Poll |
 |
|
 |
Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/12 16:13:18
Subject: Should the next Space Marine Codex include the Stormraven?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Simple really, in your opinion, should the next Space Marine Codex include the Stormraven?*
*Obviously having replaced Bloodstrike Missiles etc.
|
Enlist as a virtual Ultramarine! Click here for my Chaos Gate (PC) thread.
"It is the great irony of the Legiones Astartes: engineered to kill to achieve a victory of peace that they can then be no part of."
- Roboute Guilliman
"As I recall, your face was tortured. Imagine that - the Master of the Wolves, his ferocity twisted into grief. And yet you still carried out your duty. You always did what was asked of you. So loyal. So tenacious. Truly you were the attack dog of the Emperor. You took no pleasure in what you did. I knew that then, and I know it now. But all things change, my brother. I'm not the same as I was, and you're... well, let us not mention where you are now."
- Magnus the Red, to a statue of Leman Russ
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/12 16:35:33
Subject: Re:Should the next Space Marine Codex include the Stormraven?
|
 |
The Conquerer
Waiting for my shill money from Spiral Arm Studios
|
Yes, because Space Marines will be needing a Flyer for 6th edition that isn't a Thunderhawk.
|
Self-proclaimed evil Cat-person. Dues Ex Felines
Cato Sicarius, after force feeding Captain Ventris a copy of the Codex Astartes for having the audacity to play Deathwatch, chokes to death on his own D-baggery after finding Calgar assembling his new Eldar army.
MURICA!!! IN SPESS!!! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/12 16:36:25
Subject: Re:Should the next Space Marine Codex include the Stormraven?
|
 |
Hellish Haemonculus
|
Nope. Personally, I'd like to see flyers done away with. If the Space Marines simply must have a flyer, I'd prefer it be anything that doesn't look like a dumpster with wings.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/02/12 16:37:27
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/12 16:37:07
Subject: Should the next Space Marine Codex include the Stormraven?
|
 |
Napoleonics Obsesser
|
No. Storm Ravens are OP
|
If only ZUN!bar were here... |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/12 16:39:29
Subject: Should the next Space Marine Codex include the Stormraven?
|
 |
Frenzied Juggernaut
|
Well, it does seem flyers are being added in rather than done away with.
I think something other than the SR would be good, some variety between armies is nice, if your going to have all the marine armies getting the same vehicles and such why not just make it one book.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/12 16:39:57
Subject: Re:Should the next Space Marine Codex include the Stormraven?
|
 |
Rampaging Reaver Titan Princeps
On your roof with a laptop
|
Yes, but different. And yes, not like dumpsters with wings.
|
This is a signature. It contains words of an important or meaningful nature. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/12 16:40:55
Subject: Re:Should the next Space Marine Codex include the Stormraven?
|
 |
The Conquerer
Waiting for my shill money from Spiral Arm Studios
|
This is just an opinion poll, we all know the official answer will be "Yes", cause GW wants to sell even more stormravens
|
Self-proclaimed evil Cat-person. Dues Ex Felines
Cato Sicarius, after force feeding Captain Ventris a copy of the Codex Astartes for having the audacity to play Deathwatch, chokes to death on his own D-baggery after finding Calgar assembling his new Eldar army.
MURICA!!! IN SPESS!!! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/12 16:45:13
Subject: Should the next Space Marine Codex include the Stormraven?
|
 |
Courageous Space Marine Captain
|
Whatever happens, my vanilla Blood Ravens will still be floating around in it per my local GW's house rules! Lol.
|
I'm celebrating 8 years on Dakka Dakka!
I started an Instagram! Follow me at Deadshot Miniatures!
DR:90+S++G+++M+B+IPw40k08#-D+++A+++/cwd363R+++T(Ot)DM+
Check out my Deathwatch story, Aftermath in the fiction section!
Credit to Castiel for banner. Thanks Cas!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 0012/07/22 01:20:48
Subject: Re:Should the next Space Marine Codex include the Stormraven?
|
 |
Legendary Master of the Chapter
|
Grey Templar wrote:This is just an opinion poll, we all know the official answer will be "Yes", cause GW wants to sell even more stormravens 
not the way its been selling. ITs not been selling well apparently.
|
From whom are unforgiven we bring the mercy of war. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/12 17:15:53
Subject: Re:Should the next Space Marine Codex include the Stormraven?
|
 |
Wrathful Warlord Titan Commander
|
The StormRaven shouldn't be in any codex until a redesign of it.
