Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/06/17 10:59:01
Subject: Re:New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Confessor Of Sins
|
With the small 5-man Squads in immolators, i think the main tactic is to jump out and serve a purpose immediately, ie: Jump out onto an objective and hold or jump out and deal damage.
If it's dealing damage, then firepower is the most important, or do you think that squad with priest will deal much more damage in the assault phase? Then enemy's turn and i'm sure that squad is gone.
If it's for securing objectives, and the enemy maneuvers a Close Combat Squad to charge you, then i would think it's a squad that gets the job done.
In both cases, the priest would not really have any use at all, apart from the Securing Case, and the enemy charges you with 5 marines or something (which would be quite rare imo)
|
DA:80-S+G+M+B++I-Pw40k01++D+++A+++WD100R++T(T)DM+
Roronoa Zoro wrote:When the world shoves you around, you just gotta stand up and shove back. It's not like somebody's gonna save you if you start babbling excuses. - Bring on the hardship. It's preferred in a path of carnage. Manchu wrote:
It's like you take a Space Marine and say "what could make him cooler?" Instead of adding more super-genetic-psycho-organic modification, you take it all away. You have a regular human left in power armor and all the armies of hell at the gates. And she doesn't even flinch. Pure. Badass. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/06/17 15:08:45
Subject: New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
I would agree with most of that except the jump out part. You don't want to leave your vehicle unless absolutely necessary. You can score from inside it anyways.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/06/17 17:14:34
Subject: New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Sadistic Inquisitorial Excruciator
|
Yeah, rhinos have two fire points, a BSS can take a heavy and special weapon. Coincidence?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/06/17 17:18:27
Subject: New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
"She who bails, fails."
and the corollaries:
"Leave the Rhino? How 'bout hell no?"
"Faith may be my shield, but this vehicle is my armor."
"The meek may inherit the earth, but we control the bucket seats."
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/06/17 18:41:01
Subject: Re:New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Confessor Of Sins
|
I am aware of that guys, but in the request they are in an Immolator: No fire points
So unless it's a standard 5-girl with no weapons or anything - which would stay inside no matter what - then to make use of any weaponry (even before we get to the priest) then you'd have to have a Reason to jump out, hence above.
|
DA:80-S+G+M+B++I-Pw40k01++D+++A+++WD100R++T(T)DM+
Roronoa Zoro wrote:When the world shoves you around, you just gotta stand up and shove back. It's not like somebody's gonna save you if you start babbling excuses. - Bring on the hardship. It's preferred in a path of carnage. Manchu wrote:
It's like you take a Space Marine and say "what could make him cooler?" Instead of adding more super-genetic-psycho-organic modification, you take it all away. You have a regular human left in power armor and all the armies of hell at the gates. And she doesn't even flinch. Pure. Badass. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/06/17 18:59:16
Subject: Re:New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
BlackTalos wrote:
I am aware of that guys, but in the request they are in an Immolator: No fire points
So unless it's a standard 5-girl with no weapons or anything - which would stay inside no matter what - then to make use of any weaponry (even before we get to the priest) then you'd have to have a Reason to jump out, hence above.
Let me update my previous statement:
"Leave the immo? How 'bout hell no?"
Almost never leave it. T3 troops die too quick in the open.
This is also why I take Rhinos and not Immos for my BSS.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/06/18 00:59:48
Subject: New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Swift Swooping Hawk
|
Recently I ran 6 immolaters (5 girl melta/heavy flamer), 3 dominion immolaters (5 girl, 4 melta) 3 Exorcists, and a cannoness (taking condemnor boltguns on all available *since no faq now*)
Managed to splode a knight first turn and pretty much wiped the board in 2 of 3 games...
Lost my butt to a tranny C'tan though... That guys a beast.
KP mission ended on turn 6. I had an exorcist and 1 sister tank left... he was down 2 wraiths and 4 wounds gone from the tranny.
|
"If you are not naughty you get a cookie. If you are naked, you get a cookie." - Insaniak, Dakka Mod
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/06/18 01:01:58
Subject: New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
Condemnor was updated in the book itself to the same wording as the GK codex.
Good job either way though.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/06/18 01:07:11
Subject: New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Swift Swooping Hawk
|
pretre wrote:Condemnor was updated in the book itself to the same wording as the GK codex.
Good job either way though.
Guess that's finally a reason to buy the damn digital thing instead of the pdf. (no matter, there was only 1 psycher at the store anyway... lol)
Thanks... It was a lot more fun than 6th sisters.
|
"If you are not naughty you get a cookie. If you are naked, you get a cookie." - Insaniak, Dakka Mod
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/06/18 01:28:55
Subject: New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Sadistic Inquisitorial Excruciator
|
You could do the same in 6th though.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/06/18 07:13:07
Subject: New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Missionary On A Mission
Australia
|
Yeah, but now all those Immos on the Battle Sister Squads are Objective Secured. 12 Super Scoring units is pretty hilarious.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/06/18 10:07:45
Subject: New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Pious Palatine
|
Yeah no point leaving the MM either. An 11/11/10 vehicle with a MM sat on top might as well just have a big target hovering above it. If you're using small BSS squads for objectives then sit them in the immo on the the objective firing the MM at anything darft enough to get in range, once the Immo goes pop, try and hold the objective with the girls utilising their special weapons to deter anything soft so your opponent has to commit resouces to take the objective.
