Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/11/13 18:48:56
Subject: Space Wolf Codex development (No rules info)
|
 |
Tunneling Trygon
|
IMO, a couple shield drones aren't going to materially increase Broadside survivability in nearly the same way that a half-dozen extra Marines will.
Yeah cause T4 2+ save, 4+ inv wounds will have little impact on surviability compared to a 3+ save, no inv
|
snoogums: "Just because something is not relavant doesn't mean it goes away completely."
Iorek: "Snoogums, you're right. Your arguments are irrelevant, and they sure as heck aren't going away." |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/11/13 18:50:33
Subject: Space Wolf Codex development (No rules info)
|
 |
Ridin' on a Snotling Pump Wagon
|
Don't underestimate how useful splitting fire is.
The Obliterators can only threaten a single unit or tank each turn. Longfangs can threaten two. And also, please look at things in the context of their army list. Space Wolves have their Scouts which can pop and Meltabomb a tank into oblivion from pretty much anywhere. The rest of the army is heavily geared towards HTH. Ergo, the Longfangs ability to split fire is worth more to a Space Wolf army than if it was applied to say, Dark Angels who are less HTH inclined. There is your premium right there.,
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/11/13 19:18:58
Subject: Space Wolf Codex development (No rules info)
|
 |
Fireknife Shas'el
|
Give pack leaders the ability to take wolves...more fluffy and you still get extra wounds.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/11/13 19:29:15
Subject: Space Wolf Codex development (No rules info)
|
 |
Fireknife Shas'el
|
Mad Doc Grotsnik wrote:Don't underestimate how useful splitting fire is.
The Obliterators can only threaten a single unit or tank each turn. Longfangs can threaten two. And also, please look at things in the context of their army list. Space Wolves have their Scouts which can pop and Meltabomb a tank into oblivion from pretty much anywhere. The rest of the army is heavily geared towards HTH. Ergo, the Longfangs ability to split fire is worth more to a Space Wolf army than if it was applied to say, Dark Angels who are less HTH inclined. There is your premium right there.,
Given the difficulty in destroying vehicles now in 5th and that you have to allocate shots before you start rolling for hits, anti-tank split fire is less usefull as you will usually direct all the lazcannon shots at one vehicle anyways just to make sure you have an effect.
Now if you are splitting fire between anti tank and anti personel that is a better boon (that is until the wolf pack leader becomes a random casualty).
As it is, a LR has about as much firepower as a LF squad, the ability to split shots as well, more manuverability, higher survival ability, and costs about the same :S.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/11/13 19:33:49
Subject: Space Wolf Codex development (No rules info)
|
 |
Veteran Inquisitor with Xenos Alliances
|
Simply for what you get the LF are just overpriced. It a unit taken out of a need for heavy weapons and not because of the other abilities it currently has. There are better units for fewer points.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/11/13 20:10:34
Subject: Space Wolf Codex development (No rules info)
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Longfangs are overpriced, especially in comparison to new razorback and predator costs. Yes, in the vacumn of X vs Y at about ABC points, they're comparable. But, you're typically comparing them to something else that is either a vehicle, more duable (either similar wounds, better T or Save and/or Inv save, or has albative wounds), or can move and fire.
For the price of a LFs with missile launchers, how many attack bikes or speeders with multi-meltas can you get? 4? You really think the LFs are better at taking down a tank?
And demolishers take out obliterators, but AP3 battlecannos take out LFs - from further away.
LFs need a reworking. By the fluff, they don't have extra squad mates, they all carry a BFG. Giving the units some wolves would help, but I don't care for it. Stealth is -eh-; it's a solution, but I don't think it fits the fluff.
|
In the dark future, there are skulls for everyone. But only the bad guys get spikes. And rivets for all, apparently welding was lost in the Dark Age of Technology. -from C.Borer |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/11/13 20:29:28
Subject: Space Wolf Codex development (No rules info)
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Guys, it's not that I don't think LF need fixing - they do.
And they suffer from many of the same problems that other Heavy Weapons troopers suffer - expensive gun, non-Scoring.