A vanilla dex may be far off, because there are zero hints on a new one. The next space marine codex could be a green or black marines one, and then I hope we get something different.
|
Target locked,ready to fire
In dedicatio imperatum ultra articulo mortis.
H.B.M.C :
We were wrong. It's not the 40k End Times. It's the Trademarkening.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/12 17:19:42
Subject: Re:Should the next Space Marine Codex include the Stormraven?
|
 |
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
Asherian Command wrote:Grey Templar wrote:This is just an opinion poll, we all know the official answer will be "Yes", cause GW wants to sell even more stormravens 
not the way its been selling. ITs not been selling well apparently.
Says who? GW doesn't publish sales numbers on specific models, so that's just conjecture at this point.
Anyways, I don't think the next Space Marine codex should include the Stormraven. As accepting as I am of it as an "experimental" piece in the hands of the Grey Knights and Blood Angels, I don't think it should be made a general piece. The Land Speeder Tempest would be a far better option for a "Marine flyer".
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/12 17:21:50
Subject: Should the next Space Marine Codex include the Stormraven?
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
The Stormraven specifically - no. But I wouldn't be adverse to seeing other types of flyers in upcoming MEQ codices altogether, as long as it had a useful role.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2012/02/12 17:26:13
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/12 17:08:03
Subject: Re:Should the next Space Marine Codex include the Stormraven?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
West Michigan, deep in Whitebread, USA
|
I agree. The Stormraven is interesting, but the Tempest would be pretty cool. If I could get it as a plastic kit, I would buy one over the Stormraven. I'm fine with my Rhinos and Razorbacks having tracks, not wings.
|
"By this point I'm convinced 100% that every single race in the 40k universe have somehow tapped into the ork ability to just have their tech work because they think it should." |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/12 17:52:04
Subject: Re:Should the next Space Marine Codex include the Stormraven?
|
 |
Courageous Space Marine Captain
|
Kanluwen wrote:Asherian Command wrote:Grey Templar wrote:This is just an opinion poll, we all know the official answer will be "Yes", cause GW wants to sell even more stormravens 
not the way its been selling. ITs not been selling well apparently.
Says who? GW doesn't publish sales numbers on specific models, so that's just conjecture at this point.
Anyways, I don't think the next Space Marine codex should include the Stormraven. As accepting as I am of it as an "experimental" piece in the hands of the Grey Knights and Blood Angels, I don't think it should be made a general piece. The Land Speeder Tempest would be a far better option for a "Marine flyer".
Grey Knights have had it for mellenia. Even says so in the codex entry.
|
I'm celebrating 8 years on Dakka Dakka!
I started an Instagram! Follow me at Deadshot Miniatures!
DR:90+S++G+++M+B+IPw40k08#-D+++A+++/cwd363R+++T(Ot)DM+
Check out my Deathwatch story, Aftermath in the fiction section!
Credit to Castiel for banner. Thanks Cas!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/12 17:53:26
Subject: Should the next Space Marine Codex include the Stormraven?
|
 |
Roaring Reaver Rider
|
I think it should be there although I'd never buy one of those hideous looking things.
|
I shall rule the world someday utilizing my cuteness. And I already have one minion to help me do it!
Hollowman wrote:
Of course it makes sense. When there are a bunch of BDSM clowns doing Olympic gymnast routines throughout your unit, while also cutting off heads, you tend to get a bit distracted.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/12 18:01:10
Subject: Should the next Space Marine Codex include the Stormraven?
|
 |
Wing Commander
Firehawk 1st Armored Regimental Headquarters
|
gaovinni wrote:I think it should be there although I'd never buy one of those hideous looking things.
I don't get it, most of the Warhammer 40k mechanized things look like dumpsters with Etc.
Rhino, dumpster with treads. Razorback, dumpster with treads and machine gun. Predator, dumpster with treads and heavy gun.
Leman Russ, tractor dumpster mix with big gun and side guns.
Valkyrie, flying dumpster with wings.
Manticore, dumpster that can launch missiles.
Baneblade, really big dumpster with really big treads and a really big gun, and lots of smaller guns.
|
"The Imperium is nothing if not willing to go to any lengths necessary. So the Trekkies are zipping around at warp speed taking small chucks out of an nigh-on infinite amount of ships, with the Imperium being unable to strike back. feth it, says central command, and detonates every vortex warhead in the fleet, plunging the entire sector into the Warp. Enjoy tentacle-rape, Kirk, we know Sulu will." -Terminus
"This great fortress was a gift to the Blood Ravens from the legendary Imperial Fists. When asked about it Chapter Master Pugh was reported to say: "THEY TOOK WHAT!?"" |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/12 18:12:45
Subject: Should the next Space Marine Codex include the Stormraven?
|
 |
Wrathful Warlord Titan Commander
|
Alexzandvar wrote:gaovinni wrote:I think it should be there although I'd never buy one of those hideous looking things.
