| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/09 13:02:40
Subject: Re:Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
[DCM]
.
|
AlmightyWalrus wrote:1hadhq wrote:AlmightyWalrus wrote:The plasma blaster is a R18" S7 AP2 Assault 2 Gets Hot! weapon on the Contemptor Dreadnought.
Gets hot on a dread??
Yes. Don't ask me why, I don't write the rules.
But since it is on a vehicle/walker, the Gets Hot! rule really won't have any effect...
Might be a glimpse into what they've got planned for the man portable version though.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/03/09 13:02:47
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/09 18:48:35
Subject: Re:Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Stubborn Prosecutor
|
1hadhq wrote:AlmightyWalrus wrote:The plasma blaster is a R18" S7 AP2 Assault 2 Gets Hot! weapon on the Contemptor Dreadnought.
Gets hot on a dread??
They just do that for consistency, so it is the same as all the other imperial plasma stuff.
|
It's time to go full Skeletor |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/09 22:05:24
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Formosa wrote:the plasma blast gun, it was actually a twin plasma gun/pistol, it was a nice thing and i would expect it to return at some point
its things like this that i would like to see return, all the old mad stuff, like grav guns/ beamers (i know vanilla already has it) rapiers and the like, if any chapter should have the old tech its dark angels
The Plasma Blastgun is a titan/ SHT level weapon.
The Plasma Blaster is the infantry/Contemptor version.
|
2021-4 Plog - Here we go again... - my fifth attempt at a Dakka PLOG
My Pile of Potential - updates ongoing...
Gamgee on Tau Players wrote:we all kill cats and sell our own families to the devil and eat live puppies.
Kanluwen wrote:This is, emphatically, why I will continue suggesting nuking Guard and starting over again. It's a legacy army that needs to be rebooted with a new focal point.
Confirmation of why no-one should listen to Kanluwen when it comes to the IG - he doesn't want the IG, he want's Kan's New Model Army...
tneva82 wrote:You aren't even trying ty pretend for honest arqument. Open bad faith trolling. - No reason to keep this here, unless people want to use it for something... |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/19 17:23:32
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Resolute Ultramarine Honor Guard
|
Not sure if already in the thread...
But BL is publishing a novel called Ravenwing in Jan of 2013... might be an attempt to ride off the Codex released prior to that?
|
DO:70S++G++M+B++I+Pw40k93/f#++D++++A++++/eWD-R++++T(D)DM+
Note: Records since 2010, lists kept current (W-D-L) Blue DP Crusade 126-11-6 Biel-Tan Aspect Waves 2-0-2 Looted Green Horde smash your face in 32-7-8 Broadside/Shield Drone/Kroot blitz goodness 23-3-4 Grey Hunters galore 17-5-5 Khan Bikes Win 63-1-1 Tanith with Pardus Armor 11-0-0 Crimson Tide 59-4-0 Green/Raven/Deathwing 18-0-0 Jumping GK force with Inq. 4-0-0 BTemplars w LRs 7-1-2 IH Legion with Automata 8-0-0 RG Legion w Adepticon medal 6-0-0 Primaris and Little Buddies 7-0-0
QM Templates here, HH army builder app for both v1 and v2
One Page 40k Ruleset for Game Beginners |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/19 18:02:16
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Ancient Chaos Terminator
|
captain collius wrote:Formosa wrote:i would like a whole set of termies heavies, being relelntless with a HF or ASS cannon/Cyclone is ok, but i want las cannon/plasma or even heavy bolters.
DW Dev sqaud would also be awsome, 4 Heavies in a unit, suck on that SW's long fangs lol, although 8 kraks a turn from a unit with 2+/3++ TH/SS would be far too op
just don't give em the option to tak Th/ SS for the heavy support squads.
but a 4 cyclone term unit its delicious
Actually you go real old school with them. Heavy Termis get a CML, stormbolter and targeter. let targeters either add +1 to hit or my choice allows the model to fire at a seprate target. Then you can upgrade the sb to a pf or storm sheild.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/03/19 18:11:28
"I have traveled through the Realm of Death and brought back novelty pencils"
Oh, somewhere in this favored land the sun is shining bright;
the band is playing somewhere and somewhere hearts are light,and somewhere men are laughing, and somewhere children shout but there is no joy in Mudville — mighty Casey has struck out. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/19 18:04:03
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Member of a Lodge? I Can't Say
|
Is there any precedent for that? Them releasing a black library novel on the coattails of a codex release? (I don't follow the BL novels is why I ask)
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/20 01:05:27
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Lobukia wrote:Not sure if already in the thread...
