Switch Theme:

GW 40k "Battle for Vedros" sets price and content details  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Swamp Troll




San Diego

 insaniak wrote:
 MLaw wrote:

Here's the thing.. I don't agree with the move. Everyone is replying by attacking my position and not defending GW's decision. I've heard no valid reasons to put out a kit t hat needs to be allowed to die in the comfort of it's home surrounded by loved ones only how stupid I am for questioning GW's infinite wisdom.

Ah. So the problem is that you're taking disagreement as a personal attack.

I'd stop doing that, frankly.


You don't like these kits? That's fine. Others do, or don't see a problem with them being available as cheap starters, or have these models in their collections and so welcome the opportunity to buy more matching kits to expand their army.







Automatically Appended Next Post:
 MLaw wrote:
I won't bother responding to the rest of your snark because you're clearly not interested in discussing this so much as just picking apart posts like they're entries in a rulebook or something. That and you didn't even bother reading my reply to someone else asking what I meant by "considered official".

I suspect that you missed my point. You seem to be looking for some sort of 'official' stamp that simply doesn't exist where GW is concerned. Outside of specific tournament rulings (which are uncommon, from my expetience) any of GW's models or rules are as 'official' as players want them to be.


Slow down just a second. I'm not taking anything as a personal attack. I'm saying that instead of addressing the release and the decision (and why it's a good idea to re-release a kit that was outmoded) people are attacking my position. I don't mean anyone's hurting my feelings or calling me names or any of that silliness. I'm saying that people are responding to my position instead of what my position is about. So, as an example, if I said I really hate the wings from Papa Johns, and the response I get is "so what you just think they shouldn't sell wings because you don't like them" then that neither addresses what I dislike about them or why their wings are or are not bad. I know conversations can be hard but when people would rather talk about the people saying the things being said rather than the subject of the conversation then not everyone is having the same conversation... which is where I think we are... and why I have sounded like a broken record for my last 4 or 5 posts to this thread...

EDIT: As to missing your point.. again.. I already discussed that.. I had NOT seen the packaging and did not know if they were releasing as GW products or Citadel or something else entirely. As was my understanding, they were meant for big box retail and not hobby shop. This was already addressed and I did also offer up that unlike you I have had experiences where TOs have ruled against old models when there was a major difference in size between the models. Again though.. this is going back to what I'm saying and not what I'm talking about.. Why do people think this is a good move for GW vs investing in a new entry level kit that is more up to their modern standards? Look at the Hellbrute, AoBR Dreadnought, Deffkopta, etc.. YES, I get that it's cheaper to do this but that doesn't mean it's better..

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/12/13 22:12:21


   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka






Does anyone know where these are being sold in Northwest Florida? I'd like a couple of these for starter Gorkamorka gangs.



At Games Workshop, we believe that how you behave does matter. We believe this so strongly that we have written it down in the Games Workshop Book. There is a section in the book where we talk about the values we expect all staff to demonstrate in their working lives. These values are Lawyers, Guns and Money. 
   
Made in us
Swamp Troll




San Diego

 Grot 6 wrote:
Does anyone know where these are being sold in Northwest Florida? I'd like a couple of these for starter Gorkamorka gangs.

If all else fails, they're on Amazon

   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut





Beaumont, CA USA

 MLaw wrote:

Slow down just a second. I'm not taking anything as a personal attack. I'm saying that instead of addressing the release and the decision (and why it's a good idea to re-release a kit that was outmoded) people are attacking my position. I don't mean anyone's hurting my feelings or calling me names or any of that silliness. I'm saying that people are responding to my position instead of what my position is about.


They've done both. You've ignored all the points about being cheap intro kits for new players being sold in stores that 40K normally would not carry Warhammer, or from existing players that like having a cheaper option around, or from people that look at those old kits and remember how much fun they were and pick one up just for kicks. You also state that companies don't reuse old assets just because they have newer versions of those assets. Bandai still sells many of their older style Gundam kits even though they have newer ones that are better designed because the pricepoints are different and they cater to people of different skill levels. They even have different grades for their kit for this exact reason. The reason people are arguing against your stance is because YOU think the kits should not exist because YOU don't like them and YOU think they're ugly and too small, just because there's a more detailed option. But almost everyone else agrees that the old kits being around again is good because it offers choice. New players will look at those kits and think they're as cool as we did when they came out. Then they'll loook around the internet, see there's newer and better looking kits, but also MUCH more expensive kits. Most tween/teens are smart enough to know the difference between an entry level kit and a high end kit. That Perfect Grade Gundam kit is always WAY more awesome than the High Grade kit, but it's also $200 instead of $20, and if I've never really build a model before, that PG kit is gonna do nothing but frustrate me whereas a HG kit can be built in an afternoon and still look pretty darn cool as I fly it around and make pew-pew-pew noises.