I don't get it, most of the Warhammer 40k mechanized things look like dumpsters with Etc.
Rhino, dumpster with treads. Razorback, dumpster with treads and machine gun. Predator, dumpster with treads and heavy gun.
Leman Russ, tractor dumpster mix with big gun and side guns.
Valkyrie, flying dumpster with wings.
Manticore, dumpster that can launch missiles.
Baneblade, really big dumpster with really big treads and a really big gun, and lots of smaller guns.
Really?
Except the russ chassis, all of them could work in their given role.
The SR however, has a acceptable profile from above but is so bad it would gain a lot of criticism if one posted it as his scratchbuilt design.
What they have done is, chop'd a chopper , glue some wings on and call it a SR.
|
Target locked,ready to fire
In dedicatio imperatum ultra articulo mortis.
H.B.M.C :
We were wrong. It's not the 40k End Times. It's the Trademarkening.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/12 18:15:12
Subject: Should the next Space Marine Codex include the Stormraven?
|
 |
Wing Commander
Firehawk 1st Armored Regimental Headquarters
|
1hadhq wrote:Alexzandvar wrote:gaovinni wrote:I think it should be there although I'd never buy one of those hideous looking things.
I don't get it, most of the Warhammer 40k mechanized things look like dumpsters with Etc.
Rhino, dumpster with treads. Razorback, dumpster with treads and machine gun. Predator, dumpster with treads and heavy gun.
Leman Russ, tractor dumpster mix with big gun and side guns.
Valkyrie, flying dumpster with wings.
Manticore, dumpster that can launch missiles.
Baneblade, really big dumpster with really big treads and a really big gun, and lots of smaller guns.
Really?
Except the russ chassis, all of them could work in their given role.
The SR however, has a acceptable profile from above but is so bad it would gain a lot of criticism if one posted it as his scratchbuilt design.
What they have done is, chop'd a chopper , glue some wings on and call it a SR.
|
"The Imperium is nothing if not willing to go to any lengths necessary. So the Trekkies are zipping around at warp speed taking small chucks out of an nigh-on infinite amount of ships, with the Imperium being unable to strike back. feth it, says central command, and detonates every vortex warhead in the fleet, plunging the entire sector into the Warp. Enjoy tentacle-rape, Kirk, we know Sulu will." -Terminus
"This great fortress was a gift to the Blood Ravens from the legendary Imperial Fists. When asked about it Chapter Master Pugh was reported to say: "THEY TOOK WHAT!?"" |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/12 18:31:41
Subject: Should the next Space Marine Codex include the Stormraven?
|
 |
Legendary Master of the Chapter
|
I want a new design for the storm Raven it looks horrible.
|
From whom are unforgiven we bring the mercy of war. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/12 18:40:42
Subject: Should the next Space Marine Codex include the Stormraven?
|
 |
Stalwart Tribune
|
Hell Yes they should be in there!
|
Praise be to Dark Sphere savior of cheapskates! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/12 21:11:49
Subject: Re:Should the next Space Marine Codex include the Stormraven?
|
 |
Trustworthy Shas'vre
|
Grey Templar wrote:Yes, because Space Marines will be needing a Flyer for 6th edition that isn't a Thunderhawk.
I didn't know a Stormraven was a Flyer.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/12 21:27:42
Subject: Should the next Space Marine Codex include the Stormraven?
|
 |
Araqiel
|
Oh no, don't tell me theres a new marine codex on its way I just bought myself the current one lol
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/12 23:20:28
Subject: Should the next Space Marine Codex include the Stormraven?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Not an official one, no.
|
Enlist as a virtual Ultramarine! Click here for my Chaos Gate (PC) thread.
"It is the great irony of the Legiones Astartes: engineered to kill to achieve a victory of peace that they can then be no part of."
- Roboute Guilliman
"As I recall, your face was tortured. Imagine that - the Master of the Wolves, his ferocity twisted into grief. And yet you still carried out your duty. You always did what was asked of you. So loyal. So tenacious. Truly you were the attack dog of the Emperor. You took no pleasure in what you did. I knew that then, and I know it now. But all things change, my brother. I'm not the same as I was, and you're... well, let us not mention where you are now."
