Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/19 08:30:03
Subject: scorpions or banshees?- the age old question
|
 |
Devastating Dark Reaper
|
ive been playing for a while now but as most of my games are against guard and tau ive never really had the need for an assault unit. however after playing a couple of games at my local store (for once), ive come to release that i need some form of counter-attack (this occured mainly because of a particularly nasty unit of outflanking genestealers).
firstly id rather not use harlies for no particular reason other than i dont want to, which leaves me with two options scorpions or banshees, but which?
now im sure we all know the story; banshees are good against guys with high sv's (providing the unit is doomed), scorps good against tons of light infantry, so please refrain stating that (ive had quite enough of hearing it while "googling" the subject). what i am looking for is a unit that isnt bad at taking on both types in a counter-attack role. so i guess im asking something roughly along the lines of- which unit is more diverse (something eldar arent exactly famous for). are scorpions going to handle taking on MEQ's better than banshees tackling orks and gaunts?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/19 09:29:28
Subject: scorpions or banshees?- the age old question
|
 |
Renegade Inquisitor with a Bound Daemon
Tied and gagged in the back of your car
|
Scorpions are much more survivable and much easier to deliver.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/19 10:01:27
Subject: scorpions or banshees?- the age old question
|
 |
Stern Iron Priest with Thrall Bodyguard
|
Could you get some "count as" harlies?
Because I think thats what you are looking for, (provided You make the assault, they could actually equal the genestealers).
Harlies can get 5 power weapon attacks at S4 from their master and a bunch of rending backup attacks (also at S4), with an overall A value to equal the scorpions.
Otherwise you seem to know the difference between scorps and banshees already. I would chose scorps against most opponents exept marines, and harlies if I have lots of points to spare Automatically Appended Next Post: Add:
The harlies is about the only unit that is somewhat allaround in the codex.
Also: Im sorry to bring up the harlies after you specificly said you didnt want them. I just wanted to make a point that they are probably what you would need (yes, they can even go up against mech with their fusion pistols, so...)
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/12/19 10:07:03
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/19 14:29:12
Subject: Re:scorpions or banshees?- the age old question
|
 |
Swift Swooping Hawk
|
Scorpions = lots of S4 attacks that allow save, however equipping the Exarch with a claw(power fist) allows him to ignore saves at the cost of initiative, so you can still take on marines and the like. However if your mainly worried about stealers, the stealers will be going first anyway, so you'll loose alot of scorps to rending. Against stealers i'd go for banshees, the power weapons are wasted but the I10 should prove very usefull.
Although i'd agree with Fayric, some counts as harlies would be best.
They cost more points, but are harder to kill with shooting due to VoT and can get around quickly on foot due to their flip belts.
If charging stealers, they also attack first, with slightly more power (rending) than the scorps, they can also take on marines pretty nicely.
|
WLD: 221 / 6 / 5
5 Dragons 2011: 2nd Overall
DT:80+S++G++M+B+I+Pw40k96++D++A++/mR+++T(T)DM+
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/19 15:34:39
Subject: scorpions or banshees?- the age old question
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
The Eldar Elite slot is Fire Dragons and Harlequins. Banshees and Scorpions are neither.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/19 16:31:41
Subject: scorpions or banshees?- the age old question
|
 |
Utilizing Careful Highlighting
|
I saw the title and thought HALO, seriously though i say banshees.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/19 18:49:03
Subject: scorpions or banshees?- the age old question
|
 |
Arch Magos w/ 4 Meg of RAM
|
Banshees fast and low!
I like Scorpions. Easier to deliver to the enemy, more durable and S4 means you're less reliant on your Farseer.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/19 19:49:55
Subject: Re:scorpions or banshees?- the age old question
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Neither can do anything useful, realistically.
Banshees require a far too easy to disrupt, overly expensive transport, and a stupid foe willing to set up your charge.
Scorpions can either use the above, or a different, but still stupid foe willing to set up your infiltrating charge.
Either way, they both can't do anything useful unless your opponent lets you.
|
"'players must agree how they are going to select their armies, and if any restrictions apply to the number and type of models they can use."
This is an actual rule in the actual rulebook. Quit whining about how you can imagine someone's army touching you in a bad place and play by the actual rules.
