Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/21 11:08:40
Subject: Better terminators?
|
 |
Daring Dark Eldar Raider Rider
leeds
|
yeh that would mean you're now
WS4 BS4 STR4 T4 W2 I4 A2 LD9 3+/3+
but tbh that just makes them tougher marines that always get a normal marine save. hmm
|
I wonder if there is another word for "thesaurus"
2000 points
- 2000 points
- daemons 2000 points
In the making
Warriors of chaos (in the making)
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/21 16:19:25
Subject: Better terminators?
|
 |
Annoyed Blood Angel Devastator
York, UK
|
Super tactical dreadnought armour?
Isn't that a dreadnought?
Har har har
|
[Image removed by Google due to too much awesomeness] |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/21 16:30:19
Subject: Better terminators?
|
 |
Eternally-Stimulated Slaanesh Dreadnought
|
hmmmmm
Don't change their saves,
just have them able to reroll to hit when shooting and in combat.
If chaplain is with them then his rule becomes reroll to wound!
Reroll to wound Thunder Hammers.. ouch
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/21 16:45:34
Subject: Better terminators?
|
 |
Consigned to the Grim Darkness
|
I fail to see why people think that they actually NEED improvement... especially C:SM assault terminators, they're quite cheap and powerful for what they do.
|
The people in the past who convinced themselves to do unspeakable things were no less human than you or I. They made their decisions; the only thing that prevents history from repeating itself is making different ones.
-- Adam Serwer
My blog |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/21 18:18:03
Subject: Better terminators?
|
 |
Eternally-Stimulated Slaanesh Dreadnought
|
It's simple.
They don't live up to the hype of being the ultimate infantry you can field as a SM or CSM
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/21 18:19:16
Subject: Better terminators?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
What better equipped infantry units do the Space Marines have?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/21 18:35:14
Subject: Re:Better terminators?
|
 |
The Conquerer
Waiting for my shill money from Spiral Arm Studios
|
that is part of the problem.
Fluff wize Terminators should be 2 wounds, WS and BS6 and T5.
normal marines would be 1 wound, WS and BS5.
but then again Fluff =/= game
|
Self-proclaimed evil Cat-person. Dues Ex Felines
Cato Sicarius, after force feeding Captain Ventris a copy of the Codex Astartes for having the audacity to play Deathwatch, chokes to death on his own D-baggery after finding Calgar assembling his new Eldar army.
MURICA!!! IN SPESS!!! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/21 19:58:58
Subject: Better terminators?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Uh, why should they be "be 2 wounds, WS and BS6 and T5"? How are those number justified by the background?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/21 20:16:00
Subject: Better terminators?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Nurglitch wrote:Uh, why should they be "be 2 wounds, WS and BS6 and T5"? How are those number justified by the background?
+1
If anyone's terminators should be along those lines... i'd say chaos is more deserving then ANY SM ones.
CSM:
"Hail False god follower. To get my +1 (insert stat here), I had to sell my soul and dedicate my life to a dark chaos god. I have also physically been fighting longer then you, or your father have been alive! I have sacked entire city's and razed entire planets in the name of the dark gods!!! My base cost is high, and to upgrade my +1 I pay even a higher premium! What have you done?"
SM:
"Well, um.... I AM the poster child of games workshop."
CSM: "......"
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/21 21:35:14
Subject: Better terminators?
|
 |
Proud Phantom Titan
|
Corennus wrote:Or why don't you have a 3+ save that's invulnerable.
That's an Assault terminator only option ...
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/21 21:54:09
Subject: Better terminators?
|
 |
Consigned to the Grim Darkness
|
Corennus wrote:It's simple.
They don't live up to the hype of being the ultimate infantry you can field as a SM or CSM
That's because the hype is stupid, not because they unit is bad. The unit is awesome.
Marines are not gods upon the battlefield (in fluff OR in tabletop). But terminators get pretty damn close (again, in both), given that you have to use a friggin' lascannon or meltagun to get through their armor, and even then there's their storm shield and refractor field.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2010/09/21 21:55:46
The people in the past who convinced themselves to do unspeakable things were no less human than you or I. They made their decisions; the only thing that prevents history from repeating itself is making different ones.
-- Adam Serwer
My blog |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/22 01:10:44
Subject: Better terminators?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
*waves hands like a madman*
If we're upgrading Termies for this magical fluff value - can we upgrade the other virtual termies?
MANZ might want some love.
Then there's those bodyguard suit people the Tau have....
