Author |
Message |
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
|
2013/01/27 00:24:14
Subject: "Death from the Skies" 40k Supplement
|
|
Owns Whole Set of Skullz Techpriests
Versteckt in den Schatten deines Geistes.
|
GW: We don't want to homogenise the Marines, and that's why the Stormraven is Blood Angels/Grey Knights only.
*flash forward*
GW: Here you are non-BA/GK players, totally legal rules to use the Stormraven in your armies!
|
|
|
|
|
2013/01/27 00:47:34
Subject: "Death from the Skies" 40k Supplement
|
|
Terminator with Assault Cannon
|
The more interesting element of this book for me is updates to preexisting flyers. Hopefully this means changes (read: nerfs) to the Valkyrie and Vendetta, who were clearly not designed for 6th edition. The BA Stormraven might perhaps need a bit of a change as well, though honestly this one seems less egregious. The GK Stormraven and all other flyers seem totally fine. Automatically Appended Next Post: H.B.M.C. wrote:GW: We don't want to homogenise the Marines, and that's why the Stormraven is Blood Angels/Grey Knights only.
*flash forward*
GW: Here you are non- BA/ GK players, totally legal rules to use the Stormraven in your armies!
I agree that this is a problematic choice. Will BA/ SW/ BT players get the Stormtalon as well to compensate? Let's hope so...
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/01/27 00:48:05
|
|
|
|
2013/01/27 01:37:43
Subject: "Death from the Skies" 40k Supplement
|
|
Unstoppable Bloodthirster of Khorne
|
Give it a year or two, and regular marines will have access to all the new DA Landspeeders as well.
Just like they did the first time.
|
|
|
|
|
2013/01/27 01:43:41
Subject: "Death from the Skies" 40k Supplement
|
|
Battlefortress Driver with Krusha Wheel
Norway (Oslo)
|
d3m01iti0n wrote:phatonic wrote:I was a at GW today, the manager there showed me a mail he got about this, appears Black templars are going to be avaible to use the stormtalon legal now!
StormRAVEN or StormTALON? All the rumors Ive seen are pointing towards the Stormraven, but the original said me might get both. I only care about the Raven really.
on the little spoiler i got to see its going to be a revamp of the flyers included statchanges as goes for the ork bommer, but one of thepics i saw and the text included "black templar stormTalon"
|
Waagh like a bawz
-
Kaptin Goldteef's waagh! 16250 points 45/18/3 (W/L/D) 7th Ed
6250 points 9/3/1 (W/L/D) sixth-ed
Dark elves: 2350points 3/0/0 (W/L/D)
3400 points 19/6/0 (W/L/D) 8' armybook
Wood Elves 2600 points, 6/4/0 (W/L/D)
|
|
|
|
2013/01/27 01:50:21
Subject: Re:"Death from the Skies" 40k Supplement
|
|
Fixture of Dakka
West Michigan, deep in Whitebread, USA
|
GW: We don't want to homogenise the Marines, and that's why the Stormraven is Blood Angels/Grey Knights only.
*flash forward*
GW: Here you are non-BA/GK players, totally legal rules to use the Stormraven in your armies!
I know it's not the way you meant what you said, but don't know what the worry about homogenizing Marines' vehicles would be. Before about the time the Baal came out for the Blood Angels, every Chapter had access to the same vehicles. Only the troops made the Chapter unique.
I say keep the vehicles "unique in unlimited numbers" to specific Chapters, and then do like the first version of the Land Raider Crusader was for non- BT chapters, being limited in number.
On the other hand I can completely see it as a way to hugely strengthen sales of Storm Talons/Ravens. Especially Storm rRavens- I'm sure GW wants every increased opportunity to sell an $80 model.
|
"By this point I'm convinced 100% that every single race in the 40k universe have somehow tapped into the ork ability to just have their tech work because they think it should." |
|
|
|
2013/01/27 02:13:58
Subject: "Death from the Skies" 40k Supplement
|
|
Perfect Shot Black Templar Predator Pilot
|
I will be happy with any flyer for my BT. At least then I wont have to take guard for a vendetta just to have a flyer.
|
|
|
|
|
2013/01/27 03:52:30
Subject: "Death from the Skies" 40k Supplement
|
|
Been Around the Block
|
So are these rules and new state lines going to replace the current ones?
