Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
2017/06/12 16:23:05
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 12th June 17: White Dwarf preview (info in OP)(Also a message from Rippy)
That Meka-Dread looks pretty sweet - some fun rules and 5+ Invuln to all Ork units within 9" is nice.
I AM A MARINE PLAYER
"Unimaginably ancient xenos artefact somewhere on the planet, hive fleet poised above our heads, hidden 'stealer broods making an early start....and now a bloody Chaos cult crawling out of the woodwork just in case we were bored. Welcome to my world, Ciaphas."
Inquisitor Amberley Vail, Ordo Xenos
"I will admit that some Primachs like Russ or Horus could have a chance against an unarmed 12 year old novice but, a full Battle Sister??!! One to one? In close combat? Perhaps three Primarchs fighting together... but just one Primarch?" da001
JohnU wrote: They put Rokkit-bomms on the Dread datasheet but I don't see a way for them to take it.
Good catch - that seems to be a missing option
I AM A MARINE PLAYER
"Unimaginably ancient xenos artefact somewhere on the planet, hive fleet poised above our heads, hidden 'stealer broods making an early start....and now a bloody Chaos cult crawling out of the woodwork just in case we were bored. Welcome to my world, Ciaphas."
Inquisitor Amberley Vail, Ordo Xenos
"I will admit that some Primachs like Russ or Horus could have a chance against an unarmed 12 year old novice but, a full Battle Sister??!! One to one? In close combat? Perhaps three Primarchs fighting together... but just one Primarch?" da001
JohnU wrote: They put Rokkit-bomms on the Dread datasheet but I don't see a way for them to take it.
Good catch - that seems to be a missing option
Or something that shouldn't be on the datasheet...
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim
2017/06/12 16:38:38
Subject: Re:40k New Edition Summary - 12th June 17: White Dwarf preview (info in OP)(Also a message from Rippy)
changemod wrote: Y'vahra looks less poor than the riptide, but slightly hard to tell without points values.
I'll note it's lost torrent on it's flamer gun and the flechettes will never come up though: If you aren't in combat you won't shoot a pistol over better guns, and if you are in combat you'll leave immediately because you can fly.
Overwatch?
2017/06/12 16:42:02
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 12th June 17: White Dwarf preview (info in OP)(Also a message from Rippy)
Malanthrope is one of my favorite models hands down. Glad he is still a boss on the table! Being a 9 wound character than buffs nearby units with his venomthrope shroud is awesome! No more sniping the Malanthrope to get rid of cover bonuses. Though he has been balanced a bit now. His save is atrocious (but he gets -1 to be hit) and he no longer regenerates.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/06/12 16:47:19
I will wait to see how many points all these new units are. I bet at least some will be heavly overpriced.
Meka-dread is basically a double deff-dread with 1 extra BS. Deff is PL8. This is PL12. Seems about right to me since 2 deff dreads would be 16PL at the same toughness, but with more guns.
I'll make a bet right now that this will be 115-120 points base if the klaws are not included.
Edit: Actually should add some points for those abilities, too. Maybe 140 to 150. It's hard to figure out how much they valued hit and run. The ramshackle isn't terribly powerful. |
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/06/12 17:02:28
2017/06/12 16:54:38
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 12th June 17: White Dwarf preview (info in OP)(Also a message from Rippy)
This has to be one of the best building monopose miniatures for a starter set of Warhammer. Very intuitive and allow for a very easy customization, changing arms, heads, etc....
Not like the Chaos Chosen of Dark Vengeane. They where lovely models but how they were divided in parts... WTF? The one with an Axe and the superior half of his head attached to the axe-arm
Dakka does have White Knights and is also rather infamous for it's Black Knights. A new edition brings out the passionate and not all of them are good at expressing themselves in written form. There have been plenty of hysterical responses from both sides so far. So we descend into pointless bickering with neither side listening to each other. So posting here becomes more masturbation than conversation.
ERJAK wrote: Forcing a 40k player to keep playing 7th is basically a hate crime.