But BL is publishing a novel called Ravenwing in Jan of 2013... might be an attempt to ride off the Codex released prior to that?
We get Space Marine novels every month. Is that a sign that we will get a new Space Marine Codex every month? No.
BTW we had at least 2 Dark Angel novels in 2011.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/03/20 01:06:46
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/20 04:00:39
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Resolute Ultramarine Honor Guard
|
Kroothawk wrote:Lobukia wrote:Not sure if already in the thread...
But BL is publishing a novel called Ravenwing in Jan of 2013... might be an attempt to ride off the Codex released prior to that?
We get Space Marine novels every month. Is that a sign that we will get a new Space Marine Codex every month? No.
BTW we had at least 2 Dark Angel novels in 2011.
Besides HH stuff (which is clearly its own monster aside from the Codex/Novel line)? What were they (I'd like to read them)
|
DO:70S++G++M+B++I+Pw40k93/f#++D++++A++++/eWD-R++++T(D)DM+
Note: Records since 2010, lists kept current (W-D-L) Blue DP Crusade 126-11-6 Biel-Tan Aspect Waves 2-0-2 Looted Green Horde smash your face in 32-7-8 Broadside/Shield Drone/Kroot blitz goodness 23-3-4 Grey Hunters galore 17-5-5 Khan Bikes Win 63-1-1 Tanith with Pardus Armor 11-0-0 Crimson Tide 59-4-0 Green/Raven/Deathwing 18-0-0 Jumping GK force with Inq. 4-0-0 BTemplars w LRs 7-1-2 IH Legion with Automata 8-0-0 RG Legion w Adepticon medal 6-0-0 Primaris and Little Buddies 7-0-0
QM Templates here, HH army builder app for both v1 and v2
One Page 40k Ruleset for Game Beginners |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/20 04:29:14
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
captain collius wrote:just don't give em the option to tak Th/SS for the heavy support squads.
Of course not.
The option will be Assault Cannon paired with a Storm Shield cause it's an awesome visual.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/20 05:27:10
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Smokin' Skorcha Driver
|
A +1 to bs because of the targeter would be a universal awesome for all tactical terminators. Still, you end up paying 40 per model for a glorified bolter when other variants have a 3++.
I'd much rather see all tactical squad termies become cheaper or have 2 special weapons per squad. Right now their damage output is horribad and a 2+ armor just means power wounds hurt more when they hit (since 2+ raises unit price) and instantly remove 40 points per unsaved wound.
Now, if I could say, load up their bolters with sternguard ammo, I'd be so happy.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/20 19:01:45
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
Ahem...
*happydance*
The new paint set for 40k features the colors for traditional Dark Angels. The paint set always ties in to at least one army in the starter set; so it looks like Dark Angels in the starter set is -confirmed-.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/20 19:03:04
Subject: Re:Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Are you sure those aren't salamanders, Kan?
|
DA:70S+G+M+B++I++Pw40k08+D++A++/fWD-R+T(M)DM+
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/20 19:06:48
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
I will poke you with something sharp and pointy; and it will hurt Kronk.
Man would that suck if that happened.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/20 19:21:17
Subject: Re:Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
kronk wrote:Are you sure those aren't salamanders, Kan? 
Heh
Red gunz normally = Dark Angels though.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/20 19:30:04
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Irked Necron Immortal
|
That's the only good news I've got today, thanks Kanluwen.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/20 19:34:50
Subject: Re:Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Slinky wrote:kronk wrote:Are you sure those aren't salamanders, Kan? 
Heh
Red gunz normally = Dark Angels though.
Agreed. Salamander bolters have always, afaik, been black not red. Plus there is a lack of black on the shoulder pads and the green isn't light enough.
|
Las Vegas Open Head Judge
I'm sorry if it hurts your feelings or pride, but your credentials matter. Even on the internet.
"If you do not have the knowledge, you do not have the right to the opinion." -Plato
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/20 20:29:29
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
[DCM]
.
|
Are we excited because we're taking this as 'proof' that Dark Angels will be in the starter set?
Because all I'm seeing is Black Reach marines painted in DA colors and a paint set that features their colors, instead of Ultramarines...