I play orks for example. Will these rules replace the current ork flyer rules all together?
|
|
|
|
2013/01/27 04:04:56
Subject: Re:"Death from the Skies" 40k Supplement
|
|
Fixture of Dakka
|
Presumably, though I'm doubting that the rules will see much change. It'll just be a reprint of the existing ones for those who don't have them. Ie either fork out £4 during the limited run for your rules or the £20 or whatever for the pdf. Of course seeing as its a digital copy I'm questioning who will actually buy it other than the customer base that blindly forks out money with every fad release. I'd imagine that most people who would want the rules and have access to a computer would have just downloaded an illegal copy of them by now.
But seeing as it going to be costing something silly considering that it isn't even a physical copy and the content isn't even knew GW's going to make a decent profit. Hey it'll be a required purchase for x amount of years until GW release another flyers supplement. =P
|
|
|
|
2013/01/27 04:21:18
Subject: Re:"Death from the Skies" 40k Supplement
|
|
Owns Whole Set of Skullz Techpriests
Versteckt in den Schatten deines Geistes.
|
AegisGrimm wrote:I know it's not the way you meant what you said, but don't know what the worry about homogenizing Marines' vehicles would be. Before about the time the Baal came out for the Blood Angels, every Chapter had access to the same vehicles. Only the troops made the Chapter unique.
I don't see what the worry is either. I think it works from a fluff perspective (why would the GKs and BA's, of all people, be the only ones to have those transports - just 'cause they were the two Marine Codices that came out in a row, it seems) and from a sales perspective (why intentionally cut other Marine players, the majority of which don't play BAs/ GKs, from such a vehicle). I mean, I don't play BAs/ GKs and I bought two of the things. I imagine many more players would as well if they could legally field them.
AegisGrimm wrote:On the other hand I can completely see it as a way to hugely strengthen sales of Storm Talons/Ravens. Especially Storm rRavens- I'm sure GW wants every increased opportunity to sell an $80 model.
GW is often-times petrified of making money, and make really odd decisions that run counter to really obvious ways to increase sales. And then at the same time they go and remove limits on units that used to have limits. It doesn't really make much sense, and I think it's a case of the left hand not knowing that the right hand exists.
|
|
|
|
|
2013/01/27 04:41:21
Subject: "Death from the Skies" 40k Supplement
|
|
Veteran Inquisitorial Tyranid Xenokiller
|
My predicition is huge rule changes for current problem child flyers.
- Vendetta/valk 12/10/10 with all current rules staying the same. Possibly available for SoB.
-Stormravens 12/11/11 and a slight price decrease, also available to BT, SW and C:SM.
-Nightscythe slight point increase.
-Relase of rules for Tau/Eldar/Tyranid flyers.
With this release, all armies except Daemons have flyers. Enjoy your newly awesome flakk missiles that can pen anything 1/3rd of the time.
|
Inquisitor Jex wrote:Yeah, telling people how this and that is 'garbage' and they should just throw their minis into the trash as they're not as efficient as XYZ.
Peregrine wrote:So the solution is to lie and pretend that certain options are effective so people will feel better? |
|
|
|
2013/01/27 04:57:18
Subject: "Death from the Skies" 40k Supplement
|
|
Owns Whole Set of Skullz Techpriests
Versteckt in den Schatten deines Geistes.
|
Vendy for the SoBs? Nah. They'll get their own garish flying cathedral pipe organ nightmare when the time comes, no doubt armed with a Holy Cannon and Faithstrike Missiles.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/01/27 04:57:44
|
|
|
|
2013/01/27 05:36:10
Subject: Re:"Death from the Skies" 40k Supplement
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
H.B.M.C. wrote: AegisGrimm wrote:On the other hand I can completely see it as a way to hugely strengthen sales of Storm Talons/Ravens. Especially Storm rRavens- I'm sure GW wants every increased opportunity to sell an $80 model.
GW is often-times petrified of making money, and make really odd decisions that run counter to really obvious ways to increase sales. And then at the same time they go and remove limits on units that used to have limits. It doesn't really make much sense, and I think it's a case of the left hand not knowing that the right hand exists.
Or to be really cynical, GW release a chapter-specific model in the hope that customers will buy a whole new army just to field that chapter-specific model, GW then deliberately wait a year and announce that all chapters can now field that same model, in the hope of another sales spike. That's how cold-hearted accountants think, alas :(
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/01/27 05:37:39
|
|
|
|
2013/01/27 05:44:35
Subject: "Death from the Skies" 40k Supplement
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Engage New Hat for Malibu Stacy Protocol, Chapter Master!
|
Thread Slayer |
|
|
|
2013/01/27 05:46:21
Subject: Re:"Death from the Skies" 40k Supplement
|
|
Terminator with Assault Cannon
|
Clang wrote: H.B.M.C. wrote: AegisGrimm wrote:On the other hand I can completely see it as a way to hugely strengthen sales of Storm Talons/Ravens. Especially Storm rRavens- I'm sure GW wants every increased opportunity to sell an $80 model.