D
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/06/18 14:20:57
Subject: New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
GoonBandito wrote:
Yeah, but now all those Immos on the Battle Sister Squads are Objective Secured. 12 Super Scoring units is pretty hilarious.
Yep, cheap Immos are crazy good now.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/06/18 16:35:44
Subject: New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Preacher of the Emperor
|
I must have awful luck then, it doesn't matter how many immos I run, they all die without ever getting their points back.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/06/18 16:43:39
Subject: New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
deviantduck wrote:I must have awful luck then, it doesn't matter how many immos I run, they all die without ever getting their points back.
All of them? Every single one?
Also, 'getting your points back' is a horrible metric of efficiency.
Winning games is a good metric of efficiency.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/06/19 10:57:34
Subject: Re:New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Confessor Of Sins
|
Best "points back" immolator was:
Outflank about 2" from enemy side board, dominions jump out and melta stuff.
Enemy causes 1 Glance 1 Pen: Weapon Destroyed - no more MM.
My turn: Drive into 3 Obliterators standing on the board edge, they Fail their Leadership, run off the board... Points!
Moral of the story:
Immolators are good at Tank shocking, don't use them for transport or Shooting or those other stupid reasons!
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/06/19 10:58:30
DA:80-S+G+M+B++I-Pw40k01++D+++A+++WD100R++T(T)DM+
Roronoa Zoro wrote:When the world shoves you around, you just gotta stand up and shove back. It's not like somebody's gonna save you if you start babbling excuses. - Bring on the hardship. It's preferred in a path of carnage. Manchu wrote:
It's like you take a Space Marine and say "what could make him cooler?" Instead of adding more super-genetic-psycho-organic modification, you take it all away. You have a regular human left in power armor and all the armies of hell at the gates. And she doesn't even flinch. Pure. Badass. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/06/19 14:43:44
Subject: New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
I lol'd.
Back in 5th, I was a tank shocking fool. I once had a game against DOA Blood Angels where I think I tank shocked no less than 30 times in one game.
Ahh, those were the days.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/06/19 15:56:29
Subject: New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Confessor Of Sins
|
But why no longer? Non-fearless can still run, and at worst, you loose a Rhino/Immo that's had it's worth?
|
DA:80-S+G+M+B++I-Pw40k01++D+++A+++WD100R++T(T)DM+
Roronoa Zoro wrote:When the world shoves you around, you just gotta stand up and shove back. It's not like somebody's gonna save you if you start babbling excuses. - Bring on the hardship. It's preferred in a path of carnage. Manchu wrote:
It's like you take a Space Marine and say "what could make him cooler?" Instead of adding more super-genetic-psycho-organic modification, you take it all away. You have a regular human left in power armor and all the armies of hell at the gates. And she doesn't even flinch. Pure. Badass. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/06/19 16:42:29
Subject: New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
BlackTalos wrote:But why no longer? Non-fearless can still run, and at worst, you loose a Rhino/Immo that's had it's worth?
At the time, TS was MUCH better. You could tank shock/ram at max speed and disembark. You could block people from regrouping by being within 6", etc. so on.
It was a valid way to take people off the board, in other words, rather than a happy accident.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/06/19 17:46:12
Subject: New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Confessor Of Sins
|
Well, Rhino once disembarked in the middle of nowhere, or an Immolator with Weapon Destroyed are all valid ways to cause Ld tests on units in 7th too.
I still see it a a valid tactic since 6th Ed saw my 1 Rhino chasing 1 riptide, 2 Broadsides, a marine squad and scouts off the board (different games)
Back when i was not mechanised...