Just saying before you add those extra wounds - check out those that aren't named SPACE MARINEs and identify their counterparts.
|
"There's a difference between bein' a smartboy and bein' a smart git, Gimzod." - Rogue Skwadron, the Big Push
My Current army lineup |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/22 02:41:04
Subject: Re:Better terminators?
|
 |
The Conquerer
Waiting for my shill money from Spiral Arm Studios
|
and yet Battlesuits somehow have 2 wounds even though they are piloted by FWs.
|
Self-proclaimed evil Cat-person. Dues Ex Felines
Cato Sicarius, after force feeding Captain Ventris a copy of the Codex Astartes for having the audacity to play Deathwatch, chokes to death on his own D-baggery after finding Calgar assembling his new Eldar army.
MURICA!!! IN SPESS!!! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/22 03:08:45
Subject: Better terminators?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Yeah, they're also Dreadnought sized and only have T4 Sv3+...
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/22 03:31:17
Subject: Better terminators?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Just putting it out there that the big Ts aren't just named Terminators.
|
"There's a difference between bein' a smartboy and bein' a smart git, Gimzod." - Rogue Skwadron, the Big Push
My Current army lineup |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/22 04:13:56
Subject: Re:Better terminators?
|
 |
Warning From Magnus? Not Listening!
|
SaintHazard wrote:I propose that my Chaos Daemons all get S100, WS50,000, and I15, and a -1+ invuln save. Also, FNP. Twice.
If we're going to start defining our statlines based on fluff, I will accept nothing less.
This made me lol... Thanks, Hazard.
But in all seriousness, I do agree that Terminators are just fine the way they are. If you go around changing the Veterans' stats based on fluff alone, then you're looking at almost a complete overhaul of the SM Codex.
|
"This One Is Rurouni... Once Again, This One Will Drift..."
"Rushing towards danger without hesitation isn't recklessness, but bravery... And avoiding danger when there's a chance for victory isn't precaution, but cowardice..."
"I can only go forward." |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/22 06:19:09
Subject: Re:Better terminators?
|
 |
The Dread Evil Lord Varlak
|
Grey Templar wrote:but then again Fluff =/= game
The problem is that fluff =/= fluff. That stuff is all over the shop, depending on who the book is focussed on. If it's a marine book then the marine protagonists will slaughter incredible numbers of mooks, each marine worth a hundred of anything else. But if it's a guard book, marines are pulled way back in power levels.
|
“We may observe that the government in a civilized country is much more expensive than in a barbarous one; and when we say that one government is more expensive than another, it is the same as if we said that that one country is farther advanced in improvement than another. To say that the government is expensive and the people not oppressed is to say that the people are rich.”
Adam Smith, who must have been some kind of leftie or something. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/22 11:39:22
Subject: Re:Better terminators?
|
 |
Proud Phantom Titan
|
sebster wrote:Grey Templar wrote:but then again Fluff =/= game
The problem is that fluff =/= fluff. That stuff is all over the shop, depending on who the book is focussed on. If it's a marine book then the marine protagonists will slaughter incredible numbers of mooks, each marine worth a hundred of anything else. But if it's a guard book, marines are pulled way back in power levels.
Don't know orks seem to be doing well across the board, sure they die a bit but seem to be enjoying it as much as winning.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/22 13:09:15
Subject: Re:Better terminators?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Hey, if they're all dead, it don't count as beat!
|
DQ:80+S+++G++M+B+I+Pw40k10#+D++A++/areWD-R+++T(D)DM+ |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/23 01:28:53
Subject: Better terminators?
|
 |
Stalwart Dark Angels Space Marine
|
The only terminators that I even see worthy of ANY upgrades are the CSM and the DA (excluding GK from comparisons). I mean c'mon, the CSM have been fighting for millena and sacrificed their souls. And the DA, well their book says that the first company fights in nothing BUT termi armor,which in my book would make them superior to C:SM termis. Even then maybe just a BS/WS up for the DA or some cool DA rule, and continue the uber-iworshipagod-ness for the CSM with a BS/WS up maybe.
|
~4000pts Guardians Of The Covenant
~1500pts Nids
GENERATION 8: The first time you see this, copy and paste it into your sig and add 1 to the number after generation. Consider it a social experiment. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/23 01:40:07
Subject: Better terminators?
|
 |
Stealthy Dark Angels Scout with Shotgun
Ohio
|
You know, instead of improving the terminator assault and terminator squads, I'd suggest adding in either some kind of terminator command squad or terminator honor guard unit. Their 'elite among elite among elite among elite' status could allow for some stat boosting or special gear options. Like terminators with relic sword and storm bolter. Unit leader has 3 attacks. Options for special issue ammo for their storm bolters, maybe some combi-weapon options. Or bring back the vet skill options just for this squad. There are lots of cool things they could do with a terminator honor guard/command squad.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/23 03:13:23
Subject: Better terminators?
|
 |
Charging Dragon Prince
Chicago, IL, U.S.A.
|
Maybe give them Slow and Purposeful. That would improve them, and make them a little more like what they look like. Since it is kind of a drawback and bonus at the same time. Heck, give them some kind of lower initiative too if you want better armor. That gak's supposed to be clunky.
|
Retroactively applied infallability is its own reward. I wish I knew this years ago.