- Magnus the Red, to a statue of Leman Russ
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 20124/05/12 23:23:24
Subject: Should the next Space Marine Codex include the Stormraven?
|
 |
Boosting Ultramarine Biker
|
Flyers don't fit in 40k. Instead of flyers, maybe a choice for any army is an air strike type thing that represents a flyer making a bombing run then flying off.
|
5th Company 2000 pts
615 pts
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/12 23:55:05
Subject: Re:Should the next Space Marine Codex include the Stormraven?
|
 |
Servoarm Flailing Magos
|
Stormraven is weird. It's got huge amount of firepower but it's easily destroyed...and it can carry troops and a dreadnaught. And it's pretty expensive.
I've never really seen the merits of a storm raven, it's too fragile to be used as a gunship, it's also too fragile and expensive to be a transport.
|
Ever thought 40k would be a lot better with bears?
Codex: Bears.
NOW WITH MR BIGGLES AND HIS AMAZING FLYING CONTRAPTION |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/13 00:03:57
Subject: Should the next Space Marine Codex include the Stormraven?
|
 |
Veteran Inquisitorial Tyranid Xenokiller
|
It works extremely well for GKs if you have a Librarian in them for the Shrouding power. One of my SRs has yet to be shot down due to the 3+ cover gained from flat out movement and Shrouding. I prefer taking them over LRs.
To the OP, I'd rather not see SRs all over the place, but the other marine codecies should get some kind of "flyer"
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/13 00:06:14
Subject: Re:Should the next Space Marine Codex include the Stormraven?
|
 |
Wing Commander
Firehawk 1st Armored Regimental Headquarters
|
Joey wrote:Stormraven is weird. It's got huge amount of firepower but it's easily destroyed...and it can carry troops and a dreadnaught. And it's pretty expensive. I've never really seen the merits of a storm raven, it's too fragile to be used as a gunship, it's also too fragile and expensive to be a transport. Yeah, I have had many a GK player lose all his Stormravens to my Hydra batteries.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/02/13 00:06:25
"The Imperium is nothing if not willing to go to any lengths necessary. So the Trekkies are zipping around at warp speed taking small chucks out of an nigh-on infinite amount of ships, with the Imperium being unable to strike back. feth it, says central command, and detonates every vortex warhead in the fleet, plunging the entire sector into the Warp. Enjoy tentacle-rape, Kirk, we know Sulu will." -Terminus
"This great fortress was a gift to the Blood Ravens from the legendary Imperial Fists. When asked about it Chapter Master Pugh was reported to say: "THEY TOOK WHAT!?"" |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/13 00:06:31
Subject: Should the next Space Marine Codex include the Stormraven?
|
 |
Pyromaniac Hellhound Pilot
|
I am surprised some sort of errata hasn't been put out yet for that. Sales have to be slumping off the storm raven, seeing as how only two armies currently field them. That would be the only reason GW would add that to the normal marine Codex.
|
javascript:emoticon(' '); 3,000 pointsjavascript:emoticon(' ');
2,000 points
265 point detachment
Imperial Knight detachment: 375
Iron Hands: 1,850
where ever you go, there you are |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/13 00:27:52
Subject: Should the next Space Marine Codex include the Stormraven?
|
 |
Servoarm Flailing Magos
|
CrashCanuck wrote:It works extremely well for GKs if you have a Librarian in them for the Shrouding power. One of my SRs has yet to be shot down due to the 3+ cover gained from flat out movement and Shrouding. I prefer taking them over LRs.
As long as you don't get within 12" of plasma vets. Or anywhere near a hydra (even with cover you're looking at 1 damage result from two hydras firing). I don't trust anything that can fall to S7 when there's so much of it on the board, especially Guard.
|
Ever thought 40k would be a lot better with bears?
Codex: Bears.
NOW WITH MR BIGGLES AND HIS AMAZING FLYING CONTRAPTION |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/02/13 00:30:42
Subject: Re:Should the next Space Marine Codex include the Stormraven?
|
 |
Doc Brown
|
No they have plenty of transports.
If you're gonna give them the stormraven, give Wolves, BA's and GK's the land speeder storm.
(Wolves with a storm would be incredibly sick)
|
Director at Fool's Errand Films a San Diego Video Production and Live Streaming company.
https://foolserrandfilms.com/
|
|
 |
 |
|