| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/12/10 11:15:32
Subject: Warhammer 40k news and rumours - World Championship preview reveals pg 257
|
 |
Moustache-twirling Princeps
|
|
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2025/12/10 11:16:44
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/12/10 12:50:21
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k news and rumours - World Championship preview reveals pg 257
|
 |
Inquisitorial Scourge of Heretics
Tapping the Glass at the Herpetarium
|
Could Thousand Sons be a good army now?
Thousand Sons - The big rules change here is that when you play the Changehost of Deceit detachment, your Daemons now benefit from the Cabal of Sorcerers army rule. This should open up a completely new playstyle for Thousand Sons players to explore. In support of this, a number of units received some points adjustments down, while the Greater Daemons have mirrored the profile and points changes seen in Chaos Daemons.
|
BorderCountess wrote:Just because you're doing something right doesn't necessarily mean you know what you're doing...
"Vulkan: There will be no Rad or Phosphex in my legion. We shall fight wars humanely. Some things should be left in the dark age."
"Ferrus: Oh cool, when are you going to stop burning people to death?"
"Vulkan: I do not understand the question."
– A conversation between the X and XVIII Primarchs
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/12/10 16:33:23
Subject: Warhammer 40k news and rumours - Quarterly Balance Update – December 2025 pg 264
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
My Emperor's Champion and Castellans got more expensive. Crusade Ancient (yawn) and Execrator (on the fence) went down. Still not a great time for my Templars.
|
DA:70S+G+M+B++I++Pw40k08+D++A++/fWD-R+T(M)DM+
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/12/10 17:47:23
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k news and rumours - World Championship preview reveals pg 257
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Lathe Biosas wrote:Could Thousand Sons be a good army now?
Thousand Sons - The big rules change here is that when you play the Changehost of Deceit detachment, your Daemons now benefit from the Cabal of Sorcerers army rule. This should open up a completely new playstyle for Thousand Sons players to explore. In support of this, a number of units received some points adjustments down, while the Greater Daemons have mirrored the profile and points changes seen in Chaos Daemons.
This only makes a single detachment better, not the army. The detachment itself isn't great to begin with.
|
She/Her
"There are no problems that cannot be solved with cannons." - Chief Engineer Boris Krauss of Nuln
LatheBiosas wrote:I have such a difficult time hitting my opponents... setting them on fire seems so much simpler.
Kid_Kyoto wrote:"Don't be a dick" and "This is a family wargame" are good rules of thumb.
DR:80S++G++M--B+IPwhfb01#+D+++A+++/fWD258R++T(D)DM+++
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/12/10 18:24:57
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k news and rumours - World Championship preview reveals pg 257
|
 |
Inquisitorial Scourge of Heretics
Tapping the Glass at the Herpetarium
|
BorderCountess wrote: Lathe Biosas wrote:Could Thousand Sons be a good army now?
Thousand Sons - The big rules change here is that when you play the Changehost of Deceit detachment, your Daemons now benefit from the Cabal of Sorcerers army rule. This should open up a completely new playstyle for Thousand Sons players to explore. In support of this, a number of units received some points adjustments down, while the Greater Daemons have mirrored the profile and points changes seen in Chaos Daemons.
This only makes a single detachment better, not the army. The detachment itself isn't great to begin with.
So, it's not as awesome as I was lead to believe?
|
BorderCountess wrote:Just because you're doing something right doesn't necessarily mean you know what you're doing...
"Vulkan: There will be no Rad or Phosphex in my legion. We shall fight wars humanely. Some things should be left in the dark age."
"Ferrus: Oh cool, when are you going to stop burning people to death?"
"Vulkan: I do not understand the question."
– A conversation between the X and XVIII Primarchs
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/12/10 21:04:18
Subject: Warhammer 40k news and rumours - Quarterly Balance Update – December 2025 pg 264
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Never is.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/12/10 23:06:37
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k news and rumours - World Championship preview reveals pg 257
|
 |
Tzeentch Veteran Marine with Psychic Potential
|
Lathe Biosas wrote: BorderCountess wrote: Lathe Biosas wrote:Could Thousand Sons be a good army now?
