| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/13 19:26:01
Subject: "New Dark Eldar"... 100% absolutely confirmed by GW. Hell officially "a bit chilly".
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Alpharius wrote:Sheesh J.H.D.D., I was kidding!
Sensitive much? 
I know, I saw the smiley.
Nah, just a stickler for accuracy.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/09/13 19:26:36
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/13 19:26:59
Subject: Re:"New Dark Eldar"... 100% absolutely confirmed by GW. Hell officially "a bit chilly".
|
 |
[MOD]
Decrepit Dakkanaut
Cozy cockpit of an Archer ARC-5S
|
Hmm, okay. Wow.
|
Fatum Iustum Stultorum
Fiat justitia ruat caelum
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/13 19:31:39
Subject: "New Dark Eldar"... 100% absolutely confirmed by GW. Hell officially "a bit chilly".
|
 |
Plastictrees
|
JohnHwangDD wrote:Alpharius wrote:Given how the date was picked rather arbitrarily, and given J.H.D.D.'s conviction that they'd NEVER be out, he should really allow the +/- one month(ish) and just accept the LOSS like a man!!! 
If we go back a couple years to when the wager was made, that might be helpful in understanding things:
On 10/11/2008, Yakface threw down the gauntlet declaring that DE would be released "in the next two years" and "Phil Kelly is writing the codex and Jes Goodwin is sculpting an entirely new line of models. Both have confirmed this fact at the last LAGD. "
- Yakface set the date, not I.
On 10/11/2008, I accepted the challenge, with clarification of the terms for winning and losing.
- Yakface wins if a Phil Kelly DE Codex appears with Jes minis by 10/10/10
- I win if nothing before 10/10/10
- otherwise it's a push
On 10/14/2008, Yakface accepted, and the wager was on.
As you can see from the message trail, the actual dates were never within my control, although I did offer to test Yakface's conviction by asking if he wanted to start his clock with GD Spain (2/18/2008). Realistically, I expected him to win within the first 3-6 months. The fact that it looks to go the full duration is interesting, given how hot the DE rumors over the year were leading up to the wager.
BTW, I have *huge* respect for Yakface for having the stones to throw down the gauntlet. Nobody else had the stones to do it at the time. And nobody else was willing to pick it up...
Anyhow, Alphy, now that we're at the point of finally seeing the wager complete, it's amusing that you're so eager to want to change the conditions that were laid down two years ago, as I don't recall *you* stepping up and getting another naysayer on the hook.
Finally, it's not 10/10/10 yet. We still have nearly a month to go before the wager formally closes. See you in about a month.
Mini release wagers are serious business. I think we can all appreciate the serious intestinal fortitude it took for everyone involved to continue reading anything you post be part of such a monumental undertaking.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/13 19:36:14
Subject: "New Dark Eldar"... 100% absolutely confirmed by GW. Hell officially "a bit chilly".
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Did an ant just pass wind?
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/13 19:37:48
Subject: "New Dark Eldar"... 100% absolutely confirmed by GW. Hell officially "a bit chilly".
|
 |
Blood Angel Chapter Master with Wings
|
This is like the 3rd time I have witnessed Alphy win a wager in these forums and get shut down on technicalities... poor Alphy, can't catch a break!
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/13 19:43:20
Subject: Re:"New Dark Eldar"... 100% absolutely confirmed by GW. Hell officially "a bit chilly".
|
 |
Boom! Leman Russ Commander
|
Vhalyar wrote:Depending on how good the codex is, I think that I might have a use for it. Right now I'm using the Blood Angels codex for my marines (started out as Ultras and then moved to Wolves and then to BA), but I think that the Dark Eldar fluff would be closer to what I envision my marines as (my chapter is called the Shadow marines btw), so I'll just use my current models as stand-ins. Most of my troops are not magnetized though, so what I do for weapon coherency when using a new codex is paint a dab of colour on the bases. That way I don't need to touch the models in any way. Like a green dab is a lascannon, but in this case it'll be something like a dark gun or whatever the dark eldar use. So anyway, I'm really looking forward to them because at last my space marines will play like I've wanted them to! I'm also really stoked about the upcoming grey knights, I love having options
Peace
Lol, I really hope this is a joke.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/13 19:47:08
Subject: "New Dark Eldar"... 100% absolutely confirmed by GW. Hell officially "a bit chilly".
