Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

It’s listed in the terms and conditions

https://www.games-workshop.com/en-GB/Terms-and-Conditions-of-Sale

Do they say how long they last, never got a GW voucher before? 28 is worth giving a go maybe.

Apple fox wrote:
Do they say how long they last, never got a GW voucher before? 28 is worth giving a go maybe.

2.2. Participants must have created a 'My Warhammer’ account and must hold an active subscription to GW’s ‘Warhammer+’ subscription service by 23:59 (in your local time zone) on 31st August 2021 and also must hold an active ‘Warhammer+’ subscription by 23:59 (in your local time zone) on 30th September 2021 to be eligible for a Virtual Voucher under this Offer.

3.2. Virtual Vouchers provided as part of this promotion will be sent by email on the 1st October 2021.

4.1.1. must be redeemed by 23.59 (in your local time zone) on 31st October 2021 and will expire thereafter;

Subbed this morning. Rollout seems to be a bit of a mess, lots of people (at least early on before Warcom posted their most recent article on it, not sure if its helped any) confused about where they were supposed to sign up, etc. (I forgot the mywarhammer website even existed), lots of people unaware that the Warhammer TV app is the corresponding app to the Warhammer + service, etc. In general their branding on this just seems kind of off, they should have named all the constituent apps "Warhammer + [blank]", i.e. "Warhammer+ TV", "Warhammer+ Vault", etc. I didn't realize that Warhammer TV was relevant to my warhammer + sub until a friend pointed it out to me.

 The Phazer wrote:

chaos0xomega wrote:

 The Phazer wrote:
Not brilliant that the "top company" they've had working on this wasn't able to sort out an Android TV app for launch when there's a Fire TV app.

It's not quite zero porting required between the two, but it's not much in the grand scheme of things and it rather suggests a rushed, badly planned launch.

Did they ever reveal who the "top company" is? I wouldn't be surprised to learn its a middling but established company that nobody has ever actually heard of

No, but I'll figure it out within half an hour of the app going live.

So, whats your verdict?

 Wha-Mu-077 wrote:

And i find it kinda absurd how everyone completly misses my entire point.

Agreed, I understood your point quite clearly - I have to assume these guys are trolling you or intentionally mischaracterizing the nature of your point, otherwise their reading comprehension is awful. Its supposed to be an agri-world, i.e. open fields, barns, bales of hay, dilapidated wood/stone fences, cattle pens, etc. Instead it looks like a semi-industrial city. As someone else pointed out, its entirely possible that this represents the market square of a nearby village, the processing area of an industrial farm operation, or even an area of the planets capital, etc. So its not entirely out of the question that this does represent a scene from an agri-world, just not the "stereotype" of what you expect an agriworld to look like.

 Tokhuah wrote:
Let's make a bet that GW will release an official 40k Emperor's Tarot deck based on the internationally popular Hammer and Bolter series. It will be filled with beautiful art and proprietary card names to confuse experienced Tarot readers and to make sure nobody copies it without getting sued. It will retail for $65 and come with an exclusive wafer.

I'd buy it.

hypnoticeris wrote:
Anyone else getting this message?

Warhammer TV doesn't appear to be available in your location. But fear not, there are plenty of awesome subscriber perks you can enjoy. - The Warhammer Vault – a treasure trove of archived Warhammer publications and White Dwarf issues - Full access to Warhammer apps – both Warhammer 40,000: The App and Warhammer Age of Sigmar: The App, with more to come - Premium experiences at official events - Unique offers just for subscribers - A free, exclusive Citadel miniature - The chance to purchase the rest of the exclusive subscriber miniature lineup

Check out the Terms & Conditions for more information about your subscription

So, I got this message where I live(Iceland), but after I subscribed I still could access the videos and whatnot. YMMV of course.

 DaveC wrote:

Apple fox wrote:
Do they say how long they last, never got a GW voucher before? 28 is worth giving a go maybe.

2.2. Participants must have created a 'My Warhammer’ account and must hold an active subscription to GW’s ‘Warhammer+’ subscription service by 23:59 (in your local time zone) on 31st August 2021 and also must hold an active ‘Warhammer+’ subscription by 23:59 (in your local time zone) on 30th September 2021 to be eligible for a Virtual Voucher under this Offer.

3.2. Virtual Vouchers provided as part of this promotion will be sent by email on the 1st October 2021.

4.1.1. must be redeemed by 23.59 (in your local time zone) on 31st October 2021 and will expire thereafter;

Don’t think there will be anything worth buying by then, so eh. Worthless to me to consider.

Thanks for the info all the same very helpful.

You only have to subscribe for a month to get the voucher? So they are actually paying people to get a month of Warhammer plus? They must either be extremely desperate, or really confident that people will keep it once they try it.

Checkout at my-warhammer appears to be broken for me.. tried 3 different browsers but no dice.

 Albino Squirrel wrote:
You only have to subscribe for a month to get the voucher? So they are actually paying people to get a month of Warhammer plus? They must either be extremely desperate, or really confident that people will keep it once they try it.