Thousand Sons - The big rules change here is that when you play the Changehost of Deceit detachment, your Daemons now benefit from the Cabal of Sorcerers army rule. This should open up a completely new playstyle for Thousand Sons players to explore. In support of this, a number of units received some points adjustments down, while the Greater Daemons have mirrored the profile and points changes seen in Chaos Daemons.
This only makes a single detachment better, not the army. The detachment itself isn't great to begin with.
So, it's not as awesome as I was lead to believe?
This certainly makes that detachment better, allowing buffs to screamers who are not terrible and using the AP buff for flamers, but I really don't see any of these changes making that detachment better, or even on par with, the Cabal.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/12/22 15:45:46
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k news and rumours - Quarterly Balance Update – December 2025 pg 264
|
 |
Moustache-twirling Princeps
|
Get in the mood for an Adepta Sororitas Made to Order by replaying this Imperial Hymn
Unfortunately it's not the old metals, it's the plastics from the Army Box / Combat Patrol.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/12/22 15:49:24
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k news and rumours - Quarterly Balance Update – December 2025 pg 264
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
I guess the point of it is it might save a bit of money compared to buying them individually, but a made-to-order for ordinary products you can still buy right now seems a bit of a shame. Especially as you'd save a similar amount just from buying from a non- GW shop in the first place.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/12/22 15:58:59
Subject: Warhammer 40k news and rumours - Quarterly Balance Update – December 2025 pg 264
|
 |
[DCM]
Chief Deputy Sub Assistant Trainee Squig Handling Intern
|
What a strange MTO!
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/12/22 16:01:39
Subject: Warhammer 40k news and rumours - Quarterly Balance Update – December 2025 pg 264
|
 |
Oozing Plague Marine Terminator
|
I remember that the SoB had slightly different ETB sculpts in their launch Box before the full release, but this MTO are just models you can normally buy, right?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/12/22 16:04:30
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k news and rumours - Quarterly Balance Update – December 2025 pg 264
|
 |
Aspirant Tech-Adept
|
Mentlegen324 wrote:
I guess the point of it is it might save a bit of money compared to buying them individually, but a made-to-order for ordinary products you can still buy right now seems a bit of a shame. Especially as you'd save a similar amount just from buying from a non- GW shop in the first place.
Well, the models aren't those you can buy now, but it isn't that long ago you got them in a Combat Patrol. Maybe it's something for starters or people who are new, missed them and want them for some variety. Not the most exciting MtO though.
Sgt. Cortez wrote:I remember that the SoB had slightly different ETB sculpts in their launch Box before the full release, but this MTO are just models you can normally buy, right?
Yes. It's at least the same design, but as you mentioned, the models are different.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2025/12/22 16:07:36
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/12/22 16:15:36
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k news and rumours - Quarterly Balance Update – December 2025 pg 264
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Dryaktylus wrote:Well, the models aren't those you can buy now, but it isn't that long ago you got them in a Combat Patrol. Maybe it's something for starters or people who are new, missed them and want them for some variety. Not the most exciting MtO though.
The annoying thing is they even mention that ComPat box by suggesting ordering a Rhino with it instead of just, y'know, including a Rhino.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/12/22 16:19:50
Subject: Warhammer 40k news and rumours - Quarterly Balance Update – December 2025 pg 264
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
UK
|
Strange - a few differences but not a huge variety compared to what's on the market now. I think if its priced cheap enough it will be popular as a "not starter set" of models to get an affordable start in Sisters with some slightly unique sculpts.
Still would have been cooler to pair it with some of the classic metals on a print-on-demand order.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/12/22 16:20:45
Subject: Warhammer 40k news and rumours - Quarterly Balance Update – December 2025 pg 264
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Too bad they didn't MTO the Battle Sanctum as well. I still need some more for projects
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/12/22 18:44:35
Subject: Warhammer 40k news and rumours - Quarterly Balance Update – December 2025 pg 264
|
 |
Pious Palatine
|
Overread wrote:Strange - a few differences but not a huge variety compared to what's on the market now. I think if its priced cheap enough it will be popular as a "not starter set" of models to get an affordable start in Sisters with some slightly unique sculpts.
