KalashnikovMarine wrote:
I'm all for the Rods from God, who needs actual nukes in orbit when you can get the same effect with minimal enviromental damage by dropping something very dense and heavy on target X from orbit?

 Squidmanlolz wrote:

 KalashnikovMarine wrote:
I'm all for the Rods from God, who needs actual nukes in orbit when you can get the same effect with minimal enviromental damage by dropping something very dense and heavy on target X from orbit?

We're not cavemen, we don't need to throw things, we have technology, we need to throw things that go boom!

 Ensis Ferrae wrote:

 Squidmanlolz wrote:

 KalashnikovMarine wrote:
I'm all for the Rods from God, who needs actual nukes in orbit when you can get the same effect with minimal enviromental damage by dropping something very dense and heavy on target X from orbit?

We're not cavemen, we don't need to throw things, we have technology, we need to throw things that go boom!

\


Dude, apparently those rods of god things, in theory (or maybe in practice, dunno if theyve ever actually used one in testing) when they drop out of orbit onto their target, they'll explode with the same force as a 15 KT nuclear bomb.... only without, ya know... all that radiation and fallout.

AegisFate wrote:And on the note that its illegal to have weapons in space, I believe its just Nuclear Weapons, not conventional weapons, so we can have a Death Star without a giant doom beam and still be legal

OFFICIAL WHITE HOUSE RESPONSE TO
Secure resources and funding, and begin construction of a Death Star by 2016.
This Isn't the Petition Response You're Looking For
By Paul Shawcross

The Administration shares your desire for job creation and a strong national defense, but a Death Star isn't on the horizon. Here are a few reasons:

The construction of the Death Star has been estimated to cost more than $850,000,000,000,000,000. We're working hard to reduce the deficit, not expand it.
The Administration does not support blowing up planets.
Why would we spend countless taxpayer dollars on a Death Star with a fundamental flaw that can be exploited by a one-man starship?
However, look carefully (here's how) and you'll notice something already floating in the sky -- that's no Moon, it's a Space Station! Yes, we already have a giant, football field-sized International Space Station in orbit around the Earth that's helping us learn how humans can live and thrive in space for long durations. The Space Station has six astronauts -- American, Russian, and Canadian -- living in it right now, conducting research, learning how to live and work in space over long periods of time, routinely welcoming visiting spacecraft and repairing onboard garbage mashers, etc. We've also got two robot science labs -- one wielding a laser -- roving around Mars, looking at whether life ever existed on the Red Planet.

Keep in mind, space is no longer just government-only. Private American companies, through NASA's Commercial Crew and Cargo Program Office (C3PO), are ferrying cargo -- and soon, crew -- to space for NASA, and are pursuing human missions to the Moon this decade.

Even though the United States doesn't have anything that can do the Kessel Run in less than 12 parsecs, we've got two spacecraft leaving the Solar System and we're building a probe that will fly to the exterior layers of the Sun. We are discovering hundreds of new planets in other star systems and building a much more powerful successor to the Hubble Space Telescope that will see back to the early days of the universe.

We don't have a Death Star, but we do have floating robot assistants on the Space Station, a President who knows his way around a light saber and advanced (marshmallow) cannon, and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, which is supporting research on building Luke's arm, floating droids, and quadruped walkers.

We are living in the future! Enjoy it. Or better yet, help build it by pursuing a career in a science, technology, engineering or math-related field. The President has held the first-ever White House science fairs and Astronomy Night on the South Lawn because he knows these domains are critical to our country's future, and to ensuring the United States continues leading the world in doing big things.

If you do pursue a career in a science, technology, engineering or math-related field, the Force will be with us! Remember, the Death Star's power to destroy a planet, or even a whole star system, is insignificant next to the power of the Force.

Paul Shawcross is Chief of the Science and Space Branch at the White House Office of Management and Budget.

 Ensis Ferrae wrote:
I mean, did someone in the WH budget department seriously sit down and think out how much it would cost to build a death star?

 Ensis Ferrae wrote:
I'm not sure which is more entertaining/scary: the fact that they responded with the inherent weakness in the death star (who's to say we wouldn't have learned from the first and second ones and made improvements to both??) or the fact that they put a legitimate dollar amount as to it's costs...

I mean, did someone in the WH budget department seriously sit down and think out how much it would cost to build a death star?

 Ensis Ferrae wrote:

 Squidmanlolz wrote:

 KalashnikovMarine wrote:
I'm all for the Rods from God, who needs actual nukes in orbit when you can get the same effect with minimal enviromental damage by dropping something very dense and heavy on target X from orbit?

We're not cavemen, we don't need to throw things, we have technology, we need to throw things that go boom!

Dude, apparently those rods of god things, in theory (or maybe in practice, dunno if theyve ever actually used one in testing) when they drop out of orbit onto their target, they'll explode with the same force as a 15 KT nuclear bomb.... only without, ya know... all that radiation and fallout.

 Captain Fantastic wrote:
A Mobile Suit would be a much better investment.

Bran Dawri wrote:
I still think more money should be invested in space exploration.