36184
Post by: Alfndrate
Aerethan wrote: Alfndrate wrote:The legal side of things says it's illegal to sell counterfeits or knockoffs, and I believe it's "legal" to buy them if you didn't know you were doing so... Anyone buying from these chinese recasters are well aware of what they're getting their hands on.
Which again, Coolcast did all their stuff in yellow/tan resin like the old Armorcast stuff. The Russians and a few people in Hong Kong do FW grey.
And even if you don't know that goods are counterfeit, they can be confiscated without compensation.
Yeah, sorry :( Should have added that you're still likely to see the removal of your counterfeit stuff... I'm not sure how current the law is, but there was an article in the NY Times that states the US allows people to bring 1 counterfeit product into the country of each category of goods you can bring in... But again, I'm not sure if that has changed.
In the end though, it's still a no no..
3289
Post by: 12thRonin
Aerethan wrote:12thRonin wrote: Squigsquasher wrote:
Costly models are not illegal. Knockoff recast clones of said costly models are illegal. End of.
Continuing to say this doesn't make it correct. Buying them is not illegal.
Purchase and ownership of known counterfeit goods is in fact illegal in the US. That said, I'd imagine the penalty for illegal toy soldiers to be rather minimal.
Now for me, since I recast anyway, that action is more severe than simply owning fake goods, so I've got bigger things to worry about if people start kicking down my door screaming "WHERE ARE THE FAKE TOY SOLDIERS!?".
In fact, buying knockoffs or fakes is not illegal.
61137
Post by: mechanicalhorizon
Actually, their last financial report stated that Finecast actually costs more to manufacture than metal.
The process of Finecast costs more than metal, the raw material does not.
GW had to purchase new machines for Finecast but they ( AFAIK) function similarly to metal Nicem machines, but with a heater built in. They also would have had to purchase new resin mixers to deliver the Finecast resin into the mold. Those cost about $10,000 each (for cheap ones) and they'd need one of those for each casting station. Last time I was in Lenton they had 6 casting stations (that I saw).
Finecast models also have a large sprue which takes up space on the mold; so you get less cavities per mold which means less yield per spin than metal and longer casting times to complete an order. Finecast molds also take longer to make than molds for metal and have a shorter life span so you wind up making more molds than you would for metal. That's mostly because GW aren't using the right type of mold material though. The chemicals in th eresin are attacking the surface of the molds deteriorating them faster. That's why they should be using a release agent for casting.
You'd also need more molds to compensate for the lower yield and the apparent high miscast rate Finecast has, which I was told was around 60% (that's before it hits the packing dept).
The casting cycle time is also a bit longer than metal. That's what the heaters in the machines are for, they kick start the curing process so the resin cures faster. But most resins that would be needed to fill models like that would have a cure time of at least 1-2 minutes, any faster they would cure too quickly before the cavities were filled. Metal casting cycles are about 20-30 seconds per spin.
So when GW says Finecast costs more than metal they mean more than just material costs.
19148
Post by: Aerethan
Since when does "likely" mean "definitely"?
More importantly, that article talks exclusively about hand bags, which very well may have their own laws about ownership since it is such a widespread type of counterfeit.
Knowingly owning counterfeit currency is super illegal, so your argument doesn't really work there. And they most certainly don't replace that.
And all counterfeit goods can and often will be seized by law enforcement as evidence against the seller or maker.
36184
Post by: Alfndrate
Aerethan wrote:Since when does "likely" mean "definitely"? More importantly, that article talks exclusively about hand bags, which very well may have their own laws about ownership since it is such a widespread type of counterfeit. Knowingly owning counterfeit currency is super illegal, so your argument doesn't really work there. And they most certainly don't replace that. And all counterfeit goods can and often will be seized by law enforcement as evidence against the seller or maker. The reason why I said likely is because of the article I had read mentioned something about the US letting people bring 1 counterfeit item per category... let me see if I can find it... Like I had said, I don't know how the law is currently states, all I know is that selling counterfeits and knockoffs is illegal... Edit: This article, I read it last week or so while reading this thread. http://bucks.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/10/28/the-legality-of-buying-knockoffs/
6145
Post by: Gitkikka
Drat. I last bought stuff from these guys when they were Miniatureshobbies.com - apparently they went through a few iterations since then. Time to trawl the interwebs.
19148
Post by: Aerethan
Alfndrate wrote: Aerethan wrote:Since when does "likely" mean "definitely"?
More importantly, that article talks exclusively about hand bags, which very well may have their own laws about ownership since it is such a widespread type of counterfeit.
Knowingly owning counterfeit currency is super illegal, so your argument doesn't really work there. And they most certainly don't replace that.
And all counterfeit goods can and often will be seized by law enforcement as evidence against the seller or maker.
The reason why I said likely is because of the article I had read mentioned something about the US letting people bring 1 counterfeit item per category... let me see if I can find it... Like I had said, I don't know how the law is currently states, all I know is that selling counterfeits and knockoffs is illegal...
Edit: This article, I read it last week or so while reading this thread. http://bucks.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/10/28/the-legality-of-buying-knockoffs/
Apologies, I should have quoted the post I was replying to.
My response was to the link shown a few posts up saying that buying fakes isn't illegal.
7222
Post by: timd
Howard A Treesong wrote:Also they may come with lots of 'options' but I regularly read complaints that they don't include the options people actually want. All the popular weapons are in short supply in boxes which is the very reason that people look to third party producers to get the bits that they wish GW had put in the box instead of the heap of unwanted alternative parts. It's not like this isn't GW's fault, they design the kits and write the rules so there's little excuse for the two not dovetailing.
Unless GW rules writers don't really understand how their rules will actually work when they get out into the gaming population. There has been much evidence of this lack of understanding in every edition of 40K...
