Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

How obvious do I have to make my jokes? I mean goddamn, my previous post was pretty obvious...

lord commissar klimino wrote:from a political standpoint..... i dont think the government should do anything with it. dont legalize it, dont ban it, just dont do anything with it. leave it alone and the fire will burn down,and people will stop caring about it. hopefully.

... except for the homosexuals themselves, whom are still living as second class citizens?

The LGBT community sure as hell won't forget about it-- they have to live with it. Arguing that they should just stop trying to persue their legal rights is kinda inane...

Protip: The best way to make a joke obvious is to have it be funny.

You should tell Jim Jeffries that then

Monster Rain wrote:Protip: The best way to make a joke obvious is to have it be funny.

What the hell? Nobody ever told me that! Tsch... You people are so DEMANDING!!

Anyways - a little story from yesterday:

So... I was working out yesterday at the gym, with some buddies of mine. One of them, a homosexual guy.

Well, after work-out, it was time to stretch one's muscles. So while i was lying there, stretching out my buttocks, my friend took the opportunity to be much open-hearted about how my behind looked in that posture.
- Very disturbing material!Very, uhm... Ambivalent!

JEB_Stuart wrote:

Cannerus_The_Unbearable wrote:I drink dark beer, yet Texans seem addicted to light beer.

Not true sir.

Don't forget Ziegenbach as well.
My current evil is 2/3 dark rum and 1/3 water. Rodney the wonder wiener climbed up on the sofa, sniffed it and looked at me like "dad why are you drinking poison?!!"


Automatically Appended Next Post:

FITZZ wrote:

Melissia wrote:

Cheesecat wrote:

corpsesarefun wrote:Ah it's only 40%, you want some good European 60% vodka.

Or better yet, absinthe.

That's weak, Everclear is the only way to go.

Barf-tastic...

Actually when properly mixed it's not bad at all...but I recommend caution when drinking it...as it tends to creep up on you.

Also its good in case of zombie nazi outbreak. You can get your inner Russian soldier freak on and use it as an emergenecy flamethrower/molotov cocktail.

Haha, Frazz'!

What's up with you Americans and being prepared for anything anyways?

Billinator wrote:Haha, Frazz'!

What's up with you Americans and being prepared for anything anyways?

1. Its a Frazzled tradition. I have a plan A, B, C, and D. I am currently on Life Plan C.
2. Its also a family heritage. We see a bottle of something and wonder "can I throw this at a Nazi tank?" and "Well if I drink half of it first, can I still throw the rest at a Nazi tank?"

dogma wrote:

Melissia wrote:It's ~90% alcohol dude. It's not really even safe for consumption...

One of my favorite "memories" from college was throwing a house party, and being put in charge of making the punch after I was already several drinks into the night. This lead to me doing drunken math in order to figure out how much Everclear to put in a 5 gallon vat of punch. Long story short, my drunken math was incorrect, and what should have been about 25 proof ended up being about 50 proof.

Whoops.

I've made those same ' miscalculations" myself when mixing Jungle juice in the past...some of the events that followed are the subjects of various "tales" even to this day.


Automatically Appended Next Post:

Melissia wrote:You should tell Jim Jeffries that then

Hey hey hey!, That's where I draw the line....insult humanity all you like...but leave Jim Jeffries alone...next you'll be having a go at Doug Stanhope I suppose.

At least it's not as bad as the time a friend of mine (at a party I thankfully did not attend) mixed up the brownie batches.

Melissia wrote:At least it's not as bad as the time a friend of mine (at a party I thankfully did not attend) mixed up the brownie batches.

... Yes, I could definitely see where that could become problematic..." I swear to god officer...I haven't had a drop to drink, in fact all I had at the party was a couple of brownies...they did taste a bit off though".

Frazzled wrote:
2. Its also a family heritage. We see a bottle of something and wonder "can I throw this at a Nazi tank?" and "Well if I drink half of it first, can I still throw the rest at a Nazi tank?"

You'd most likely still be able to throw it in the direction of a Nazi tank after taking in half of it.

halonachos wrote:

Frazzled wrote:
2. Its also a family heritage. We see a bottle of something and wonder "can I throw this at a Nazi tank?" and "Well if I drink half of it first, can I still throw the rest at a Nazi tank?"

You'd most likely still be able to throw it in the direction of a Nazi tank after taking in half of it.

... You drink half a bottle of everclear and it's a good bet that you won't even be able to see the Nazi tank..

FITZZ wrote:

halonachos wrote:

Frazzled wrote:
2. Its also a family heritage. We see a bottle of something and wonder "can I throw this at a Nazi tank?" and "Well if I drink half of it first, can I still throw the rest at a Nazi tank?"

You'd most likely still be able to throw it in the direction of a Nazi tank after taking in half of it.

... You drink half a bottle of everclear and it's a good bet that you won't even be able to see the Nazi tank..

Young Padiwon, you underestimate the power of drunken Slavic genes! The more drunk we are, the better our aim!

That only works in video games Frazzled.

But I move to call the LGBT community the HBT community, why do lesbians get to have their own special name for being homosexual and men don't? Honestly for a group that wants to be treated fairly they should treat members of their own community fairly first.