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
MajorTom11 wrote:This is like the 3rd time I have witnessed Alphy win a wager in these forums and get shut down on technicalities... poor Alphy, can't catch a break!
Have you got a link to what you're talking about?
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/13 19:49:20
Subject: "New Dark Eldar"... 100% absolutely confirmed by GW. Hell officially "a bit chilly".
|
 |
Blood Angel Chapter Master with Wings
|
I don't remember, I think it was a bet with Kan or something lol, these wagers never seem to go well lol!
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/13 19:49:40
Subject: "New Dark Eldar"... 100% absolutely confirmed by GW. Hell officially "a bit chilly".
|
 |
Plastictrees
|
I half expected the Incubi to be a metal/plastic set based on the new warriors, but I guess GW don't really do that sort of thing anymore.
Assuming he's the sculptor, when was the last time we had full metal minis by Goodwin?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/13 19:50:08
Subject: "New Dark Eldar"... 100% absolutely confirmed by GW. Hell officially "a bit chilly".
|
 |
[SWAP SHOP MOD]
Killer Klaivex
|
So to clarify then John, DE don't actually have to have been released, we just need to have who wrote the rulebook, and who sculpted the miniatures clarified by the 10th?
That's still possible. Could go either way,
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/13 19:54:17
Subject: "New Dark Eldar"... 100% absolutely confirmed by GW. Hell officially "a bit chilly".
|
 |
Ancient Chaos Terminator
|
If the Incubi and Mandrakes are still going to be metal then given what the price of metal miniatures is these days I'll probably stick with my existing minis. Mandrakes are adequate and Incubi still look cool. I like a bit of retro in my armies anyway.
I will be interested to see how the plastic sets look. A less fragile and fiddly Talos model made of plastic would be cool.
|
"I hate movies where the men wear shorter skirts than the women." -- Mystery Science Theater 3000
"Elements of the past and the future combining to create something not quite as good as either." -- The Mighty Boosh
Check out Cinematic Titanic, the new movie riffing project from Joel Hodgson and the original cast of MST3K.
See my latest eBay auctions at this link.
"We are building a fighting force of extraordinary magnitude. You have our gratitude!" - Kentucky Fried Movie |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/13 19:56:35
Subject: Re:"New Dark Eldar"... 100% absolutely confirmed by GW. Hell officially "a bit chilly".
|
 |
Adolescent Youth on Ultramar
|
Illumini wrote:Vhalyar wrote:Depending on how good the codex is, I think that I might have a use for it. Right now I'm using the Blood Angels codex for my marines (started out as Ultras and then moved to Wolves and then to BA), but I think that the Dark Eldar fluff would be closer to what I envision my marines as (my chapter is called the Shadow marines btw), so I'll just use my current models as stand-ins. Most of my troops are not magnetized though, so what I do for weapon coherency when using a new codex is paint a dab of colour on the bases. That way I don't need to touch the models in any way. Like a green dab is a lascannon, but in this case it'll be something like a dark gun or whatever the dark eldar use. So anyway, I'm really looking forward to them because at last my space marines will play like I've wanted them to! I'm also really stoked about the upcoming grey knights, I love having options
Peace
Lol, I really hope this is a joke.
idk, man. I was kind of thinking the same thing. The newest codexes are always the best, right? So why not use the latest one for your army?
Though when I switched from Space Wolves to Blood Angels, I started losing more games than I'd like.
I may get some speeders to counts-as those Dark Eldar skimmer things, and run my marines as counts-as Dark Eldar as well.
|
Salamanders: 4,000 Points. 17-2-0
Imperial Guard: 2,850 Points. 9-0-0
Space Wolves: 1,500 Points. 5-0-1
Blood Angels: 1,000 Points. 1-2-0 :( |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/13 20:04:59
Subject: "New Dark Eldar"... 100% absolutely confirmed by GW. Hell officially "a bit chilly".
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
MajorTom11 wrote:I don't remember, I think it was a bet with Kan or something lol, these wagers never seem to go well lol! Oh, OK. I was wondering if I had somehow missed something. ____ Ketara wrote:So to clarify then John, DE don't actually have to have been released, we just need to have who wrote the rulebook, and who sculpted the miniatures clarified by the 10th? No, it has to be released. See Yakface's original post.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/09/13 20:06:33
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/13 20:13:58
Subject: "New Dark Eldar"... 100% absolutely confirmed by GW. Hell officially "a bit chilly".
|
 |
Growlin' Guntrukk Driver with Killacannon
|
This is not true, april fool. Oh wait that was done already.