Tim
21499
Post by: Mr. Burning
timd wrote: Howard A Treesong wrote:Also they may come with lots of 'options' but I regularly read complaints that they don't include the options people actually want. All the popular weapons are in short supply in boxes which is the very reason that people look to third party producers to get the bits that they wish GW had put in the box instead of the heap of unwanted alternative parts. It's not like this isn't GW's fault, they design the kits and write the rules so there's little excuse for the two not dovetailing.
Unless GW rules writers don't really understand how their rules will actually work when they get out into the gaming population. There has been much evidence of this lack of understanding in every edition of 40K...
Tim
Gw do not acknowledge competitive player builds, if they do they are dismissive, hence why you wont get 3 melta or plasma in your guard box for vets or right and left arm autocannons for riflemen dreads etc.
That their rule allow for optimised builds is probably by coincidence.
Caveat Emptor!
19148
Post by: Aerethan
Mr. Burning wrote:timd wrote: Howard A Treesong wrote:Also they may come with lots of 'options' but I regularly read complaints that they don't include the options people actually want. All the popular weapons are in short supply in boxes which is the very reason that people look to third party producers to get the bits that they wish GW had put in the box instead of the heap of unwanted alternative parts. It's not like this isn't GW's fault, they design the kits and write the rules so there's little excuse for the two not dovetailing.
Unless GW rules writers don't really understand how their rules will actually work when they get out into the gaming population. There has been much evidence of this lack of understanding in every edition of 40K...
Tim
Gw do not acknowledge competitive player builds, if they do they are dismissive, hence why you wont get 3 melta or plasma in your guard box for vets or right and left arm autocannons for riflemen dreads etc.
That their rule allow for optimised builds is probably by coincidence.
Caveat Emptor!
Which shows that they are ignorant of the rampant imbalance in their game.
The only game that has no optimized builds are those where both sides have the exact same pieces: chess, checkers, tic- tac-toe etc. The day you release an army with options, there will be an optimized build for it.
And I call BS on that policy, because GW is known for making flavor of the month models have overpowered rules in order to sell more models. In some cases the entire codex is overpowered in order to sell it more. That isn't coincidence at this point, it's policy.
49272
Post by: Testify
I honestly can't believe so many people are happy, if not enthusiastic, about killing Games Workshop. Automatically Appended Next Post: Aerethan wrote:
And I call BS on that policy, because GW is known for making flavor of the month models have overpowered rules in order to sell more models. In some cases the entire codex is overpowered in order to sell it more. That isn't coincidence at this point, it's policy.
Except...wouldn't all codexes be OP if that were the case?
And wouldn't the most OP codex be the most expensive one? Is that way blob guard is so powerful and Draigowing is so weak? Just grow up, GW are a company and they want to make money, like all companies. You are buying counterfeit goods, which damages them.
I'm not one for judging but don't pretend that you are doing anything other than actively and consciously damaging everyone's hobby.
19148
Post by: Aerethan
Testify wrote:
I'm not one for judging but don't pretend that you are doing anything other than actively and consciously damaging everyone's hobby.
First, GW isn't a "hobby", despite what they might tell you.
Secondly, don't be so dramatic. Me buying my little toy soldiers from a recaster has the same financial impact on GW as me just buying any other 3rd party models. It's a sale they didn't get, because of the lack of availability or the price of the items.
Honestly, if GW still had the bits service I'd have ordered most of my recasts through it if they were available.
GW could theoretically even offer plastic bits service since the plastic that doesn't sell can be ground up and used again. I'm not aware of any major degradation of HIPS from being recycled.
As for FW, their quality versus price is where I have issue. The casts I got from china are impeccable. How many horror stories are there of FW items being warped or just poorly cast? Why would I pay the premium price for what equates to amateur production quality? Their designs might be worth the money, but their final product generally isn't.
Also, China gives me free shipping on anything over $25 and they don't charge me(as US citizen and buyer) VAT. So there's that.
FW is, as those Brits say, taking the piss/biscuit or whatever else it is that people take when overcharging for things.
3289
Post by: 12thRonin
Everything in the law is likely. There's no such thing as definitely.
More importantly, that article talks exclusively about hand bags, which very well may have their own laws about ownership since it is such a widespread type of counterfeit.
Knock offs are knock offs.
Knowingly owning counterfeit currency is super illegal, so your argument doesn't really work there. And they most certainly don't replace that.
I must have missed when GW products became legal tender.
And all counterfeit goods can and often will be seized by law enforcement as evidence against the seller or maker.
Not usually from the owner unless they have committed a crime. The seller, yeah.
44272
Post by: Azreal13
Rather than the morality and legality of consciously seeking out and buying counterfeit models, isn't the real discussion here that a small backroom operation in China without access to the original moulds and sculpts, is apparently turning out higher quality product than the self confessed premium brand in the table top wargaming hobby?
If you're charging a premium for an inferior product then youre asking for trouble.
49272
Post by: Testify
azreal13 wrote:Rather than the morality and legality of consciously seeking out and buying counterfeit models, isn't the real discussion here that a small backroom operation in China without access to the original moulds and sculpts, is apparently turning out higher quality product than the self confessed premium brand in the table top wargaming hobby?
I'd be very surprised if a backroom in China was capable of out-producing, in quality or quantity, the manufacturing process of a modern developed factory in the first world. Automatically Appended Next Post: Aerethan wrote: Testify wrote:
I'm not one for judging but don't pretend that you are doing anything other than actively and consciously damaging everyone's hobby.
First, GW isn't a "hobby", despite what they might tell you.
Secondly, don't be so dramatic. Me buying my little toy soldiers from a recaster has the same financial impact on GW as me just buying any other 3rd party models. It's a sale they didn't get, because of the lack of availability or the price of the items.