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/20 20:33:23
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Alpharius wrote:
Because all I'm seeing is Black Reach marines painted in DA colors and a paint set that features their colors, instead of Ultramarines...
Glad I'm not the only one.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/20 20:34:09
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Member of a Lodge? I Can't Say
|
Can anyone make out what colors those are?
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/20 20:55:17
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
Alpharius wrote:Are we excited because we're taking this as 'proof' that Dark Angels will be in the starter set?
Because all I'm seeing is Black Reach marines painted in DA colors and a paint set that features their colors, instead of Ultramarines...
As I said in my post:
The paint sets always tie in to at least one army in the starter set.
The fact that they're "Black Reach Marines painted in Dark Angels colors and a paint set that features their colors" is a very, very, very good indicator that this is in fact true.
I don't foresee them going out of their way to include a mass of robed Marines for the starter set, as even in the current Codex they have a lot of unrobed Marines in the Studio army--which means they can (theoretically) reuse the Black Reach Marines which are fairly nice sculpts anyways.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/20 21:02:21
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
[DCM]
.
|
I'm now less excited for the starter set if they are just going to be the Same Ol' Same Ol' Marines in there, on the loyalist side.
It is all up to how good the CSM/Traitor/Cultist stuff looks now!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/20 21:04:28
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
Dok wrote:Can anyone make out what colors those are?
From top left to bottom right and comparing it to the color chart:
Ushtabi Bone
Mournfang Brown
Imperial Primer
Mephiston Red
Athonian Camoshade
Caliban Green
Leadbelcher
Runefang Steel
Automatically Appended Next Post:
Alpharius wrote:I'm now less excited for the starter set if they are just going to be the Same Ol' Same Ol' Marines in there, on the loyalist side.
It is all up to how good the CSM/Traitor/Cultist stuff looks now!
I don't think they'd just republish the same Marines by themselves though, do you?
Frankly--I'm guessing we'll see a Master of the Deathwing model in there or a "new" Azrael.
|
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2012/03/20 21:22:14
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/20 21:09:18
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Just because the tactical marines may or may not be the same, it doesn't mean the Dreadnought, terminators, and the captain will be included.
|
DA:70S+G+M+B++I++Pw40k08+D++A++/fWD-R+T(M)DM+
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/20 23:06:14
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Ultramarine Master with Gauntlets of Macragge
|
That new painting book looks really nifty, actually.
|
Check out my Youtube channel!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/20 23:45:21
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Lord of the Fleet
|
I'm cautiously in agreement about this being a confirmation on DA in the starter. Looking at the track record for these intro paint sets...
40k has had Ultras for the past two editions I believe? Both 4th and 5th editions had Ultramarines in the starter
7th WF had Night Goblins in the starter who are in the current paint set, 8th now has High Elves
I think waiting till the new paints come out will help though, if indeed these space marines are intended to be DA then that'll increase the chances of them being in the set. GW designed these paint sets to introduce new people into painting up the starter set armies
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/03/20 23:46:01
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/21 11:35:58
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Most Glorious Grey Seer
|
So, I think this constitutes proof that 1) there IS a 6th edition of 40k coming this summer and 2) Dark Angels are the loyalist army. Now we just need a little more detail on whether the Chaos part is CSM or some sort of mix of CSM and something else like Traitor Guard or something.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/21 13:01:16
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Dark Angels Neophyte Undergoing Surgeries
|
They must have done some resculpting on these as they have the correct tactical symbol on the shoulder pads. I take it as a little more proof that DA are in the 6th box set and as previously stated these are tactical marines what are you expecting ?
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/21 13:17:18
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Thinking of Joining a Davinite Loge
|
I popped into GW Nottingham today to have a poke around. Got talking with one of the employees there. Apparently, according to her, this image is photoshopped.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/21 13:24:29
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Lord of the Fleet
|
Eiríkr wrote:I popped into GW Nottingham today to have a poke around. Got talking with one of the employees there. Apparently, according to her, this image is photoshopped.

I can imagine the head of GW now...
"Pics are leaking online, again, what do we do?"
"Claim it is shopped! Everyone believes that!"
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/03/21 16:50:24
Subject: Dark Angels tidbits
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Eiríkr wrote:I popped into GW Nottingham today to have a poke around. Got talking with one of the employees there. Apparently, according to her, this image is photoshopped.
"Hi, I am Mandy. How can I break my NDA for you?"
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|