Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

I'm sure I read somewhere that she was getting rules - can't remember where, though.

Does anyone have a better picture of the model in the top left? Looks really interesting as yet another Inquisitor in my armies.

Ah, I have given up trying to say a given army is not mine so I will look away and not buy them.
Sisters of Battle being rolled into some Inquisition rules will give me every reason to get a few of them.
Seeing Sisters in plastic could be just what is needed to get a few. I meant "made in plastic" not dressed in plastic...

next person to piss of the MODs in this thread gets a suspension.

 General Annoyance wrote:

 Kid_Kyoto wrote:
This is an absolute dumpster fire of a thread.

This can't be quoted enough, until this thread gets locked

It's embarrassing.

FWIW, I think the mini will look really good at the right scale. It's the super closeup that draws attention to the distortions they put into every miniature.

 gorgon wrote:

 General Annoyance wrote:

 Kid_Kyoto wrote:
This is an absolute dumpster fire of a thread.

This can't be quoted enough, until this thread gets locked

It's embarrassing.

FWIW, I think the mini will look really good at the right scale. It's the super closeup that draws attention to the distortions they put into every miniature.

I think the mini is fine, the leg pose seems a bit off. but honestly its a great Homage to the picture.

if you really dont like it, just get one of the metal canoness that they have still.

nekooni wrote:
Does anyone have a better picture of the model in the top left? Looks really interesting as yet another Inquisitor in my armies.

The one with the crossbow? Here ya go:

 StupidYellow wrote:
if you really dont like it, just get one of the metal canoness that they have still.

I already have one, and I still think Canoness Montana looks strange and silly from the waist down (also the skull-boobs). It's not a great model. Not "Nemesis baby-carrier"-bad, but not great either.

Cosmic Schwung wrote:

nekooni wrote:
Does anyone have a better picture of the model in the top left? Looks really interesting as yet another Inquisitor in my armies.

The one with the crossbow? Here ya go:

Spoiler:

Yupp, that one - thanks! Damn, I didn't want to spend any more on 40k this year, but I'll have to get one of those I think...

A pity there's no Argo-flagellants amongst that lot, but I've been after a daemonhost for ages.

I wonder if this means there'll be stats for Redemptor Kyrinov? He's not in the current Codex: Adepta Sororitas.

I doubt he gets stats, seeing how its a made to order model

 AndrewGPaul wrote:
A pity there's no Argo-flagellants amongst that lot, but I've been after a daemonhost for ages.

I wonder if this means there'll be stats for Redemptor Kyrinov? He's not in the current Codex: Adepta Sororitas.

The arco-flagellants are still for sale on the website. Also, seeing as he'll be limited run, I severly doubt we'll get rule Kyrinov.

Phew, I managed to reserve two of the Canonesses!

(Also, the skull-bra is bloody awesome! It is brilliantly insane goth-punk detail. Sure, it would be daft if all SoB had such, but they won't.)

Apparently the canoness is having stats in the box - not sure if they are normal canoness stats or SC ones, like say the special Space Marine.

Hopefully, she won't have crazy stats like the 30th Anniversary Space Marine. A Strength 5, AP2, Rapid Fire and Instant Death combi-weapon is a bit much.

That's a really nice canonness. I can't wait for it to be sold out day 1.

Space Pope returns! Getting that.

Probably one of those lady Inquisitors too. Back in the day I was really put off by the beehive hair, but now I'm confident I could do a smart hat like in DoW2.

 TheCustomLime wrote:
That's a really nice canonness. I can't wait for it to be sold out day 1.

Probably hour 1. Have your credit cards ready at noon CST, American people!

nekooni wrote:

Cosmic Schwung wrote:

nekooni wrote:
Does anyone have a better picture of the model in the top left? Looks really interesting as yet another Inquisitor in my armies.

The one with the crossbow? Here ya go:

Spoiler:

Yupp, that one - thanks! Damn, I didn't want to spend any more on 40k this year, but I'll have to get one of those I think...

Oh man im excited

i need like 4 of those then i have basically all of them.

The cannoness is a great model if you ask me. Of course they have to change the proportions and upscale it. If they didn't it would look like a Malifaux model among all the GW models. GW upscales things to fit with their proportions and so detail is not obscured. Looks like any other sisters model if you ask me. Of course the hair/boots/skullboobs are silly, the picture itself is silly. 40k is silly. Grimdark doesn't mean practical. There's nothing practical about how anyone fights in the 41st millennium.