The fact that there's 14 pages of people mostly saying "these are cool, where can I get them? When are they coming to my area?" should give you an idea that maybe there's some good value in these existing,even if you don't like them. In fact, the opinion "Wow, I think that thing is absolutely dreadfull, I can't imagine anybody liking that but clearly people do, so whatever floats your boat, I suppose" covers 90% of all movies, TV, music and toys I see nowadays

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/12/13 22:34:59


~Kalamadea (aka ember)
My image gallery 
   
Made in us
Swamp Troll




San Diego

 Kalamadea wrote:
 MLaw wrote:

Slow down just a second. I'm not taking anything as a personal attack. I'm saying that instead of addressing the release and the decision (and why it's a good idea to re-release a kit that was outmoded) people are attacking my position. I don't mean anyone's hurting my feelings or calling me names or any of that silliness. I'm saying that people are responding to my position instead of what my position is about.


They've done both. You've ignored all the points about being cheap intro kits for new players being sold in stores that 40K normally would not carry Warhammer, or from existing players that like having a cheaper option around, or from people that look at those old kits and remember how much fun they were and pick one up just for kicks. You also state that companies don't reuse old assets just because they have newer versions of those assets. Bandai still sells many of their older style Gundam kits even though they have newer ones that are better designed because the pricepoints are different and they cater to people of different skill levels. They even have different grades for their kit for this exact reason. The reason people are arguing against your stance is because YOU think the kits should not exist because YOU don't like them and YOU think they're ugly and too small, just because there's a more detailed option. But almost everyone else agrees that the old kits being around again is good because it offers choice. New players will look at those kits and think they're as cool as we did when they came out. Then they'll loook around the internet, see there's newer and better looking kits, but also MUCH more expensive kits. Most tween/teens are smart enough to know the difference between an entry level kit and a high end kit. That Perfect Grade Gundam kit is always WAY more awesome than the High Grade kit, but it's also $200 instead of $20, and if I've never really build a model before, that PG kit is gonna do nothing but frustrate me whereas a HG kit can be built in an afternoon and still look pretty darn cool as I fly it around and make pew-pew-pew noises.

The fact that there's 14 pages of people mostly saying "these are cool, where can I get them? When are they coming to my area?" should give you an idea that maybe there's some good value in these existing,even if you don't like them. In fact, the opinion "Wow, I think that thing is absolutely dreadfull, I can't imagine anybody liking that but clearly people do, so whatever floats your boat, I suppose" covers 90% of all movies, TV, music and toys I see nowadays


14 pages of people oohing and ahhing over GW is pretty normal for this place.. They were sending out little lapel pin looking things and keychains and people were flipping their lids on that.. so sorry that 14 pages of people complimenting GW over a release I don't care for didn't sway my opinion..
The bit on the Gundam kits is the type of discussion I was looking for though and that offers valid points. However, I think it would have done them far more good to have invested in modernizing this kit at least a little. I really don't understand why people think that's a bad idea. Yeah it would have cost them a little money. It would have also drastically extended the life of the kit and also opened the market for it to more than just nostalgia and broke kids.. Again.. I am not saying there's no place for an entry level kit... As to the size, I honestly don't think the majority of the people who are happy about this realize how small they are.. or how short. Whatever, I think it's pretty obvious I'm barking up the wrong tree here. Oooh.. I'll go gripe to some Mantic players so they can feel like they might win me over

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/12/13 22:42:54


   
Made in de
Stealthy Space Wolves Scout




Germany, Frankfurt area

 MLaw wrote:
 CURNOW wrote:
He seems to have a bee in his bonnet about people using old models when there are newer ones released. And also seems to think its some kind of scam run buy GW to trick kids in to buying a "inferior " kit ,

Personally I love the old trucks and how easy they were to convert up .

Now if they did a drastic plastics I would be all over them


Seriously.. how does nobody else understand this?
If you own a company and you replace inferior, older products with something newer, the idea is to allow the newer products to become the face of your company's products and capabilities. Re-releasing inferior products (yes they are inferior in almost every conceivable way) is not something done by 99% of businesses. Why put the resources into it at all? If they want to make cheap starter kits then make cheap starter kits. Ork players have a hard enough time with being taken seriously, now on top of all else, we'll have this stuff floating around again..

