| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/03/06 20:56:21
Subject: Orks or Dark Eldar?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
Feasting on the souls of unworthy opponents
|
Hey folks!
I'm headed to the Southern California Slaughter in Space 2, and am undecided about whether to take Orks or Dark Eldar for this 2,000 point GT. Here's the missions, although they need some fine-tuning.
http://www.scgwl.com/downloads/SIS10.pdf
The tables are apparently going to be pretty heavily terrained, including LOS blocking stuff, meaning that my assault-oriented orks would be generally a better choice.
There's no doubt that armies are heavily mechanized these days, which my dark Eldar have a better answer to.
Deff Rollas work on vehicles without question now, so Orks can at least answer at close range...but having an army full of 36" lances is nice too.
Dark Eldar don't scale well past 1750-1850 - you don't get a whole lot of added killiness. For 2000 points, I've added Asdrubael Vect with his fast skimming land raider.
Asdrubael Vect is scary, but so is Ghazghkull Thraka, who leads my 2,000 point Orks.
I have much more experience with orks than with Dark Eldar.
I think Dark Eldar are potentially much more of a threat than Orks.
On the flip side, this GT has heavy LOS blocking terrain, while my DE are a glass cannon. If they can't see, they can't shoot.
I'm torn about what to do.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/03/07 00:28:53
Subject: Re:Orks or Dark Eldar?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Id say DE. Im basically a fanboy of the DE mostly, BUT they do have that whole "HA! dark eldar? psh never played against them, because they SUCK!" And thats a pretty powerful tool.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/03/07 02:47:26
Subject: Re:Orks or Dark Eldar?
|
 |
Revving Ravenwing Biker
|
Not a fan of that sportsmanship card! "My opponents army did not unreasonably overwhelm the hand-to-hand shooting phase" As a guard player if I am not overwhelming my opponent in the shooting phase I am doing something terribly wrong!
I agree with DE. Because maybe if they make strong showings at tournaments then they might actually get redone!
|
-Any terrain containing Sly Marbo is dangerous terrain.
-Sly Marbo once played an objective mission just to see what it was like to not meet every victory condition on his own.
-Sly Marbo bought a third edition rulebook just to play meat grinder as the attacker.
-Marbo doesn't need an Eldar farseer as an ally; his enemies are already doomed
-Sly Marbo was originally armed with a power weapon, but he dropped it while assaulting a space marine command squad just so his enemies could feel pain
-Sly Marbo still attacks the front armor value in assault, for pity's sake. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/03/07 03:02:50
Subject: Re:Orks or Dark Eldar?
|
 |
Battlewagon Driver with Charged Engine
Between Alpha and Omega, and a little to the left
|
What I'd like to know is what these "Choas Demons" and "Choas Space Marines" codexs are.
I'd go with Orks. assault in inevitable, so it best to pick something that can hit hard when it happens.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/03/07 03:54:43
Subject: Orks or Dark Eldar?
|
 |
Angry Chaos Agitator
Behind you
|
DE i guess
|
-1754pts wins: 3 losses: 2
-842 pts wins: 3 loses: 0
- 750 pts
DQ:90-S++G+MB+I+Pw40k07+ID++A+++/mWD356R++T(D)DM+
http://commorragh.proboards.com/index.cgi |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/03/07 08:09:25
Subject: Orks or Dark Eldar?
|
 |
Arch Magos w/ 4 Meg of RAM
|
Dark Eldar. Most players don't know what to do (gak, I don't even know what to do), and that is an advantage you can't take lightly.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/03/07 15:49:06
Subject: Re:Orks or Dark Eldar?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
Feasting on the souls of unworthy opponents
|
Lot of DE votes here - I should have made it a poll. ><
As for people not knowing what to do, I'm going to a GT, not a local tournament; I'm not sure I can count on getting an advantage for people not knowing what my army does.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/03/07 16:03:35
Subject: Orks or Dark Eldar?
|
 |
Rough Rider with Boomstick
|
You see, most people, even those who go into tourneys, won't know too much about them. They might have fought them once or twice, but DE are very mysterious. If they only fought one person, and that person uses them way differently than you, then you could take a serious advantage. Anyways, you do want more stuff, right?
|
I have 2000 points of , called the Crimson Leaves.
I will soon be starting WoC, devoted to
I have 500 points of , in blueberry and ice cream (light grey and light blue) flavour. From the fictional world Darkheim.
DarkHound wrote:Stop it you. Core has changed. It's no longer about nations, ideologies or ethnicity. It's an endless series of proxy battles, fought by mercenaries and machines. Core, and its consumption of life, has become a well-oiled machine. Core has changed. ID tagged soldiers carry ID tagged weapons, use ID tagged gear. Nanomachines inside their bodies enhance and regulate their abilities. Genetic control. Information control. Emotion control. Battlefield control. Everything is monitored, and kept under control. Core has changed. The age of deterrence has become the age of control. All in the name of averting catastrophe from weapons of mass destruction. And he who controls the battlefield, controls history. Core has changed. When the battlefield is under total control, war... becomes routine.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/03/07 18:50:24
Subject: Orks or Dark Eldar?
|
 |
Ladies Love the Vibro-Cannon Operator
|
I'd pick DE as they are a bit unusual at those events.
|
Former moderator 40kOnline
Lanchester's square law - please obey in list building!
Illumini: "And thank you for not finishing your post with a " " I'm sorry, but after 7200 's that has to be the most annoying sign-off ever."
Armies: Eldar, Necrons, Blood Angels, Grey Knights; World Eaters (30k); Bloodbound; Cryx, Circle, Cyriss |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/03/08 22:25:51
Subject: Orks or Dark Eldar?
|
 |
Slaanesh Chosen Marine Riding a Fiend
Inside a pretty, pretty pain cave... won't you come inside?
|
See what the DE can do.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/03/14 22:13:45
Subject: Re:Orks or Dark Eldar?
|
 |
Lone Wolf Sentinel Pilot
|
KingCracker wrote:Id say DE. Im basically a fanboy of the DE mostly, BUT they do have that whole "HA! dark eldar? psh never played against them, because they SUCK!" And thats a pretty powerful tool.
That's how I was...was I wrong. So horribly wrong.
Anyways, DE sounds like a good choice.
|
2000 pts |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/03/14 22:28:56
Subject: Orks or Dark Eldar?
|
 |
Nihilistic Necron Lord
The best State-Texas
|
DE
You said yourself that you've never been beaten with them, so put them to a real test.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/03/15 02:27:53
Subject: Orks or Dark Eldar?
|
 |
Committed Chaos Cult Marine
|
Take DE, see how they run. No one should be surprised, but 3/5 opponents will be anyways
|
Check out my blog at:http://ironchaosbrute.blogspot.com.
Vivano crudelis exitus.
Da Boss wrote:No no, Richard Dawkins arresting the Pope is inherently hilarious. It could only be funnier if when it happens, His Holiness exclaims "Rats, it's the Fuzz! Let's cheese it!" and a high speed Popemobile chase ensues. |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|