You need to pay for two months, you have to stay subscribed past the start of October.

 Albino Squirrel wrote:
You only have to subscribe for a month to get the voucher? So they are actually paying people to get a month of Warhammer plus? They must either be extremely desperate, or really confident that people will keep it once they try it.

Well two months so no.
It’s the first two months free basically..


Automatically Appended Next Post:
Beaten to it..

There is also the calculus of vouchers/rebates/gift cards. How many issued will actually get used? When spending it, will you buy more than it’s value? By buying from the company store, they get a higher margin.

It is in no way a desperation move.

Wow a GW voucher?

Last time I saw one of those was a store opening voucher in WD hundred-and-something, buy three boxsets and get the cheapest one free think it was

Just after the collapse of the Soviet Union, I remember the date.

 Albino Squirrel wrote:
You only have to subscribe for a month to get the voucher? So they are actually paying people to get a month of Warhammer plus? They must either be extremely desperate, or really confident that people will keep it once they try it.

since it’s for there own store, and most things cost extra there. If people buy minis, the major cost is in design and manufacturing before the cost of mini itself.
So getting extra money, even if it costs them a voucher is well worth it for nearly anything they sell.
It’s a great incentive as a whole for them, they do get money, even if on paper they are losing some.

 Pacific wrote:
Wow a GW voucher?

Last time I saw one of those was a store opening voucher in WD hundred-and-something, buy three boxsets and get the cheapest one free think it was

Just after the collapse of the Soviet Union, I remember the date.

Eh? They've done voucher offers several times in the last year. Including this last month.
They had an ongoing series last fall for buy X amount, get a voucher for Y, recurring for about 3 months.

 kirotheavenger wrote:
I've heard it, iirc much of Europe doesn't get WHTV.

Well looks like even if you get statement it's not in your area it still shows.




Automatically Appended Next Post:
And the board for um vs necron isn't sparse but damn boring layout. Why they evee bothered rolling who picks　up deployment zone

That's a good point. I guess it doesn't actually cost GW much, since anyone using that voucher will end up spending much more than the value of the voucher on the store, and may even buy something they otherwise wouldn't have to use it up on time. So I guess there's little risk to GW, so it's not necessarily that they're confident people will keep the subscription. But it should bump the numbers up for the first few months if they're essentially giving it away for free.

I wanted to peek out for curiosity.

Got sent to this page: https://mywarhammer.com/error

I'm on international region, any ideas?

Edit: I guess I know now:

GeeDubs- wrote:Will Warhammer TV be available where I live?
Warhammer TV has been officially launched in the following territories: UK, USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, Belgium, The Netherlands, Denmark, Sweden, Germany, and Italy.

However, we’re adding new countries to this list all the time, so check for updates regularly, or sign up for our Warhammer+ newsletter to get all the latest information delivered directly to your inbox.

Can any of my colegas íbericos or other people from around the world confirm if they get an error too?

chaos0xomega wrote:


Agreed, I understood your point quite clearly - I have to assume these guys are trolling you or intentionally mischaracterizing the nature of your point, otherwise their reading comprehension is awful. Its supposed to be an agri-world, i.e. open fields, barns, bales of hay, dilapidated wood/stone fences, cattle pens, etc. Instead it looks like a semi-industrial city. As someone else pointed out, its entirely possible that this represents the market square of a nearby village, the processing area of an industrial farm operation, or even an area of the planets capital, etc. So its not entirely out of the question that this does represent a scene from an agri-world, just not the "stereotype" of what you expect an agriworld to look like.

No, it's supposed to be the battle of Iax, which takes place in the capital city of an agriworld, and is documented in great detail in a novel that came out months ago - and the place the battle takes place looks pretty much like that board.

I can totally see why someone might not realise that, certainly not everyone is going to have read the book. And yes, "agriworld" does sound like you'd expect something else without that context. But what I can't understand is that when someone politely points that out the battle they're recreating happens in a city, the reaction isn't to go "oh fair enough, haven't read it," but to double down, to say that's bad reading comprehension or trolling, or to come up with conspiracy theories about how that's justification after the fact for using the gakky GW terrain boards, when the book was written a year ago.

The battle and its setting are described in great detail over 50 pages or so of Godblight. It doesn't take place on farmland. Might have been cool if it did, but it didn't.

There is no argument here, other than "a rural battle would have been cooler than an industrial one". People are inferring stuff about the setting from one word in the marketing copy when there's 20,000 words written that describe it in great detail. There's no need.

 streetsamurai wrote:
Yeah, that's one of the part of nuGW that i hate the most. Completely removed the diy part of the hobby and almost only showing GW produced terrain. Which is kind of sad considering that old WD were having articles showing how to make some terrain

It's very much a bummer. I learned so much about how to make terrain from WD as well as the terrain book GWS put out; excellent resources. Sad to see them pretend they never did stuff like that. If you like terrain, the GWS book "How To Make Wargames Terrain" is a must-own at like $16 USD.

 endlesswaltz123 wrote:
I can't load the warhammer tv page... Standard GW

Eh. No streaming service worked well on the first day, or even the first few days.

