| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
2009/05/08 20:00:32
Subject: Re:Daemons are OP, Yes or No?
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Opulent Porridge?
|
|
|
 |
|
2009/05/08 20:46:37
Subject: Re:Daemons are OP, Yes or No?
|
|
Drew_Riggio
Vancouver, British Columbia.
|
 ?
I can't be the only one here who remembers the late eighties.
|
|
|
|
|
2009/05/08 21:45:45
Subject: Daemons are OP, Yes or No?
|
|
Fixture of Dakka
|
DAMN TB is back in the house !!!
G
PS (OP is an idiot)
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009/05/09 03:31:45
Subject: Daemons are OP, Yes or No?
|
|
Serious Squig Herder
|
Optimal Penetrotion.
|
blarg |
|
|
|
|
2009/05/09 03:38:59
Subject: Daemons are OP, Yes or No?
|
|
Grey Knight Psionic Stormraven Pilot
|
No no no no no... It is a tech question.
Oracle Products.
|
 
  REPENT! For tomorrow you die!
"I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be." - Douglas Adams |
|
|
|
|
2009/05/13 03:30:49
Subject: Re:Daemons are OP, Yes or No?
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Optimally pulchrudinous? Yes, they are, because the Chaos gods love all of their children. 
|
|
|
|
|
2009/05/13 03:55:31
Subject: Daemons are OP, Yes or No?
|
|
Serious Squig Herder
|
Overly Psychotic.
|
blarg |
|
|
|
|
2009/05/13 03:56:30
Subject: Re:Daemons are OP, Yes or No?
|
|
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Triggerbaby wrote:I can't be the only one here who remembers the late eighties.
Still trying to forget.
|
|
|
|
|
2009/05/13 04:04:23
Subject: Daemons are OP, Yes or No?
|
|
Slippery Scout Biker
|
I thought it was OG, original gangsta.
|
|
|
|
|
2009/05/13 04:04:49
Subject: Daemons are OP, Yes or No?
|
|
Slippery Scout Biker
|
Sorry but my Mac doesn't play well with routers.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/05/13 04:06:21
|
|
|
|
|
2009/05/13 04:05:32
Subject: Daemons are OP, Yes or No?
|
|
Slippery Scout Biker
|
I wish Apple would fix the issue but wifi with Mac Tiger isn't the best. It drops the signal and takes minutes to reconnect.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/05/13 04:07:05
|
|
|
|
|
2009/05/13 04:25:04
Subject: Daemons are OP, Yes or No?
|
|
Tunneling Trygon
|
I think he meant OPP. And I'm down with it.
I can't be the only one here who remembers the late eighties.
Does 1991 count?
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009/05/13 04:31:14
Subject: Re:Daemons are OP, Yes or No?
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
*Current meatspace coordinates redacted*
|
I think that Ordinary People here, who spend their Over-Plentitude of spare time ridiculing the Original Poster ,who wanted to ask a question about Oval Pizzas, are Obligated Plainly to the Omni-Present and Oh-so-Patient members of our Moderating crew. (Who are Overlong, Possibly, in their absence).
Oh Poo, I seem to have Obviated Publicly my Original Plan to remain Obfuscated Particulary amidst this Oratory Pasting.
OK, I'm done now. Really ...
Oviod Pantaloons.
Now I'm done.
|
He knows that I know and you know that he actually doesn't know the rules at all. |
|
|
|
|
2009/05/13 04:44:03
Subject: Daemons are OP, Yes or No?
|
|
Homicidal Veteran Blood Angel Assault Marine
|
Cheese Elemental wrote:That's why you can take 9-man psyker squads.
which only applies to 1 race, whereas the DH IQ with Mystics can be fielded in armies from 8 different codexes. I'd say the IQ/Mystic is the more common threat, and Kairos dimishes how effective it is. Once Daemon lists have adapted to the IG book, Choirs will be less of a problem for them as well since they should be able to find it with a Bolt or Tongue when they fall on turn 1.
|
|
|
|
|
2009/05/13 06:11:02
Subject: Daemons are OP, Yes or No?
|
|
Arch Magos w/ 4 Meg of RAM
|
Orange Plushies
Over-priced Punishers
Orgasmic Pe-.. wait...
On topic, no, GW perfectly balances everything they make and do. Plenty of playtesting went into this, and it was in no way a bad idea.
For full disclosures sake, I'm a Chaos Marines player.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009/05/13 13:02:51
Subject: Re:Daemons are OP, Yes or No?
