Poll |
 |
|
 |
Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/03/10 03:43:16
Subject: Does 40k need a new type of space marine?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
To be completely honest, no, 40k doesn't need a new Marine. However, provided that the new Marines are sufficiently interesting, and have good models and fluff, I'll welcome them into the setting happily.
|
Peregrine - If you like the army buy it, and don't worry about what one random person on the internet thinks.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/03/10 04:09:53
Subject: Does 40k need a new type of space marine?
|
 |
Journeyman Inquisitor with Visions of the Warp
|
Basic SM Tacticals are terrible and GW knows it. They are so bad, they get a 400-600pt handicap in free vehicles when taken in a "fluffy" Battle Company,
Maybe it's actually a fix.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/03/10 04:54:12
Subject: Does 40k need a new type of space marine?
|
 |
Gore-Soaked Lunatic Witchhunter
|
...There are sixty-nine different Space Marine armies in the game already (eighteen Chapter Tactics with the Space Marine book, all eighteen still usable with the Siege Assault Vanguard list, three variant Codexes, nine Traitor Legions, nineteen variations on the 30k Legion list, plus the Deathwatch and the Grey Knights). With one hundred and thirty-odd Special Characters between them.
What would we do with another one? Besides overlap with an existing army?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/03/10 05:09:49
Subject: Does 40k need a new type of space marine?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Gamgee wrote:Hastings said IG future is hazy if I recall. :( WHYYY! There are now almost no humans working to save themselves. Just space marines. It's an empire of marines at this point.
This is not that supriing isn't it ? GW clearly doesn't like stuff that they can't protect the IP of, and the current IG are the definition of unprotectable IP.
Automatically Appended Next Post: AnomanderRake wrote:...There are sixty-nine different Space Marine armies in the game already (eighteen Chapter Tactics with the Space Marine book, all eighteen still usable with the Siege Assault Vanguard list, three variant Codexes, nine Traitor Legions, nineteen variations on the 30k Legion list, plus the Deathwatch and the Grey Knights). With one hundred and thirty-odd Special Characters between them.
What would we do with another one? Besides overlap with an existing army?
There are outside FW no neutral / pirate factions. There could be a pletora of black shield like chapters post guilliman
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/03/10 05:12:08
Inactive, user. New profile might pop up in a while |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/03/10 05:16:05
Subject: Does 40k need a new type of space marine?
|
 |
Consigned to the Grim Darkness
|
Or there could just be more boring rehashes that just take the place of something more interesting that's not another marine-clone vomited out without any effort put in to it.
|
The people in the past who convinced themselves to do unspeakable things were no less human than you or I. They made their decisions; the only thing that prevents history from repeating itself is making different ones.
-- Adam Serwer
My blog |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/03/10 05:23:01
Subject: Does 40k need a new type of space marine?
|
 |
Gore-Soaked Lunatic Witchhunter
|
oldzoggy wrote:Automatically Appended Next Post:
AnomanderRake wrote:...There are sixty-nine different Space Marine armies in the game already (eighteen Chapter Tactics with the Space Marine book, all eighteen still usable with the Siege Assault Vanguard list, three variant Codexes, nine Traitor Legions, nineteen variations on the 30k Legion list, plus the Deathwatch and the Grey Knights). With one hundred and thirty-odd Special Characters between them.
What would we do with another one? Besides overlap with an existing army?
There are outside FW no neutral / pirate factions. There could be a pletora of black shield like chapters post guilliman
And... what would the 70th Space Marine variant do that the previous 69 don't?
Alternately: Why do we need Space Marine list #70 before Ork list #2?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/03/10 05:42:02
Subject: Does 40k need a new type of space marine?
|
 |
Renegade Inquisitor with a Bound Daemon
Tied and gagged in the back of your car
|
I wouldn't mind a gradual introduction of marines in a more fitting scale.
But for the love of god, give the Sisters some love first.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/03/10 05:53:39
Subject: Does 40k need a new type of space marine?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
AnomanderRake wrote:
And... what would the 70th Space Marine variant do that the previous 69 don't?
Alternately: Why do we need Space Marine list #70 before Ork list #2?
Look cool on the battle field, have cool fluff ally etc. In game... ehm not much of a difference really but meh is that really why you collect an army ?
Na I am actually not sure if I would rahter have ork list 2. My orks can be any ork amy I want them to be they just need a better set of rules no need for an other list with an other background really, while I would certainly jump on to pirate black shield marines to add to my inquisitors, instead of using my scummy marine conversions as count as puritan ones.
|
Inactive, user. New profile might pop up in a while |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/03/10 05:56:44
Subject: Does 40k need a new type of space marine?
|
 |
Consigned to the Grim Darkness
|
Can your Orks be a Kommando army that is sneaky and ambushes with brutal kunning? Cause I'd like to know how, outside of including some rather underwhelming Kommando units. And, again, what the HELL can a new spehss marny faction even BE at this point? They're kind of running out of colors even at this point.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/03/10 05:57:21
The people in the past who convinced themselves to do unspeakable things were no less human than you or I. They made their decisions; the only thing that prevents history from repeating itself is making different ones.
-- Adam Serwer
My blog |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/03/10 06:05:29
Subject: Does 40k need a new type of space marine?
|
 |
Heroic Senior Officer
|
I mean if we're including FW, there's an Ork list #2 called the Dread Mob.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/03/10 06:40:09
Subject: Does 40k need a new type of space marine?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Melissia wrote:Can your Orks be a Kommando army that is sneaky and ambushes with brutal kunning? Cause I'd like to know how, outside of including some rather underwhelming Kommando units. And, again, what the HELL can a new spehss marny faction even BE at this point? They're kind of running out of colors even at this point.
You kan, it is even possible to outflank a stompa pretty kunning but brutal if you ask me.
However orks could use a better codex with buffed rules, but you do not need an other list to be able to do this.
|
Inactive, user. New profile might pop up in a while |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/03/10 09:20:36
Subject: Does 40k need a new type of space marine?
|
 |
Legendary Dogfighter
|
Don Savik wrote:Idk I feel like the closer we get to the new edition the mania of what happened to fantasy is slowly reaching critical mass. No matter how many times GW tells us they won't pull another end times people still find ways around it.
A new super space marine? Can anyone seriously say that out loud without laughing? Space Marines are the elite of the elite, and grey knights/deathwatch are the elite of the elite of the elite, but the new SPACE MARINE KNIGHTS OF GUILLIMAN are the elite of the elite of the elite of the elite!
GW does stupid stuff, but here I have to give them the benefit of the doubt. They aren't that stupid. I don't care what percentage this guys crystal ball visions are, even the top ones have been wrong repeatedly. So many people have been making up nonsense with this new edition coming around the corner that speculation is pointless. I'm just waiting to see what comes out before I set fire to my collection.
edit: even 80% accuracy means 1 out of every 5 things coming out of your mouth is squig-gak.
After they blew up the Warhammer world, and replaced it with plane walking fantasy marines I can't give them the benefit of the doubt for anything. By all accounts that's a majority view amongst their fan base. We keep being told to calm down they won't do the same with 40K, and then rumours of super space marines start doing the rounds amongst reliable rumour mongers. At this point I have to assume they will ruin everything I love about the IP, theres no evidence to show they won't.
|
it's the quiet ones you have to look out for. Their the ones that change the world, the loud ones just take the credit for it. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/03/10 13:29:37
Subject: Does 40k need a new type of space marine?
|
 |
Consigned to the Grim Darkness
|
oldzoggy wrote:However orks could use a better codex with buffed rules, but you do not need an other list to be able to do this.
And you don't need ffity seven codices to give Marines variety either but they're doing that. So I suggest they go all out and give EVERYONE fifty seven codices. More variety, more fun.
|
The people in the past who convinced themselves to do unspeakable things were no less human than you or I. They made their decisions; the only thing that prevents history from repeating itself is making different ones.
-- Adam Serwer
My blog |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/03/10 13:31:01
Subject: Does 40k need a new type of space marine?
|
 |
Grovelin' Grot
South Africa
|
There are too many Factions of Space Marines already... please no more
|
'As long deres 'eads to bash and shootas to blast wif den we Orks is 'appy boyz |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/03/10 14:02:09
Subject: Does 40k need a new type of space marine?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
For the love of god...
Dear geederps, *the other side needs some toys*
Start with Chaos Space Marines, then Tyranids, Orks, Dark Eldar.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/03/10 14:08:08
Subject: Does 40k need a new type of space marine?
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
I voted no but can entirely understand financially why they would do.
|
I've been playing a while, my first model was a lead marine and my first White Dwarf was bound with staples |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/03/10 14:08:12
Subject: Re:Does 40k need a new type of space marine?
|
 |
Furious Fire Dragon
|
Yes! Moar Spam Marines!
There really is no such thing as too much spam marines.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/03/10 14:11:20
Subject: Does 40k need a new type of space marine?
|
 |
Consigned to the Grim Darkness
|
zerosignal wrote:For the love of god...
Dear geederps, *the other side needs some toys*
Start with Chaos Space Marines, then Tyranids, Orks, Dark Eldar.
Chaos Space Marines got some new toys tho, especially compared to Tyranids and Orks.
|
The people in the past who convinced themselves to do unspeakable things were no less human than you or I. They made their decisions; the only thing that prevents history from repeating itself is making different ones.
-- Adam Serwer
My blog |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/03/10 15:06:27
Subject: Re:Does 40k need a new type of space marine?
|
 |
Beautiful and Deadly Keeper of Secrets
|
New Marines Old Marines.. Chaos is gonna corrupt em and destroy the rest! FOR THE DARK GODS!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/03/10 15:33:36
Subject: Does 40k need a new type of space marine?
|
 |
Mighty Vampire Count
|
No they really, really don't need more Marines.
Plastic Sisters, Plastic non Cadian Guard, Exodites, and many more would be more interesting that yet another Marine.
|
I AM A MARINE PLAYER
"Unimaginably ancient xenos artefact somewhere on the planet, hive fleet poised above our heads, hidden 'stealer broods making an early start....and now a bloody Chaos cult crawling out of the woodwork just in case we were bored. Welcome to my world, Ciaphas."
Inquisitor Amberley Vail, Ordo Xenos
"I will admit that some Primachs like Russ or Horus could have a chance against an unarmed 12 year old novice but, a full Battle Sister??!! One to one? In close combat? Perhaps three Primarchs fighting together... but just one Primarch?" da001
www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/528517.page
A Bloody Road - my Warhammer Fantasy Fiction |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/03/10 15:48:51
Subject: Does 40k need a new type of space marine?
|
 |
Boosting Black Templar Biker
|
Gamgee wrote:Hastings has been right about everything so far. He called Deathwatch a year and a half before anyone else. He specifically says they will be better in all ways.
WS 5, BS 5, S 5, T 5, W 5, I 5, A 5, Ld 10, Sv 2+/4++ for a "New Tactical Super Space Marine"? 20 to a squad? 10 points per model each? With Guilliman Super-Bolters, Range 48", S 5, AP 2, Assault 3?
(Kidding, of course. Wouldn't know actually)
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/03/10 15:53:06
Subject: Does 40k need a new type of space marine?
|
 |
Gore-Soaked Lunatic Witchhunter
|
oldzoggy wrote: AnomanderRake wrote:
And... what would the 70th Space Marine variant do that the previous 69 don't?
Alternately: Why do we need Space Marine list #70 before Ork list #2?
Look cool on the battle field, have cool fluff ally etc. In game... ehm not much of a difference really but meh is that really why you collect an army ?
Na I am actually not sure if I would rahter have ork list 2. My orks can be any ork amy I want them to be they just need a better set of rules no need for an other list with an other background really, while I would certainly jump on to pirate black shield marines to add to my inquisitors, instead of using my scummy marine conversions as count as puritan ones.
WHY WOULD YOU PICK SPACE MARINE LIST #70 OVER SPACE MARINE LISTS #0-69?
Why can you make your Orks any Ork army you want them to be with one list but you need seventy lists to make your Space Marines what you want them to be? Automatically Appended Next Post: Mr Morden wrote:No they really, really don't need more Marines.
Plastic Sisters, Plastic non Cadian Guard, Exodites, and many more would be more interesting that yet another Marine.
You don't even need to go that far. Updated Guardians, updated Orks, an update to every vehicle in the game, plastic Aspect Warriors, replace all the Finecast Daemon units, give the Inquisition some actual models (and possibly a Codex that works)...
Seriously. There's a new power-armoured Space Marine kit on a monthly basis. The Eldar and the Orks are stuck with infantry that were old when 5e landed a decade ago. And everyone is stuck with ancient vehicles that are chock-full of warped parts and wasted space where they could have put all the gun options they don't make.
(The most annoying part about the vehicle thing is that you don't need to update (for instance) six kits for the Rhino chassis, you could fit them in two multi-kits and have room to spare to give them a bunch of the variant turret weapons you need to go to Forge World or third parties to get today. Your Wave Serpent/Falcon chassis could build all six tanks with one kit instead of five. It'd be easier and cheaper for GW and it'd be vastly more convenient for us.)
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/03/10 16:06:22
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/03/10 17:20:55
Subject: Does 40k need a new type of space marine?
|
 |
Khorne Veteran Marine with Chain-Axe
|
Insectum7 wrote:No.
More No.
The full Grey Knight army was already too many. Actually Space Wolves, Blood Angels and Dark Angels getting their own full Codexes was too many.
No.
|
6000 World Eaters/Khorne |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/03/10 17:43:29
Subject: Does 40k need a new type of space marine?
|
 |
Mekboy Hammerin' Somethin'
Alaska
|
AnomanderRake wrote:[Seriously. There's a new power-armoured Space Marine kit on a monthly basis. The Eldar and the Orks are stuck with infantry that were old when 5e landed a decade ago.
The ork infantry is old, but I actually think it still looks pretty good. I wouldn't mind seeing new ork kits, but I think other armies could use new plastics first. (The warbuggy and wartrakk are pretty ancient though.)
|
YELL REAL LOUD AN' CARRY A BIG CHOPPA! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/03/10 17:57:33
Subject: Does 40k need a new type of space marine?
|
 |
Bonkers Buggy Driver with Rockets
|
AnomanderRake wrote: oldzoggy wrote: AnomanderRake wrote:
And... what would the 70th Space Marine variant do that the previous 69 don't?
Alternately: Why do we need Space Marine list #70 before Ork list #2?
Look cool on the battle field, have cool fluff ally etc. In game... ehm not much of a difference really but meh is that really why you collect an army ?
Na I am actually not sure if I would rahter have ork list 2. My orks can be any ork amy I want them to be they just need a better set of rules no need for an other list with an other background really, while I would certainly jump on to pirate black shield marines to add to my inquisitors, instead of using my scummy marine conversions as count as puritan ones.
WHY WOULD YOU PICK SPACE MARINE LIST #70 OVER SPACE MARINE LISTS #0-69?
Why can you make your Orks any Ork army you want them to be with one list but you need seventy lists to make your Space Marines what you want them to be?
Exalted. We have enough rules and army variants for space marines to support many playstyles and units. Pretty much every SM unit is made useful in a formation, detachment, or variant army somewhere. Meanwhile half of the DE codex languishes due to lack of stuff, and xenos armies lose characters every edition.
|
40k drinking game: take a shot everytime a book references Skitarii using transports.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/03/10 18:27:18
Subject: Does 40k need a new type of space marine?
|
 |
Dark Angels Librarian with Book of Secrets
|
gnome_idea_what wrote: AnomanderRake wrote: oldzoggy wrote: AnomanderRake wrote:
And... what would the 70th Space Marine variant do that the previous 69 don't?
Alternately: Why do we need Space Marine list #70 before Ork list #2?
Look cool on the battle field, have cool fluff ally etc. In game... ehm not much of a difference really but meh is that really why you collect an army ?
Na I am actually not sure if I would rahter have ork list 2. My orks can be any ork amy I want them to be they just need a better set of rules no need for an other list with an other background really, while I would certainly jump on to pirate black shield marines to add to my inquisitors, instead of using my scummy marine conversions as count as puritan ones.
WHY WOULD YOU PICK SPACE MARINE LIST #70 OVER SPACE MARINE LISTS #0-69?
Why can you make your Orks any Ork army you want them to be with one list but you need seventy lists to make your Space Marines what you want them to be?
Exalted. We have enough rules and army variants for space marines to support many playstyles and units. Pretty much every SM unit is made useful in a formation, detachment, or variant army somewhere. Meanwhile half of the DE codex languishes due to lack of stuff, and xenos armies lose characters every edition.
Because that's why you see so much variety at every tournament  come on man, it's either biker spam or a Gladius. There's literally no variety to SM lists.
|
~1.5k
Successful Trades: Ashrog (1), Iron35 (1), Rathryan (3), Leth (1), Eshm (1), Zeke48 (1), Gorkamorka12345 (1),
Melevolence (2), Ascalam (1), Swanny318, (1) ScootyPuffJunior, (1) LValx (1), Jim Solo (1), xSoulgrinderx (1), Reese (1), Pretre (1) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/03/10 19:13:15
Subject: Does 40k need a new type of space marine?
|
 |
Consigned to the Grim Darkness
|
Man, I wish Sisters or Orks or even Guard had your problem with "lack of variety", then, because it's looking really fething good from where I am.
|
The people in the past who convinced themselves to do unspeakable things were no less human than you or I. They made their decisions; the only thing that prevents history from repeating itself is making different ones.
-- Adam Serwer
My blog |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/03/10 19:25:04
Subject: Does 40k need a new type of space marine?
|
 |
Omnipotent Necron Overlord
|
VictorVonTzeentch wrote: Gamgee wrote: VictorVonTzeentch wrote:May as well enjoy the ride then. And they most likely will, cause you'll get Vets and new players buying them. They will likely look really cool, of that I have no doubt.
Who knows maybe some of the Chapters will be upset that they are being replaced by Guillstartes and one will do the unthinkable and join the Tau. ( pls no)
I thought the same thing lol. What if those marines get sad at being outdated? Will they come here? Please no :(
Too late, time for Astartes with Pulse Weapons and shoulder mounted missile pods fighting the Guillstartes with their Mk X CalthPattern Armor and Ultra Pattern Boltrifles.
I would actually buy that. Considering a space marine is complete GAK and what I want actually is a space marine that doesn't suck complete GAK.
|
If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced.
- Fox Mulder |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/03/10 19:36:28
Subject: Does 40k need a new type of space marine?
|
 |
Ancient Venerable Black Templar Dreadnought
Where ever the Emperor needs his eyes
|
Xenomancers wrote: VictorVonTzeentch wrote: Gamgee wrote: VictorVonTzeentch wrote:May as well enjoy the ride then. And they most likely will, cause you'll get Vets and new players buying them. They will likely look really cool, of that I have no doubt.
Who knows maybe some of the Chapters will be upset that they are being replaced by Guillstartes and one will do the unthinkable and join the Tau. ( pls no)
I thought the same thing lol. What if those marines get sad at being outdated? Will they come here? Please no :(
Too late, time for Astartes with Pulse Weapons and shoulder mounted missile pods fighting the Guillstartes with their Mk X CalthPattern Armor and Ultra Pattern Boltrifles.
I would actually buy that. Considering a space marine is complete GAK and what I want actually is a space marine that doesn't suck complete GAK.
Yeah, I realized later after thinking about it more that I too would buy those. Space Marines with power armor made to be Smaller Crisis Suits would be awesome.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/03/10 19:38:04
Subject: Does 40k need a new type of space marine?
|
 |
Heroic Senior Officer
|
Centurions with jetpacks, essentially. Mhmm.
As for the thread, yeah, I think there's already way too many SM, way way way too many. Andd these new ones are supposed to be better urgh.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|