Still would have been cooler to pair it with some of the classic metals on a print-on-demand order.
I own I think 3 of that set, but if they're willing to chuck it out for less than 80USD I can always use more jumppack bodies.
It'll probably be more than the MSRP of the full kits separately, but it's absolutely not worth that.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/12/22 22:43:44
Subject: Warhammer 40k news and rumours - Quarterly Balance Update – December 2025 pg 264
|
 |
Sadistic Inquisitorial Excruciator
|
Sgt. Cortez wrote:I remember that the SoB had slightly different ETB sculpts in their launch Box before the full release, but this MTO are just models you can normally buy, right?
These are the exact same models as the original launch box of 2019, sharing sprues save for the Canoness on her lonesome (weird that she never got a solo release).
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/12/22 23:03:49
Subject: Warhammer 40k news and rumours - Quarterly Balance Update – December 2025 pg 264
|
 |
Oozing Plague Marine Terminator
|
Shakalooloo wrote:Sgt. Cortez wrote:I remember that the SoB had slightly different ETB sculpts in their launch Box before the full release, but this MTO are just models you can normally buy, right?
These are the exact same models as the original launch box of 2019, sharing sprues save for the Canoness on her lonesome (weird that she never got a solo release).
Then it's actually a nice thing to have for people who joined at a later date. Alternative sculpts are always good.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/12/23 22:34:55
Subject: Warhammer 40k news and rumours - Quarterly Balance Update – December 2025 pg 264
|
 |
Sadistic Inquisitorial Excruciator
|
Sgt. Cortez wrote: Shakalooloo wrote:Sgt. Cortez wrote:I remember that the SoB had slightly different ETB sculpts in their launch Box before the full release, but this MTO are just models you can normally buy, right?
These are the exact same models as the original launch box of 2019, sharing sprues save for the Canoness on her lonesome (weird that she never got a solo release).
Then it's actually a nice thing to have for people who joined at a later date. Alternative sculpts are always good.
The Seraphim do have some very nice poses.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/12/24 16:39:51
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k news and rumours - Quarterly Balance Update – December 2025 pg 264
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Since there's likely to be a big reveal tomorrow, I'm setting the line for number of Primarchs revealed at 0.5.
I'm also setting that number at 1.5 for the remainder of the edition.
Where does everyone fall?
|
She/Her
"There are no problems that cannot be solved with cannons." - Chief Engineer Boris Krauss of Nuln
LatheBiosas wrote:I have such a difficult time hitting my opponents... setting them on fire seems so much simpler.
Kid_Kyoto wrote:"Don't be a dick" and "This is a family wargame" are good rules of thumb.
DR:80S++G++M--B+IPwhfb01#+D+++A+++/fWD258R++T(D)DM+++
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/12/24 17:21:36
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k news and rumours - Quarterly Balance Update – December 2025 pg 264
|
 |
Inquisitorial Scourge of Heretics
Tapping the Glass at the Herpetarium
|
BorderCountess wrote:Since there's likely to be a big reveal tomorrow, I'm setting the line for number of Primarchs revealed at 0.5.
I'm also setting that number at 1.5 for the remainder of the edition.
Where does everyone fall?
I felt a great disturbance in the Forums, as if hundreds of voices suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced... as another Ultramarine was released.
|
BorderCountess wrote:Just because you're doing something right doesn't necessarily mean you know what you're doing...
"Vulkan: There will be no Rad or Phosphex in my legion. We shall fight wars humanely. Some things should be left in the dark age."
"Ferrus: Oh cool, when are you going to stop burning people to death?"
"Vulkan: I do not understand the question."