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Ork Players?
|
"There's a difference between bein' a smartboy and bein' a smart git, Gimzod." - Rogue Skwadron, the Big Push
My Current army lineup |
|
|
|
|
2009/05/13 14:32:07
Subject: Daemons are OP, Yes or No?
|
|
Guard Heavy Weapon Crewman
Antwerp, Capitol of the Universe
|
Observation Post?
|
Nemo me impune lacessit
|
|
|
|
|
2009/05/13 14:49:46
Subject: Daemons are OP, Yes or No?
|
|
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Organic Produce
|
http://www.military-sf.com/MilitaryScienceFiction.htm
“Attention citizens! Due to the financial irresponsibility and incompetence of your leaders, Cobra has found it necessary to restructure your nation’s economy. We have begun by eliminating the worthless green paper, which your government has deceived you into believing is valuable. Cobra will come to your rescue and, out of the ashes, will arise a NEW ORDER!” |
|
|
|
|
2009/05/13 17:09:53
Subject: Daemons are OP, Yes or No?
|
|
Incorporating Wet-Blending
|
Optically Perverse?
|
Mannahnin wrote:A lot of folks online (and in emails in other parts of life) use pretty mangled English. The idea is that it takes extra effort and time to write properly, and they’d rather save the time. If you can still be understood, what’s the harm? While most of the time a sloppy post CAN be understood, the use of proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling is generally seen as respectable and desirable on most forums. It demonstrates an effort made to be understood, and to make your post an easy and pleasant read. By making this effort, you can often elicit more positive responses from the community, and instantly mark yourself as someone worth talking to.
insaniak wrote: Every time someone threatens violence over the internet as a result of someone's hypothetical actions at the gaming table, the earth shakes infinitisemally in its orbit as millions of eyeballs behind millions of monitors all roll simultaneously.
|
|
|
|
|
2009/05/13 20:53:54
Subject: Daemons are OP, Yes or No?
|
|
Drop Trooper with Demo Charge
|
Oxygen parties
|
"No pity. No remorse. No fear." - Black Templar battle cry
"Heroes of Armageddon! You have withstood the evil savagery of the Orks, and they have nothing left for you to fear. So raise high the black banners of vengeance - now is our time." - Commissar Yarrick
 Check the guard blog: http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/344305.page |
|
|
|
|
2009/05/13 21:33:32
Subject: Daemons are OP, Yes or No?
|
|
[DCM]
Sentient OverBear
|
I think I actually had that shirt in the late 80's, Triggerbaby (which made me a total poseur, certainly).
This is almost as fun as the "I" threads on Dakka of old.
But seriously, Daemons are a top-tier army, but not overpowered.
|
DQ:70S++G+++M+B++I+Pw40k94+ID+++A++/sWD178R+++T(I)DM+++
Trust me, no matter what damage they have the potential to do, single-shot weapons always flatter to deceive in 40k. Rule #1
- BBAP
|
|
|
|
|
2009/05/13 21:46:21
Subject: Daemons are OP, Yes or No?
|
|
1st Lieutenant
|
optimus prime?
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009/05/13 23:26:47
Subject: Daemons are OP, Yes or No?
|
|
[DCM]
Sentient OverBear
|
Reaver83 wrote:optimus prime?
Check out Chrispy's post on the previous page.
D'oh!
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/05/13 23:26:55
DQ:70S++G+++M+B++I+Pw40k94+ID+++A++/sWD178R+++T(I)DM+++
Trust me, no matter what damage they have the potential to do, single-shot weapons always flatter to deceive in 40k. Rule #1
- BBAP
|
|
|
|
|
2009/05/14 07:19:37
Subject: Re:Daemons are OP, Yes or No?
|
|
Been Around the Block
|
Other Posters.
No, that's mighty ][ of you to even ask that.
|
|
|
|
|
2009/05/16 00:41:44
Subject: Daemons are OP, Yes or No?
|
|
Incorporating Wet-Blending
|
Organically Produced.
|
Mannahnin wrote:A lot of folks online (and in emails in other parts of life) use pretty mangled English. The idea is that it takes extra effort and time to write properly, and they’d rather save the time. If you can still be understood, what’s the harm? While most of the time a sloppy post CAN be understood, the use of proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling is generally seen as respectable and desirable on most forums. It demonstrates an effort made to be understood, and to make your post an easy and pleasant read. By making this effort, you can often elicit more positive responses from the community, and instantly mark yourself as someone worth talking to.
insaniak wrote: Every time someone threatens violence over the internet as a result of someone's hypothetical actions at the gaming table, the earth shakes infinitisemally in its orbit as millions of eyeballs behind millions of monitors all roll simultaneously.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