Here's the thing.. I don't agree with the move. Everyone is replying by attacking my position and not defending GW's decision. I've heard no valid reasons to put out a kit that needs to be allowed to die in the comfort of it's home surrounded by loved ones only how stupid I am for questioning GW's infinite wisdom.

I honestly don't see where I attacked anyone's position.

For me it makes a lot of sense to release these kits from a business perspective:

1) the cost is tiny compared to new kits
2) way easier to build than full kits
3) more robust, so better to withstands kids playing
4) are sold in toy stores to directly compete with plane models, toys and games, so have to be cheaper than normal kits

Sure, if I would still play my Orks I would have replaced my old trukks. But I wouldn't have moaned that I'm forced to spend money. Because you don't have to get the latest kit if you don't want to. GW is expensive as hell, but so are all hobbies. If I see what my friends spend on their hobbies I always get big eyes. Hell, a movie with the family costs more than a Start Collecting box.



edit: also going for a completely new distribution channel is highly risky. It would not have been a smart move to invest in new kits for this.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/12/13 22:49:29


 
   
Made in us
Gargantuan Gargant





New Bedford, MA USA

My Ork army still has had all these Vedros Ork vehicles in it since they were released in Gorkamorka.

Old model kits are re-released all the time. The manufacturer gets to use an existing mold, getting an additional return on a previous investment, and cash in people getting the warm fuzzies for models they remember from 20 years ago. It's a good move.


   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka





Runnin up on ya.

Personally, I think it's great from both a business and hobby (not conflating GW with being its own hobby but hobby as in model-building/painting) perspective.

Business:
-Cheap and quick to get out.
-Diversifies product line.
-Branches out into currently untapped markets...or at least has a potential to if these kits start showing up at Hobby Lobby or Michaels or something similar.

Hobby:
-Simple, easy to put-together and paint kits for beginning modelers.
-Offers a simple game for kids to cut their teeth on rather than just lining up green army men and making pew-pew noises like I did when I was a kid.

MLAW,

I get what you're saying and agree in some respects but for once I don't think GW's in the wrong here. I think that, in their misguided way, they're attempting to broaden their corporate exposure by attempting to actually attract the customers that they have said are their target for years, kids.

If you seriously want to turn a kid off of 40k, hand them one of the fiddly, multi-pose so-and-so models that GW makes so well. If you want to attract kids, make colored plastics that are simple to put together and easy to paint then offer free rules for a simplified version of 40k. They cut their teeth on 40k-lite and then maybe eventually work their way into the larger game.

Six mistakes mankind keeps making century after century: Believing that personal gain is made by crushing others; Worrying about things that cannot be changed or corrected; Insisting that a thing is impossible because we cannot accomplish it; Refusing to set aside trivial preferences; Neglecting development and refinement of the mind; Attempting to compel others to believe and live as we do 
   
Made in us
Gargantuan Gargant





New Bedford, MA USA

My friend bought a Harlequin army for his daughter. She's 16 years old and she took one look at how many fidly bits they were in and basically refused to play until her father assembled the army for her.

Easy to assemble models have an appeal.

   
Made in au
Owns Whole Set of Skullz Techpriests






Versteckt in den Schatten deines Geistes.

 MLaw wrote:
I don't think you are reading or understanding what I am saying. I clearly mentioned kids. Kids are the only ones who WOULD be fooled by it. The reason I don't like this approach is because specifically it seems like it's aimed at entry level kids who are new to the hobby. Being a father of two children in that exact target group I am extremely tuned into this (if not a bit over sensitive)


No one's being 'fooled' by anything. No one is attempting to 'fool' anyone.

Industrial Insanity - My Terrain Blog
"GW really needs to understand 'Less is more' when it comes to AoS." - Wha-Mu-077

 
   
Made in fi
Locked in the Tower of Amareo





 MLaw wrote:
I stand corrected on the date but I think you're stretching semantics to claim they're not trying to treat this as a new release. For the uninitiated they have no clue that it's leftovers microwaved and being served up as cuisine.. The pricing tells the real story. It wouldn't have been hard at all for them to at least update the driver and gunner on either of those kits. Even if it was just to re-use the crew from the new Trukk kit or the Stompa crew or whatever. I suppose bits sellers will be busy supplying alternatives :/


Not hard no. Just costs as much as updating whole thing basically thus invalidating the point. They would then have to be sold for same price as current ork vehicles or even higher thus making models unsuitable for cheap gateway product thus making update pointless in the first place.