2017/06/12 16:58:47
Subject: Re:40k New Edition Summary - 12th June 17: White Dwarf preview (info in OP)(Also a message from Rippy)
rollawaythestone wrote: Malanthrope is one of my favorite models hands down. Glad he is still a boss on the table! Being a 9 wound character than buffs nearby units with his venomthrope shroud is awesome! No more sniping the Malanthrope to get rid of cover bonuses. Though he has been balanced a bit now. His save is atrocious (but he gets -1 to be hit) and he no longer regenerates.
It doesn't say units it says model with in 3" so only useful for small number of models. But you could put him close to a Hive Tyrant and make it harder to hit.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/06/12 17:40:19
2017/06/12 17:52:05
Subject: Re:40k New Edition Summary - 12th June 17: White Dwarf preview (info in OP)(Also a message from Rippy)
rollawaythestone wrote: Malanthrope is one of my favorite models hands down. Glad he is still a boss on the table! Being a 9 wound character than buffs nearby units with his venomthrope shroud is awesome! No more sniping the Malanthrope to get rid of cover bonuses. Though he has been balanced a bit now. His save is atrocious (but he gets -1 to be hit) and he no longer regenerates.
It doesn't say units it says model with in 3" so only useful for small number of models. But you could put him close to a Hive Tyrant and make it harder to hit.
The real question is how do you resolve a shooting attack against a unit where only some of the models have -1 to hit? My guess is that it's an error by FW and it should be units and not models.
2017/06/12 18:50:42
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 12th June 17: White Dwarf preview (info in OP)(Also a message from Rippy)
When in doubt, it's an error by FW. They don't exactly have a good (or even passable) record of churning out lots of functional rules updates in a short time. Anyone remember IA: Aeronautica?
The old meta is dead and the new meta struggles to be born. Now is the time of munchkins.
2017/06/12 19:22:24
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 12th June 17: White Dwarf preview (info in OP)(Also a message from Rippy)
rollawaythestone wrote: Malanthrope is one of my favorite models hands down. Glad he is still a boss on the table! Being a 9 wound character than buffs nearby units with his venomthrope shroud is awesome! No more sniping the Malanthrope to get rid of cover bonuses. Though he has been balanced a bit now. His save is atrocious (but he gets -1 to be hit) and he no longer regenerates.
It doesn't say units it says model with in 3" so only useful for small number of models. But you could put him close to a Hive Tyrant and make it harder to hit.
The real question is how do you resolve a shooting attack against a unit where only some of the models have -1 to hit? My guess is that it's an error by FW and it should be units and not models.
Or you just read the rules in question.
We had this kind of stuff in the past, and it was generally not an issue except when people wanted it to be an issue.
2017/06/12 19:25:10
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 12th June 17: White Dwarf preview (info in OP)(Also a message from Rippy)
rollawaythestone wrote: Malanthrope is one of my favorite models hands down. Glad he is still a boss on the table! Being a 9 wound character than buffs nearby units with his venomthrope shroud is awesome! No more sniping the Malanthrope to get rid of cover bonuses. Though he has been balanced a bit now. His save is atrocious (but he gets -1 to be hit) and he no longer regenerates.
It doesn't say units it says model with in 3" so only useful for small number of models. But you could put him close to a Hive Tyrant and make it harder to hit.
The real question is how do you resolve a shooting attack against a unit where only some of the models have -1 to hit? My guess is that it's an error by FW and it should be units and not models.
Not a problem, you target a unit where one of the models has a -1 to hit, you're targeting that model and it kicks in.
2017/06/12 19:41:26
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 12th June 17: White Dwarf preview (info in OP)(Also a message from Rippy)
Models are not targeted, units are. Most likely the rule means "if a target unit has at least one model within 3 inches..." but that's not what it says.
2017/06/12 21:25:08
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 12th June 17: FW Xenos Datasheets/Lord Duncan assembles Primaris (in OP)
The way I'd play it is like cover; either the whole unit has it or it doesn't. But I agree that its almost certainly a mistake, given FW's track record of lackluster rules integration.