Frazzled wrote:

FITZZ wrote:

halonachos wrote:

Frazzled wrote:
2. Its also a family heritage. We see a bottle of something and wonder "can I throw this at a Nazi tank?" and "Well if I drink half of it first, can I still throw the rest at a Nazi tank?"

You'd most likely still be able to throw it in the direction of a Nazi tank after taking in half of it.

... You drink half a bottle of everclear and it's a good bet that you won't even be able to see the Nazi tank..

Young Padiwon, you underestimate the power of drunken Slavic genes! The more drunk we are, the better our aim!

I'll have to take your word for that Frazz...
But speaking for myself, having zero Slavic genes....were I to consume a half bottle of everclear and then attempt to use the remaining half as a molotov cocktail ...I suspect a trip to the hospital would be in my near future.

Because "gay" is associated with men more than women.

Melissia wrote:Because "gay" is associated with men more than women.

That's nonsense 'gay' is associated with the Flintstones more so than actual people.

Monster Rain wrote:

Mannahnin wrote:Non-sweet alcoholic drinks are an acquired taste, like most bitter foods. No one starts out liking the taste of beer or whisky.

Not to be needlessly contrary, but I really liked scotch the first time I tried it.

Something about the smoky flavor really struck a chord with me on a primal level. Can't disagree about beer though; it took me a while to be able to acquire that particular taste.

Also, Jim Jeffries is one of my favorite comedians of all time. Nice clip!

Agreed with MR here, I'm a lover of smoke is most of its forms (smoked fish, chargrilled foods, woodsmoke fires) so I'm quite a scotch fan.

Irish whiskey, meh.

corpsesarefun wrote:

Monster Rain wrote:

Mannahnin wrote:Non-sweet alcoholic drinks are an acquired taste, like most bitter foods. No one starts out liking the taste of beer or whisky.

Not to be needlessly contrary, but I really liked scotch the first time I tried it.

Something about the smoky flavor really struck a chord with me on a primal level. Can't disagree about beer though; it took me a while to be able to acquire that particular taste.

Also, Jim Jeffries is one of my favorite comedians of all time. Nice clip!

Agreed with MR here, I'm a lover of smoke is most of its forms (smoked fish, chargrilled foods, woodsmoke fires) so I'm quite a scotch fan.

Irish whiskey, meh.

You must love papayas then. Like dousing a mango in liquid smoke.

I think the LG part of the name is kind of important to clarify naturally-born men and women too. This scene has all sorts of partakers, after all

I thought of another question. Again, remember the disclaimer What's the general consensus on BDSM (bondage and discipline, dominance and submission, sadism and masochism)? For those not in the know, it's all that stuff you see involving leather, whips and chains. Do you think it's abuse regardless of context? Does the emotional control element or use of slavery as a concept cross a line that seems unreasonable? Sound off!

I'm fine with BDSM as long as is stays away from grievous bodily harm, blood and suffocation.

Oh and latex, I have an allergy

EDIT: Oh for other people? In that case you go ahead and do whatever you are into as long as everyone involved consents.

As for the papaya, I've never eaten a papaya but I tend to find mango a little too sweet for my tastes.

Whatever you do with a consenting adult in your bedroom is your business as long as you aren't harming anyone in the process is fine is probably going to be my stock answer for all of these questions.

I'm not into it though, since I don't enjoy receiving or inflicting pain.

Nothing wrong with a bit of latex and leather, thigh boots and handcuffs...and some scratching, biting and such can be fun...just my two bits.

Mpnster Rain wrote:Also, Jim Jeffries is one of my favorite comedians of all time. Nice clip!

I'm not a big fan of stand-up but that link that Mannahnin showed was hilarious.

Melissia wrote:How obvious do I have to make my jokes? I mean goddamn, my previous post was pretty obvious...

Well, considering how cynical you can sometimes be I had trouble telling if you were serious.

Cheesecat wrote:

Mpnster Rain wrote:Also, Jim Jeffries is one of my favorite comedians of all time. Nice clip!

I'm not a big fan of stand-up but that link that Mannahnin showed was hilarious.

Melissia wrote:How obvious do I have to make my jokes? I mean goddamn, my previous post was pretty obvious...

Well, considering how cynical you can sometimes be I had trouble telling if you were serious.

Dude, that post was WAY over the top for almost anyone on this forum.... including me.

Eh, I just presumed you had spent too long in the chem labs and the fumes had got to you.

That's why we have fume hoods.

It's only the OTHER kind of pharmacist that has that happen to them..

You want to smell something try formaldehyde, that stuff burns like high heaven and this reminds me that I need to take a shower now because I still smell like the stuff from this morning.

Yeah I tend to disregard safety in the lab...

I'm the dude who never uses gloves, picks hot things up with his bare hands, never uses fume hoods, spills probably dangerous chemicals on his hands and curses a LOT during any practical work.

Funnily enough I get straight 100% marks in all practical assessments though.

That's because everyone is petrified that you'll dissolve them alive if you don't get full marks.

As if you'd even consider dissolving them alive.

Burning is much more fun.

Avatar 720 wrote:That's because everyone is petrified that you'll dissolve them alive if you don't get full marks.

As if you'd even consider dissolving them alive.

Burning is much more fun.

Well, it all depends on how slow you dip them in the acid.