Freelance Ontologist
When people ask, "What's the point in understanding everything?" they've just disqualified themselves from using questions and should disappear in a puff of paradox. But they don't understand and just continue existing, which are also their only two strategies for life. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/19 19:55:43
Subject: scorpions or banshees?- the age old question
|
 |
Sneaky Striking Scorpion
New Iberia, Louisiana, USA
|
Depending on the list, the set-up might not be so hard. He mentioned playing Guard and Tau, and if they mostly play their armies static, then there's not much issue with getting them INTO assault.
I personally use Scorpions and have had mixed success with them. The one thing they've always done is survive - never had a unit fall back or get wiped out in around 4 or 5 games with Eldar. If you want survivability, nothing beats Scorpions, and I also like them because they glance vehicles without having to buy a Harlequin's Kiss.
|
DS:80+S+G++M---B--IPw40k10#+D++A/eWD-R+T(D)DM+
Current Race - Eldar
Record with Eldar 1-0-2 (W-L-D)
Last game was a DRAW against DARK ELDAR.
I shake your hand and say "Good Game". How are you a good sport? |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/19 20:23:08
Subject: scorpions or banshees?- the age old question
|
 |
Unrelenting Rubric Terminator of Tzeentch
|
Striking Scorpions versus Howling Banshees, Ten men, Exarch with Executioner/Scorpion Claw, Charging, against GEQ (MEQ)
Scorpions- 12.89 (5.22) Kills
Banshees-10.67 (5.83) Kills
with Fortune
Scorpions-16.81 (7.09) Kills
Banshees-15.44 (9.28) Kills
---
I'd probably side with the Scorpions. Their increased toughness coupled with superior performance against GEQ's and passable performance against MEQ's make them, in my eyes, the superior all rounder choice. If Genestealers are really your problem, Banshees might be the better choice due to striking first, but I'd just reccomend shooting genestealers.
|
DR:90S+G++MB+I+Pw40k07++D++A++/eWD-R+++T(Ot)DM+
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/19 21:39:21
Subject: Re:scorpions or banshees?- the age old question
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
Getting my broom incase there is shenanigans.
|
As said, the best is Harlequins.
But you can break down Banshees/Scorpions argument many ways but I prefer Scorpions.
Banshees
Pros: Fleet, Strike First, Power Weapons
Cons: Strength 3
Scorpions
Pros: Strength 4, Lots of Attacks, 3+ Save
Cons: No fleet, Only Exarch has power weapon
To me it is durability+number of attacks that make them good against both horde and MEQ units.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/19 22:16:14
Subject: scorpions or banshees?- the age old question
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
You dont want to assult genestealers you want to shoot them.
As far as an assult unit Shining Spears are the best in the Eldar Codex, they have an 18' assult range, and str 6 power weapons. A squad of 3 Shining Spears with an Autarch on a jetbike will whipe out any squad you need whiped out, and then dont forget they have the power to leave CC with an initiative check.
Seer Councils are also better, on Jetbike or not. A full council has re-rollable 4++ saves and 3 attacks that wound on a 2+. On Jetbikes these arnt even fair.
As far as Howling Banshees and Striking scorpians Id go with Howling Banshees with doom support. Their Init10 that ignores cover is insane, and with doom their power weapons are just nasty.
Honestly I dont think Banshees or Scorpians have their place in an eldar list, but thats just mho.
|
5000+ pts. Eldar 2500pts
"The only thing that match's the Eldar's firepower, is their arrogance".
8th General at Alamo GT 2011.
Tied 2nd General Alamo GT 2012
Top General Lower Bracket Railhead 2011
Top General Railhead 2012
# of Local Tournaments Won: 4
28-9-1 In Tournaments As Eldar.
Maintained a 75% Win Ratio As Eldar in 5th Edition GT's.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/12/20 01:56:29
Subject: Re:scorpions or banshees?- the age old question
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
I think the best aspect to use greatly depends on your army. If I decide I want to use a counter charge unit, I generally look to balance out any weaknesses in my army. For example, I currently take loads of scatter lasers, which leaves me only a few guns to take out tanks let alone marines. For this reason, I'll take banshees. If however I'm running lots of wraithguard and fire dragons, I'll take scorpions.
Hope this helps.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|