But more that I just have a different idea of what they ought to look like. That is, it isn't LF-like to have extra bodies; it isn't LF-like (or SM-like) to depend on Stealth.
If it were up to me, I'd suggest GW bring down the cost of the Heavy Weapons upgrades themselves - the old 3E price for a Lascannon (that people are using for their examples) just isn't what it should be in 5E, for example.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/11/13 21:10:22
Subject: Re:Space Wolf Codex development (No rules info)
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
Las Vegas, NV, USA
|
I can't wait to see what happens when the new fluff about order of promotion hits the SW (if at all).  Old fluff was that it went: Scout, Tactical, Heavy/Special Weapon Tactical, Assault and/or Devastator, Veteran, HQ. Now it is Scout, Devastator, Assault, Tactical, Veteran, HQ. The SW go Blood Claws, Grey Hunters, Long Fang, Wolf Guard, HQ with some taking the Scout path instead of WG. Now we know why Russ hated the Codex so much, it meant that Long Fangs are doing the same job as the newest/greenest Space Marines in most of the other Chapters.
|
"This thread is made of so much unrefined awesome spice, the Harkonnens are coming." -Frazzled
"After all, the Space Marines need something to fight against, and it can't always be Chaos!" -Phil Kelly |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/11/13 21:35:26
Subject: Space Wolf Codex development (No rules info)
|
 |
[DCM]
.
|
In my mind, the background took a huge hit in the latest SM Codex.
The Ultramarine fellatio was way over the top, and the new standard of not only does everyone want to be an Ultramarine, but everyone wants to be a Tactical Marine was odd too.
I'm sure that many of the other Founding Legions would inspire others the same if not more than the Ultras do.
Ah well, go Wolves go!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/11/13 21:36:16
Subject: Space Wolf Codex development (No rules info)
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
JohnHwangDD wrote:
But more that I just have a different idea of what they ought to look like. That is, it isn't LF-like to have extra bodies; it isn't LF-like (or SM-like) to depend on Stealth.
If it were up to me, I'd suggest GW bring down the cost of the Heavy Weapons upgrades themselves - the old 3E price for a Lascannon (that people are using for their examples) just isn't what it should be in 5E, for example.
I agree with you, that LF squads shouldn't be too large but why not give them the option of adding wolves to the squad for wounds and CC support?
Also, I don't agree with Stealth not being appropriate for Space Wolves... Aren't they supposed to be deadly (i.e. quiet) hunters? The psychic power 'Storm Caller' is about gaining cover through obfuscation, so it's not a stretch to gain a bonus through being stealthy. At worse, I think it's fair to say that they are experienced and cunning enough to have "Bolster Defenses" to grant a piece of terrain +1 to cover saves, ala Techmarines and Lysander.
|
- Craftworld Kai-Thaine
- Task Force Defiance 36
- Sunwolves Great Company
- 4th Company Imperial Fists
- Hive Fleet Scylla - In progress
If the man doesn't believe as we do, we say he is a crank, and that settles it. I mean, it does nowadays, because now we can't burn him. - M. Twain
The world owes you nothing. It was here first. - M. Twain
DR:70+S++G+++MB-I--Pw40k03+D++A+++/rWD-R+T(R)DM++
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/11/13 21:51:41
Subject: Space Wolf Codex development (No rules info)
|
 |
Tunneling Trygon
|
I suspect Long Fangs may end up being the Sterngaurd of the Space Wolves -- only with 4 heavy weapons instead of 2 and no combi option. They'd have expensive ablative wounds but with the weaponry and stats appropriate for older then old veterans. Then give them an upgrade character that grants split-fire. As a heavy choice that would differentiate them as the heavy weapon toting veterans that they are.
|
snoogums: "Just because something is not relavant doesn't mean it goes away completely."