GW is a hobby.
hob·by/ˈhäbē/
Noun:
An activity done regularly in one's leisure time for pleasure.
3rd party sellers still buy from GW. A dude making them illegally in China is not, that's a very obvious difference.
44272
Post by: Azreal13
Testify wrote: azreal13 wrote:Rather than the morality and legality of consciously seeking out and buying counterfeit models, isn't the real discussion here that a small backroom operation in China without access to the original moulds and sculpts, is apparently turning out higher quality product than the self confessed premium brand in the table top wargaming hobby?
I'd be very surprised if a backroom in China was capable of out-producing, in quality or quantity, the manufacturing process of a modern developed factory in the first world.
In quantity no doubt, but people posting in this thread who have bought product from both sources are saying the quality is excellent.
19148
Post by: Aerethan
GW is a company. They are not a hobby in and of themselves.
They are a sect of the scale model and tabletop wargames hobbies.
And I don't mean buying GW models from an LGS. Me buying recast termie heads is financially the same to GW as me buying Scibor heads to use instead.
And by your standards, FW is a backroom in China or less, since Coolcast parts were worlds better than any FW i've handled. Automatically Appended Next Post: azreal13 wrote: Testify wrote: azreal13 wrote:Rather than the morality and legality of consciously seeking out and buying counterfeit models, isn't the real discussion here that a small backroom operation in China without access to the original moulds and sculpts, is apparently turning out higher quality product than the self confessed premium brand in the table top wargaming hobby?
I'd be very surprised if a backroom in China was capable of out-producing, in quality or quantity, the manufacturing process of a modern developed factory in the first world.
In quantity no doubt, but people posting in this thread who have bought product from both sources are saying the quality is excellent.
I'd post pictures to that end if it were allowed, but it is not. Coolcast and those in Russia are cranking out pretty damn good quality casts.
722
Post by: Kanluwen
azreal13 wrote:Rather than the morality and legality of consciously seeking out and buying counterfeit models, isn't the real discussion here that a small backroom operation in China without access to the original moulds and sculpts, is apparently turning out higher quality product than the self confessed premium brand in the table top wargaming hobby?
If you're charging a premium for an inferior product then youre asking for trouble.
I don't know why people insist on calling these Chinese counterfeiters "small backroom operations".
There's nothing "small" about them. They're an industry unto themselves, usually operating out of a manufacturing plant and using its employees/resources.
49272
Post by: Testify
Aerethan wrote:GW is a company. They are not a hobby in and of themselves.
They are a sect of the scale model and tabletop wargames hobbies.
GW is a hobby. It means you collect Warhammer/Warhammer 40k/Lord of the Rings. Please don't try to definie my and my friend's hobbies by lumping us in with the worst kind of neckbeards.
Aerethan wrote:
And I don't mean buying GW models from an LGS. Me buying recast termie heads is financially the same to GW as me buying Scibor heads to use instead.
Good for you. It's still killing the hobby, feel good about that?
Aerethan wrote:
And by your standards, FW is a backroom in China or less, since Coolcast parts were worlds better than any FW i've handled.
Weird, you'd think they'd start exporting to the west en masse. Clearly you're missing an opportunity to exploit this incredible quality of manufacturing.
Actually, didn't GW shut a factory in China? Automatically Appended Next Post: azreal13 wrote:
In quantity no doubt, but people posting in this thread who have bought product from both sources are saying the quality is excellent.
I don't trust the internet on this in the slightest. Anything that makes GW seem incompetent or gak, they will argue until they're blue in the face about.
44272
Post by: Azreal13
Kanluwen wrote: azreal13 wrote:Rather than the morality and legality of consciously seeking out and buying counterfeit models, isn't the real discussion here that a small backroom operation in China without access to the original moulds and sculpts, is apparently turning out higher quality product than the self confessed premium brand in the table top wargaming hobby?
If you're charging a premium for an inferior product then youre asking for trouble.
I don't know why people insist on calling these Chinese counterfeiters "small backroom operations".
There's nothing "small" about them. They're an industry unto themselves, usually operating out of a manufacturing plant and using its employees/resources.
I guess my perception is based on they are effectively a niche within a niche within a further niche, but I guess my mental picture is probably a tad naive.
51394
Post by: judgedoug
I think a lot of people are missing the point that there's no "couple people in a backroom" in China. It's a widespread industry, and those Chinese recasters have more employees, more experience, better equipment, better quality control, better shipping rates, and better product than GW/FW.
I just bought my first Finecast model (Sammael on Jetbike) a couple days ago (have been into GW since Space Hulk 1st edition and 40k 2nd edition). Showed it to several of my friends who have also been into GW for a long time but also avoided buying Finecast. We all agreed, feth GW. Period. The quality of the material is horrible and every_single_sprue in the box was horribly warped and covered in flash. No self-respecting company who had any care for it's customers would ever release this garbage for $47. Anyone who believes that model is a "good value" or "high quality" is insane. If given the option, I would not hesitate to buy a high-quality, better cast version of the same model from someone else for half the price. I do NOT want to support a company who thinks of it's customer base so poorly. Barf.
56721
Post by: Dawnbringer
Testify wrote:
I honestly can't believe so many people are happy, if not enthusiastic, about killing Games Workshop.
Really? It's not really any different than all the people that would like to see big oil companies, Microsoft, Apple, (basically any big business that is seen as ripping it's customers off) do poorly. Also, if that is actually killing Games Workshop, then they failed to adapt. They have massive amounts of resources (for the world TTWG) and dominant market visibilty, if they can't compete, I'm not going to shed a tear over them.
Testify wrote:
I'm not one for judging but don't pretend that you are doing anything other than actively and consciously damaging everyone's hobby.