OMG, OMG this must be really.
Oh wait this isn't april...... Ahhhhh
Sorry for all the taunting. I take it back Dark Eldar may yet get a second release.
8D
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/13 20:23:46
Subject: "New Dark Eldar"... 100% absolutely confirmed by GW. Hell officially "a bit chilly".
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Well if they aren't getting squatted (sad face), I'll just have to hope the new models and fluff will make me tolerate their existence
|
My armies:
, , , and a little and now VC
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/13 20:34:02
Subject: "New Dark Eldar"... 100% absolutely confirmed by GW. Hell officially "a bit chilly".
|
 |
Noble of the Alter Kindred
United Kingdom
|
Little lord Fauntleroy wrote:It does make me chuckle that they never actually mention a new codex, just new 'Dark Eldar'.
I'm still grinning like a Cheshire cat.
Good news/ Bad news
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/13 20:42:32
Subject: "New Dark Eldar"... 100% absolutely confirmed by GW. Hell officially "a bit chilly".
|
 |
Haemonculi Flesh Apprentice
|
I just want to see some pics!!!!!
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/13 20:50:04
Subject: "New Dark Eldar"... 100% absolutely confirmed by GW. Hell officially "a bit chilly".
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
JohnHwangDD wrote:
O hai, for several years that I was absolutely sure Dark eldar were getting squatted just like my own beloved dogs of war, it seems I was actually wrong.
I'd like to take the time to humbly apologise for all the threads I pulled into the abyss in the meanwhile...
|
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2010/09/13 22:24:34
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/13 21:07:59
Subject: Re:"New Dark Eldar"... 100% absolutely confirmed by GW. Hell officially "a bit chilly".
|
 |
Plaguelord Titan Princeps of Nurgle
Alabama
|
Darth Bob wrote:I'm still not convinced.
Heavily implied sarcasm.
I know that was sarcasm, but "the Studio has made some brand-new Dark Eldar" doesn't instill a whole lot of confidence. Usually, when there is a codex release, they are pretty proud of it and they let you know.
Hopefully, the vaguery of it is because it is still a couple of weeks out and it'll start to shape up into a whole new release. However, "some brand-new Dark Eldar" sounds like a couple of new boxes, not an entire range + codex.
|
WH40K
Death Guard 5100 pts.
Daemons 3000 pts.
DT:70+S++G+M-B-I--Pw40K90-D++A++/eWD?R++T(D)DM+
28 successful trades in the Dakka Swap Shop! Check out my latest auction here!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/13 21:20:23
Subject: Re:"New Dark Eldar"... 100% absolutely confirmed by GW. Hell officially "a bit chilly".
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
KPCommissar wrote:Illumini wrote:Vhalyar wrote:Depending on how good the codex is, I think that I might have a use for it. Right now I'm using the Blood Angels codex for my marines (started out as Ultras and then moved to Wolves and then to BA), but I think that the Dark Eldar fluff would be closer to what I envision my marines as (my chapter is called the Shadow marines btw), so I'll just use my current models as stand-ins. Most of my troops are not magnetized though, so what I do for weapon coherency when using a new codex is paint a dab of colour on the bases. That way I don't need to touch the models in any way. Like a green dab is a lascannon, but in this case it'll be something like a dark gun or whatever the dark eldar use. So anyway, I'm really looking forward to them because at last my space marines will play like I've wanted them to! I'm also really stoked about the upcoming grey knights, I love having options
Peace
Lol, I really hope this is a joke.
idk, man. I was kind of thinking the same thing. The newest codexes are always the best, right? So why not use the latest one for your army?
Though when I switched from Space Wolves to Blood Angels, I started losing more games than I'd like.
I may get some speeders to counts-as those Dark Eldar skimmer things, and run my marines as counts-as Dark Eldar as well.
KPCommissar gets the idea. I wasn't joking, why would you think that
Going to use my rhinos to count as ravagers. While people will be scrambling to paint their stuff, I'll be playing the codex
And if it doesn't pan out competitively, I can just go back to Blood Angels or Space Wolves until Grey Knights roll out. Missile Spam with the SW is awesome.
