Drk_O's 40k Mafia Game: Dark Invasion. Game Over! Dark Eldar had their fun!

Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:

No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.

If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

**Emperors Faithful**

...oops. :*( (Again)

Vote: Vulkan

**Drk_Oblitr8r**

Emperors Faithful wrote:Also, I'm sure I unvoted Shas'o.

Anyway, now I'm going to vote for Vulkan. Just becuase he's a bit random, posting only to fill in his daily requirement, and not adding anything useful to the discussion.

Vulkan

lol, yes, you did. And it was right after a post about me missing something. I need to pay more attention.

**Drk_Oblitr8r**

I have replaced SideEffect, so it doesn't matter I'm an hour late for asking anyone if they want to join.

I'll post the_ferret his Role PM and he can start posting from that point.

**SagesStone**

It is pretty suspicious, I'm not going to vote for him though as I'm sure it will start off the "OMG BANDWAGUNZ" reaction. But, I guess like EF, an explanation would be nice

So that brings it up to four suspicious people so far. Some have atleast given an alright explanation others have sort of danced around it.

Maybe Drk_O really is one, after all only a Dark Kin would ignore important parts of the Eldar's investigation

**the_ferrett**

So what's the conspiracy theory currently going? I hope I can be as loyal a citizen as the innocent I am replacing.

**Emperors Faithful**

Oh hell no...

(wave of Guilt after remembering responsibility in the_ferrets demise)

@not_u: Who are those 4 that you find most suspicious?

**Drk_Oblitr8r**

I know it's a little soon, but it'll make it easier if I forget to put the_ferret in later...

Voting Count 5

- n0t_u ( - )
- Mekboy ( - )
- the_ferret ( - )
1- BishopGore (Mekboy)
2- Vulkan ( shas'o, Emperor's Faithful)
1- Arheiner (avantgarde)
- RustyKnight ( - )
- AvantGarde ( - )
- Lord-Loss ( - )
- Scarper ( - )
3- shas'o vera (RustyKnight, Arheiner, Scarper)
- Emperor's Faithful ( - )

Not Voting: n0t_u, the_ferret, BishopGore, Vulkan, Lord-Loss

If the deadline were to occur now, shas'o would meet their doom

With 12 Alive, 7 is needed for a Lynch...

Will it be you?

Voting Tracker = DayPhase1(in progress)
Emperor's Faithful voted for shas'o vera
Lord-Loss voted for EF
Mekboy voted for Scarper
Scarper voted for Mekboy
shas'o vera voted for Mekboy
BishopGore voted for avantegarde
Arheiner voted for Vulkan
BishopGore unvoted, then voted for EF
Vulkan voted for "dark_o"
Mekboy unvoted, then voted for BishopGore
Lord-Loss unvoted Emperor's Faithful
BishopGore unvoted Emperor's Faithful
Arheiner unvoted, voted for avantegarde
Scarper unvoted Mekboy
Arheiner unvoted avantegarde
Scarper voted for Vulkan
shas'o ver unvoted, voted for Vulkan
Lord-Loss voted for Shas'o
Rusty voted for Shas'o
Arheiner voted for Shas'o, under the condition it didn't lynch
Scarper unvoted Vulkan
Scarper voted for Shas'o
Lord-Loss unvoted Shas'o
Emperor's Faithful unvoted Shas'o
avantgarde voted for Arheiner
Emperor's Faithful voted for Vulkan

**Emperors Faithful**

Wow, I didn't realise there we already so many voting for Vulkan. Would Scarper and Shas'o like to explain thier suspicions?

Shas'o may be trying to save himself...but Scarper?

**SagesStone**

First post and he's already a little suspicious

Emperors Faithful wrote:Oh hell no...

(wave of Guilt after remembering responsibility in the_ferrets demise)

@not_u: Who are those 4 that you find most suspicious?