– A conversation between the X and XVIII Primarchs
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/12/24 18:15:54
Subject: Warhammer 40k news and rumours - Quarterly Balance Update – December 2025 pg 264
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
I too expect a primarch tomorrow, question is which.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/12/24 18:20:32
Subject: Warhammer 40k news and rumours - Quarterly Balance Update – December 2025 pg 264
|
 |
Liche Priest Hierophant
|
Perturabo of course, to stick with the seasonal theme of cheer and merriment.
|
Nehekhara lives! Sort of!
Why is the rum always gone? |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/12/24 18:47:31
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k news and rumours - Quarterly Balance Update – December 2025 pg 264
|
 |
Servoarm Flailing Magos
|
BorderCountess wrote:Since there's likely to be a big reveal tomorrow, I'm setting the line for number of Primarchs revealed at 0.5.
I'm also setting that number at 1.5 for the remainder of the edition.
Where does everyone fall?
I'd say the next ones in line are Russ (that is pretty much a given, by virtue of having a line of models and a backstory that requires no major retcon/macguffin to have him like... alive and stuff) and either Perturabo or Lorgar. Both of the latter are Daemons and have some reason to be active - Lorgar would be the more iconic choice for an Undivided DP after all the god-specific ones have had their models, but has the downside of not having done much in the recent past. On the other hand, Perturabo has the better-liked legion and is more interesting (for me, personally), but i'd wager they're saving him up for whenever (if they ever) decide to advance the plot concerning Whatshisname the One-book-wonder and his (presumably) Dark Mechanicus pals.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/12/24 19:30:17
Subject: Warhammer 40k news and rumours - Quarterly Balance Update – December 2025 pg 264
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
NoVA
|
I’m betting it’s Huron, because we got a Primarch last year.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/12/24 19:46:44
Subject: Warhammer 40k news and rumours - Quarterly Balance Update – December 2025 pg 264
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
Pete Turbo is unalligned.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/12/24 20:11:18
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k news and rumours - Quarterly Balance Update – December 2025 pg 264
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Double whammy of Yarrick & Yriel. The 'Y's have it.
|
Casual gaming, mostly solo-coop these days.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/12/24 20:15:27
Subject: Warhammer 40k news and rumours - Quarterly Balance Update – December 2025 pg 264
|
 |
[DCM]
Chief Deputy Sub Assistant Trainee Squig Handling Intern
|
One of the Grotmas short stories may have been hinting at Peturabo.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/12/24 20:21:24
Subject: Re:Warhammer 40k news and rumours - Quarterly Balance Update – December 2025 pg 264
|
 |
Stern Iron Priest with Thrall Bodyguard
|
Tsagualsa wrote: BorderCountess wrote:Since there's likely to be a big reveal tomorrow, I'm setting the line for number of Primarchs revealed at 0.5.
I'm also setting that number at 1.5 for the remainder of the edition.
Where does everyone fall?
I'd say the next ones in line are Russ (that is pretty much a given, by virtue of having a line of models and a backstory that requires no major retcon/macguffin to have him like... alive and stuff) and either Perturabo or Lorgar. Both of the latter are Daemons and have some reason to be active - Lorgar would be the more iconic choice for an Undivided DP after all the god-specific ones have had their models, but has the downside of not having done much in the recent past. On the other hand, Perturabo has the better-liked legion and is more interesting (for me, personally), but i'd wager they're saving him up for whenever (if they ever) decide to advance the plot concerning Whatshisname the One-book-wonder and his (presumably) Dark Mechanicus pals.
Lorgar would be a cool choise, but i dont get the impression he is a very popular Primach. I think for horus heresy it would be great to give him an update (because the existing one is a pretty lame model). It should not be hard to make a really cool crazed daemon preacher.
For 40k it would probably be a headace to include all basic daemons as allies. On the other hand they could take the opportunity to release more generic daemons and finally make something new and fresh for the daemon side.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2025/12/24 20:27:44
Subject: Warhammer 40k news and rumours - Quarterly Balance Update – December 2025 pg 264
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
If it's a Chaos Primarch, betting on Perturabo
If it's loyalist, Russ.
What I'd prefer? Vulcan, who is also alive and kicking.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|