And it won't be in the imperial agents book. You can quote me on that and make me eat my words if its false. But have any collectors/anniversary/limited print models ever been in codexes? They only put in models you can actively buy so you want to you know...buy them.

 Don Savik wrote:

And it won't be in the imperial agents book. You can quote me on that and make me eat my words if its false. But have any collectors/anniversary/limited print models ever been in codexes? They only put in models you can actively buy so you want to you know...buy them.

I don't think anyone here expects the LE Cannoness model to be in the Imperial Agents codex.

Someone mentioned seeing a Photoshop job that altered the face, I was skeptical but ended up finding it:



That's more or less in line with what I'm thinking (there's a guide out there to painting better sororitas faces that achieve similar results compared to GW's examples. The underlying structure is still there.

As for the rules, did the imperial space marine end up in any printed material? I seem to recall seeing him in a book somewhere.

 Captain Joystick wrote:


As for the rules, did the imperial space marine end up in any printed material? I seem to recall seeing him in a book somewhere.

No, it did not. Not even a WD article.

 AndrewGPaul wrote:
A pity there's no Argo-flagellants amongst that lot, but I've been after a daemonhost for ages.

I wonder if this means there'll be stats for Redemptor Kyrinov? He's not in the current Codex: Adepta Sororitas.

In US store at least. Had to check all of these in search function in webstore https://www.games-workshop.com/en-US/Grey-Knights-Arco-flagellants so looks like everything is in store or being brought back on demand for a brief time.
Agree, I loved the wacky carrot-top guy.

ERJAK wrote:
It is tiresome to listen to 14-55 year old white men (statistically) Argue ad nauseum about modern feminist theory as it relates to boobplates, stripper heels, and latex dominatrix outfits on miniature toy soldiers ...

Point of clarification, but those are NOT the ordinary "stripper heels" that you'd see on the girls working the local Deja Vu. They are fetish heels, like what you'd find in a BDSM dungeon. Fetish heels turn heels to eleven, where the foot is nearly enpointe. That hyperfeminine look is what the artwork depicts for the footwear.

It has nothing to do with modern feminist theory, as far as I'm aware.

 JohnHwangDD wrote:

ERJAK wrote:
It is tiresome to listen to 14-55 year old white men (statistically) Argue ad nauseum about modern feminist theory as it relates to boobplates, stripper heels, and latex dominatrix outfits on miniature toy soldiers ...

Point of clarification, but those are NOT the ordinary "stripper heels" that you'd see on the girls working the local Deja Vu. They are fetish heels, like what you'd find in a BDSM dungeon. Fetish heels turn heels to eleven, where the foot is nearly enpointe. That hyperfeminine look is what the artwork depicts for the footwear.

It has nothing to do with modern feminist theory, as far as I'm aware.

Depending on who you would ask. Some feminist theory considers any kind of fetish wrong. It certainly has a very Latexrotica look about it, personally I like that.

S.Y.

 StupidYellow wrote:

 JohnHwangDD wrote:

ERJAK wrote:
It is tiresome to listen to 14-55 year old white men (statistically) Argue ad nauseum about modern feminist theory as it relates to boobplates, stripper heels, and latex dominatrix outfits on miniature toy soldiers ...

Point of clarification, but those are NOT the ordinary "stripper heels" that you'd see on the girls working the local Deja Vu. They are fetish heels, like what you'd find in a BDSM dungeon. Fetish heels turn heels to eleven, where the foot is nearly enpointe. That hyperfeminine look is what the artwork depicts for the footwear.

It has nothing to do with modern feminist theory, as far as I'm aware.

Depending on who you would ask some feminist theory considers any kind of fetish wrong. It certainly has a very Latexrotica look about it, personally I like that.

S.Y.

OK, fair enough. The original is definitely full fetish latex suit.

£15 my store manager told me. I'm preordering can't wait! I don't have a sisters army but she will make a fine addition for Inquisimunda style games :-)

In reference to that comment i made earlier to the photoshop of the face, i managed to find the pic and the softer look really does help it a lot.

GW just announced these will be available on the web store indefinitely. No worries about getting your Canoness.