|
DA:80-S+G+M+B++I-Pw40k01++D+++A+++WD100R++T(T)DM+
Roronoa Zoro wrote:When the world shoves you around, you just gotta stand up and shove back. It's not like somebody's gonna save you if you start babbling excuses. - Bring on the hardship. It's preferred in a path of carnage. Manchu wrote:
It's like you take a Space Marine and say "what could make him cooler?" Instead of adding more super-genetic-psycho-organic modification, you take it all away. You have a regular human left in power armor and all the armies of hell at the gates. And she doesn't even flinch. Pure. Badass. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/06/19 17:47:46
Subject: New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
I'm not saying it isn't a valid tactic. I'm just saying it isn't as good as it was. Most of the time, there's a better option. Like I said, Happy Accident instead of a strategy.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/06/19 17:48:48
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/06/20 17:43:19
Subject: Re:New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Confessor Of Sins
|
Finally got around to uploading some pictures of the Order of our Lady Tyche Fortuna,
Order of Our Martyred Lady but Green instead of the usual Red Robes. Split into Card Suits too :p
http://www.dakkadakka.com/gallery/images-81346-41701_Order%20Of%20Our%20Lady%20Tyche%20Fortuna.html
A bit late to the "my painting scheme" part of this thread, but please enjoy, leave any comments you wish too
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2014/06/20 17:43:57
DA:80-S+G+M+B++I-Pw40k01++D+++A+++WD100R++T(T)DM+
Roronoa Zoro wrote:When the world shoves you around, you just gotta stand up and shove back. It's not like somebody's gonna save you if you start babbling excuses. - Bring on the hardship. It's preferred in a path of carnage. Manchu wrote:
It's like you take a Space Marine and say "what could make him cooler?" Instead of adding more super-genetic-psycho-organic modification, you take it all away. You have a regular human left in power armor and all the armies of hell at the gates. And she doesn't even flinch. Pure. Badass. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/06/20 17:44:05
Subject: New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Badass "Sister Sin"
|
Looking good!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/06/20 23:21:06
Subject: Re:New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Missionary On A Mission
Australia
|
Cool looking Priest model - what was that made from?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/06/21 11:21:44
Subject: Re:New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Confessor Of Sins
|
From the old metal Bretonian Damsel:
http://www.coolminiornot.com/238883
(not my picture)
|
DA:80-S+G+M+B++I-Pw40k01++D+++A+++WD100R++T(T)DM+
Roronoa Zoro wrote:When the world shoves you around, you just gotta stand up and shove back. It's not like somebody's gonna save you if you start babbling excuses. - Bring on the hardship. It's preferred in a path of carnage. Manchu wrote:
It's like you take a Space Marine and say "what could make him cooler?" Instead of adding more super-genetic-psycho-organic modification, you take it all away. You have a regular human left in power armor and all the armies of hell at the gates. And she doesn't even flinch. Pure. Badass. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/06/21 12:17:52
Subject: New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Sisters are looking really good in 7th with maelstrom missions. Lot of fairly cheap, fast and resilient MSU to claim objectives [priests for fearless are a must, and make them competitive in CC], with Exorcists to claim VPs for taking out enemy tanks.
Plus, high AV gunlines [which I always struggle against] can't castle up any more if they want to gain VPs.
Throw in a Warhound Titan to take out high AV targets and Sisters are looking very competitive.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/06/21 13:19:24
Subject: New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Sister Oh-So Repentia
Canada
|
A Warhound Titan? That's a little excessive isn't it? Especially when Sisters can bring so much melta to the table. A Knight titan would be a bit more reasonable, both on the table and in the wallet.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/06/21 15:47:13
Subject: New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Preacher of the Emperor
|
Gleefully crossposted this bit to the 1,001 Sisters jokes thread:
pretre wrote:"She who bails, fails."
and the corollaries:
"Leave the Rhino? How 'bout hell no?"
"Faith may be my shield, but this vehicle is my armor."
"The meek may inherit the earth, but we control the bucket seats."
I'm also reminded of the old US mech infantry line, "Death Before Dismount."
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/06/21 18:49:28
Subject: New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Paimon wrote:A Warhound Titan? That's a little excessive isn't it? Especially when Sisters can bring so much melta to the table. A Knight titan would be a bit more reasonable, both on the table and in the wallet.
Love being able to use my Warhound - go big or go home!  Having said that it's a big risk so maybe a knight might be more cost effective. Anyway, I'll continue to use the Warhound whenever possible. Really like that it's now in the core rules, so it's down to my opponent to come up with a really good reason why he won't play it, rather than for me to come up with a reason why he should.
Even without SHs Sisters are looking good in maelstrom.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2014/06/21 20:19:25
Subject: New Sisters of Battle Codex Tactica
|
 |
Confessor Of Sins
|
tyrannosaurus wrote: Paimon wrote:A Warhound Titan? That's a little excessive isn't it? Especially when Sisters can bring so much melta to the table. A Knight titan would be a bit more reasonable, both on the table and in the wallet.
Love being able to use my Warhound - go big or go home!  Having said that it's a big risk so maybe a knight might be more cost effective. Anyway, I'll continue to use the Warhound whenever possible. Really like that it's now in the core rules, so it's down to my opponent to come up with a really good reason why he won't play it, rather than for me to come up with a reason why he should.
Even without SHs Sisters are looking good in maelstrom.
What is your preferred load-out if you have multiple, or the one you have?
|
DA:80-S+G+M+B++I-Pw40k01++D+++A+++WD100R++T(T)DM+
Roronoa Zoro wrote:When the world shoves you around, you just gotta stand up and shove back. It's not like somebody's gonna save you if you start babbling excuses. - Bring on the hardship. It's preferred in a path of carnage. Manchu wrote:
It's like you take a Space Marine and say "what could make him cooler?" Instead of adding more super-genetic-psycho-organic modification, you take it all away. You have a regular human left in power armor and all the armies of hell at the gates. And she doesn't even flinch. Pure. Badass. |
|
 |
 |
|