Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/07/05 19:13:52
Subject: Re:Psychic Shooting Attacks, JotWW, Specific > General
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
nevermind.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/07/05 19:14:02
"'players must agree how they are going to select their armies, and if any restrictions apply to the number and type of models they can use."
This is an actual rule in the actual rulebook. Quit whining about how you can imagine someone's army touching you in a bad place and play by the actual rules.
Freelance Ontologist
When people ask, "What's the point in understanding everything?" they've just disqualified themselves from using questions and should disappear in a puff of paradox. But they don't understand and just continue existing, which are also their only two strategies for life. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/07/05 19:29:21
Subject: Re:Psychic Shooting Attacks, JotWW, Specific > General
|
 |
Wolf Guard Bodyguard in Terminator Armor
|
JBW wrote:I assume you folks have seen this. I don't always agree with the INAT but I have to say I agree this instance.
http://www.dakkadakka.com/s/up/INATFAQv5.0.pdf
◊SW.37H.07 – Q: Does Jaws of the World Wolf require
the psyker to make a ‘to hit’ roll to successfully use it?
A: No [clarification].
Hadn't seen it, but interesting.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/07/08 08:40:40
Subject: Psychic Shooting Attacks, JotWW, Specific > General
|
 |
Stealthy Space Wolves Scout
|
So going with the Inat FAQ you dont have to roll?
|
My purpose in life is to ruin yours. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/07/08 09:21:40
Subject: Psychic Shooting Attacks, JotWW, Specific > General
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
IF you follow INAT.
If you follow GW FAQs it seems to make it clear you DO need to roll, as you have a legal target and it is a PSA
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/07/19 22:37:29
Subject: Re:Psychic Shooting Attacks, JotWW, Specific > General
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
JBW wrote:I assume you folks have seen this. I don't always agree with the INAT but I have to say I agree this instance.
http://www.dakkadakka.com/s/up/INATFAQv5.0.pdf
◊SW.37H.07 – Q: Does Jaws of the World Wolf require
the psyker to make a ‘to hit’ roll to successfully use it?
A: No [clarification].
Glad they went the right way
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/07/19 23:09:56
Subject: Psychic Shooting Attacks, JotWW, Specific > General
|
 |
Irked Necron Immortal
|
If you fail to roll a hit, then the 'line' could be considered to miss and was off target - therefore missing the subsequent models
|
Strike Force Serpentine: 3000
Kabal of the Annihilated Souls: 3000
Red Corsairs: 2500
Knights of Titan: 2000
Waagh Wazzdakka 2000
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/07/20 00:27:36
Subject: Psychic Shooting Attacks, JotWW, Specific > General
|
 |
Stealthy Space Wolves Scout
|
Caranthir987 wrote:If you fail to roll a hit, then the 'line' could be considered to miss and was off target - therefore missing the subsequent models
It just happens to take a left turn at Albuquerque  .
|
My purpose in life is to ruin yours. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/07/20 01:25:16
Subject: Psychic Shooting Attacks, JotWW, Specific > General
|
 |
Rough Rider with Boomstick
USA
|
is that how they ruled it at Wargamescon?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/16 16:06:16
Subject: Re:Psychic Shooting Attacks, JotWW, Specific > General
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
Empath wrote:JBW wrote:I assume you folks have seen this. I don't always agree with the INAT but I have to say I agree this instance.
http://www.dakkadakka.com/s/up/INATFAQv5.0.pdf
◊SW.37H.07 – Q: Does Jaws of the World Wolf require
the psyker to make a ‘to hit’ roll to successfully use it?
A: No [clarification].
Glad they went the right way
I'm glad GW agreed too
down with the rule lawyers
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/01/16 16:07:05
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/16 16:07:51
Subject: Psychic Shooting Attacks, JotWW, Specific > General
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Yet they made Lash, for the first time since the book came out, roll to hit.
Apparently you can make the ground open up perfectly, but psychically making people dance can "miss"
Idiotic GW...oh, and now Infantry Platoons are one unit for everything, including DoW. Lovely
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/16 17:20:08
Subject: Re:Psychic Shooting Attacks, JotWW, Specific > General
|
 |
Speedy Swiftclaw Biker
Deep in the Heart of Texas!!!
|
Finally!!! The end of this pointless argument! And the over analyzing of something so simple. Specific rules outweigh the general. All son's of Russ rejoice! And same goes for the blood lance!!! Oh ya, and.....I told you so.
|
"You call yourselves true warriors. With Your palaces and fountains. Your medals and parades? I grasped my first axe when I was still in my birth-caul. I earned my first wolfskin whin I was Still a whelp. I've been fighting every single day of my life, son. Perhaps you're today's challenge, eh?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/17 00:06:01
Subject: Re:Psychic Shooting Attacks, JotWW, Specific > General
|
 |
Wolf Guard Bodyguard in Terminator Armor
|
merlin96 wrote:Finally!!! The end of this pointless argument! And the over analyzing of something so simple. Specific rules outweigh the general. All son's of Russ rejoice! And same goes for the blood lance!!! Oh ya, and.....I told you so.
This.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/17 16:22:05
Subject: Psychic Shooting Attacks, JotWW, Specific > General
|
 |
Incorporating Wet-Blending
|
Heh, I figured it would go this way, but the rulings on Lash and Warptime are very bizarre. I would have liked to see Lance, Jaws, and Lash all use hit rolls or none. But I guess the Chaos gods are fickle....
|
-James
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/17 17:07:42
Subject: Re:Psychic Shooting Attacks, JotWW, Specific > General
|
 |
Frightening Flamer of Tzeentch
|
It says every model touched by the line must take an initiatve check, therefore it doesn't require a roll to hit.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/01/17 17:08:12
Tournament record: (W/D/L)
Space wolves : 1/1/1
Dark Eldar : 6/0/1 (1 overall win)
Daemons :8/0/2 (1 overall win)
Normal games starting 5/11/12:
Dark Eldar 13/0/1
Daemons 32/1/1
Friends armies 1/0/0 |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/01/17 17:17:13
Subject: Psychic Shooting Attacks, JotWW, Specific > General
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Nothing you said there has any relation to rules.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/19 02:48:17
Subject: Psychic Shooting Attacks, JotWW, Specific > General
|
 |
Thunderhawk Pilot Dropping From Orbit
|
Can you use 2 psychic shooting attacks in the same turn?
If so can you target 2 different units?
Sorry for reviving the thread, didnt want to start up a new thread for one that was already up.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/19 02:49:49
Subject: Psychic Shooting Attacks, JotWW, Specific > General
|
 |
The Hive Mind
|
Only if you have special rules allowing it.
Again, only if you have special rules allowing it.
There's no reason to necro a 2 month old thread.
|
My beautiful wife wrote:Trucks = Carnifex snack, Tanks = meals. |
|
 |
 |
|