Not everyone's hobby, though perhaps you meant everyone's "Hobby". Unless of course he's making recasts of all the various figures that exist beyond GW, but that seems like alot of work, for what becomes quickly diminishing gains once you get away from GW prices I imagine.
51394
Post by: judgedoug
Testify wrote: Aerethan wrote:
And I don't mean buying GW models from an LGS. Me buying recast termie heads is financially the same to GW as me buying Scibor heads to use instead.
Good for you. It's still killing the hobby, feel good about that?
So you believe that if I have $10, and I will either spend $10 on recast Terminator heads or Scibor heads, or $10 on some sandwiches... then if I spend that $10 on recast Terminator or Scibor heads, I have actively participated in the killing of the hobby of all miniatures/tabletop gaming.
19148
Post by: Aerethan
Testify wrote: Aerethan wrote:GW is a company. They are not a hobby in and of themselves. They are a sect of the scale model and tabletop wargames hobbies. GW is a hobby. It means you collect Warhammer/Warhammer 40k/Lord of the Rings. Please don't try to definie my and my friend's hobbies by lumping us in with the worst kind of neckbeards. Aerethan wrote: And I don't mean buying GW models from an LGS. Me buying recast termie heads is financially the same to GW as me buying Scibor heads to use instead.
Good for you. It's still killing the hobby, feel good about that? Aerethan wrote: And by your standards, FW is a backroom in China or less, since Coolcast parts were worlds better than any FW i've handled.
Weird, you'd think they'd start exporting to the west en masse. Clearly you're missing an opportunity to exploit this incredible quality of manufacturing. Actually, didn't GW shut a factory in China? Automatically Appended Next Post: And your inability to accept facts about GW shows your bias and blind loyalty. But no, you're right, finecast is a huge success and is the pinnacle of model making technology, and we should be grateful that GW even lets us buy it at all. azreal13 wrote: In quantity no doubt, but people posting in this thread who have bought product from both sources are saying the quality is excellent.
I don't trust the internet on this in the slightest. Anything that makes GW seem incompetent or gak, they will argue until they're blue in the face about. This reeks of elitism. Just because you don't want to be associated with tabletop gaming doesn't mean gak. You play a tabletop game of 28mm models. That is tabletop gaming. GW is a company not a hobby. Unless your hobby is you running GW. Then it could be a hobby. If you play any video game, it lumps you in with "gamers" in general, whether you like it or not. Your elitist attitude that GW players somehow are never neckbeards as well is appalling. And me buying from another company isn't killing wargaming by any stretch of the imagination. But then your definition of "hobby" is GW, so what you are saying is that my recasts are killing GW, a company that isn't exactly dying(yet). And if/when GW dies, it 100% won't be from the black market of toy soldiers. It will be from their inability to sustain a viable business plan, or to even implement a viable business plan to begin with.
45565
Post by: cormadepanda
Buying out side of GW doesn't kill crap, it promotes more options. GW has a large monopoly, that is causing a price vacuum that mini players come to terms with. Which also effectively is causing other companies to have the same prices. I demand competition. If GW cant compete with CHINA, then CHINA is my new supplier.
profile pic: Deal with it.
<------
51394
Post by: judgedoug
Aerethan wrote: Testify wrote: Aerethan wrote:GW is a company. They are not a hobby in and of themselves.
They are a sect of the scale model and tabletop wargames hobbies.
GW is a hobby. It means you collect Warhammer/Warhammer 40k/Lord of the Rings. Please don't try to definie my and my friend's hobbies by lumping us in with the worst kind of neckbeards.
This reeks of elitism. Just because you don't want to be associated with tabletop gaming doesn't mean gak. You play a tabletop game of 28mm models. That is tabletop gaming. GW is a company not a hobby. Unless your hobby is you running GW. Then it could be a hobby.
That is interesting. If the Hobby is WHFB/ 40k/ LoTR, then do these GW Hobby Elitists look down on Specialist Games? Because I love and enjoy Blood Bowl, that means I'm not part of the Hobby's embrace? Did my clean-shaven neck just spout a giant beard?
What about Warhammer Historicals? Written by GW employees, published by GW... does it pass the NO-NECKBEARD test?
How do the GW Hobby Elitists feel about the games that the authors of the "Big Three" (I miss how the third was Epic, and not LotR, btw) have authored outside of Games Workshop? Does the " GW" branding, to them, somehow mean automatic quality and infallible rules and decisions? But as soon as Rick Priestley writes Hail Caesar or Bolt Action, or Andy Chambers writes Dust Warfare or Starship Troopers, or Alessio Cavatore writes Kings of War or Warpath... those are all giant neckbeardy turdburglars with an inferior product and inferior players?
19148
Post by: Aerethan
And another thing, just because you play a GW game doesn't mean you have to use GW models. Plenty of people play WFB and use Mantic models or others that they've found.
Wildly off topic, but the elitism really pissed me off.
49272
Post by: Testify
Dawnbringer wrote:
Really? It's not really any different than all the people that would like to see big oil companies, Microsoft, Apple, (basically any big business that is seen as ripping it's customers off) do poorly. Also, if that is actually killing Games Workshop, then they failed to adapt. They have massive amounts of resources (for the world TTWG) and dominant market visibilty, if they can't compete, I'm not going to shed a tear over them.
...this is the crux of the issue. GW's intellectual copyright is being stolen. It has nothing to do with competition. If I steal tvs from a shop, and sell them next door at a cut down price, doesn't mean that shop has failed commercially.