2024 painted/bought: 109/109 
   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka






I am fully interested in the ork side for ready made gangs. I think it was a good idea to pitch these for the smaller audience, as they are one of the more well spouted ideas about good cheap GW gateway drugs. We have been asking for them for years, and these sets would be additionally served with one for each army.



At Games Workshop, we believe that how you behave does matter. We believe this so strongly that we have written it down in the Games Workshop Book. There is a section in the book where we talk about the values we expect all staff to demonstrate in their working lives. These values are Lawyers, Guns and Money. 
   
Made in us
Ultramarine Land Raider Pilot on Cruise Control





Macragge

I hope this is the correct thread to post this in, but I thought I'd share a few pics of one of the build and paint kits I got my hands on. I
Box Art:
Spoiler:


As was said before it comes moulded in colored plastic, and interestingly, there is no base color included, so I guess you are supposed to paint directly over top the model without priming? Also, definitely marketed at modellers?collectors as it comes with a sheet laying out where to display all the various pieces in the kit to form a diorama.
Also, there is no mention of 40k the game. No rules like the vedros kits. The leaflet included mentions only more kits to collect and references the website. FInally, the art appears to differ from most 40k kits in that it is clearly painted using only the paints available in the kit itself, and not a 'eavy metal masterpiece.

Box Contents:
Spoiler:


Display Mat
Spoiler:


hope this is informative.
cheers

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/12/18 13:31:10


   
Made in us
Gargantuan Gargant





New Bedford, MA USA

Build and Paint kits are at home here.

Is that last pic a display mat ?


   
Made in us
Legendary Master of the Chapter





SoCal

Thanks bushcommando! Awesome pictures, and they are really helpful. The blue will really look nice when I never paint my miniatures.

   
Made in gb
Boom! Leman Russ Commander





UK

 adamsouza wrote:
Build and Paint kits are at home here.

Is that last pic a display mat ?



Some of the larger kits' descriptions mention a play mat but I hadn't seen any pictures until now. It looks quite good.

   
Made in us
Ultramarine Land Raider Pilot on Cruise Control





Macragge

@adamsouza: It is, although it is made of paper (doesn't seem particularly durable) only. The pics came out kind of fuzzy, but those circles indicate where to place bases if you want to do a diorama. There was also another pic I forgot to post showing the completed diorama if you bought all the kits. Here it is:
Spoiler:


Edit: Also of note I just realized that this set comes with stickers, and not waterslide transfers for decals.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/12/18 16:35:04


   
Made in us
Gargantuan Gargant





New Bedford, MA USA

Thanks for the clarification, and pic. Would have been better without the circles, but still better than nothing.

   
Made in gb
[DCM]
Et In Arcadia Ego





Canterbury

http://icv2.com/articles/reviews/view/36706/review-warhammer-40-000-build-paint-series-1-miniatures

new review



Warhammer 40,000 Build + Paint Series 1
Publisher: Games Workshop
Release Date (US): December 2016
MSRP: $39.99 for Space Marine Heavy Assault, other kits vary from $14.99 to $39.99.
Ages: 8 and up
Product #: 99172001001 (Space Marine Heavy Assault)
ICv2 Rating: 3.5 Stars out of 5

I was lucky: my introduction to miniatures painting was by a talented and very patient friend of the family (thanks, Duck!) who generously showed me the basics. Though it would be some years before I embraced the joys of tabletop miniature gaming, those basics stuck with me and gave me a huge leg up when it was time to start painting my own armies. But what about those who aren't so fortunate? How does one leap into the often-overwhelming world of minis? Well, one could do far worse than Games Workshop’s new line of Build + Paint mini kits, but sadly they aren't perfect for the task.

Summary: The Warhammer 40,000 Build + Paint Series 1 includes six different kits that feature the iconic foes of the Warhammer 40,000 world: the Space Marines and the Space Orks. Each kit includes a small number of plastic miniatures on sprues, an all-around utility brush, and a small assortment of tiny little jars of paint, along with a picture-based instruction booklet that shows how to assemble the models. Collect and build all six sets, and you end up with a nice little diorama display, using the full-color paper mat and plastic scenery pieces included in the various kits.

The stated purpose of these kits is to introduce new miniatures enthusiasts to the world of Warhammer 40,000. Each kit has a pamphlet inviting them to explore "a whole galaxy of miniatures," with the ultimate goal of joining the game’s global fan community.