Edit:
MeanGreenStompa wrote:Also, if you set up marines opposite me and told me you're using the brand new Dark Eldar codex to represent them because it's powerful, I will be very happy to move to another table and place you on r/l ignore.
Well ok, whatever floats your boat. But we wouldn't even play each other at first because you'd be busy buying and painting models while I'd actually play people
|
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2010/09/13 21:23:14
8000 points of XI Legion the Space Vagabonds, they can adapt their tactics to represent any and every Legion and Chapter as needed because they were created by the Emperor to be the ultimate tactical power. They have faked their disappearance in order to infiltrate every part of the conflicts in the galaxy.
8000 points of Tau/Craftworld Eldar/Necron because the Space Vagabonds can also emulate their wargear and tactics.
Victories: ALL
Losses: NONE (My armies have the psychic ability to conjure a cataclysmic storm whenever they are about to lose. This allows the Space Vagabonds to teleport away while releasing power waves that destroys the battlefield and so every battle is a victory)
Sabet wrote:PS: Vhalyar, that signature makes you look like a band wagoner and a very bad loser |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/13 21:25:51
Subject: "New Dark Eldar"... 100% absolutely confirmed by GW. Hell officially "a bit chilly".
|
 |
Reverent Tech-Adept
|
So are they just bringing out a codex and some new models or are they completely redesigning the dark eldar?
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/13 21:28:23
Subject: Re:"New Dark Eldar"... 100% absolutely confirmed by GW. Hell officially "a bit chilly".
|
 |
Twisted Trueborn with Blaster
|
I think I just died. Like heart stop died. Oh sweet geeky heaven!!!!
Someone slap me?
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/13 21:32:13
Subject: "New Dark Eldar"... 100% absolutely confirmed by GW. Hell officially "a bit chilly".
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
So.. Dark eldar is going to beat duke nukem forever?! Amazing!
|
Keeper of the DomBox
Warhammer Armies - Click to see galleries of fully painted armies
32,000, 19,000, Renegades - 10,000 , 7,500, |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/13 21:37:39
Subject: "New Dark Eldar"... 100% absolutely confirmed by GW. Hell officially "a bit chilly".
|
 |
Adolescent Youth on Ultramar
|
MeanGreenStompa wrote:
If you don't buy the minis for other ranges, all GW will do is extent the period between this and the next Dark Eldar codex and increase the release of more marine codices...
Also, if you set up marines opposite me and told me you're using the brand new Dark Eldar codex to represent them because it's powerful, I will be very happy to move to another table and place you on r/l ignore.
I'd prefer more marine codexes, I think. The tyranids codex was crap, full of a lot of confusing options that people say weren't any good to even bother with. With the newer marine codexes they keep making things better and better (predators that can move fast? yes please!) and I can't wait to see what will happen with the rumored grey knights codex.
That said, with as long as the dark eldar codex has been in coming, I bet its' going to be full of kickin rad stuff that blows the current marine books out of the water. So why not use my models for dark eldar until an even better marine codex comes out? It's just the natural progression of power, man.
And honestly, what do you care what models I use for my army? So long as I use landspeeders for the dark eldar skimmers and my squads are the right size, and special weapons can be told, what does it matter to you what rules I'm using for them?
|
Salamanders: 4,000 Points. 17-2-0
Imperial Guard: 2,850 Points. 9-0-0
Space Wolves: 1,500 Points. 5-0-1
Blood Angels: 1,000 Points. 1-2-0 :( |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/13 21:38:45
Subject: "New Dark Eldar"... 100% absolutely confirmed by GW. Hell officially "a bit chilly".
|
 |
Owns Whole Set of Skullz Techpriests
Versteckt in den Schatten deines Geistes.
|
MeanGreenStompa wrote:JohnHwangDD wrote:
O hai, for several years that I was absolutely sure Dark eldar were getting squatted just like my own beloved dogs of war, it seems I was actually wrong.
I'd like to take the time to humbly apologise for all the threads I pulled into the abyss in the meanwhile...
Nice one MGS.
And anyone here who's surprised to see Johnny trying to weasel his way out of this wager, raise your hand please.
No one? No one?
*crickets chirp*
Didn't think so.
JohnnyHDD:
Well, I do so hope, my dear, dear, Hwangman, that after years of flame baiting and trolling people who wanted a new DE army that you enjoy that heaping big slice of humble pie. I've said it to you a dozen times in the past on a number of issues, but, really, it's never felt any better than this:
You were wrong.
Ah! Feels liberating.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/13 21:40:04
Subject: "New Dark Eldar"... 100% absolutely confirmed by GW. Hell officially "a bit chilly".
|
 |
Androgynous Daemon Prince of Slaanesh
|
It would be so much more fun if Duke Nukem Forever and Dark Eldar were slated for 12/22/12-then the naysayers AND the hopefuls would do a massive facepalm. I'd give that a thumbs up for hilarity's sake. But rest assured, I'm excited for dark eldar-the models mostly...I will probably play them, regardless of how well they play, but mostly because of how beautiful the sculpts will probably be. If the sculpts suck...I won't play. Art will inspire me here, not codex creep
|
Reality is a nice place to visit, but I'd hate to live there.
Manchu wrote:I'm a Catholic. We eat our God.
Due to work, I can usually only ship any sales or trades out on Saturday morning. Please trade/purchase with this in mind. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/13 21:41:26
Subject: Re:"New Dark Eldar"... 100% absolutely confirmed by GW. Hell officially "a bit chilly".
|
 |
Shas'o Commanding the Hunter Kadre
|
Dark eldar are no longer safe from updates... update your relevant images!
Need time with photoshop...
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/13 21:48:38
Subject: "New Dark Eldar"... 100% absolutely confirmed by GW. Hell officially "a bit chilly".
|
 |
Boom! Leman Russ Commander
|
KPCommissar wrote:MeanGreenStompa wrote:
If you don't buy the minis for other ranges, all GW will do is extent the period between this and the next Dark Eldar codex and increase the release of more marine codices...
Also, if you set up marines opposite me and told me you're using the brand new Dark Eldar codex to represent them because it's powerful, I will be very happy to move to another table and place you on r/l ignore.
I'd prefer more marine codexes, I think. The tyranids codex was crap, full of a lot of confusing options that people say weren't any good to even bother with. With the newer marine codexes they keep making things better and better (predators that can move fast? yes please!) and I can't wait to see what will happen with the rumored grey knights codex.
That said, with as long as the dark eldar codex has been in coming, I bet its' going to be full of kickin rad stuff that blows the current marine books out of the water. So why not use my models for dark eldar until an even better marine codex comes out? It's just the natural progression of power, man.
And honestly, what do you care what models I use for my army? So long as I use landspeeders for the dark eldar skimmers and my squads are the right size, and special weapons can be told, what does it matter to you what rules I'm using for them?
Well, stupid as this idea is, you can of course do whatever you please in friendly games as long as you can keep finding opponents. It won't fly in tournaments, I don't have to spend my time playing guys like you, so have fun with your proxyhammer
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/13 21:49:48
Subject: "New Dark Eldar"... 100% absolutely confirmed by GW. Hell officially "a bit chilly".
|
 |
Noble of the Alter Kindred
United Kingdom
|
Don't want codex creep just something to justify £17.50 on a book that will fall apart after 2 weeks.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2010/09/13 21:53:05
Subject: "New Dark Eldar"... 100% absolutely confirmed by GW. Hell officially "a bit chilly".
|
 |
Androgynous Daemon Prince of Slaanesh
|
Not to derail the thread Illumini, but how do you feel about one set of SM models to be used with any/all SM variants? I play BA, but I also have a vanilla codex, SWs, BT, Chaos and I'll get DA eventually. All of my models are appropriately armed for whatever army is playing them, just the paint jobs and symbols are all BA. Actually, everyone I know who has SM models does the same-in tournaments locally even. 'Course, I run the tourney's in my FLGS and I have no problem with it, but other than testing out armies...yea, different species shouldn't count for proxying in tourneys.
To rerail the thread-can't wait for a plastic Talos-might buy a couple just on looks alone!
|
Reality is a nice place to visit, but I'd hate to live there.
Manchu wrote:I'm a Catholic. We eat our God.
Due to work, I can usually only ship any sales or trades out on Saturday morning. Please trade/purchase with this in mind. |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|