GW is often-times petrified of making money, and make really odd decisions that run counter to really obvious ways to increase sales. And then at the same time they go and remove limits on units that used to have limits. It doesn't really make much sense, and I think it's a case of the left hand not knowing that the right hand exists.
Or to be really cynical, GW release a chapter-specific model in the hope that customers will buy a whole new army just to field that chapter-specific model, GW then deliberately wait a year and announce that all chapters can now field that same model, in the hope of another sales spike. That's how cold-hearted accountants think, alas :(
I think Clang is exactly right.
|
SickSix's Silver Skull WIP thread
My Youtube Channel
JSF wrote:... this is really quite an audacious move by GW, throwing out any pretext that this is a game and that its customers exist to do anything other than buy their overpriced products for the sake of it. The naked arrogance, greed and contempt for their audience is shocking. = Epic First Post.
|
|
|
|
2013/01/27 05:54:47
Subject: "Death from the Skies" 40k Supplement
|
|
Owns Whole Set of Skullz Techpriests
Versteckt in den Schatten deines Geistes.
|
Never attribute to malice that which can be attributed to incompetence.
|
|
|
|
|
2013/01/27 07:27:55
Subject: "Death from the Skies" 40k Supplement
|
|
Bane Lord Tartar Sauce
|
Coyote81 wrote:My predicition is huge rule changes for current problem child flyers.
- Vendetta/valk 12/10/10 with all current rules staying the same. Possibly available for SoB.
-Stormravens 12/11/11 and a slight price decrease, also available to BT, SW and C: SM.
-Nightscythe slight point increase.
-Relase of rules for Tau/Eldar/Tyranid flyers.
With this release, all armies except Daemons have flyers. Enjoy your newly awesome flakk missiles that can pen anything 1/3rd of the time.
Daemons have fliers. Lots of them. 2 of the greater deamons are FMC, as are Daemon Princes. They can field more fliers per FOC than any army other than Necrons and Guard.
|
|
|
|
2013/01/27 09:39:38
Subject: "Death from the Skies" 40k Supplement
|
|
Calculating Commissar
|
I think it very unlikely that GW would change points costs and rules in a supplement.
|
The supply does not get to make the demands. |
|
|
|
2013/01/27 09:54:05
Subject: "Death from the Skies" 40k Supplement
|
|
Stone Bonkers Fabricator General
A garden grove on Citadel Station
|
H.B.M.C. wrote:Never attribute to malice that which can be attributed to incompetence.
Or never attribute to incompetence that which can be attributed to a business decision.
|
ph34r's Forgeworld Phobos blog, current WIP: Iron Warriors and Skaven Tau
+From Iron Cometh Strength+ +From Strength Cometh Will+ +From Will Cometh Faith+ +From Faith Cometh Honor+ +From Honor Cometh Iron+
The Polito form is dead, insect. Are you afraid? What is it you fear? The end of your trivial existence?
When the history of my glory is written, your species shall only be a footnote to my magnificence. |
|
|
|
2013/01/27 09:56:57
Subject: "Death from the Skies" 40k Supplement
|
|
Speedy Swiftclaw Biker
Germany
|
Agamemnon2 wrote:I think it very unlikely that GW would change points costs and rules in a supplement.
I would say so too. especially as it is only available in english and direct order only,
Unless of course they decided to cut costs for translations and publish the new Citadel-Dictionary alongside instead
|
|
|
|
2013/01/27 09:57:05
Subject: "Death from the Skies" 40k Supplement
|
|
Veteran Inquisitorial Tyranid Xenokiller
|
Ever heard of Ravening Hordes? I played warhammer fantasy with an army that was changed to fit in a 5 page paper supplement for roughly 5 years. I'll never put it past GW to changes rules in even the most cheaply made supplement.
|
Inquisitor Jex wrote:Yeah, telling people how this and that is 'garbage' and they should just throw their minis into the trash as they're not as efficient as XYZ.