19148
Post by: Aerethan
Testify wrote: Dawnbringer wrote: Really? It's not really any different than all the people that would like to see big oil companies, Microsoft, Apple, (basically any big business that is seen as ripping it's customers off) do poorly. Also, if that is actually killing Games Workshop, then they failed to adapt. They have massive amounts of resources (for the world TTWG) and dominant market visibilty, if they can't compete, I'm not going to shed a tear over them.
...this is the crux of the issue. GW's intellectual copyright is being stolen. It has nothing to do with competition. If I steal tvs from a shop, and sell them next door at a cut down price, doesn't mean that shop has failed commercially. IP theft is not anything close to physical property theft. You all need to let that go. This is copying something and selling the copy, not taking product off the shelf without paying for it. GW isn't in any kind of bind because of these fairly obscure recasters. How many GW customers who don't lurk endlessly on forums even know about recasting as a possibilty, let alone a reality? The online community makes up a very small percentage of GW's customers, and within that online community those who know of recasting are an even smaller percentage, and those who BUY recasts are yet a smaller percentage of that. It is negligible. And I should add that so far GW has shown very little ability to prove ownership of damn near anything that they claim to.
49272
Post by: Testify
judgedoug wrote:
So you believe that if I have $10, and I will either spend $10 on recast Terminator heads or Scibor heads, or $10 on some sandwiches... then if I spend that $10 on recast Terminator or Scibor heads, I have actively participated in the killing of the hobby of all miniatures/tabletop gaming.
I don't understand this post, please rephrase it.
Aerethan wrote:
This reeks of elitism. Just because you don't want to be associated with tabletop gaming doesn't mean gak. You play a tabletop game of 28mm models. That is tabletop gaming. GW is a company not a hobby. Unless your hobby is you running GW. Then it could be a hobby.
If you play any video game, it lumps you in with "gamers" in general, whether you like it or not. Your elitist attitude that GW players somehow are never neckbeards as well is appalling.
And me buying from another company isn't killing wargaming by any stretch of the imagination. But then your definition of "hobby" is GW, so what you are saying is that my recasts are killing GW, a company that isn't exactly dying(yet). And if/when GW dies, it 100% won't be from the black market of toy soldiers. It will be from their inability to sustain a viable business plan, or to even implement a viable business plan to begin with.
Actually if someone played The Sims or My Little Pony on their Wii then no, I wouldn't classify them as a gamer. Similarly playing 40k doesn't mean you're in the same catagory as people who player other games which, in the UK at least, are very obscure. If you try to define my hobby again I will simply ignore that part of your post.
It's touching that you care so much about GW's business plan. Of course, you are not a part of their management, so you wouldn't know that. A company that size to NOT have a plan would be very very odd.
I think this boils down to you not wanting to pay full price for something you shouldn't have to. Except GW isn't like Apple or Nokia, if they go out of business there isn't a competator you can buy from - the hobby is dead.
56721
Post by: Dawnbringer
This reminds me of the bit from the Powerthrist videos: "If God gives you lemons, you find a new God." (Needs more allcaps, but I can't stand writing in those.)
Testify wrote:
If you try to define my hobby again I will simply ignore that part of your post.
Interesting, given that you tried to define "everyone's" hobby for them.
7942
Post by: nkelsch
Aerethan wrote:
And I should add that so far GW has shown very little ability to prove ownership of damn near anything that they claim to.
GW has had extremely easy time proving ownership of thier copyrights, which is exactly what is what is being infringed upon and why the ebay stores and websites do get shut down.
So they do claim ownership of thier copyrights and can prove they own them.
19148
Post by: Aerethan
Except GW isn't like Apple or Nokia, if they go out of business there isn't a competator you can buy from - the hobby is dead.
That is just ignorance. If GW up and died tomorrow, I'd still play WFB with my wife and local group. You think if they go away that the game does? No. It would get picked up by another company and continued, or the fans would do it themselves and use other companies models.
GW isn't the only company that makes 28mm models, just like Apple isn't the only company that makes smart phones. Do the other products look different? Yes, but they function pretty much the same, sometimes better even.
Quit calling it YOUR hobby. You play wargames on a tabletop, therefore you are a tabletop wargamer. That isn't specific to you and your little group of friends.
The only thing actually unique to GW are the game rules, which are patented and can't be done elsewhere really. Models are models. There isn't some law that says WFB must be played with GW models. Plenty of people play Warhammer without using GW models.
51394
Post by: judgedoug
nkelsch wrote: Aerethan wrote:
And I should add that so far GW has shown very little ability to prove ownership of damn near anything that they claim to.
GW has had extremely easy time proving ownership of thier copyrights, which is exactly what is what is being infringed upon and why the ebay stores and websites do get shut down.
So they do claim ownership of thier copyrights and can prove they own them.
GW is very good at filing C&D letters. They are currently getting destroyed in court because they overreached on their 'copyrights' (blood drops, halberds, etc) and apparently have failed to ever register any of the trademarks they said they did.
19148
Post by: Aerethan
nkelsch wrote: Aerethan wrote:
And I should add that so far GW has shown very little ability to prove ownership of damn near anything that they claim to.
GW has had extremely easy time proving ownership of thier copyrights, which is exactly what is what is being infringed upon and why the ebay stores and websites do get shut down.
So they do claim ownership of thier copyrights and can prove they own them.
No. Those sites close because it is easier to open up under a new name than get sued. C&D's don't mean gak as far as proof of ownership.
If GW has such an easy time proving ownership of copyrights, then why is the CHS case so insanely favored against them, and they didn't prove ownership of the vast majority of items they claimed to own.
Just because a store backs down to avoid legal action doesn't mean GW was right. It means the other party determined that it wasn't financially worth fighting over, and GW hedges their bets on that happening every time, and then they gak themselves when a company actually fights back.
18249
Post by: Charax
>> GW's Intellectual Copyright is being stolen
>> Intellectual copyright
>> Copyright being stolen.