If I remember right as I might have reconsidered them before it, which is why I didn't put any names

Vulkan, Bishop (don't exactly remember why anymore so I guess he can be off the list for now), shas'o and I can't really remember the last one at the moment... >_>
It was either Scarper, Avent or Mekboy so for now it's "that suspicious guy"

**BishopGore**

Scarper seems suspicious, as apparently he gets 2 votes to our one! That must mean he's evil

I haven't voted for a while so I'm going to re-affirm my position and vote for Lord-Loss

Vote: Lord-Loss

I think LL is a lot like me and is trying to find things out about people, but he's been muddying waters quite a bit and I feel that makes him suspicious.

**shas'o vera**

he hardily ever says anything anyway, thats the reason why i voted for him.

**Emperors Faithful**

Actually, I now count two bandwagon attempts of yours Shas'o. First that deal with Mekboy and then you try one on Vulkan? And that was before there was really any opportunity to say the he wasn't posting enough. Really Shas'o, you're not helping your case here.

**shas'o vera**

well, would you rather have me not talking? and putting even more suspition on myself?

**BishopGore**

I kinda see where Shas'O is coming from with this whole 'bandwagon voting' thing.

If you don't have a clue who to vote for then you will be reading other people's opinions and then following along with the vote of the person who convinces you. If you jump on every person who is persuaded by arguments to vote then you're often targeting people who are persuaded by others, rather than anti-town.

The air of suspicion just makes people see clumsiness or confusion as proof of intent to kill everyone.

**shas'o vera**

thank you, see? Bishop understands what i mean.

**SagesStone**

It's just we're all looking for the subtle hints of evil, some harder than others.

**BishopGore**

Understandable, but Shas'O is taking a lot of heat for trying to enjoy himself and be involved.

Anyway, I'm not saying Shas'O isn't evil, but maybe there should be a little understanding is all I'm thinking.

Plus people should be picking on Lord-Loss more

**SagesStone**

Hmmm?

Well time and time again the random "free spirit" of the game usually turns out to be a bad guy trying to give of the illusion of incompetence. So it's only to be expected that the veterans would have a closer eye on people like that. Sometimes they're innocent though, but as they generally don't add much to the investigation people are more likely to take a chance when voting for them.

**the_ferrett**

(I doubt people require my experiments this time?)

Apart from the Shas bandwagon, I can't see anything apart from revenge voting. Spite will get us once again, you know.

**BishopGore**

But love will conquer all.

**Arheiner**

Love doesn't catch Dark Kin.

**the_ferrett**

(I'm randomly american again? Strange)

Neither does senseless drivvel Mr Arheiner.

**Arheiner**

I disagree, what Shas'o has said so far may very well prove your point wrong.

**the_ferrett**

That Bishop fellow seems to fire off like a scattergun - doesn't make him guilty, does put him up in the top 3 of my suspects.

**BishopGore**

the_ferrett wrote:That Bishop fellow seems to fire off like a scattergun - doesn't make him guilty, does put him up in the top 3 of my suspects.

Are you referring to my wishy washy comments of being on everyone's side, or my voting?

Please see my email a couple above to see why my voting may seem odd. If I wanted to vote for someone who already has votes I get accused of bandwagoning, agreeing with someone and unvoting is suspicious, dancing around randomly is suspicious, if I post anything which is not so in depth as to be barely comprehensible with sub notes and a group of proven references... you get my drift

And besides, isn't first day supposed to be a bit random? Testing the waters and such?

I'm slowly learning the ropes I hope, but probably still talking far too much.

**Arheiner**

So what does that make Shas'o?

**the_ferrett**

He's voted twice? I mean I'm yet to review the logs but its down to his wording as to how guilty he is.

**Arheiner**

Gore has only voted 3 times and on the first day it could be worse. Still, he could be a Dark Kin.

**the_ferrett**

Three is more than 2. Although 0 after day 2 is more suspicious than them all.

**Arheiner**

3 is more than 2, no s***. And what do you know about that, you've never survived day 1 so far?