Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Chancetragedy wrote:
Should have stuck with Hoyer brownies. Manziel can't bust fast enough for me.

Pats clinch 6th AFC east title straight! Anyone else besides Arizona clinch a playoff spot this week?

Indy clinched one as well. Go Colts!

Ahh right, nice. The playoffs start to take shape!

Manziel = fail

Kinda like 'nids current codex.

Wow... my Dakka FFL game went down to the wire, and really, for my team hinged on what should have been a good day for Rodgers turning out to be such a bad one

 Ensis Ferrae wrote:
Wow... my Dakka FFL game went down to the wire, and really, for my team hinged on what should have been a good day for Rodgers turning out to be such a bad one

Indeed, good game man.

 IAmTheWalrus wrote:

 Ensis Ferrae wrote:
Wow... my Dakka FFL game went down to the wire, and really, for my team hinged on what should have been a good day for Rodgers turning out to be such a bad one

Indeed, good game man.

you too man. Most of the games IRL were pretty damn good as well. That was kind of a wild one

It's been a long, strange road this season, but if the Steelers win against KC, they're in. Win out and they're division champs, which would mean a home playoff game for the first time in a few years. I love me some playoff tickets.

I'm a Manziel fan... but, I got a kick out of this:

Sure was a baptism of fire for him!

Let's give it half a season though, time on the pitch, there were sparkles there even in that thrashing but they need time to build up the organisation.

I turned off the game at the end of the first quarter. Looks like I just missed a dumpster fire.

Looks like I get Ensis' Marauders.

Poor Chicago. Can't catch a break lol.

Ensis and byte I hope you tie ;p

Chancetragedy wrote:
Poor Chicago. Can't catch a break lol.

Ensis and byte I hope you tie ;p

Lol!



There can be only one.

On the topic of Chicago, am I alone in thinking that an inordinate amount of blame has been foisted onto Cutler? Now don't get me wrong, he has a TON wrong with him, but its portrayal is that Chicago is only flawed because of him when the whole organization is pretty tanked.

Meh, I got the feeling it was a combination of terrible coaching and that cutler really is that bad yes. I never got the impression from national media it was all cutler.

 curran12 wrote:
On the topic of Chicago, am I alone in thinking that an inordinate amount of blame has been foisted onto Cutler? Now don't get me wrong, he has a TON wrong with him, but its portrayal is that Chicago is only flawed because of him when the whole organization is pretty tanked.

The thing I find ironic, is that Romo is just as "bad" as Cutler, and yet, because it's the Cowboys he seems to avoid much of that level of criticism.

Except Romo appears to care about football and is passionate and by all accounts a great teammate. It's not just cutlers play that makes him bad it's the whole package and Blasè attitude.

I'd take Cutler in a heartbeat.

<--- RAMs fan

I think he's having an "off" year and subject to poor OC planning.

He's currently sitting at 28 TD and 18 INT.

Guess who has 38 TD and 14 INT?

So your saying cutler is a lot worse than luck? I think we all agree with that ;p

Chancetragedy wrote:
So your saying cutler is a lot worse than luck? I think we all agree with that ;p

I have a Man Crush™ on Luck.

He's the guy I'd want to lead my franchise for years. (#2, ironically, is Russell Wilson).

The Bears are trying to force Cutler to throw the ball too much imo... he's not a Manning/Brees/Rodger QB.

I think I'd take luck too. Think of what seattle could be with luck and it's terrifying. More so than it is even now.

Cutler is a gunslinger. Gotta sling it. They use forte a ton so you can't even say use him more. This is also the 4th head coach for cutler. Most quarterbacks barely make it with more than 2. Let alone 4, but is it cutlers fault he's had so many head coaches?

Chancetragedy wrote:
I think I'd take luck too. Think of what seattle could be with luck and it's terrifying. More so than it is even now.

Nah man.... I don't think Seattle would do anything more with Luck than they already get with Wilson. There's a reason why they voted Wilson the Captain, and he started ahead of the big money free agent when he got there.

I don't think you could wrong with either of them. But they're pretty even as far as mobility, but luck has a better pocket passing game than Wilson. All things being equal I think most non Seahawks fans would take luck. You really aren't making a bad choice between either of them though.

whembly wrote:

Chancetragedy wrote:
So your saying cutler is a lot worse than luck? I think we all agree with that ;p

I have a Man Crush™ on Luck.

He's the guy I'd want to lead my franchise for years. (#2, ironically, is Russell Wilson).

The Bears are trying to force Cutler to throw the ball too much imo... he's not a Manning/Brees/Rodger QB.

Chancetragedy wrote:I don't think you could wrong with either of them. But they're pretty even as far as mobility, but luck has a better pocket passing game than Wilson. All things being equal I think most non Seahawks fans would take luck. You really aren't making a bad choice between either of them though.

Back, slavering beasts! The Neard will never leave Indy!

I bet people thought manning would never leave Indy either ;p


Automatically Appended Next Post:
Oh snap Saturday football hooray!

Are you ready for some football?!

New England now officially on upset alert down by 6 in the 3rd ;(

 whembly wrote:

I think he's having an "off" year and subject to poor OC planning.

Also, general frustration. No QB likes taking as many hits as he has, especially when his team is losing and he's being blamed.

 whembly wrote:

The Bears are trying to force Cutler to throw the ball too much imo... he's not a Manning/Brees/Rodger QB.

He also lacks the receivers and offensive lines those guys have, or had, when their production was prolific.

Your telling me Brandon Marshall, alshon jeffry, and Matt forte aren't at least as good as any of those QB's receivers? Besides mannings group I'd take chicagos skill position players over the saints, packers, Patriots, and many others...

Also that jets V pats game was super uncomfortable.

Chancetragedy wrote:
Your telling me Brandon Marshall, alshon jeffry, and Matt forte aren't at least as good as any of those QB's receivers? Besides mannings group I'd take chicagos skill position players over the saints, packers, Patriots, and many others...

You would take Brandon Marshall, Alshon Jeffry, and Matt Forte over guys like Randy Moss, Troy Brown, Deion Branch, and Wes Welker?

As an aside: It seems the Lions like to stomp. For reference.

If you're going to be dirty, at least try to be subtle.