Is...is anyone else seeing this? because I just facepalmed so hard I think I fractured something.
As for GW being a hobby...No. I don't spend my evening Games Workshopping, just like when I paint I don't spend time Humbrolling or Vallejoing, and when I read I don't go Pratchetting. GW produces supplies to be used in various aspects of the Tabletop Wargaming hobby. Don't want to be associated with the rest of the wargamers? Tough - if you Read, you're in the same group as other people who enjoy Reading. If you Paint, you're in the same group as the other people who enjoy Painting. You don't get a choice about who shares your hobby
nkelsch wrote:
GW has had extremely easy time proving ownership of thier copyrights, which is exactly what is what is being infringed upon and why the ebay stores and websites do get shut down.
So they do claim ownership of thier copyrights and can prove they own them.
You haven't been keeping up with the Chapterhouse situation have you?
3486
Post by: Shotgun
"I think this boils down to you not wanting to pay full price for something you shouldn't have to. Except GW isn't like Apple or Nokia, if they go out of business there isn't a competator you can buy from - the hobby is dead."
Only if the "hobby" is only GW, and I think you will find very few people only view GW as the "hobby".
51394
Post by: judgedoug
Testify wrote:Similarly playing 40k doesn't mean you're in the same catagory as people who player other games which, in the UK at least, are very obscure. If you try to define my hobby again I will simply ignore that part of your post.
Hahaha! You're very right. I'm not just a car driver, I drive a 6th gen Camaro. It's not a car, it's a Camaro. I will simply ignore anyone who tries to define me as a (barf) CAR driver. Camaro's most certaintly do not share any of the same characteristics as any other car. *facepalm*
Unbelievable. Sorry, holmes, you play tabletop wargames. 40k is a tabletop wargame, just like DBM or Hail Caesar or any other game that uses little toy soldiers and dice and a set of rules that govern how they move about.
Automatically Appended Next Post: Charax wrote:As for GW being a hobby...No. I don't spend my evening Games Workshopping, just like when I paint I don't spend time Humbrolling or Vallejoing, and when I read I don't go Pratchetting. GW produces supplies to be used in various aspects of the Tabletop Wargaming hobby. Don't want to be associated with the rest of the wargamers? Tough - if you Read, you're in the same group as other people who enjoy Reading. If you Paint, you're in the same group as the other people who enjoy Gaming. You don't get a choice about who shares your hobby
Dude don't lump MY hobby in like that! Some evenings I like to do some GamesWorkshopHobbyCitadelPainting on my Tomb Kings, but I'll mix it up and then do some TheArmyPainterBasing on 'em. Then I'll use them in during some ManticKingsOfWaring on Saturday. It gets really awkward switching between different hobbies when I'm using Citadel paints and the Army Painter paints on a Mantic model, but I can make it work.
But it's DEFINITELY NOT Tabletop Wargaming like with all those neckbeards oh no indeedy doodly
49272
Post by: Testify
Aerethan wrote:Except GW isn't like Apple or Nokia, if they go out of business there isn't a competator you can buy from - the hobby is dead.
That is just ignorance. If GW up and died tomorrow, I'd still play WFB with my wife and local group. You think if they go away that the game does? No. It would get picked up by another company and continued, or the fans would do it themselves and use other companies models.
GW isn't the only company that makes 28mm models, just like Apple isn't the only company that makes smart phones. Do the other products look different? Yes, but they function pretty much the same, sometimes better even.
Quit calling it YOUR hobby. You play wargames on a tabletop, therefore you are a tabletop wargamer. That isn't specific to you and your little group of friends.
The only thing actually unique to GW are the game rules, which are patented and can't be done elsewhere really. Models are models. There isn't some law that says WFB must be played with GW models. Plenty of people play Warhammer without using GW models.
The intellectual copyright would be dead. There would be no new "Imperial Guard codex" as we know it. Say goodbye to Space Marines, say hello to "The United Space Trooper Core". Yeah, doesn't quite fit. Automatically Appended Next Post: judgedoug wrote:
Hahaha! You're very right. I'm not just a car driver, I drive a 6th gen Camaro. It's not a car, it's a Camaro. I will simply ignore anyone who tries to define me as a (barf) CAR driver. Camaro's most certaintly do not share any of the same characteristics as any other car. *facepalm*
Good metaphor. You drive a car, does that mean you're interested in engines and horsepower and torque and motor racing?
18249
Post by: Charax
Please stop using the phrase "Intellectual Copyright", it makes you look bad. It's Intellectual Property or Copyright, pick one
19148
Post by: Aerethan
Testify wrote: Aerethan wrote:Except GW isn't like Apple or Nokia, if they go out of business there isn't a competator you can buy from - the hobby is dead. That is just ignorance. If GW up and died tomorrow, I'd still play WFB with my wife and local group. You think if they go away that the game does? No. It would get picked up by another company and continued, or the fans would do it themselves and use other companies models. GW isn't the only company that makes 28mm models, just like Apple isn't the only company that makes smart phones. Do the other products look different? Yes, but they function pretty much the same, sometimes better even. Quit calling it YOUR hobby. You play wargames on a tabletop, therefore you are a tabletop wargamer. That isn't specific to you and your little group of friends. The only thing actually unique to GW are the game rules, which are patented and can't be done elsewhere really. Models are models. There isn't some law that says WFB must be played with GW models. Plenty of people play Warhammer without using GW models.