It's an error, based on the Venomthrope ability's wording saying unit. Easy to work around. Unless you rilly rilly wanna be that guy. They'll FAQ it pronto I'm sure.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/06/12 21:56:19
Stormonu wrote: For me, the joy is in putting some good-looking models on the board and playing out a fantasy battle - not arguing over the poorly-made rules of some 3rd party who neither has any power over my play nor will be visiting me (and my opponent) to ensure we are "playing by the rules"
2017/06/12 22:09:32
Subject: Re:40k New Edition Summary - 12th June 17: White Dwarf preview (info in OP)(Also a message from Rippy)
Hopefully they do a whole series on how to paint the minis from the set like they did for Dark Vengeance.
My armies (re-counted and updated on 11/7/24, including modeled wargear options):
Dark Angels: ~16000 Astra Militarum: ~1200 | Imperial Knights: ~2300 | Leagues of Votann: ~1300 | Tyranids: ~3400 | Stormcast Eternals: ~5000 | Kruleboyz: ~3500 | Lumineth Realm-Lords: ~700
Check out my P&M Blogs: ZergSmasher's P&M Blog | Imperial Knights blog | Board Games blog | Total models painted in 2024: 40 | Total models painted in 2025: 21 | Current main painting project: Warhammer 40k Leviathan set
Mad Doc Grotsnik wrote: You need your bumps felt. With a patented, Grotsnik Corp Bump Feelerer 9,000.
The Grotsnik Corp Bump Feelerer 9,000. It only looks like several bricks crudely gaffer taped to a cricket bat.
Grotsnik Corp. Sorry, No Refunds.
2017/06/12 22:17:25
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 12th June 17: FW Xenos Datasheets/Lord Duncan assembles Primaris (in OP)
Very disappointed that the meka-dread no longer has the ability to repair.
The Ramshackle Monster rule seems rather pointless. It's likely to save you a wound or so, but it's a very complicated way to go about that. For all the streamlining, 8th edition still suffers from GW rules writers' apparent need to make new rules for every unit rather than working with the tools that the profile gives them.
Hopefully they do a whole series on how to paint the minis from the set like they did for Dark Vengeance.
We already have a SCHEDULE for what Duncan's doing this week.
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim
2017/06/12 22:31:07
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 12th June 17: FW Xenos Datasheets/Lord Duncan assembles Primaris (in OP)
Perfect Organism wrote: Very disappointed that the meka-dread no longer has the ability to repair.
The Ramshackle Monster rule seems rather pointless. It's likely to save you a wound or so, but it's a very complicated way to go about that. For all the streamlining, 8th edition still suffers from GW rules writers' apparent need to make new rules for every unit rather than working with the tools that the profile gives them.
On the other hand I'm liking the BS 4+ that doesn't degrade. Just a pity it can't swap both claws for Kannon…
"Three months? I'm going to go crazy …and I'm taking you with me!"
— Vala Mal Doran
2017/06/12 23:58:26
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 12th June 17: FW Xenos Datasheets/Lord Duncan assembles Primaris (in OP)
Perfect Organism wrote: Very disappointed that the meka-dread no longer has the ability to repair.
The Ramshackle Monster rule seems rather pointless. It's likely to save you a wound or so, but it's a very complicated way to go about that. For all the streamlining, 8th edition still suffers from GW rules writers' apparent need to make new rules for every unit rather than working with the tools that the profile gives them.
I'm not sure how to interpret your last sentence, but the thought process is that they write rules for the model. It's an appropriate rule that adds to the feel of the model without making a model with just another 4++ or 5++.
2017/06/13 00:55:56
Subject: 40k New Edition Summary - 12th June 17: FW Xenos Datasheets/Lord Duncan assembles Primaris (in OP)
Luciferian wrote: Damn, I was really hoping the marines would have interchangeable shoulder pads. A few days ago I ordered $40 worth of Dark Angels pads
Aw man that sucks, If I hadn't so many spare Space Wolves transfers I might have done the same.
Alot of independent online retailers are warning that pre-order stocks of Dark Imperium are running low. Buy now to avoid disappointment. The place I pre-ordered from told me that they will be dispatching orders as soon as stock arrives (usually Wednesday). I might get mine on release day, all being well