Originality: Introducing new players to miniatures gaming always leads to the challenge of teaching them how to assemble and paint their own models so they can fully enjoy the experience. Over the years, there have been a number of attempts to create a product that would serve this purpose, and my hope was that Games Workshop would be able to use its resources, both physical and digital, to achieve this goal better than had been done before. Sadly, the final result did not live up to my hopes: instead it's a fairly typical set of minis with tiny paint pots, which is something we’ve seen many times before.

Presentation: Like always, Games Workshop does a fine job with the artistic presentation of their product: bright bold colors, dynamic action-filled artwork, easy-to-read titles and text. The box nicely presents the kit and explains what it is, along with a little blurb of "fluff" that is the hallmark of Warhammer. Sadly, they chose a flimsy paper tuckbox for the packaging, but considering that you’re not likely to use the box once you take the minis out and assemble them, that's forgivable.

Quality: Many of the models in Series 1 are actually the same models as the regular line of Warhammer 40,000. Others, like the Space Marine Dreadnought, are streamlined and simplified for a novice assembler. This was a great idea, and I wish that all of the models in the line had been given the same treatment, as some of the more complex models could overwhelm a new modeler (I'm looking at you, Land Speeder!). The models themselves are, naturally, well-detailed, top quality plastic minis, thoughtfully molded in colored plastic that matches the typical base coat color for the models--ultramarine blue for the Space Marines, green for the Orks--which will save new and excited painters a lot of time and effort (and paint).

The variety of paint colors included is very limited, with only three to six colors to choose from in each kit. Notably absent was a base coat color to match the color of the plastic that could be used to clean up the sloppy errors that a new painter will inevitably make. In some cases, the choice of plastic color actually undermines this goal, however, such as the Space Ork Trukkboyz truck, which comes in solid green but must be painted almost completely red.

But the real oversight is in the instructions, or lack thereof. I really wanted to see an in-depth explanation of how to prepare and assemble the models, along with step-by-step instructions on the basics of painting. If I were new to the hobby, and I picked up a Build + Paint, I would still be left off with no idea of where to begin, where I was going, or how to get there.

Marketability: Build + Paint kits are not going to appeal to existing players. In order to succeed, then, they must appeal to inexperienced modelers and compel them to embrace the hobby. Much of this appeal is going to be the price: The Space Marine Heavy Assault kit includes five Terminator Marines plus a Dreadnought. The Terminators alone normally retail for $50 (albeit in a more customizable form), which makes this kit a real bargain. The other kits offer similar deals.

Overall: Build + Paint Series 1 is not the model kit line I wanted it to be. It would have been far more effective as an introduction to the hobby if it had more models that were easier to assemble (snap fit, perhaps?), a more generous paint assortment, and a quality set of introductory-level instructions (or even better, links to on-line videos showing, step-by-step, the entire process from beginning to end).

But setting aside that disappointment, these are good, basic level model kits with a good all-around brush and enough paint to have a lot of fun painting and experimenting with some basic effects. This is not a terrible place for new miniatures gamers to start, particularly if they are excited by the Warhammer 40,000 setting. And that's why I give these kits 3.5 out of 5.

--William Niebling




The poor man really has a stake in the country. The rich man hasn't; he can go away to New Guinea in a yacht. The poor have sometimes objected to being governed badly; the rich have always objected to being governed at all
We love our superheroes because they refuse to give up on us. We can analyze them out of existence, kill them, ban them, mock them, and still they return, patiently reminding us of who we are and what we wish we could be.
"the play's the thing wherein I'll catch the conscience of the king,
 
   
Made in us
Prospector with Steamdrill




New England/cyberspace

Finally picked up a couple of the Ork build+paint kits to get some Gorkamorka models, but had to import them from Italy.

Has anyone seen these in the US lately?
   
Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut





Biloxi, MS USA

First off, Holy Threadnomancy!

Second, considering the Vedros Facebook page has been offline for years, pretty sure these have OOP for years.

You know you're really doing something when you can make strangers hate you over the Internet. - Mauleed
Just remember folks. Panic. Panic all the time. It's the only way to survive, other than just being mindful, of course-but geez, that's so friggin' boring. - Aegis Grimm
Hallowed is the All Pie
The Before Times: A Place That Celebrates The World That Was 
   
Made in nl
[MOD]
Decrepit Dakkanaut






Cozy cockpit of an Archer ARC-5S

Please do not commit acts of thread necromancy, locking now.





Fatum Iustum Stultorum



Fiat justitia ruat caelum

 
   
 
Forum Index » News & Rumors
Go to: