Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/03/17 02:19:01
Subject: New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Preacher of the Emperor
|
I suspect at this point it's either blow up the FOC or throw out the non-standard codexes (Knights, Inquisition, etc. etc.), pick one.
I honestly prefer blowing up the FOC. Ok, you have to have at least 1 HQ, and you had better have some troops to score, but otherwise go cRazY.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/03/17 08:19:44
Subject: Re:New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Fully-charged Electropriest
UK
|
Ovion wrote:I normally post stuff here for you guys, so here you go.
Updated FoC
Looks nice but you got the Inquisition wrong. You can take a Primary Inquisition detachment + an Inquisition detachment. It's Knights that can't do both as they can't ally with themselves.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/03/17 10:36:03
Subject: Re:New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Mighty Vampire Count
|
Ovion wrote:I normally post stuff here for you guys, so here you go.
Updated FoC
thank you thats a great resource
|
I AM A MARINE PLAYER
"Unimaginably ancient xenos artefact somewhere on the planet, hive fleet poised above our heads, hidden 'stealer broods making an early start....and now a bloody Chaos cult crawling out of the woodwork just in case we were bored. Welcome to my world, Ciaphas."
Inquisitor Amberley Vail, Ordo Xenos
"I will admit that some Primachs like Russ or Horus could have a chance against an unarmed 12 year old novice but, a full Battle Sister??!! One to one? In close combat? Perhaps three Primarchs fighting together... but just one Primarch?" da001
www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/528517.page
A Bloody Road - my Warhammer Fantasy Fiction |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/03/17 14:00:01
Subject: Re:New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Ichor-Dripping Talos Monstrosity
|
Loopstah wrote: Ovion wrote:I normally post stuff here for you guys, so here you go. Updated FoC Looks nice but you got the Inquisition wrong. You can take a Primary Inquisition detachment + an Inquisition detachment. It's Knights that can't do both as they can't ally with themselves.
My problem with people saying Inquisition can take a Primary Inquisitioroial Detachment AND an Inquistorial Detachment is the wording of the entry: "When you choose an army, Inquisitors may be taken as a primary detachment or as a special form of allied detachment known as an Inquisitorial detachment." <- Key word here OR. "If you take Inquisitors as a primary detachment, use the Inquisitorial detachment Force Organisation chart instead of the primary detachment Force Organisation chart. Alternatively, an army may include an Inquisitorial detachment in addition to any other detachments." <- Key word ALTERNATIVELY. The other ones with the alternate Primary ( LotD, Imperial Knights) and special detachment don't state that, and LotD specifically states you can take both.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/03/17 14:01:54
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/03/17 14:35:12
Subject: New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Sadistic Inquisitorial Excruciator
|
I think we need a Codex: anti-air.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/03/17 14:43:00
Subject: New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Cosmic Joe
|
I like the detachment thing because I can ally my SOB with IF and have the inquisitor leading them. I like the fluff that can come from it.
|
Also, check out my history blog: Minimum Wage Historian, a fun place to check out history that often falls between the couch cushions. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/03/17 15:46:13
Subject: Re:New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Fully-charged Electropriest
UK
|
Ovion wrote:Loopstah wrote: Ovion wrote:I normally post stuff here for you guys, so here you go.
Updated FoC
Looks nice but you got the Inquisition wrong. You can take a Primary Inquisition detachment + an Inquisition detachment. It's Knights that can't do both as they can't ally with themselves.
My problem with people saying Inquisition can take a Primary Inquisitioroial Detachment AND an Inquistorial Detachment is the wording of the entry:
"When you choose an army, Inquisitors may be taken as a primary detachment or as a special form of allied detachment known as an Inquisitorial detachment." <- Key word here OR.
"If you take Inquisitors as a primary detachment, use the Inquisitorial detachment Force Organisation chart instead of the primary detachment Force Organisation chart.
Alternatively, an army may include an Inquisitorial detachment in addition to any other detachments." <- Key word ALTERNATIVELY.
The other ones with the alternate Primary ( LotD, Imperial Knights) and special detachment don't state that, and LotD specifically states you can take both.
You missed the bit that says "You may take two inquisitorial detachments in the same army but one of these must be the primary detachment"
It's just below the bit you quoted. Plus inquisition can ally with themselves on their ally matrix, Knights don't appear on their own ally matrix at all.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/03/17 15:48:31
Subject: New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
Heheheh. Just bought $4k worth of SOB that are currently en-route. It'll probably take me a couple days, but there should be an abundance of cheap SOB on the swap shop soon for those looking to expand.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/03/17 15:50:51
Subject: New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Sadistic Inquisitorial Excruciator
|
pretre wrote:Heheheh. Just bought $4k worth of SOB that are currently en-route. It'll probably take me a couple days, but there should be an abundance of cheap SOB on the swap shop soon for those looking to expand. 
Wow... And I thought I went crazy last month.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/03/17 15:55:46
Subject: Re:New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Ichor-Dripping Talos Monstrosity
|
Loopstah wrote: Ovion wrote:Loopstah wrote: Ovion wrote:I normally post stuff here for you guys, so here you go. Updated FoC
Looks nice but you got the Inquisition wrong. You can take a Primary Inquisition detachment + an Inquisition detachment. It's Knights that can't do both as they can't ally with themselves.
My problem with people saying Inquisition can take a Primary Inquisitioroial Detachment AND an Inquistorial Detachment is the wording of the entry: "When you choose an army, Inquisitors may be taken as a primary detachment or as a special form of allied detachment known as an Inquisitorial detachment." <- Key word here OR. "If you take Inquisitors as a primary detachment, use the Inquisitorial detachment Force Organisation chart instead of the primary detachment Force Organisation chart. Alternatively, an army may include an Inquisitorial detachment in addition to any other detachments." <- Key word ALTERNATIVELY. The other ones with the alternate Primary ( LotD, Imperial Knights) and special detachment don't state that, and LotD specifically states you can take both.
You missed the bit that says "You may take two inquisitorial detachments in the same army but one of these must be the primary detachment" It's just below the bit you quoted. Plus inquisition can ally with themselves on their ally matrix, Knights don't appear on their own ally matrix at all.
It does not have that in mine.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/03/17 15:56:16
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/03/17 16:14:48
Subject: Re:New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Fully-charged Electropriest
UK
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/03/17 16:24:27
Subject: New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
Mavnas wrote: pretre wrote:Heheheh. Just bought $4k worth of SOB that are currently en-route. It'll probably take me a couple days, but there should be an abundance of cheap SOB on the swap shop soon for those looking to expand. 
Wow... And I thought I went crazy last month.
It is how I pay for my hobbies. Buying big lots and reselling them.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/03/17 16:40:43
Subject: New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Confessor Of Sins
|
Well for 4k.. that's a lot of kilograms of Sisters..
|
Cratfworld Alaitoc (Gallery)
Order of the Red Mantle (Gallery)
Grand (little) Army of Chaos, now painting! (Blog) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/03/17 16:47:17
Subject: New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/03/18 06:17:05
Subject: Re:New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Sister Vastly Superior
|
Want some thoughts on a 2500 points list I just threw together. My troops never do much for me I've found so I decided to go MSU on them and focus on other strong points.
2 x Canoness - Cloak of St. Aspira on one of them
5 x Sister squads (5) - Flamer and Rhino
4 x Dominions (5) - Meltaguns x 4 in MM Immolators
6 x Exorcists
Coteaz (divination)
1 x Henchman (5) - 2 x Jokaero and 3 x Plasma Cannon Servitors
Bastion with Icarus Lascannon
Aegis Defense Line with Comms relay
Coteaz + Henchmen + Cannoness with cloak inside the bastion to man the lascannon and soak wounds which can be rerolled. Coteaz can start taking them once shes down to one left.
Other canoness rides with a sister squad to make that one troops a tad more resilient. One troops stays behind their ride, behind the defense line to get benefits of the comms relay. Aegis also provides a nice long line to spread the Exorcists and still get cover.
Troops are fragile, but I can keep a few of them in reserve if needed to protect them. I also think by turn 2 target saturation should be nasty enough to make the troops a lesser priority.
|
18 / 3 / 6 since 6th ed. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/03/18 07:48:46
Subject: New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Trigger-Happy Baal Predator Pilot
|
I love running Coteaz with the girls, I'd add in some plasma acolytes for fun. Prescience on plasma is great, and at 14 pts per they're a great bonus to a shooty, scoring unit.
|
10000
2700
4000
3800
3000 |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/03/18 10:38:58
Subject: New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Preacher of the Emperor
|
EDIT: never mind, misread something with blurred early-am vision.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/03/18 10:40:06
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/03/19 03:04:30
Subject: Re:New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Cosmic Joe
|
Here's my counts-as jakero. I dislike the idea of space monkeys. She's a hermit madwoman that's a savant with dangerous weapons. I still need a few more henchmen including a plasma cannon servitor, but I'm almost there.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/03/19 03:05:07
Also, check out my history blog: Minimum Wage Historian, a fun place to check out history that often falls between the couch cushions. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/03/19 03:06:46
Subject: New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Preacher of the Emperor
|
Who doesn't love Idiot Savant Space Monkeys? Oh wait, I hate them, they're a ridiculous holdover from the Rogue Trader days of Obi Wan Clouseau, never mind.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/03/19 05:00:31
Subject: New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Trigger-Happy Baal Predator Pilot
|
Really? I love space monkeys, they're just ridiculous and when I field my bright orange ones people are highly amused, I guess I like the non grim darkness of my shooty little space monkeys
|
10000
2700
4000
3800
3000 |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/03/19 07:26:18
Subject: New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Confessor Of Sins
|
SisterSydney wrote:Who doesn't love Idiot Savant Space Monkeys? Oh wait, I hate them, they're a ridiculous holdover from the Rogue Trader days of Obi Wan Clouseau, never mind.
That's Obi-wan SHERLOCK Clousseau to you, sir
|
Cratfworld Alaitoc (Gallery)
Order of the Red Mantle (Gallery)
Grand (little) Army of Chaos, now painting! (Blog) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/03/19 07:33:13
Subject: New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Love the use of the Empire arcane rifle doo-dah! Was thinking of using that as a hellrifle but that's seriously clever.
As an aside, I've finally finished my Dark Talon > Avenger conversion.
With a Goff Rok gig as the base.
What?
More pics in me blog, if you're interested.
|
Theophony"... and there's strippers in terminator armor and lovecraftian shenanigans afoot."
Solar_Lion: "Man this sums up your blog nicely."
Anpu-adom: "being Geek is about Love. Some love broadly. Some love deeply. And then there are people like Graven. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/03/19 08:07:07
Subject: Re:New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Pious Palatine
|
Ovion wrote:I normally post stuff here for you guys, so here you go.
Updated FoC
Link appears to be dead?
D
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/03/19 12:11:03
Subject: New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Ichor-Dripping Talos Monstrosity
|
Oh yeah, I updated it and deleted the oldun!
And I'll go fix the other post too!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/03/19 13:21:06
Subject: New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Cosmic Joe
|
inmygravenimage wrote:Love the use of the Empire arcane rifle doo-dah! Was thinking of using that as a hellrifle but that's seriously clever.
As an aside, I've finally finished my Dark Talon > Avenger conversion.
With a Goff Rok gig as the base.
What?
More pics in me blog, if you're interested.
Are those the old RT Ork rocker minis? Wow.
|
Also, check out my history blog: Minimum Wage Historian, a fun place to check out history that often falls between the couch cushions. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/03/19 14:31:06
Subject: New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Pious Palatine
|
Ovion wrote:Oh yeah, I updated it and deleted the oldun!
And I'll go fix the other post too!
Thanks that's really useful.
Has anyone used LotD with Sisters? Are there any decent combos/synergies to be had?
D
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/03/19 15:00:37
Subject: New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Sadistic Inquisitorial Excruciator
|
What's the empire arcane rifle from?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/03/19 15:13:12
Subject: New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Cosmic Joe
|
|
Also, check out my history blog: Minimum Wage Historian, a fun place to check out history that often falls between the couch cushions. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/03/21 14:31:10
Subject: New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Cosmic Joe
|
How do you all use inquisitors and henchmen? I'm thinking of using them as fire support and rear guard.
|
Also, check out my history blog: Minimum Wage Historian, a fun place to check out history that often falls between the couch cushions. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/03/21 14:34:33
Subject: New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
MWHistorian wrote:How do you all use inquisitors and henchmen? I'm thinking of using them as fire support and rear guard.
Yep, pretty much.
I'm a fan of two squads of henchmen in a bastion with Coteaz and an Inquisitor. Plasma Cannons with perfect timing are hilarious.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|