 I am Red/White Take The Magic Dual Colour Test - Beta today! <small>Created with Rum and Monkey's Personality Test Generator.</small>I'm both chaotic and orderly. I value my own principles, and am willing to go to extreme lengths to enforce them, often trampling on the very same principles in the process. At best, I'm heroic and principled; at worst, I'm hypocritical and disorderly. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/23 11:23:09
Subject: Better terminators?
|
 |
Stealthy Dark Angels Scout with Shotgun
Ohio
|
Terminators all ready have relentless, which is what slow and purposeful gives as a bonus. So giving them slow and purposeful in addition to that would just be a way to tone them down.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/23 16:27:41
Subject: Better terminators?
|
 |
Charging Dragon Prince
Chicago, IL, U.S.A.
|
Ah you got my point then. Sorry but I just don't see something that clunky able to 'run' very fast. Their clunkiness should imply a low initiative (though their weapons already do that for the most part) but if you want their armor to be better, I think its only fair to make it slower.
|
Retroactively applied infallability is its own reward. I wish I knew this years ago.
 I am Red/White Take The Magic Dual Colour Test - Beta today! <small>Created with Rum and Monkey's Personality Test Generator.</small>I'm both chaotic and orderly. I value my own principles, and am willing to go to extreme lengths to enforce them, often trampling on the very same principles in the process. At best, I'm heroic and principled; at worst, I'm hypocritical and disorderly. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/23 19:06:02
Subject: Better terminators?
|
 |
Stealthy Dark Angels Scout with Shotgun
Ohio
|
Their slowness or bulkyness is currently represented by being unable to sweeping advance after an enemy flees from combat. But I can understand wanting some other kind of penalty added on if they gain some other kind of benefit.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/23 20:17:05
Subject: Better terminators?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
It would be preferable to unify the rules that represent being slow and clunky. Though it would be better if Slow and Purposeful was like what Terminators have instead of what it currenty is, somewhat because it makes no difference to them to cross difficult terrain, but also because it makes them vulnerable to Combat Tactics without requiring the implementation of actual tactics to pull it off successfully (such as using a Walker to lock the enemy down while the squad Falls Back).
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/23 20:49:59
Subject: Better terminators?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
Beaver Dam, WI
|
Okay make them T5 W2 with a 2+(5++save) Just cost them like an obliterator with Mark of Nurgle thrown on top of the unit cost and I will throw in the WS5.
Let's see 75 for an oblit and 50 pts for MoN? So a squad of 5 costs 425. At that rate you can have the heavy weapon for "free." So you can have super termies but then they are a significant hit on your FoC.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/24 10:05:55
Subject: Re:Better terminators?
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
Sadly I have come to realise that there's no room for any kind of background related improvement within the confines of 40k today - even by increasing their base wounds by a mere 1 point (which I'd argue background wise isn't out of the question for Marines in general) - you'd be effectively doubling the ammount of damage/lastability of such an Elite unit. Simply beefing something up and then adding points is something that would cause statistical tremors across the board. If we did it to one thing we'd have to escalate it to others - all those Chaos Terminators would have to improve, then maybe all Chaos Lords should receive an additional wound (especially if we equipped them with Terminator armour) giving them the same wounds as a Hive Tyrant or a Bloodthirster - which can't be right?
As it stands terminators are veteran marines and no more than that - so why should we adjust Toughness, Strength & wounds to their base and not to other Marines? Because of their armour? They get a 2+ 5++ anyway to represent this. I now personally feel that if were true to the background they could reasonably be S&T 4(5) maybe with additional WS and or BS, even possibly a wound - but there's simply no room in the game as it is to make that improvement without suitably escalating other material.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/09/24 10:07:45
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/24 11:08:28
Subject: Better terminators?
|
 |
Thunderhawk Pilot Dropping From Orbit
|
Asherian Command wrote: Terminators are alot taller than their power armored brethren and have been serving for centuries.
Space Marines as they age get stronger, bigger, and alot more intellegent.
True to a point, because a marine wears Terminator does not mean that he has served the Chapter for centuries though, the fluff states that only acts of near suicidal bravery grants a marine access to the First Company and thus the right to wear TDA. There is no implication within the statement that length of service has any bearing on a marine's initiation into the First Company.
|
No trees were hurt in the making of this sig, however many electrons were disturbed.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/24 11:09:40
Subject: Better terminators?
|
 |
Bounding Assault Marine
|
the reason is if you collected SM with those stats your army would cosist of 5 marines for about 1500 points...
|
|
|
 |
 |
|