Iorek: "Snoogums, you're right. Your arguments are irrelevant, and they sure as heck aren't going away." |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/11/13 22:25:54
Subject: Space Wolf Codex development (No rules info)
|
 |
Knight Exemplar
Layton, UT
|
Hmm, I wonder if I can buy a space wolf army off some one at the FLGS. I've always liked the models and with a new dex coming out I might have a good reason to get one
|
Protectorate of Menoth |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/11/13 22:40:50
Subject: Space Wolf Codex development (No rules info)
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
LFs are supposed to be incredibly stubborn, the last to leave the battlefield. I wouldn't be shocked if they gain Fearless, which would help keep a small, expensive squad in the game for as long as possible.
The ability to split fire is nice, but I don't think it's 18 points nice. Plus, the pack leader is the only expendable member of the squad (unless you throw a packleader in there for 30+ points).
SWs should keep the SM tanks and variants. I won't mind them keep the LRE, but I won't be too upset if it's out of the Codex - it's legal in APOC afterall.
The third edition codex had some pretty substantial fluff changes from second edition (role of scouts, experience of blood claws, squads having a dedicated sergeant, and combat squads, plus probably some others).
|
In the dark future, there are skulls for everyone. But only the bad guys get spikes. And rivets for all, apparently welding was lost in the Dark Age of Technology. -from C.Borer |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/11/14 00:55:43
Subject: Space Wolf Codex development (No rules info)
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
NoVA
|
The Wolves don't really advance in a regimented fashion. They start as Blood Claws, advance to Grey Hunters, and then usually die. Survivors become Sgts, Wolf Guard, Priests, or Scouts. From the WG are chosen the Wolf Lords.
It's a bit more free-form.
I'll trust Kelly with the fluff. Orks and Eldar were right, so hopefully this will be.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/11/14 01:58:49
Subject: Space Wolf Codex development (No rules info)
|
 |
Hoary Long Fang with Lascannon
|
Long Fangs need an increase in their effectiveness, or a reduction in point costs. Something to show that unlike their inexperienced ultra counterparts, they really know how to use a gun.
Tank hunters would be a good start. Possibly relentless as well. Stealth Just doesn't seem to fit the fluff.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/11/14 03:40:16
Subject: Space Wolf Codex development (No rules info)
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
St. George, UT
|
Give Long Fangs bolster defences and FNP. These are old grizzled SW that know the best places to fight and how to fight through that which knocks down the younger generation.
That gives them a 3+ armor or cover and a 4+ FNP in most situations and would help keep them alive longer. You wouldn't have to add more bodies when each guy can get two saves.
|
See pics of my Orks, Tau, Emperor's Children, Necrons, Space Wolves, and Dark Eldar here:

|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/11/14 03:49:21
Subject: Space Wolf Codex development (No rules info)
|
 |
Scarred Ultramarine Tyrannic War Veteran
Maple Valley, Washington, Holy Terra
|
I think that Space Wolves should emphasis the Drop Pod build more than any other Chapter. Some of their earlier fluff really depicted them as the premier Drop Legion, and I'd like to see more of that in the new book.
It would be nice if there was a 13th Co. character that gave access to Wulfen, but it may just be that 13th Co. are relegated to Apocalypse. Regardless, I think that the difference between a Storm Claw and a Blood Claw, and a Grey Slayer and a Grey Hunter, are small enough to be irrelevant.
|
"Calgar hates Tyranids."
Your #1 Fan |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/11/14 04:00:31
Subject: Space Wolf Codex development (No rules info)
|
 |
Owns Whole Set of Skullz Techpriests
Versteckt in den Schatten deines Geistes.
|
I don't think it is so much a case of them being the best drop legion, more a case of them not trusting 'modern' technology, and refusing to Teleport. Ever.
BYE
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/11/14 04:26:37
Subject: Space Wolf Codex development (No rules info)
|
 |
Scarred Ultramarine Tyrannic War Veteran
Maple Valley, Washington, Holy Terra
|
They had a special drop regiment formation in 1st edition Epic.
|
"Calgar hates Tyranids."
Your #1 Fan |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/11/14 04:27:46
Subject: Space Wolf Codex development (No rules info)
|
 |
Sure Space Wolves Land Raider Pilot
|
Well, in current form(3rd ed. dex, 5th ed. rules) they do have an advantige over the others in a DP army....they don't care if they get charged, mostly get their attacks anyway...so I don't really see any more buffs for Droppin in. Although it would be cool if they decided that in a SW army, DP's didn't count as a Kill Point unit, cuz THAT hurts...don't see it happinin though.
|
Cry Fenris, and let slip the Wolves of Russ!