The intellectual copyright would be dead. There would be no new "Imperial Guard codex" as we know it. Say goodbye to Space Marines, say hello to "The United Space Trooper Core". Yeah, doesn't quite fit. The IP most certainly wouldn't be dead. It would be bought by someone else and products would eventually be continued to be developed. And if GW as a company died, whoever bought the rights would probably hire most of the GW staff to continue it. Also, companies don't die that often anymore(at least not ones the size of GW). Most of the time they are bought out and restructured within their markets. Which would probably work out well for the customers at this point. And the metaphor carries weight. You like warhammer, therefore you like some manner of 28mm models, and some manner of tabletop games, therefore you are part of the tabletop games hobby. No one is part of the Ford hobby, yet metric tons of people are vehicle enthusiasts or hobbyists.
7942
Post by: nkelsch
Charax wrote:
nkelsch wrote:
GW has had extremely easy time proving ownership of thier copyrights, which is exactly what is what is being infringed upon and why the ebay stores and websites do get shut down.
So they do claim ownership of thier copyrights and can prove they own them.
You haven't been keeping up with the Chapterhouse situation have you?
I have... you are frustratingly ignorant of the differences between copyrights, trademarks and Intellectual property.
Chapterhouse was never accused of 'COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT' or 'RECASTING GW MODELS'. If they were doing that, they would have lost and lost big. They didn't recast any GW models so it is not a copyright case.
Chapterhouse and chinese counterfeiters are nothing alike and have nothing to do with each other.
My statement is perfectly valid and correct. Copyrights protects the model and the mold. GW owns those sculpts, even in china.
IP infringement is a totally different arena and issue. This has to do with copyright infringement.
19148
Post by: Aerethan
At this point, I sincerely hope that Testify is just trolling, otherwise I'll lose even more faith in humanity. The amount of blind loyalty is overwhelming. Automatically Appended Next Post: nkelsch wrote:Charax wrote: nkelsch wrote: GW has had extremely easy time proving ownership of thier copyrights, which is exactly what is what is being infringed upon and why the ebay stores and websites do get shut down. So they do claim ownership of thier copyrights and can prove they own them. You haven't been keeping up with the Chapterhouse situation have you? I have... you are frustratingly ignorant of the differences between copyrights, trademarks and Intellectual property. Chapterhouse was never accused of 'COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT' or 'RECASTING GW MODELS'. If they were doing that, they would have lost and lost big. They didn't recast any GW models so it is not a copyright case. Chapterhouse and chinese counterfeiters are nothing alike and have nothing to do with each other. My statement is perfectly valid and correct. Copyrights protects the model and the mold. GW owns those sculpts, even in china. IP infringement is a totally different arena and issue. This has to do with copyright infringement. Except all those copyrights that GW claims are being infringed upon, such as the shoulder pad design, the jet bikes, the eldar models. They aren't disputing the use of trademarks(which GW also didn't prove use of), they are straight up claiming that CHS is infringing on the copyrights of those items, but never showed ownership of any such copyrights. An item doesn't need to be a 1:1 copy to infringe a copyright.
10578
Post by: Magc8Ball
Testify wrote:The intellectual copyright would be dead. There would be no new "Imperial Guard codex" as we know it. Say goodbye to Space Marines, say hello to "The United Space Trooper Core". Yeah, doesn't quite fit.
In the same way in which there was no more Mechwarrior when FASA died, no more D&D when TSR died, no more Lord of the Rings content after JRR Tolkien died, I suppose.
The entire point of the concept of "intellectual property" is to protect it for the owner. This gives IP a value. The secondary effects of that, though, is that IP can be transferred or licensed to other people or businesses for their own use. The IP having been granted value means that, should GW collapse as a business, you can bet your life that another company, whether Privateer Press, Hasbro, Microsoft, the dessicated corpse of Christopher Tolkien... SOMEBODY will buy the rights to the IP and continue to produce things based upon that background.
7942
Post by: nkelsch
Aerethan wrote:
No one is part of the Ford hobby, yet metric tons of people are vehicle enthusiasts or hobbyists.
I know loads of people who can prove this statement false. 'brand loyalty' and being a FORD or BMW enthusiast is a massive thing int he car owner hobby.
There are forums, shows, meet-ups all dedicated to specific brands and people who only collect and restore specific brands...
The idea that hobbies cannot be brand-specific and have to be generalized as a way to invalidate people's hobbies simply doesn't work. Some hobbies are sub-catergories of others, doesn't mean sub divisions never happen and are invalid.
51394
Post by: judgedoug
Testify wrote: judgedoug wrote:
Hahaha! You're very right. I'm not just a car driver, I drive a 6th gen Camaro. It's not a car, it's a Camaro. I will simply ignore anyone who tries to define me as a (barf) CAR driver. Camaro's most certaintly do not share any of the same characteristics as any other car. *facepalm*
Good metaphor. You drive a car, does that mean you're interested in engines and horsepower and torque and motor racing?
Yes, it's perfect. Playing 40k is part of the tabletop wargaming hobby, much as me driving my Camaro is part of the driving community. Games Workshop manufactures 40k for the tabletop wargame hobbyists, as Chevrolet manufactures a Camaro for the car driving community. The "Games Workshop HOBBY" is the exact same non-existant entity that is designed to make 40k players feel superior as the Camaro Club is a non-existant entity designed to make Camaro enthusiasts feel superior to other members of the car driving community.
40k is a tabletop wargame. Your hobby includes all those neckbeards by association. There is nothing elite about 40k other than the high prices. But that's fine, people are willing to pay high prices, as I paid a high price for my Camaro. However, you might have bought a used car, in the same way that the Dark Angels army I just bought were used, 75% off retail, and GW did not see a penny from that sale.
19148
Post by: Aerethan
nkelsch wrote: Aerethan wrote: No one is part of the Ford hobby, yet metric tons of people are vehicle enthusiasts or hobbyists. I know loads of people who can prove this statement false. 'brand loyalty' and being a FORD or BMW enthusiast is a massive thing int he car owner hobby. There are forums, shows, meet-ups all dedicated to specific brands and people who only collect and restore specific brands... The idea that hobbies cannot be brand-specific and have to be generalized as a way to invalidate people's hobbies simply doesn't work. Some hobbies are sub-catergories of others, doesn't mean sub divisions never happen and are invalid. Is a Ford enthusiast a car enthusiast? Yes. In every case, seeing as cars are all Ford makes. Now is a car enthusiast a Ford enthusiast? Not always, seeing as Ford isn't the only company that makes cars. Brand specificity doesn't make it's own hobby, but rather a faction or subsection of a hobby, just like GW, or PP, or Mantic or whoever. No one claims to like Ford but not like cars. And a side note, I've met more neckbeards playing 40k than I've ever met playing any other game, tabletop or otherwise. So there's that.
7942
Post by: nkelsch
Aerethan wrote:
Except all those copyrights that GW claims are being infringed upon, such as the shoulder pad design, the jet bikes, the eldar models. They aren't disputing the use of trademarks(which GW also didn't prove use of), they are straight up claiming that CHS is infringing on the copyrights of those items, but never showed ownership of any such copyrights.
An item doesn't need to be a 1:1 copy to infringe a copyright.
But the chinese ones *ARE* 1:1 copies... and the copyright claims of the chapterhouse scenatio claimed CH used GW models as blanks which would have been a valid claim if true. But it wasn't true so there was no copyrights being infringed upon.
Designs, the jetbikes and eldar models are not recasts of GW models and have nothing to do with copyrights. Copyrights protect the piece, not the likeness. If I sculpt a space marine from scratch, it is not copyright infringement of their molds or sculpts... it may be IP infringement if they can prove it and I wish to take it to court.
So how does GW not own thier copyrights because of the CH case? and how does that make the recasting not copyright infringement?
19148
Post by: Aerethan
nkelsch wrote: Aerethan wrote:
Except all those copyrights that GW claims are being infringed upon, such as the shoulder pad design, the jet bikes, the eldar models. They aren't disputing the use of trademarks(which GW also didn't prove use of), they are straight up claiming that CHS is infringing on the copyrights of those items, but never showed ownership of any such copyrights.
An item doesn't need to be a 1:1 copy to infringe a copyright.
But the chinese ones *ARE* 1:1 copies... and the copyright claims of the chapterhouse scenatio claimed CH used GW models as blanks which would have been a valid claim if true. But it wasn't true so there was no copyrights being infringed upon.
Designs, the jetbikes and eldar models are not recasts of GW models and have nothing to do with copyrights. Copyrights protect the piece, not the likeness. If I sculpt a space marine from scratch, it is not copyright infringement of their molds or sculpts... it may be IP infringement if they can prove it and I wish to take it to court.
So how does GW not own thier copyrights because of the CH case? and how does that make the recasting not copyright infringement?
1. GW said that the CHS jetbike infringed on the design(copyright) of the purple bikes they showed as evidence. The GW jetbike was a painting, not a sculpture, and GW still claimed it was being infringed upon.
2. GW might own said copyrights, but they still have to PROVE it. I can claim I own all manner of items, and I may actually own them, but if I can't prove that ownership then I'm just talking out my ass.
3. I never said that the Chinese recasts didn't infringe copyrights. They do. I'll readily admit that.
4. This has all veered way off topic. No one cares about how elitist anyone is with the word "hobby". Recasts aren't killing anything. Shut up and let it go(to those whom that applies).
The site took down the items, it will show up again. End of story. Can we lock this now?
7942
Post by: nkelsch
Aerethan wrote:nkelsch wrote: Aerethan wrote:
No one is part of the Ford hobby, yet metric tons of people are vehicle enthusiasts or hobbyists.
I know loads of people who can prove this statement false. 'brand loyalty' and being a FORD or BMW enthusiast is a massive thing int he car owner hobby.
There are forums, shows, meet-ups all dedicated to specific brands and people who only collect and restore specific brands...
The idea that hobbies cannot be brand-specific and have to be generalized as a way to invalidate people's hobbies simply doesn't work. Some hobbies are sub-catergories of others, doesn't mean sub divisions never happen and are invalid.
Is a Ford enthusiast a car enthusiast? Yes. In every case, seeing as cars are all Ford makes.
Now is a car enthusiast a Ford enthusiast? Not always, seeing as Ford isn't the only company that makes cars.
Brand specificity doesn't make it's own hobby, but rather a faction or subsection of a hobby, just like GW, or PP, or Mantic or whoever.
No one claims to like Ford but not like cars.
And a side note, I've met more neckbeards playing 40k than I've ever met playing any other game, tabletop or otherwise. So there's that.
And wargaming minis is a sub hobby of a 'gaming' hobby, and gaming is a subhobby of 'recreational activities' compared to sports or movies, it can also be considered a sub hobby of artistic hobbies but that doesn't make a violin player the same as a wargaming painter as they are both 'artistic hobbies'.
Anyone arrogant enough to tell people what 'their' hobby is and what the valid cross-section of their experience is and how general or defined their interest is beyond discussion as they are being purposefully dense to win arguments...
And I can tell you there are people who love ford and don't like cars... it is called truck owners... Who said you get to define all mechanical vehicles under the same hobby and make that the only valid determination of such a hobby?
19148
Post by: Aerethan
Really? cars vs trucks? I should have specified automobiles if you are going to nit pick.
Hot damn that is asinine.
123
Post by: Alpharius
Well, it seems as if we've reached the point in this thread where little else will be accomplished.
Opinions on the matter clearly vary - and as long as the rules of this site are followed, I think we'll all be OK in the end.
As for this thread - it is now closed.
|
|