Peregrine wrote:So the solution is to lie and pretend that certain options are effective so people will feel better? |
|
|
|
2013/01/27 10:06:02
Subject: Re:"Death from the Skies" 40k Supplement
|
|
Sneaky Sniper Drone
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
|
Ministry wrote: d3m01iti0n wrote: Ministry wrote: Malthor wrote:English only is correct, also if I recall correctly it will at least introduce the Storm Raven to Black Templars and Vanilla SM, maybe also the Storm Talon to the Templars.
DA could really use a better flyer so I hope they make the ST accessible to them.
Jesus Christ........gets a brand new codex and a ton of models and still isnt happy............
The new DA flyers are great looking models but statistically they are absolute rubbish for their points cost. We need a competitive flyer like the Helldrake or Vendetta, or the Stormtalon....
Sooo....the Vendetta. Aka the most undercosted thing in any codex evar?
AV 12 all around, BS 4, 3 Twinlinked lascannons, ignores crew shaken and stunned results, and has skyfire while in hover mode. All of that is base at 130pnts. It's op as hell. Not because of it's special rules or weapons or anything, but because it's stupidly undercosted and does both anti-tank and anti-flyer more efficiently then anything in any other codex forever.
|
*NYI*
1850pnts
lost
Stolen
Beezlebub has never seen, a solider quite like me. Who not only does his job but does it happily. I'm the fear that keeps you awake. I'm the shadows on the wall. I'm the monsters they become. I'm the nightmare in your skull. I'm the dagger in your back, an extra turn upon the rack. I'm the quivering of your heart, a stabbing pain, a sudden start. |
|
|
|
2013/01/27 12:17:30
Subject: Re:"Death from the Skies" 40k Supplement
|
|
Willing Inquisitorial Excruciator
|
TheMind wrote: Ministry wrote: d3m01iti0n wrote: Ministry wrote: Malthor wrote:English only is correct, also if I recall correctly it will at least introduce the Storm Raven to Black Templars and Vanilla SM, maybe also the Storm Talon to the Templars.
DA could really use a better flyer so I hope they make the ST accessible to them.
Jesus Christ........gets a brand new codex and a ton of models and still isnt happy............
The new DA flyers are great looking models but statistically they are absolute rubbish for their points cost. We need a competitive flyer like the Helldrake or Vendetta, or the Stormtalon....
Sooo....the Vendetta. Aka the most undercosted thing in any codex evar?
AV 12 all around, BS 4, 3 Twinlinked lascannons, ignores crew shaken and stunned results, and has skyfire while in hover mode. All of that is base at 130pnts. It's op as hell. Not because of it's special rules or weapons or anything, but because it's stupidly undercosted and does both anti-tank and anti-flyer more efficiently then anything in any other codex forever.
Wait what?
It is AV10 on the back, BS3, doesnt ignore crew shaken, reduces stuns to shakens and doesn't have skyfire when in hover. You're mistaken as hell.
Please check your facts before posting.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2013/01/27 12:20:40
|
|
|
|
2013/01/27 12:29:33
Subject: "Death from the Skies" 40k Supplement
|
|
Shas'o Commanding the Hunter Kadre
Missouri
|
Agamemnon2 wrote:I think it very unlikely that GW would change points costs and rules in a supplement.
Yeah, this sounds to me more like another one of those pointless expansions that no one will play. Unless GW uses language like "official codex update for ____" or whatever in the book then no one's really going to take it seriously.
|
Desubot wrote:Why isnt Slut Wars: The Sexpocalypse a real game dammit.
"It's easier to change the rules than to get good at the game." |
|
|
|
2013/01/27 14:45:31
Subject: "Death from the Skies" 40k Supplement
|
|
Fixture of Dakka
|
And they're definitely not going to make the Storm Raven available as a normal unit for marine armies.
What they might do, is encourage people to buy it for them in the scenario games though.
Right now, the Storm Raven is in a pretty good money making position for GW.
"I have ultramarines but I really want to use a storm raven. Oh hey look, ALLIES rules, I can ally in a Grey Knights Storm Raven with an HQ and a unit of Grey Knight Terminators to go in it..... "
"Hey.... I've got a Storm Raven, an HQ and a Grey Knight Terminator unit, all I need is another grey knight squad and the codex and I've got a small version of another army......"
"Hey, I've got a small Grey Knight army, I might as well make it bigger so I can play some games with that!"
"Hey, my Grey Knights army can use some extra bodies on the field, I could ally in some Guardsmen...."