-Erik Shadowfang
Space Wolves (Shadowfang's Great Company)
Tau (Aun'burn sept)
Dark Elves
Saints of Revelation (The Whole Flin-flarn Chapter) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/11/14 06:17:20
Subject: Space Wolf Codex development (No rules info)
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
drinking ale on the ground like russ intended
|
dietrich wrote:LFs are supposed to be incredibly stubborn, the last to leave the battlefield. I wouldn't be shocked if they gain Fearless, which would help keep a small, expensive squad in the game for as long as possible.
The ability to split fire is nice, but I don't think it's 18 points nice. Plus, the pack leader is the only expendable member of the squad (unless you throw a packleader in there for 30+ points).
SWs should keep the SM tanks and variants. I won't mind them keep the LRE, but I won't be too upset if it's out of the Codex - it's legal in APOC afterall.
The third edition codex had some pretty substantial fluff changes from second edition (role of scouts, experience of blood claws, squads having a dedicated sergeant, and combat squads, plus probably some others).
not fearless fearless stinks now stubborn is what they need
|
Logan's Great Company Oh yeah kickin' and not even bothering to take names. 2nd company 3rd company ravenguard House Navaros Forge world Lucious & Titan legion void runners 314th pie guard warboss 'ed krunchas waaaaaargh This thred needs more cow bell. Raised to acolyte of the children of the church of turtle pie by chaplain shrike 3/06/09 Help stop thread necro do not post in a thread more than a month old. "Dakkanaut" not "Dakkaite"
Join the Church of the Children of Turtle Pie To become a member pm me or another member of the Church |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/11/14 06:26:57
Subject: Space Wolf Codex development (No rules info)
|
 |
Stormin' Stompa
|
It would be nice if LFs got Tank Hunters; that bumped marines up to 18pts in the 4th ed marinedex, and that on top of space wolves rules would nice.
This codex sounds as though it's going to come out TOO early... I can't afford to start Space Wolves again any time soon. I will, though. Damn it...
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/11/14 07:15:14
Subject: Space Wolf Codex development (No rules info)
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
SW won't get Fearless - that's a Chaos Cult Marine ability. SW can have ATSKNF and Stubborn, though...
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/11/14 07:17:51
Subject: Space Wolf Codex development (No rules info)
|
 |
Stormin' Stompa
|
...and I just sold my LRT Exterminator on eBay.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/11/14 17:36:50
Subject: Space Wolf Codex development (No rules info)
|
 |
RogueSangre
The Cockatrice Malediction
|
Alpharius wrote:In my mind, the background took a huge hit in the latest SM Codex.
The Ultramarine fellatio was way over the top, and the new standard of not only does everyone want to be an Ultramarine, but everyone wants to be a Tactical Marine was odd too.
And White Scar Brotherhoods becoming boring old codex Companies. And Iron Hands having their Clan Council replaced by a Chapter Master.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/11/14 18:27:59
Subject: Space Wolf Codex development (No rules info)
|
 |
Fireknife Shas'el
|
Durandal wrote:Long Fangs need an increase in their effectiveness, or a reduction in point costs. Something to show that unlike their inexperienced ultra counterparts, they really know how to use a gun.
Tank hunters would be a good start. Possibly relentless as well. Stealth Just doesn't seem to fit the fluff.
Well they are overpriced, you pay 3 pts more per LF over a vanilla and 21 pts more for a Pack Leader.
This is compounded by having smurfs get combat tactics with out paying extra points for the new ability. Whereas greyhunters, WG, heroes, and LF pay for having True Grit and Counter Charge at 3 pts a model (Greyhunters + Bolters = 18pts)
Now, LF have the following abilities: Acute Senses, True Grit and Split Fire, Blood Fued (They don't get counter-charge and No Matter the Odds was removed in 5th).