Voss wrote:

 Pacific wrote:
Wow a GW voucher?

Last time I saw one of those was a store opening voucher in WD hundred-and-something, buy three boxsets and get the cheapest one free think it was

Just after the collapse of the Soviet Union, I remember the date.

Eh? They've done voucher offers several times in the last year. Including this last month.
They had an ongoing series last fall for buy X amount, get a voucher for Y, recurring for about 3 months.

Thanks for the correction.. I have very much missed the current releases (and by current I mean the last decade) other than the odd copy of WD

Good that they are giving the odd offer again!

chaos0xomega wrote:
]. Its supposed to be an agri-world, i.e. open fields, barns, bales of hay, dilapidated wood/stone fences, cattle pens, etc. Instead it looks like a semi-industrial city. As someone else pointed out, its entirely possible that this represents the market square of a nearby village, the processing area of an industrial farm operation, or even an area of the planets capital, etc. So its not entirely out of the question that this does represent a scene from an agri-world, just not the "stereotype" of what you expect an agriworld to look like.

Ah yes. Battle taking in capital city(as per fluff of battle. You HAVE read it right?) Looks like farm, forest etc...since when?

How many capitals in our world has barns and hay???

Really? Not even north korea or afganistan have such capitals.

You have weird ideas on what capital cities(you did of course know where story takes place since you critique. Surely you wouldn't do that without knowing fluff of battle in question) looks like.

deano2099 wrote:

chaos0xomega wrote:


Agreed, I understood your point quite clearly - I have to assume these guys are trolling you or intentionally mischaracterizing the nature of your point, otherwise their reading comprehension is awful. Its supposed to be an agri-world, i.e. open fields, barns, bales of hay, dilapidated wood/stone fences, cattle pens, etc. Instead it looks like a semi-industrial city. As someone else pointed out, its entirely possible that this represents the market square of a nearby village, the processing area of an industrial farm operation, or even an area of the planets capital, etc. So its not entirely out of the question that this does represent a scene from an agri-world, just not the "stereotype" of what you expect an agriworld to look like.

No, it's supposed to be the battle of Iax, which takes place in the capital city of an agriworld, and is documented in great detail in a novel that came out months ago - and the place the battle takes place looks pretty much like that board.

I can totally see why someone might not realise that, certainly not everyone is going to have read the book. And yes, "agriworld" does sound like you'd expect something else without that context. But what I can't understand is that when someone politely points that out the battle they're recreating happens in a city, the reaction isn't to go "oh fair enough, haven't read it," but to double down, to say that's bad reading comprehension or trolling, or to come up with conspiracy theories about how that's justification after the fact for using the gakky GW terrain boards, when the book was written a year ago.

The battle and its setting are described in great detail over 50 pages or so of Godblight. It doesn't take place on farmland. Might have been cool if it did, but it didn't.

There is no argument here, other than "a rural battle would have been cooler than an industrial one". People are inferring stuff about the setting from one word in the marketing copy when there's 20,000 words written that describe it in great detail. There's no need.

I would follow up, that we have seen some pictures of parts of what look to be the finished board.
Bit extra terrain and tactical dust of a more desert kind.
It doesn’t really look like anything, not a space port. City hub with shops or a habitat for living.
Maybe they will wow me, and the side with nurgle will be covered in green and spores and color as the Aproach of chaos nears.
Even if you can say it’s appropriate for the setting they invoking, it’s still rather dull.

Also as a narrative mission from a book, how did they even get off the planet if it all but fell and this is a last stand ? This more my curiosity as added idea before I watch the batrep if I end up paying.

Anyway, what about Masterclass? That's the only thing I'm looking after.

Masterclass I found enjoyable enough. So far it’s Pale Flesh and Wet Blending.

I guess it’s one of those things you’ll need to suck it and see for yourself. After all, what I find useful may be old hat to you, and vice verse.

I can say they’re well shot, with clear examples of the techniques and paint consistencies. Both also extol the use and benefit of a wet palette.

And screenshots won't come easily it looks like. App has anti screenshot feature

On the second battle report. Neither has used stock, unconverted terrain. Both have use entirely scratch built terrain.

But you know what I want? I want legendary battles.

Not narratively legendary. I’m talking battles between legends. Wheel Jervis out of retirement, and dig up Big Bad Andy C. Perhaps find Fat Bloke too.

Hell, even dig out the old games. I’d love one more 2nd Ed Epic Battle Report, me. Just for poops and titters.

tneva82 wrote:
And screenshots won't come easily it looks like. App has anti screenshot feature

But…..one can take a pic of one’s screen on one’s phone.

Voila! But please note Louise didn’t paint the head like that. It’s a mock up she created to explain the colour theory thing of faces.

I have no idea where that’s from, but yes.

The actual model she paints is amazing though.

Wow, 2 free months of something that isn't worth the free part....

Such wonderous times we live in.

So in order to get people to sign up they need:
£10 voucher
2 free months

Man the sheer value they've given everyone!

Sweet. So don’t sign up.

Simple answers, eh?