Repeat ad infinitum. All thanks to having a Storm Raven not in Codex Space Marines.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/01/27 14:46:15
|
|
|
|
2013/01/27 17:10:57
Subject: "Death from the Skies" 40k Supplement
|
|
Courageous Space Marine Captain
|
Vanilla Stormravens? Oh god, now I have to get one!
I wonder if other chapters' Strormravens will have same weapon loadouts as BA ones.
|
|
|
|
|
2013/01/27 17:39:08
Subject: Re:"Death from the Skies" 40k Supplement
|
|
Sneaky Sniper Drone
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
|
pizzaguardian wrote: TheMind wrote: Ministry wrote: d3m01iti0n wrote: Ministry wrote: Malthor wrote:English only is correct, also if I recall correctly it will at least introduce the Storm Raven to Black Templars and Vanilla SM, maybe also the Storm Talon to the Templars.
DA could really use a better flyer so I hope they make the ST accessible to them.
Jesus Christ........gets a brand new codex and a ton of models and still isnt happy............
The new DA flyers are great looking models but statistically they are absolute rubbish for their points cost. We need a competitive flyer like the Helldrake or Vendetta, or the Stormtalon....
Sooo....the Vendetta. Aka the most undercosted thing in any codex evar?
AV 12 all around, BS 4, 3 Twinlinked lascannons, ignores crew shaken and stunned results, and has skyfire while in hover mode. All of that is base at 130pnts. It's op as hell. Not because of it's special rules or weapons or anything, but because it's stupidly undercosted and does both anti-tank and anti-flyer more efficiently then anything in any other codex forever.
Wait what?
It is AV10 on the back, BS3, doesnt ignore crew shaken, reduces stuns to shakens and doesn't have skyfire when in hover. You're mistaken as hell.
Please check your facts before posting.
OK well, I've apparently been cheated on the Skyfire in hover mode thing. My point still stands. Also I saw that edit. Pot, kettle, black?
|
*NYI*
1850pnts
lost
Stolen
Beezlebub has never seen, a solider quite like me. Who not only does his job but does it happily. I'm the fear that keeps you awake. I'm the shadows on the wall. I'm the monsters they become. I'm the nightmare in your skull. I'm the dagger in your back, an extra turn upon the rack. I'm the quivering of your heart, a stabbing pain, a sudden start. |
|
|
|
2013/01/27 18:31:07
Subject: Re:"Death from the Skies" 40k Supplement
|
|
Fixture of Dakka
West Michigan, deep in Whitebread, USA
|
Right now, the Storm Raven is in a pretty good money making position for GW.
"I have ultramarines but I really want to use a storm raven. Oh hey look, ALLIES rules, I can ally in a Grey Knights Storm Raven with an HQ and a unit of Grey Knight Terminators to go in it..... "
"Hey.... I've got a Storm Raven, an HQ and a Grey Knight Terminator unit, all I need is another grey knight squad and the codex and I've got a small version of another army......"
"Hey, I've got a small Grey Knight army, I might as well make it bigger so I can play some games with that!"
I didn't really think of that, but it's true.
I can see the 'Talon being opened up to other Chapters, though I hate the very idea of the model. It completely outmoded land speeders in their own job, when the model they should have released was the FW land Speeder Tempest in plastic to fulfill the same " SM flyer" role.
|
"By this point I'm convinced 100% that every single race in the 40k universe have somehow tapped into the ork ability to just have their tech work because they think it should." |
|
|
|
2013/01/27 22:01:58
Subject: "Death from the Skies" 40k Supplement
|
|
Angry Blood Angel Assault marine
UK
|
My sources say this will be a 70 page "compendium".
It will have updated 6th edition rules for flyers:
Stormraven (now available to space marines and BT)
Storm Talon
Ork Bomba / dakka jet / burna bomba
Valkyrie / vendetta
Razorwing & Voide Raven
Night Scythe / doom scythe
also dog fighting rules from crusade of fire and a new flyers scenario.
|
|
|
|
2013/01/27 22:05:41
Subject: "Death from the Skies" 40k Supplement
|
|
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Here's hoping for a massive nerf to Vendettas.
All thumbs pressed!
|
|
|
|
|
2013/01/27 22:27:53
Subject: "Death from the Skies" 40k Supplement
|
|
Blood Angel Terminator with Lightning Claws
|
Sigvatr wrote:Here's hoping for a massive nerf to Vendettas.
All thumbs pressed!
Not a nerf, just a points increase. Maybe 180?
|
GW: "We do no demographic research, we have no focus groups, we do not ask the market what it wants" |
|
|
|
|