Acute Senses: Still useful, infact, more useful to LF and other Heavy Weapon Choices and less useful to SW troops that lack heavy weopons. However this buff is somewhat countered by happening in only 1 in 3 scenarios.
True Grit: Useless unless they turn LF into stern guard. I doubt this would happen.
Split Fire: This has been effectively reduced in 5th with the abundance of cover saves and the increased survival ability of tanks, which means greater need to combine fire. Couple this with the sergeant being the first casualty and the reason for paying 21 pts for this ability diminishes fast.
Blood Fued: Rare occurance and useless for LF
Personally, I see True Grit and Counter Charge being the exchange for vanilla's combat tactics and therefore not costing SW anything further for these abilities (ie. Grey Hunters, WG, Heroes, and LF drop 3 points each).
Of course true grit and counter charge don't benefit LF so they should trade these abilities for either scout, infiltrate, or stealth. According to 3 space wolf novels I have read, all space wolves are adepts at using thier keen senses to out manuever and sneak up on thier prey. Yeah, they scream and howl, but only after they have caught thier prey unawares and are on top of them. The book mentions long fangs carying out the same tactics.
A second option would be to give the entire army stealth instead of counter charge and true grit which would match the nature of the wolves' style of warefare in the novels. Novel wise, they are werewolves who manage to control thier other more bestial nature.
Exchanging Split Fire for either Tank Hunter or the Relentless USR would be equitable, expecially if it no longer relied on the survival of the Pack Leader (this should cost 15 pts per 5 man squad rather than the current 21 pts).
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/11/14 19:54:03
Subject: Space Wolf Codex development (No rules info)
|
 |
Veteran Inquisitor with Xenos Alliances
|
And I guess in the purely hypothetical inclusion of 13th Company they'd have a special character who comes with mark of the wulfen built in and grant either or both "Scouts" and move through cover to the army or his unit, but disallow drop pods.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2008/11/14 19:55:18
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/11/14 22:01:47
Subject: Space Wolf Codex development (No rules info)
|
 |
Stubborn Dark Angels Veteran Sergeant
Ontario
|
Really, I want to see the LF get BS 5 and Stealth. I think its all they really need. (And a price drop cause they no longer score.)
|
DCDA:90-S++G+++MB++I+Pw40k98-D+++A+++/areWD007R++T(S)DM+ |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/11/14 22:39:16
Subject: Space Wolf Codex development (No rules info)
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
drinking ale on the ground like russ intended
|
wooooooooot on bs 5 and bolster not stealth. split fire needs to stay
|
Logan's Great Company Oh yeah kickin' and not even bothering to take names. 2nd company 3rd company ravenguard House Navaros Forge world Lucious & Titan legion void runners 314th pie guard warboss 'ed krunchas waaaaaargh This thred needs more cow bell. Raised to acolyte of the children of the church of turtle pie by chaplain shrike 3/06/09 Help stop thread necro do not post in a thread more than a month old. "Dakkanaut" not "Dakkaite"
Join the Church of the Children of Turtle Pie To become a member pm me or another member of the Church |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/11/15 10:01:31
Subject: Space Wolf Codex development (Update 11/15/08)
|
 |
[DCM]
.. .-.. .-.. ..- -- .. -. .- - ..
|
Got to talk to a reliable staffer today further about the codex.
He knew nothing about it HOWEVER he was saying it was probably the new SW FAQ to be released.
He assured me the new drop pod rules are in it as well as other stuff to bring the SWs in line with the new SM codex.
Now I've spent the last half hour on the annoying GW website and cannot find a SW FAQ anywhere.
|
2025: Games Played:8/Models Bought:162/Sold:169/Painted:125
2024: Games Played:6/Models Bought:393/Sold:519/Painted: 207
2023: Games Played:0/Models Bought:287/Sold:0/Painted: 203
2020-2022: Games Played:42/Models Bought:1271/Sold:631/Painted:442
2016-19: Games Played:369/Models Bought:772/Sold:378/ Painted:268
2012-15: Games Played:412/Models Bought: 1163/Sold:730/Painted:436 |
|
 |
 |
|