Switch Theme:

Better terminators?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
Thunderhawk Pilot Dropping From Orbit






London, England

warspawned wrote: As it stands terminators are veteran marines and no more than that - so why should we adjust Toughness, Strength & wounds to their base and not to other Marines? Because of their armour? They get a 2+ 5++ anyway to represent this. I now personally feel that if were true to the background they could reasonably be S&T 4(5) maybe with additional WS and or BS, even possibly a wound - but there's simply no room in the game as it is to make that improvement without suitably escalating other material.


Agreed, as Warspawned says the effects would have to be replicated, consider a marine against a guardsman, marines are supposed to live through almost anything, yet both have only one wound, it has to represented in more than just give marines an extra wound. marine or not if your armour fails then dead is dead for a human, super-duper or not.


No trees were hurt in the making of this sig, however many electrons were disturbed.
 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K Proposed Rules
Go to: